Search

Background: Delirium is common in critically ill patients. Haloperidol has long been used for the treatment of delirium. Dexmedetomidine has recently been used to treat delirium among intubated critically ill patients. However, the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for delirium in non-intubated critically ill patients remains unknown. We hypothesize that dexmedetomidine is superior to haloperidol for sedation of patients with hyperactive delirium, and would reduce the prevalence of delirium among non-intubated patients after administration. We will conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare dexmedetomidine and haloperidol for the treatment of nocturnal hyperactive delirium in non-intubated patients in high dependency units (HDUs). Methods: This is an open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and haloperidol for nocturnal hyperactive delirium in non-intubated patients at two HDUs of a tertiary hospital. We will recruit consecutive non-intubated patients who are admitted to the HDU from the emergency room, and allocate them in a 1:1 ratio to the dexmedetomidine or haloperidol group in advance. The allocated investigational drug will be administered only when participants develop hyperactive delirium (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale [RASS] score ≥1 and a positive score on the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU between 19:00 and 6:00 the next day) during the night at an HDU. Dexmedetomidine is administered continuously, while haloperidol is administered intermittently. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants who achieve the targeted sedation level (RASS score of between -3 and 0) 2h after the administration of the investigational drug. Secondary outcomes include the sedation level and prevalence of delirium on the day following the administration of the investigational drugs, and safety. We plan to enroll 100 participants who develop nocturnal hyperactive delirium and receive one of the two investigational drugs. Discussion: This is the first randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and haloperidol for sedation of non-intubated critically ill patients with hyperactive delirium in HDUs. The results of this study may confirm whether dexmedetomidine could be another option to sedate patients with hyperactive delirium. Trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCT1051220015, registered on 21 April 2022. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Recently an association between blood glucose dysregulation and sleep disruption was suggested. The association between sleep disordered breathing, most of which is due to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the general population, and diabetic severity, as well as the impact of antidiabetic treatment, remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate these associations as well as age and sex differences. This cross‐sectional study evaluated 7,680 community participants as the main cohort (population‐based cohort). OSA was assessed by the 3% oxygen desaturation index from pulse oximetry, which was corrected for sleep duration obtained by wrist actigraphy. For arguing the limitations for using pulse oximetry, 597 hospitalised patients, who were assessed by the apnea–hypopnea index from attended polysomnography, were also evaluated as the validation cohort (hospital‐based cohort). Moderate‐to‐severe OSA was more prevalent as haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels increased (<5.6%/5.6%–<6.5%/6.5%–<7.5%/≥7.5%, respectively) in both cohorts (p < 0.001), but only in those without antidiabetic treatment. The HbA1c level was an independent factor for moderate‐to‐severe OSA (population‐based cohort, odds ratio [OR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10–1.45; hospital‐based cohort, OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.22–2.33, per 1% increase). These associations were more prominent in the middle‐aged (aged <60 years) than in the elderly (aged ≥60 years) and in women than in men in both cohorts. The prevalence of moderate‐to‐severe OSA in patients with antidiabetic treatment in the hospital‐based cohort was ≥75% regardless of HbA1c levels. In conclusion, an association between the prevalence of OSA and HbA1c level even within or over the normal range was found only in patients without antidiabetic treatment and was more prominent in the middle‐aged and in women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objectives: Since subjective sleep duration (SSD) is considered to be longer than objective sleep duration (OSD), results of SSD minus OSD (SSD-OSD) might always be thought to be positive. Some recent reports showed different results, but exact results have not been obtained. The difference between SSD and OSD may change according to OSD. We investigated this difference and its association with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) or nonrestorative sleep., Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 6,908 community residents in Nagahama, Japan. SSD was determined by self-administered questionnaire. OSD was measured by wrist actigraphy and sleep diary. SDB was assessed according to the 3% oxygen desaturation index adjusted for OSD., Results: Worthy of notice was that SSD was shorter than OSD for those with SSD longer than 6.98 hours in all participants, 7.36 hours in males, and 6.80 hours in females. However, SSD was longer than OSD (mean ± SD: 6.49 ± 1.07 vs 6.01 ± 0.96; P < .001) overall, as SSD is considered to be longer than OSD. In patients with SDB, the difference between SSD-OSD was greater when OSD was s horter. The difference also depended on SDB severity. The degree of positivity between OSD and SSD was a significant factor in nonrestorative sleep (odds ratio: 2.691; P < .001)., Conclusions: When OSD was slightly less than 7 (6.98) hours, participants reported or perceived SSD > OSD. When OSD was > 6.98 hours, participants reported or perceived SSD < OSD. Patients with SDB reported longer SSD than OSD according to severity of SDB. Evaluating SSD, OSD, and their differences may be useful for managing sleep disturbances, including nonrestorative sleep., Citation: Takahashi N, Matsumoto T, Nakatsuka Y, et al. Differences between subjective and objective sleep duration according to actual sleep duration and sleep-disordered breathing: the Nagahama Study. J Clin Sleep Med . 2022;18(3):851-859., (© 2022 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.)

Study Objectives: Whether the association between sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and cardiovascular disease is independent of comorbid risk factors for cardiovascular disease is controversial. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether the association between SDB severity and the surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease events differs in relation to the number of comorbidities., Methods: This cross-sectional study included 7,731 participants. Severity of SDB was determined by the oxygen desaturation index adjusted by actigraph-measured objective sleep time. Participants were stratified according to SDB severity and the number of comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity), and the associations between the maximum value of intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery (CCA-IMT-max), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, and cardio-ankle vascular index were evaluated., Results: Among participants with no risk factors, CCA-IMT-max increased according to SDB severity (n = 1022, P < .0001). Even after matching the background, the median CCA-IMT-max value was 14% higher in moderate-severe SDB patients than those without SDB (n = 45 in each group, P = .020). The difference was not significant for brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and cardio-ankle vascular index. On the other hand, a significant difference in CCA-IMT-max was not found in those with multiple comorbidities. Consistently, multiple regression analysis revealed an independent association between CCA-IMT-max and moderate-severe SDB for all study participants (β: 0.0222, 95% confidence interval: 0.0039-0.0405, P = .017), but the association was not significant for stratified participants with multiple comorbidities., Conclusions: SDB severity is associated with the CCA-IMT-max level, but the independent association becomes weaker for those with multiple comorbidities., Citation: Nakatsuka Y, Murase K, Matsumoto T, et al. Markers of cardiovascular disease risk in sleep-disordered breathing with or without comorbidities: the Nagahama Study. J Clin Sleep Med . 2021;17(12):2467-2475., (© 2021 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.)