Search

ABSTRACT Background Objective Methods Results Conclusion The epidemiology of chronic hand eczema (CHE) remains poorly examined.To investigate the prevalence of CHE in a general adult population and describe the characteristics of affected individuals.We investigated the prevalence and characteristics of CHE using a random sample from the general Danish population (The Danish Skin Cohort). CHE was defined as eczema on the hands or wrists during a minimum of three consecutive months or reoccurrence of hand eczema at least twice within 12 months.Out of 11 166 adults, 1306 experienced hand eczema (HE) at some point in their lifetime. Within the last 12 months, 408 (3.7%) experienced HE, of which 332 (81.4%) reported CHE. The crude 1‐year period prevalence of CHE was 3.0% (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.7%–3.3%) while the standardised prevalence was 3.5% (95% CI, 3.3%–3.6%). Among adults with CHE, 70.8% were female, and the mean age was 48.0 years (standard deviation 16.6 years). Most individuals with CHE had two relapses (n = 309, 93.1%), while n = 206, 61.1%, had HE for more than 3 months. Compared to HE, CHE was more likely diagnosed by a dermatologist and affect the fingers and back of the hand.The standardised prevalence was 3.5% (95% CI, 3.3%–3.6%) and 4.2% (95% CI, 4.0%–4.4%) for CHE and HE, respectively. We identified a large overlap between HE and CHE (81.4%) in adults from the general population, indicating that many individuals affected by eczema on the hands may experience a chronic course. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promising potential to enhance human decision‐making as synergistic augmented intelligence (AuI), but requires critical evaluation for skin cancer screening in a real‐world setting. Objectives: To investigate the perspectives of patients and dermatologists after skin cancer screening by human, artificial and augmented intelligence. Methods: A prospective comparative cohort study conducted at the University Hospital Basel included 205 patients (at high‐risk of developing melanoma, with resected or advanced disease) and 8 dermatologists. Patients underwent skin cancer screening by a dermatologist with subsequent 2D and 3D total‐body photography (TBP). Any suspicious and all melanocytic skin lesions ≥3 mm were imaged with digital dermoscopes and classified by corresponding convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Excisions were performed based on dermatologist's melanoma suspicion, study‐defined elevated CNN risk‐scores and/or melanoma suspicion by AuI. Subsequently, all patients and dermatologists were surveyed about their experience using questionnaires, including quantification of patient's safety sense following different examinations (subjective safety score (SSS): 0–10). Results: Most patients believed AI could improve diagnostic performance (95.5%, n = 192/201). In total, 83.4% preferred AuI‐based skin cancer screening compared to examination by AI or dermatologist alone (3D‐TBP: 61.3%; 2D‐TBP: 22.1%, n = 199). Regarding SSS, AuI induced a significantly higher feeling of safety than AI (mean‐SSS (mSSS): 9.5 vs. 7.7, p < 0.0001) or dermatologist screening alone (mSSS: 9.5 vs. 9.1, p = 0.001). Most dermatologists expressed high trust in AI examination results (3D‐TBP: 90.2%; 2D‐TBP: 96.1%, n = 205). In 68.3% of the examinations, dermatologists felt that diagnostic accuracy improved through additional AI‐assessment (n = 140/205). Especially beginners (<2 years' dermoscopic experience; 61.8%, n = 94/152) felt AI facilitated their clinical work compared to experts (>5 years' dermoscopic experience; 20.9%, n = 9/43). Contrarily, in divergent risk assessments, only 1.5% of dermatologists trusted a benign CNN‐classification more than personal malignancy suspicion (n = 3/205). Conclusions: While patients already prefer AuI with 3D‐TBP for melanoma recognition, dermatologists continue to rely largely on their own decision‐making despite high confidence in AI‐results. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04605822). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cold climate and unique genetic and environmental factors may influence the prevalence of skin diseases in Greenland. However, there is a lack of epidemiological studies on skin diseases in the adult Greenlandic population. To address this unmet need a cross-sectional study, run by dermatologists from Denmark, the UK, and Switzerland estimated the prevalence and clinical manifestations of skin diseases among adults in East Greenland in May 2022. All adults ≥18 years in the town of Tasiilaq were invited, and 295 individuals aged 18–78 years participated (22.5% of the overall adult population in Tasiilaq). Two-hundred and three participants (69%) had visible signs of current skin disease, and among these, 242 cases of dermatoses were identified. The most common skin diseases were hand eczema (22.4%), lichen simplex (9.5%), discoid eczema (7.1%), psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and acne vulgaris (5.8% each). Scabies was the most frequent infectious skin disease (4.4%). No cases of skin cancer were identified. Atopic dermatitis and psoriasis presented with disease that was of limited extent and different from the classical presentations. Skin diseases showed a high prevalence among adults in East Greenland, and some of them were severe. This indicates a noteworthy public health problem that warrants better access to dermatologist support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Currently, in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) there is a lack of evidence demonstrating optimal biologic treatment response with respect to disease duration. The aim of this post-hoc analysis, using real world data from the Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO), is to provide evidence if early intervention with biologics is associated with better treatment outcomes and if there is any difference among drug classes or individual biologics. Materials and methods: For this post-hoc analysis patients were categorised into two subgroups according to shorter (≤2 years) or longer (>2 years) disease duration. Analysis was performed on anti-interleukin (IL)-17A cohort vs other biologics cohort, anti-IL-17A vs other drug classes, and pairwise comparisons of ixekizumab vs individual biologics, provided that the statistical models converged. Analysis investigated the association of disease duration with the proportion of patients achieving 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index score (PASI 100) at week 12. Adjusted comparative analyses, reported as odds ratio (OR), were performed using Frequentist Model Averaging (FMA) for each cohort or treatments within each subcategory of the subgroups. Results: At week 12, anti-IL-17A and other biologics cohorts displayed minimal differences in numerical response rate for PASI 100 with respect to disease duration. The anti-IL-17A cohort showed a higher numerical PASI 100 response rate compared to the other biologic cohort irrespective of disease duration (≤2 years: 36.7% vs 21.8%; >2 years: 35.8% vs 21.9%). Conclusion: Overall, the results do not clearly indicate that treating patients early is critical in achieving optimal patient outcomes. Furthermore, patients treated with ixekizumab show numerically higher response rates relative to other individual biologics irrespective of disease duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Biologics are among the most effective therapies for psoriasis. However, many patients are only introduced to them at advanced stages of the disease course. Objectives: Our aim was to identify predictors of initiating biologic therapy in patients with psoriasis and compare patients initiating biologics early versus late in their disease course. Methods: Kaplan–Meier curves visualized time to biologic initiation, while Cox regression models further explored variables as predictors of biologic initiation. Mann–Whitney U and chi‐squared tests compared patients who started biologics early with those who began biologics later in the disease course. Results: Our primary analysis included 233 psoriasis patients. Cox regression showed that age at diagnosis (P = 0.007), general physical well‐being (P = 0.02), and nail psoriasis severity (P = 0.02) were significantly associated with time to biologic initiation. Our secondary analysis, the comparisons between patients starting biologics early versus later in the disease course, included a total of 378 patients. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at diagnosis was 34.5 (25.0–51.2) years for patients initiating biologics within 5 years, compared to 22.0 (15.0–32.8) years for patients initiating biologics later (P < 0.0001). The median (IQR) age at initiation was 37.0 (27.0–53.2) and 45.0 (36.0–55.0) years for patients initiating biologics earlier versus later than 5 years (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Age at diagnosis, general well‐being, and severity of nail psoriasis significantly predicted future initiation of biologic treatment. Patients initiating biologics early in their disease course were generally older at diagnosis but younger at the time of biologic initiation compared to patients initiating biologics later in their disease course. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the rate of COVID-19 vaccination among psoriasis patients internationally and to correlate it with their treatment regimens. (2) Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from January 2021 to October 2022 among adults in the United States (US), Chile, China, Switzerland, and Singapore using the Global Healthcare Study on Psoriasis survey. (3) Results: A total of 310 psoriasis patients in the US (98), Chile (32), China (80), Switzerland (39), and Singapore (61) were surveyed. Of these, 248 patients (80.0%) were vaccinated at least once for COVID-19 (Chile: 100%, Singapore: 100%, US: 93.9%, Switzerland: 69.2%, China: 45.0%). Compared with other countries, patients in China were 89% less likely to report at least one COVID-19 vaccination (1 − 0.11 = 0.89; OR 0.11; 95% CI: 0.03–0.48), and patients in Switzerland were 80% less likely (1 − 0.20 = 0.80; OR 0.20; 95% CI: 0.05–0.79). Compared with patients on biologics, patients on topicals were 10.9 (95% CI: 2.1–56.6) times more likely to report at least one COVID-19 vaccination, and patients on oral systemics were 7.2 times more likely (95% CI: 1.6–31.6). (4) Conclusions: Country of residence and treatment regimen are associated with different COVID-19 vaccination rates in psoriasis patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Copenhagen Hidradenitis Suppurativa Cohort, established in 2016 at the Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, aims to advance research on the aetiology, natural history, and treatment of Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The cohort has recruited 760 patients over 8 years, with a median age of 38.3 years, and 62.9% female. The data collected includes demographics, disease severity, comorbidities, treatments, and patient-reported outcomes, contributing to studies on comorbidities, biomarkers, and treatment effects in HS. The initiative supports global collaboration through standardized data collection to address the multifaceted challenges of HS and improve patient outcomes worldwide. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Keloid is an abnormal proliferation of scar tissue that grows beyond the original margins of the injury. Even after complete resection, recurrences are common and pose a poorly understood challenge in dermatology. There is lack of large prospective clinical trials; thus, treatment recommendations are based on retrospective analyses and small cohort studies. Superficial radiotherapy is recommended in recurrent keloids; however, the successful treatment rates vary greatly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the keloid recurrence rate after post-excision soft X-ray radiotherapy and the associated factors. Methods: We reviewed retrospective data of all patients, treated with adjuvant post-excision soft X-ray radiotherapy with 12 Gy in 6 sessions at the tertiary referral center, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, between 2005 and 2018. We analyzed individual keloids as separate cases. Successful treatment was defined as no sign of recurrence within 2 years. Results: Of the 200 identified patients, 90 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. In 90 patients, 104 cases of treated keloids were analyzed. Keloids were mainly located on the trunk (49%) and were mostly caused by previous surgery (52.2%). 50% of the keloids did not relapse within 2 years after therapy. A significant factor leading to recurrence was the presence of previous therapy, with prior topical therapies, such as steroid injections or 5-fluorouracil, leading to most relapses. 69.2% of keloid cases who relapsed were pretreated. Soft X-ray radiotherapy was well tolerated, with posttreatment hyperpigmentation noted in 34% of patients, particularly in patients with non-Caucasian origin (61.3%). Conclusion: Treatment of refractory keloids is difficult. Post-excision radiotherapy is an established adjuvant treatment option; nevertheless, recurrence rates are high, especially in pretreated keloids. Prospective studies determining the exact dosage and fraction of post-excisional radiotherapy are needed to determine the optimal radiation parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Psoriasis is a disease that often requires prolonged systemic treatment. It is important to determine the safety of available therapies. There is currently little insight into sex‐specific differences in the safety of systemic psoriasis therapies. Objectives: To examine the real‐world, long‐term safety of systemic psoriasis therapies with sex stratification in drug‐related adverse events (ADRs). Methods: Ten‐year data from adults with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis requiring systemic treatment (conventional systemic therapies [CST], biologics) were obtained from the Swiss psoriasis registry (SDNTT). ADRs were categorized according to the international terminology Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Safety was assessed by calculating event rates per 100 patient‐years (PY). We used descriptive statistics for patient and disease characteristics, and binomial and t‐tests to compare treatment groups and sex. Results: In total, 791 patients (290 females) were included with a mean age of 46 years. 358 (45%) received CSTs and 433 (55%) biologics; both groups had similar baseline characteristics except for more joint involvement in patients using biologics (26.86% vs. 14.8%, p < 0.0001). CSTs were associated with a 2.2‐fold higher ADR rate (40.43/100 PY vs. 18.22/100 PY, p < 0.0001) and an 8.0‐fold higher drug‐related discontinuation rate than biologics (0.16/PY vs. 0.02/PY, p < 0.0001). Trends showed non‐significant higher serious adverse event rates per 100 PY for biologics (8.19, CI 6.87–9.68) compared to CSTs (7.08, CI 5.39–9.13) (p = 0.3922). Sex stratification revealed a significantly higher overall ADR rate for all treatments in females (1.8‐fold for CSTs [57.30/100 PY vs. 31.69/100 PY] and 2.0‐fold for biologics [27.36/100 PY vs. 13.9/100 PY], p < 0.0001), and drug‐related discontinuation rates for most CSTs in females. Conclusion: Females were associated with a significantly higher rate of ADRs and drug‐related discontinuation rates. Sex stratification should be taken into consideration when designing studies in the patient‐tailored management of psoriasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]