Search

Background: Metatarsalgia is a common diagnosis for patients with forefoot pain. Many have proposed metatarsal fat pad atrophy is a cause of metatarsalgia and therefore have suggested fat grafting instead of distal metatarsal osteotomies to treat metatarsalgia. For fat grafting to be a viable treatment, fat pad atrophy should correlate with metatarsalgia. This study looked to determine the relationship between metatarsal fat pad thickness and metatarsalgia and the correlation between metatarsal fat pad thickness and patient-reported outcomes., Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with metatarsalgia and those with foot or ankle osteoarthritis who had a nonweightbearing MRI performed between February 1, 2021, and March 1, 2023. Data collected included demographics, PROMIS scores, metatarsal fat pad thickness in the second and third rays of the affected foot, and thinnest area on coronal section, measured on MRI. Student t test was used to compare continuous variables, whereas the χ 2 test was used to compare categorical variables. Multivariable linear regression models were used to control for potential confounding factors., Results: A total of 112 patients were included in this study. Patients with metatarsalgia were significantly more likely to have a lower body mass index (29.3 vs 32.0, P   =  .03) than patients with osteoarthritis, but this finding was not present when controlling for confounding variables. We found no significant difference in fat pad thickness between patients with metatarsalgia vs patients with foot or ankle osteoarthritis ( P   =  .43). We found no correlation between metatarsal fat pad thickness and pain interference ( P   =  .59), physical function ( P   =  .64), or mobility ( P   =  .94) PROMIS scores., Conclusion: In this retrospective comparative study of a relatively small cohort we found no significant difference in metatarsal fat pad thickness for patients with metatarsalgia vs patients with foot and ankle osteoarthritis based on nonweightbearing MRI, and no association between metatarsal fat pad thickness and patient-reported outcomes., Level of Evidence: Level III, case control study., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Disclosure forms for all authors are available online.

Purpose: Based on the tripod concept of load distribution, our study aimed to evaluate whether a slight extension of first metatarsal (M1) that may occur after the Lapidus procedure (LP) could alter the radiographic measurements of the hindfoot and influence clinical and functional outcomes., Methods: Twenty-five patients (27 feet) were reviewed. Hindfoot radiographic analysis was based on seven measurements. Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated with self-reported questionnaires. Transfer metatarsalgia was also assessed. Correlation analysis was performed according to variations of the studied variables., Results: The average extension of the M1 was 4.26 degrees (p < 0.001). None of the hindfoot radiographic measurements changed significantly (p = 0.13, p = 0.50, p = 0.19, p = 0.70, p = 0.11, p = 0.36, p = 0.83). Patients improved on most questionnaires (p < 0.001). None presented transfer metatarsalgia. No correlation between M1 extension and clinical and functional outcomes was found., Conclusion: Possibly there is a tolerance of M1 extension in which it does not alter the radiographic measurements of the hindfoot, overload the lesser metatarsals, or compromise clinical and functional outcomes., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.)

Lesser (or central) metatarsalgia is defined as pain in the forefoot under or around the lesser metatarsals and their respective metatarsophalangeal joints. Two common causes of central metatarsalgia are Morton's neuroma (MN) and plantar plate (PP) injury. Because both clinical and imaging features overlap, establishing the correct differential diagnosis may be challenging. Imaging has a pivotal role in the detection and characterization of metatarsalgia. Different radiologic modalities are available to assess the common causes of forefoot pain, so the strengths and weakness of these imaging tools should be kept in mind. It is crucial to be aware of the pitfalls that can be encountered in daily clinical practice when dealing with these disorders. This review describes two main causes of lesser metatarsalgia, MN and PP injury, and their differential diagnoses., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Good clinical and radiological outcomes in mild-moderate hallux valgus (HV) can be achieved with Chevron osteotomy (CO) and modified-Mitchell osteotomy (MMO). The main goal of the present study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes after CO and MMO in HV., Methods: The study included 45 patients, comprising 40 females with a mean follow-up of 87.5 ± 27.8 months. The outcome measurements of metatarsal length (MT1), HV angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), clinical outcomes, and metatarsalgia were evaluated pre- and postoperatively., Results: No significant difference was determined between the MMO and CO groups in respect of metatarsalgia and AOFAS scores. The CO resulted in a significantly larger decrease in the MT1. The mean HVA and IMA correction was significantly greater after MMO than after CO., Conclusion: Since MMO may prevent MT1 shortening, which is a typical problem in the Mitchell osteotomy, MMO may be preferred over CO in patients with preoperative shortened first metatarsal., (Copyright © 2023 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The role of concomitant Weil osteotomy to address second toe metatarsalgia during hallux valgus correction is unclear. We aimed to critically analyse outcomes of an additional Weil osteotomy versus isolated Scarf osteotomy.in the management of hallux valgus and second metatarsalgia., Methods: Patients with second toe metatarsalgia who underwent first metatarsal Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus were enrolled retrospectively. Demographics, radiographic measurements and functional outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6-months and 2-years postoperatively. Between-group significance was established with Fisher exact test, Chi-square or Mann-Whitney U test. Within-group changes from baseline were assessed with paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test., Results: 48 feet (34 isolated Scarf, 14 concomitant Weil osteotomy) were included. Both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements across all measures of functional outcome. However, patients with additional Weil osteotomy reported poorer short-term outcomes., Conclusion: Superiority of additional Weil osteotomy versus isolated Scarf osteotomy in addressing second toe metatarsalgia or improving functional outcomes was not demonstrated., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript., (Copyright © 2022 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Metatarsalgia is a frequent foot disorder. The objective was to evaluate whether the length ratio between the second and the third metatarsals after Weil osteotomy influences clinical outcomes. This retrospective study included 37 patients (53 feet). Preoperative planning consisted of keeping the second metatarsal greater than or equal to the third metatarsal after Weil osteotomy of the second metatarsal or the second and third metatarsals. Based on postoperative weightbearing and digital AP radiographs after Weil osteotomy, we divided the patients into 2 groups: group 1, the second metatarsal was longer than or equal to the third metatarsal; and group 2, the second metatarsal was shorter than the third metatarsal. We investigated whether there were differences between the groups. In 35 (66%) feet, the second metatarsal was longer than or equal to the third metatarsal (group 1), and in 18 (34%) feet, the second metatarsal was shorter than the third metatarsal (group 2). Postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores were 86.2 and 82.7, respectively (p = .32). Postoperative Visual Analog Scale scores were 1.26 and 1.67, respectively (p = .39). The sample showed 11.3% of transfer metatarsalgia to the third metatarsal. Group 1 had 9% of transfer metatarsalgia, whereas group 2 had 17% of transfer metatarsalgia (p = .40). The presence of a second metatarsal shorter than the third metatarsal, after Weil osteotomy of the second metatarsal or the second and third metatarsals, does not influence outcomes or incidence of transfer metatarsalgia to the third metatarsal., (Copyright © 2022 the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Case: Three cases of atypical metatarsalgia are presented, all diagnosed with foot synovial sarcomas (SSs) at different stages of evolution, after a year of medical consultations. One case was treated with marginal excision without requiring bone excision; the second patient required amputation of the first ray; and the third patient, with advanced disease, required amputation through Chopart's joint., Conclusion: Metatarsalgia is a recurrent reason for consultation in orthopaedics. Even so, patients with persistent symptoms should be studied further in depth. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging can detect tumor pathology, such as SS, of insidious development., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/B907)., (Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: Transfer metatarsalgia is a potential complication of hallux valgus surgery. This study aimed to investigate the shortened first metatarsal length and elevation and to compare groups with and without second transfer metatarsalgia after Scarf osteotomy., Methods: The first metatarsal length of 123 feet was measured via the Maestro's method using the metatarsal axial length and the relative second metatarsal protrusion to the first metatarsal. Metatarsal elevation was measured using the first metatarsal angle., Results: Second transfer metatarsalgia occurred after Scarf osteotomy in 11 (8.9%) feet. When baseline characteristics were considered in propensity score matching, the 11 feet were compared with the 33 feet in the control group. The group with transfer metatarsalgia showed a more shortened first metatarsal axial length (-4.1 ± 1.8 mm vs. -2.5 ± 2.2 mm, p = 0.032), a significantly longer relative second metatarsal protrusion (+5.8 ± 2.6 mm vs. +1.2 ± 2.6 mm, p < 0.001), and a significantly lower first metatarsal angle (18.1 ± 4.3° vs. 21.5 ± 4.0°, p = 0.012) than the control group postoperatively., Conclusions: To avoid iatrogenic transfer metatarsalgia, first metatarsal length shortening should be minimized to at least less than 4.0 mm. Furthermore, the metatarsal parabola should be retained., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The author(s) declares no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the variation of the first metatarsal (M1) sagittal alignment after the Lapidus procedure (LP) on clinical and functional outcomes, and transfer metatarsalgia., Methods: Twenty-nine patients who underwent a LP, with a mean follow-up of 20 months, were reviewed. Radiographic, clinical and functional measurements were compared. Clinical and functional questionnaires applied were the visual analogue scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale, lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) and SF-12, which is divided in physical (PCS-12) and mental-health (MCS-12) scales. Radiographic analysis of M1 sagittal alignment was based on the first metatarsal declination angle (FMDA) and Meary Angle (MA). Intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and hallux valgus angle (HVA) were also measured., Results: FMDA, IMA and HVA showed significant variation, but MA did not. Clinical and functional improvements were observed, except in MCS-12. No patient developed transfer metatarsalgia. A direct correlation was found between Δ-FMDA with Δ-PCS-12 and Δ-LEFS, meaning that excessive M1 dorsiflexion as measured by FMDA led to a decrease in PCS-12 and LEFS. Patients with Δ-FMDA of up to 3.2° of dorsiflexion were those who had significant improvements., Conclusion: Dorsiflexion of M1 can lead to decreased outcomes as measured by PCS-12 and LEFS. However, satisfactory outcomes can be obtained even with some dorsal deviation of the M1., Level of Evidence: IV, retrospective case series., (Copyright © 2021 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic criteria for a complete tear of metatarsophalangeal plantar plate are well-established. However, more subtle abnormalities can also occur and be a source of pain. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of degenerative plantar plate injuries in patients with metatarsalgia who underwent forefoot magnetic resonance imaging and describe the main abnormalities found. The hypothesis is that mild capsular fibrosis will have high sensitivity but low specificity for plantar plate degenerative injuries., Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 85 patients (105 feet) with metatarsalgia who underwent forefoot magnetic resonance imaging using a specific protocol to study metatarsophalangeal plantar plate. The experiment observer classified second toe plantar plate as normal, complete rupture or degenerative lesion and described the main magnetic resonance imaging findings., Results: A normal plantar plate was observed in 75 (71.4%) of the 105 feet assessed, in 25 (24%) feet there were degenerative plantar lesions, and in 5 (4.6%) feet there were complete ruptures. Degenerative injury of the plantar plate was best identified in coronal short axis intermediate-weighted images, with high sensitivity (92%). Pericapsular fibrosis below the intermetatarsal ligament was identified in 96% of cases, with high sensitivity (96%) for diagnosis of degenerative plantar plate injury., Conclusion: Degenerative lesions of the metatarsophalangeal plantar plate were more prevalent than complete ruptures and were best viewed in coronal short axis intermediate-weighted sequences. Pericapsular fibrosis below the intermetatarsal ligament was the indirect finding most strongly associated with degenerative plantar plate injury.