Search

The density weighted average derivative (DWAD) of a regression function is a canonical parameter of interest in economics. Classical first-order large sample distribution theory for kernel-based DWAD estimators relies on tuning parameter restrictions and model assumptions that imply an asymptotic linear representation of the point estimator. These conditions can be restrictive, and the resulting distributional approximation may not be representative of the actual sampling distribution of the statistic of interest. In particular, the approximation is not robust to bandwidth choice. Small bandwidth asymptotics offers an alternative, more general distributional approximation for kernel-based DWAD estimators that allows for, but does not require, asymptotic linearity. The resulting inference procedures based on small bandwidth asymptotics were found to exhibit superior finite sample performance in simulations, but no formal theory justifying that empirical success is available in the literature. Employing Edgeworth expansions, this paper shows that small bandwidth asymptotic approximations lead to inference procedures with higher-order distributional properties that are demonstrably superior to those of procedures based on asymptotic linear approximations.

Yurinskii's coupling is a popular theoretical tool for non-asymptotic distributional analysis in mathematical statistics and applied probability, offering a Gaussian strong approximation with an explicit error bound under easily verifiable conditions. Originally stated in $\ell^2$-norm for sums of independent random vectors, it has recently been extended both to the $\ell^p$-norm, for $1 \leq p \leq \infty$, and to vector-valued martingales in $\ell^2$-norm, under some strong conditions. We present as our main result a Yurinskii coupling for approximate martingales in $\ell^p$-norm, under substantially weaker conditions than those previously imposed. Our formulation further allows for the coupling variable to follow a more general Gaussian mixture distribution, and we provide a novel third-order coupling method which gives tighter approximations in certain settings. We specialize our main result to mixingales, martingales, and independent data, and derive uniform Gaussian mixture strong approximations for martingale empirical processes. Applications to nonparametric partitioning-based and local polynomial regression procedures are provided, alongside central limit theorems for high-dimensional martingale vectors., Comment: 57 pages, 1 figure

In the context of treatment effect estimation, this paper proposes a new methodology to recover the counterfactual distribution when there is a single (or a few) treated unit and possibly a high-dimensional number of potential controls observed in a panel structure. The methodology accommodates, albeit does not require, the number of units to be larger than the number of time periods (high-dimensional setup). As opposed to modeling only the conditional mean, we propose to model the entire conditional quantile function (CQF) without intervention and estimate it using the pre-intervention period by a l1-penalized regression. We derive non-asymptotic bounds for the estimated CQF valid uniformly over the quantiles. The bounds are explicit in terms of the number of time periods, the number of control units, the weak dependence coefficient (beta-mixing), and the tail decay of the random variables. The results allow practitioners to re-construct the entire counterfactual distribution. Moreover, we bound the probability coverage of this estimated CQF, which can be used to construct valid confidence intervals for the (possibly random) treatment effect for every post-intervention period. We also propose a new hypothesis test for the sharp null of no-effect based on the Lp norm of deviation of the estimated CQF to the population one. Interestingly, the null distribution is quasi-pivotal in the sense that it only depends on the estimated CQF, Lp norm, and the number of post-intervention periods, but not on the size of the post-intervention period. For that reason, critical values can then be easily simulated. We illustrate the methodology by revisiting the empirical study in Acemoglu, Johnson, Kermani, Kwak and Mitton (2016).