Search

Background: Radio-guided surgery (RGS) holds promise for improving surgical outcomes in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Previous studies showed low specificity (SP) using γ-probes to detect radiation emitted by radio-labeled somatostatin analogs., Objective: We aimed to assess the sensitivity (SE) and SP of the intraoperative RGS approach using a β-probe with a per-lesion analysis, while assessing safety and feasibility as secondary objectives., Methods: This prospective, single-arm, single-center, phase II trial (NCT05448157) enrolled 20 patients diagnosed with small intestine NETs (SI-NETs) with positive lesions detected at 68 Ga-DOTA-TOC positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Patients received an intravenous injection of 1.1 MBq/Kg of 68Ga-DOTA-TOC 10 min prior to surgery. In vivo measurements were conducted using a β-probe. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed, with the tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) as the independent variable and pathology result (cancer vs. non-cancer) as the dependent variable. The area under the curve (AUC), optimal TBR, and absorbed dose for the surgery staff were reported., Results: The intraoperative RGS approach was feasible in all cases without adverse effects. Of 134 specimens, the AUC was 0.928, with a TBR cut-off of 1.35 yielding 89.3% SE and 86.4% SP. The median absorbed dose for the surgery staff was 30 µSv (range 12-41 µSv)., Conclusion: This study reports optimal accuracy in detecting lesions of SI-NETs using the intraoperative RGS approach with a novel β-probe. The method was found to be safe, feasible, and easily reproducible in daily clinical practice, with minimal radiation exposure for the staff. RGS might potentially improve radical resection rates in SI-NETs., Clinical Trials Registration: 68 Ga-DOTATOC Radio-Guided Surgery with β-Probe in GEP-NET (RGS GEP-NET) [NCT0544815; https://classic., Clinicaltrials: gov/ct2/show/NCT05448157 ]., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in its advanced stages. Despite progress in early detection and treatment, PCa is the second most common cancer diagnosis among men. This review aims to provide an overview of current therapeutic approaches and innovations in PCa management, focusing on the latest advancements and ongoing challenges. We conducted a narrative review of clinical trials and research studies, focusing on PARP inhibitors (PARPis), phosphoinositide 3 kinase-protein kinase B inhibitors, immunotherapy, and radioligand therapies (RLTs). Data was sourced from major clinical trial databases and peer-reviewed journals. Androgen deprivation therapy and androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors remain foundational in managing castration-sensitive and early-stage castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). PARPi's, such as olaparib and rucaparib, have emerged as vital treatments for metastatic CRPC with homologous recombination repair gene mutations, highlighting the importance of personalized medicine. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown clinical benefit limited to specific subgroups of PCa, demonstrating significant improvement in efficacy in patients with microsatellite instability/mismatch repair or cyclin-dependent kinase 12 alteration, highlighting the importance of focusing ongoing research on identifying and characterizing these subgroups to maximize the clinical benefits of ICIs. RLTs have shown effectiveness in treating mCRPC. Different alpha emitters (like [ 225 Ac]PSMA) and beta emitters compounds (like [ 177 Lu]PSMA) impact treatment differently due to their energy transfer characteristics. Clinical trials like VISION and TheraP have demonstrated positive outcomes with RLT, particularly [ 177 Lu]PSMA-617, leading to FDA approval. Ongoing trials and future perspectives explore the potential of [ 225 Ac]PSMA, aiming to improve outcomes for patients with mCRPC. The landscape of PCa treatment is evolving, with significant advancements in both established and novel therapies. The combination of hormonal therapies, chemotherapy, PARPis, immunotherapy, and RLTs, guided by genetic and molecular insights, opens new possibilities for personalized treatment.

In the last decades, the development of PET/CT radiopharmaceuticals, targeting the Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA), changed the management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients thanks to its higher diagnostic accuracy in comparison with conventional imaging both in staging and in recurrence. Alongside molecular imaging, PSMA was studied as a therapeutic agent targeted with various isotopes. In 2021, results from the VISION trial led to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 as a novel therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and set the basis for a radical change in the future perspectives of PCa treatment and the history of Nuclear Medicine. Despite these promising results, primary resistance in patients treated with single-agent [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 remains a real issue. Emerging trials are investigating the use of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in combination with other PCa therapies in order to cover the multiple oncologic resistance pathways and to overcome tumor heterogeneity. In this review, our aim is to retrace the history of PSMA-targeted therapy from the first preclinical studies to its future applications in PCa.

(1) Background: Thyroid cancer (TC) is often treated with surgery followed by iodine-131. Up to 50% of the instances of TC lose their avidity to 131 I, becoming more aggressive. In this scenario, [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT imaging is used for evaluating the widespread nature of the disease, despite its low sensitivity and a false negative rate of 8-21.1%. A novel class of PET agents targeting the fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPi) has emerged, studied particularly for their potential application to theranostics. (2) Methods: A search of the literature was performed by two independent authors (P.G. and L.E.) using the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases. The following terms were used: "FAP" or "FAPi" or "Fibroblast activating protein" and "thyroid" or "thyroid cancer", in different combinations. The included papers were original articles, clinical studies, and case reports in the English language. No time limits were used. Editorials, conference papers, reviews, and preclinical studies were excluded. (3) Results: There were 31 papers that were selected. Some studies reported a low or absent FAPi uptake in TC lesions; others reported promising findings for the detection of metastases. (4) Conclusions: The preliminary results are encouraging. FAPI agents are an alternative to [ 18 F]FDG and a promising theranostic tool. However, further studies with a larger population are needed.

FAPI-based radiopharmaceuticals are a novel class of tracers, mainly used for PET imaging, which have demonstrated several advantages over [ 18 F]FDG, especially in the case of low-grade or well-differentiated tumors. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate all the studies where a head-to-head comparison had been performed to explore the potential utility of FAPI tracers in clinical practice. FAPI-based radiopharmaceuticals have shown promising results globally, in particular in detecting peritoneal carcinomatosis, but studies with wider populations are needed to better understand all the advantages of these new radiopharmaceuticals.

Context: The introduction of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) had a substantial impact on the management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with a stage migration phenomenon and consequent treatment changes., Objective: To summarise the role of PSMA-PET to define the burden of disease through an accurate location of metastatic site(s) in PCa patients, describing the most common locations at PSMA-PET in the primary staging and recurrence setting, and to assess the clinical impact in the decision-making process., Evidence Acquisition: A comprehensive nonsystematic literature review was performed in April 2022. Literature search was updated until March 2022. The most relevant studies have been summarised, giving priority to registered clinical trials and multicentre collaborations., Evidence Synthesis: PSMA-PET showed higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional imaging both in newly diagnosed PCa and in recurrent disease. This greater accuracy led to a migration of a higher proportion of patients identified with metastatic disease. Bone metastases were reported as the most frequent site of metastatic spread in staging (up to 17%) and restaging (up to 18%). In staging, considering the suboptimal sensitivity in lymph node metastasis detection prior to radical surgery, PSMA-PET should be performed in patients with high risk or unfavourable intermediate risk only, and it is not recommended to routinely avoid pelvic lymph node dissection in case of a negative scan. In case of prostate-specific antigen relapse, PSMA-PET had higher diagnostic accuracy than other diagnostic procedures in the early detection of the sites of recurrence, thus influencing the therapy decision-making process., Conclusions: PSMA-PET detects a higher number of lesions than conventional imaging or other PET radiotracers, especially metastatic lesions unseen with other modalities. The high diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-PET leads to a significant patient upstage and thus an impact in clinical management, even if the overall impact on cancer mortality is still to be assessed., Patient Summary: Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) identifies metastatic lesions with higher accuracy than conventional imaging, both in primary prostate cancer and during disease recurrence. Skeletal metastasis and extrapelvic lymph nodes are the most common sites of metastatic spread. The high accuracy of PSMA-PET in the detection of metastatic disease led to a significant impact on patient management, even if the overall impact on cancer mortality is still to be assessed., (Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: to evaluate the feasibility of the intra-operative application of a specimen PET/CT imager in a clinical setting., Materials and Methods: this is a pilot analysis performed in three patients who received an intra-operative administration of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 (n = 2) and 68 Ga-DOTA-TOC (n = 1), respectively. Patients were administrated with PET radiopharmaceuticals to perform radio-guided surgery with a beta-probe detector during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa) and salvage lymphadenectomy for recurrent neuroendocrine tumor (NET) of the ileum, respectively. All procedures have been performed within two ongoing clinical trials in our Institute (NCT05596851 and NCT05448157). Pathologic assessment with immunohistochemistry (PSMA-staining and SSA immunoreactivity) was considered as standard of truth. Specimen images were compared with baseline PET/CT images and histopathological analysis., Results: Patients received 1 MBq/Kg of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 (PCa) or 1.2 MBq/Kg of 68 Ga-DOTA-TOC (NET) prior to surgery. Specimens were collected, positioned in the dedicated specimen container, and scanned to obtain high-resolution PET/CT images. In all cases, a perfect match was observed between the findings detected by the specimen imager and histopathology. Overall, the PET spatial resolution was sensibly higher for the specimen images compared to the baseline whole-body PET/CT images. Furthermore, the use of the PET/CT specimen imager did not significantly interfere with any procedures, and the overall length of the surgery was not affected using the PET/CT specimen imager. Finally, the radiation exposure of the operating theater staff was lower than 40 µSv per procedure (range 26-40 μSv)., Conclusions: the image acquisition of specimens obtained by patients who received intra-surgery injections of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 and 68 Ga-DOTA-TOC was feasible and reliable also in a live-experience session and has been easily adapted to surgery daily practice. The high sensitivity, together with the evaluation of intra-lesion tumor heterogeneity, were the most relevant results since the data derived from specimen PET/CT imaging matched perfectly with the histopathological analysis.

Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is generally characterized by low-FDG avidity, and [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT is not recommended to stage the primary tumor. However, its role to assess metastases is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT in correctly identifying RCC lung metastases using histology as the standard of truth. The records of 350 patients affected by RCC were retrospectively analyzed. The inclusion criteria were: (a) biopsy- or histologically proven RCC; (b) Computed Tomography (CT) evidence of at least one lung nodule; (c) [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT performed prior to lung surgery; (d) lung surgery with histological analysis of surgical specimens; (e) complete follow-up available. A per-lesion analysis was performed, and diagnostic accuracy was reported as sensitivity and specificity, using histology as the standard of truth. [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT semiquantitative parameters (Standardized Uptake Value [SUVmax], Metabolic Tumor Volume [MTV] and Total Lesion Glycolysis [TLG]) were collected for each lesion. Sixty-seven patients with a total of 107 lesions were included: lung metastases from RCC were detected in 57 cases (53.3%), while 50 lesions (46.7%) were related to other lung malignancies. Applying a cut-off of SUVmax ≥ 2, the sensitivity and the specificity of [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT in detecting RCC lung metastases were 33.3% (95% CI: 21.4-47.1%) and 26% (95%CI: 14.6-40.3%), respectively. Although the analysis demonstrated a suboptimal diagnostic accuracy of [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT in discriminating between lung metastases from RCC and other malignancies, a semiquantitative analysis that also includes volumetric parameters (MTV and TLG) could support the correct interpretation of [ 18 F]FDG-PET/CT images.

Background and Aim: The American College of Radiology (ACR) defines "actionable findings" the ones requiring a special communication between radiologists and referring clinicians, suggesting to organize their categorization in a three-degree scale on the basis of the risk for the patient to develop complications. These cases may fall in a grey-zone communication between different care figures with the risk of being underestimated or even not being considered at all. In this paper, our aim is to adapt the ACR categorization to the most frequent actionable findings encountered when reporting PET/CT images in a Nuclear Medicine Department, describing the most frequent and relevant imaging features and presenting the modalities of communication and the related clinical interventions that can be modulated by the prognostic severity of the clinical cases., Materials and Methods: We performed a descriptive, observational and critical analysis of the most relevant literature on the topic of "actionable findings", in particular, starting from the reports of the ACR Actionable Reporting Work Group, we categorised and described, in a narrative review, the most relevant "actionable findings" encountered in the Nuclear Medicine PET/CT daily practice., Results: To the best of our knowledge, to date there are no clear indications on this selective PET/CT topic, considering that the current recommendations target mainly radiologists and assume a certain level of radiological expertise. We resumed and classified the main imaging conditions under the term of "actionable findings" according to the corresponding anatomical districts, and we described their most relevant imaging features (independently of PET avidity or not). Furthermore, a different communication timing and strategy was suggested on the basis of the findings' urgency., Conclusion: A systematic categorization of the actionable imaging findings according to their prognostic severity may help the reporting physician to choose how and when to communicate with the referring clinician or to identify cases requiring a prompt clinical evaluation. Effective communication is a critical component of diagnostic imaging: timely receipt of the information is more important than the method of delivery., Competing Interests: Conflict of interestAll the authors declare no conflict of interest regarding this topic., (© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2023, corrected publication 2023Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.)