Search

PURPOSE Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a poor prognosis. Multianalyte signatures, including liquid biopsy and traditional clinical variables, have shown promise for improving prognostication in other solid tumors but have not yet been rigorously assessed for PDAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a prospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) or metastatic PDAC (mPDAC) who were planned to undergo systemic therapy. We collected peripheral blood before systemic therapy and assessed circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA concentration (cfDNA), and circulating tumor KRAS (ctKRAS)–variant allele fraction (VAF). Association of variables with overall survival (OS) was assessed in univariate and multivariate survival analysis, and comparisons were made between models containing liquid biopsy variables combined with traditional clinical prognostic variables versus models containing traditional clinical prognostic variables alone. RESULTS One hundred four patients, 40 with LAPC and 64 with mPDAC, were enrolled. CTCs, cfDNA concentration, and ctKRAS VAF were all significantly higher in patients with mPDAC than patients with LAPC. ctKRAS VAF (cube root; 0.05 unit increments; hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.21; P = .01), and CTCs ≥ 1/mL (hazard ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.69; P = .002) were significantly associated with worse OS in multivariate analysis while cfDNA concentration was not. A model selected by backward selection containing traditional clinical variables plus liquid biopsy variables had better discrimination of OS compared with a model containing traditional clinical variables alone (optimism-corrected Harrell's C-statistic 0.725 v 0.681). CONCLUSION A multianalyte prognostic signature containing CTCs, ctKRAS, and cfDNA concentration outperformed a model containing traditional clinical variables alone suggesting that CTCs, ctKRAS, and cfDNA provide prognostic information complementary to traditional clinical variables in advanced PDAC.

Outcomes for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have improved in the past 12 years, mainly because of progress made in systemic therapies. New treatment strategies for advanced pancreatic cancer include switch maintenance with cytotoxic therapies, induction maintenance, and the utilization of targeted agents for patients with actionable variants, as well as ongoing development of cytotoxic regimens, such as NALIRIFOX. The activity of immunotherapy has been disappointing to date, but novel combinations and identifying appropriate patient populations may further unlock its potential.

Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy has improved the treatment of certain solid tumors, but effective regimens remain elusive for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We conducted a randomized phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy of nivolumab (nivo; anti-PD-1) and/or sotigalimab (sotiga; CD40 agonistic antibody) with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (chemotherapy) in patients with first-line metastatic PDAC (NCT03214250). In 105 patients analyzed for efficacy, the primary endpoint of 1-year overall survival (OS) was met for nivo/chemo (57.7%, P = 0.006 compared to historical 1-year OS of 35%, n = 34) but was not met for sotiga/chemo (48.1%, P = 0.062, n = 36) or sotiga/nivo/chemo (41.3%, P = 0.223, n = 35). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response and safety. Treatment-related adverse event rates were similar across arms. Multi-omic circulating and tumor biomarker analyses identified distinct immune signatures associated with survival for nivo/chemo and sotiga/chemo. Survival after nivo/chemo correlated with a less suppressive tumor microenvironment and higher numbers of activated, antigen-experienced circulating T cells at baseline. Survival after sotiga/chemo correlated with greater intratumoral CD4 T cell infiltration and circulating differentiated CD4 T cells and antigen-presenting cells. A patient subset benefitting from sotiga/nivo/chemo was not identified. Collectively, these analyses suggest potential treatment-specific correlates of efficacy and may enable biomarker-selected patient populations in subsequent PDAC chemoimmunotherapy trials.

Figure S1. Sample cohort of this study, which included 204 subjects in total. Workflow shows patient cohorts involved in each classification. * indicated 8 patients repeated in the discovery set and the training set. ** indicated 32 locally advanced patients that were not used in the occult metastases detection as training set did not have locally advanced PDAC patients.

e15580 Background: The antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor regorafenib provides a survival benefit in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. Antiangiogenic therapy causes hypoxic stress within tumor cells, which activate autophagy as a survival mechanism. Entinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, increases dependence on autophagy through epigenetic mechanisms. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blocks autophagy by blunting lysosomal acidification and is synergistic with antiangiogenic therapies. We hypothesized that HCQ and entinostat would be tolerable with regorafenib and potentiate the antitumor response. Methods: This was a 3+3 phase I trial to find the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of HCQ and entinostat with regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. No prior regorafenib or HDAC inhibitor therapy was permitted. Regorafenib was dosed at 160mg daily on days 1-21 of 28-day cycles, with provision to lower the starting dose to 80mg if toxicity was excessive. Entinostat was dosed at 3mg weekly in dose level 1 and at 5mg weekly in dose levels 2 and 3 while HCQ was dosed at 200mg qAM and 400mg qPM in dose levels 1 and 2 and at 600mg BID at dose level 3. Expansion was planned at the RP2D with a primary endpoint of objective response rate. Results: Twenty-eight patients were screened, and 20 patients were enrolled from November 2017 to January 2020. Six patients were treated at dose level 1 with no dose-limiting toxicity. The starting regorafenib dose was reduced to 80mg after 3 patients discontinued therapy early due to fatigue or rash due to regorafenib. At dose level 2, 7 patients were enrolled to achieve 6 evaluable patients. One DLT (G3 fatigue) was noted and one patient withdrew consent after 14 days due to fever and tumor pain flare possibly related to treatment. Six patients enrolled at dose level 3; no DLTs were seen. One additional patient received HCQ 400mg BID instead of 600mg BID due to a clerical error. Weight loss (60%), fatigue (50%), and anorexia (50%) were the most common toxicities. Thirteen grade 3 toxicities were noted, with rash (15%), fatigue (10%), and alkaline phosphatase elevation (10%) the most common. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Seven patients discontinued therapy early due to toxicity. Nearly all patients experienced rapid weight loss, with a range of 1.5 lbs to 27.1 lbs and a median weight loss of 9.5 lbs at two weeks. No objective responses were observed. The median PFS was 1.8 months, the median OS was 5.2 months, and no patient remained on study longer than 4 months. Expansion was not pursued due to toxicity and lack of efficacy. Conclusions: The combination of regorafenib, HCQ, and entinostat was poorly tolerated without evident activity in metastatic colorectal cancer. The substantial weight loss suggests a potential adverse metabolic interaction between these drugs. Clinical trial information: NCT03215264.

Introduction: In the setting of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), lower baseline plasma KRAS mutation levels have been associated with improved survival. While tissue-agnostic, plasma-based copy number instability (CNI) has been demonstrated as an early indicator of response to immunotherapy for some solid tumors, it has not been assessed for patients with mPDAC, nor in combination with KRAS mutations for patients receiving standard of care chemo/radiotherapy. Here we evaluate the combination of mutant KRAS (mKRAS) and CNI detection in plasma as a predictor of overall and progression-free survival (OS/PFS) in mPDAC patients who received standard of care therapy. Methods: Cell-free DNA was extracted from plasma and libraries prepared at baseline (Week 0) and weeks 8, 16 and 24 on therapy, and analyzed by next-generation sequencing (CNI) and droplet digital PCR (mKRAS). Descriptive statistics were computed for variables including CNI (score is a measure of circulating tumor DNA) and mKRAS variant allele fraction. Detection was defined as above the limit of detection (mKRAS=0.13%) and above the 95th percentile of the value in normal individuals (CNI=24). Therapy response was assessed by OS and PFS. Results: 196 plasma samples from 64 mPDAC patients were analyzed. When dichotomized as detectable vs undetectable, CNI alone was significantly associated with OS at all on-therapy timepoints but not baseline, whereas mKRAS was significantly associated with OS for all 4 timepoints (Table 1). Detection of both CNI and mKRAS in combination was strongly associated with worse OS at all timepoints, yielding the highest HR. Similar results were obtained when mKRAS and CNI were dichotomized at their respective median values or with PFS as the clinical endpoint. Conclusions: Combined CNI and mKRAS detection at baseline and on-therapy may provide a strong and early indication of worse prognosis for patients with mPDAC. Table 1. Association of CNI and mKRAS with Overall Survival (HazardRatio [95% CI], log-rank p-value) Timepoint CNI mKRAS CNI and KRAS Baseline/Week 0 1.54 [0.89-2.68], 0.1 2.05 [1.12-3.78], 0.02 2.50 [1.46-4.28], 0.0006 Week 8 1.78 [0.99-3.18], 0.05 2.21 [1.19-4.08], 0.01 9.81 [3.40-28.28], Citation Format: Samuele Cannas, Jacob E. Till, Kristine Kim, Michael J. LaRiviere, Charles M. Vollmer, Jennifer R. Eads, Thomas B. Karasic, Peter J. O'Dwyer, Charles J. Schneider, Ursina R. Teitelbaum, Kim A. Reiss Binder, Mark H. O'Hara, Douglas T. Ross, Kim McGregor, Kirsten Bornemann-Kolatzki, Ekkehard Schütz, Julia Beck, Erica L. Carpenter. Liquid biopsy signature combining copy number instability and mutant KRAS detection is associated with survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1043.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have limited clinical activity in pancreatic cancer. Based on preclinical data, we hypothesized that hypofractionated radiation may cooperate with dual checkpoint inhibition in patients (Rech AJ, et al, Cancer Research, 2018). We therefore designed a phase 1 study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of two schedules of hypofractionated radiation with durvalumab (anti-PDL1) and tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4) in patients with metastatic pancreatic, lung, and breast cancers and melanoma. Here, we present the data for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with at least one prior line of therapy with measurable disease by RECIST in addition to an index lesion amenable to hypofractionated radiation were enrolled sequentially to two cohorts – cohort A evaluating 3 fractions of 8 Gy or cohort B evaluating 1 fraction of 17 Gy. Patients received 4 cycles of tremelimumab 1 mg/kg IV and durvalumab 20 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks for 4 doses followed by durvalumab 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks until progression. Radiation was given in week 2 of treatment. Patients were replaced if they did not receive week 5 of therapy on trial, but were included in safety/feasibility analysis. Blood and, when feasible, baseline and on-treatment biopsies were obtained for exploratory biomarker evaluation. Results: 10 patients were treated in cohort A and 21 patients in cohort B. All patients were included in the safety and feasibility assessment. Overall, treatment was well tolerated in both cohorts. The most common adverse events were grade 1 or 2 fatigue (A 30%, B 23.8%), diarrhea (A 10%, B 14.3%), pruritis (A 10%, B 14.3%), AST/ALT elevation and constipation (each A 10%, B 9.5%). Grade 3 diarrhea, elevated bilirubin, pneumonitis, and syncope were noted in 1 patient each, all in cohort B. Grade 5 pneumothorax occurred after baseline biopsy in 1 patient. Grade 2 hyperthyroidism (A) and pneumonitis (B) were noted each in 1 patient. 8 patients in cohort A and 13 patients in cohort B were evaluable for response. In cohort A, 50% of patients had stable disease as best response, and median overall survival was 4.9 months. In cohort B, 23.1% had PR and 30.8% had SD as best response and mOS was 5.2 months. Responses occurred more frequently when metastatic lung nodules were radiated – SD in 3/5 (60%) patients in cohort A, PR in 3/10 (30%) and SD in 4/10 (40%) patients in cohort B, compared to SD in 1/3 (33%) patients in cohort A and 0/3 (0%) patients in cohort B who underwent radiation to a liver lesion. Biomarker analysis will be presented. Conclusions: The combination of durvalumab, tremelimumab with hypofractionated radiation is safe and feasible in a refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma patient population. Encouraging clinical activity warrants further evaluation, especially when hypofractionated radiation is delivered to lung nodules. Citation Format: Mark H. O'Hara, Adham S. Bear, Max M. Wattenberg, Ursina R. Teitelbaum, Kim A. Reiss, Thomas B. Karasic, Charles J. Schneider, Peter J. O'Dwyer, Edgar H. Ben-Josef, Andrzej P. Wojcieszynski, Amit H. Maity, Rosemarie H. Mick, Robert H. Vonderheide. Phase 1 study of hypofractionated radiation in combination with tremelimumab and durvalumab in refractory metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2022 Sep 13-16; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(22 Suppl):Abstract nr A016.

Up to 85% of patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) experience metastatic relapse after curative intent surgery with many recurring early. Detection of such occult metastases (those thought to be below the level of detection of standard of care imaging at the time of resection) could steer patients to a different treatment course rather than delaying systemic therapy until after recovery from inappropriate surgery. Here we investigate the potential of pancreas-specific circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a biomarker for the detection of occult metastatic disease and as a prognostic biomarker. Blood specimens were collected from 53 patients (15 negative control healthy subjects, 11 positive control metastatic PDAC patients, and 27 resectable PDAC patients prior to resection), processed to plasma, and banked. Plasma cfDNA was extracted, quantified, treated with bisulfite, and used as template for PCR amplification of 9 marker loci that are uniquely unmethylated in DNA of pancreatic acinar or duct cells. Following deep sequencing of PCR products, the fraction of cfDNA molecules derived from the pancreas was determined and multiplied by the total cfDNA concentration to yield pancreas-specific cfDNA. Recurrence and survival data were abstracted from the medical record and receiver operator curve analysis was utilized to determine statistical significance. Metastases were categorized as overt (present at diagnosis), occult (discovered during or within 4 months of curative intent surgery), or two-year (discovered during or within two years of curative intent surgery). Pancreas-derived cfDNA was significant for the detection of occult or overt metastases in our full cohort (18 of 52 evaluable subjects) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% Confidence Interval, 0.74-0.80) and 0.91 (0.83-1.00) for liver-specific occult or overt metastases (15 of 52). It was borderline significant for the detection of occult metastases in the resectable sub-cohort (7 of 27) with an AUC of 0.71 (0.47-0.96) but significant for the detection of occult liver-specific metastases (5 of 27) with an AUC of 0.79 (0.62-0.96). Further, detection of overt metastases or two-year metastases (28 of 50) was significant with an AUC of 0.85 (0.74-0.96). In the resectable sub-cohort, it was also significant for the detection of two-year metastases (17 of 25) with an AUC of 0.79 (0.60-0.97) and prognostic for 2-year overall survival (12 of 24) with an AUC of 0.81 (0.62-1.00) in the resectable sub-cohort. Liver-derived cfDNA was also analyzed and was always outperformed by pancreas-specific cfDNA. In this pilot cohort, enumeration of pancreas-specific cfDNA shows promise as biomarker of occult metastatic disease, two-year metastatic progression, and two-year overall survival in resectable PDAC. Further investigation of a larger cohort and potential combination with other known markers like CA19-9 and tumor size is underway; results for an additional ~40 patients will be available by the time of the meeting. Citation Format: Jacob E. Till, Roni Ben-Ami, Ruth Shemer, Kristine Kim, Aseel Abdalla, Samuele Cannas, Charles M. Vollmer, Mark H. O'Hara, Ben Z. Stanger, Yuval Dor, Erica L. Carpenter. Pancreas-specific circulating cell-free DNA for detection of occult metastases and prognosis in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2022 Sep 13-16; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(22 Suppl):Abstract nr A030.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapy is FDA approved for the treatment of a subset of B cell malignancies but has shown limited clinical success in solid tumor therapy. T cell exhaustion is an important factor involved in treatment failure, and can, in part, result from continuous stimulation of the CAR by tumor cells expressing the cognate antigen. To gain deeper understanding of CAR T cell exhaustion induced by chronic antigen exposure (CAE), we developed and validated a robust in vitro model, in which mesothelin-redirected CAR T cells (M5CAR) were continuously stimulated with mesothelin-expressing AsPC-1 pancreatic tumor cells such that tumor cells were never cleared, and we characterized these CAE CAR T cells by gene expression at population and single-cell levels, and by epigenetic analyses. CAE M5CAR T cells recapitulate the hallmarks of T cell exhaustion, including reduced proliferation, down-modulation of surface CAR, decreased cytokine production, and reduced cytotoxicity. In addition, CAR T cells undergoing CAE have a transcriptional signature and an epigenetic landscape consistent with exhaustion. Further, transcriptomic analysis revealed that CAE M5CAR T cells undergo a transition from T cells to a post-thymic NK-like T cell phenotype. This plasticity was confirmed by TCR lineage tracing and was also detected in CD19 CAR T cells analyzed from post-infusion blood from DLBCL patients and in M5CAR T cells infiltrating relapsed tumors derived from a xenograft NSG/AsPC-1 mouse model. The dysfunctional signature and the NK phenotype were further detected in vivo by transcriptomic analysis in Ly95 TCR-specific TILs infiltrating NY-ESO-1 tumors. Among the genes included in the dysfunctional signature, the transcription factors SOX4 and ID3 were identified as potential regulators of dysfunction by differential gene expression and pathway analyses. To determine their role in the establishment of a dysfunctional phenotype, we generated ID3KO.M5 and SOX4KO.M5 CAR T cells using CRISPR technology in primary human lymphocytes. The cytotoxic potential of the M5 CAR T cell product generated was not modified by the genetic disruption of the transcription factors. However, when CAR T cells were challenged with chronic antigen stimulation, KO CAR T cells showed a significant reduction of the dysfunctional signature and the NK-like T cell gene expression. Importantly, CAE KO CAR T cells exhibit improved cytotoxicity as compared to Mock.M5CAR T cells. In summary, we have developed a robust in vitro model that recapitulates the hallmarks of T cell exhaustion and that facilitated the identification of a gene signature defining CAR dysregulation, a T-to-NK-like-T cell transition as a novel feature of CAR T cell dysfunction and the transcription factors SOX4 and ID3 as key regulators of CAR T cell exhaustion. Citation Format: M. Angela Aznar, Charly R. Good, Shunichiro Kuramitsu, Parisa Samareh, Sangya Agarwal, Greg Donahue, Kenichi Ishiyama, Nils Wellhausen, Austin K. Rennels, Yujie Ma, Lifeng Tian, Sonia Guedan, Katherine A. Alexander, Zhen Zhang, Philipp C. Rommel, Nathan Singh, Karl M. Glastad, Max W. Richardson, Keisuke Watanabe, Janos L. Tanyi, Mark H. O’Hara, Marco Ruella, Simon F. Lacey, Edmund K. Moon, Stephen J. Schuster, Steven M. Albelda, Lewis L. Lanier, Regina M. Young, Shelley L. Berger, Carl H. June. Mechanisms of CAR T cell dysfunction and identification of transcription factors that drive the exhaustion phenotype [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3602.

2548 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly used as a prognostic marker with high ctDNA shedding associated with poor survival. Gene-, but not variant-specific, differences in ctDNA shedding have been reported. Tumor burden, mitotic rate, and cell death rate have been proposed as contributors to ctDNA shedding. Here we investigate associations of ctDNA shedding for the two most common mPDAC KRAS variants, G12D and G12V, with tumor burden, mitotic score, and overall survival (OS). Methods: Pretreatment (baseline) ctDNA was analyzed by droplet digital PCR for 86 (including 44 G12D, 30 G12V) patients with mPDAC receiving front-line chemoimmunotherapy in a randomized open-label Phase II study (NCT03214250). Baseline tumor burden in total, within the pancreas, and distally, was assessed by sum of RECIST target lesion diameters. Tumor tissue variant allele fraction (tVAF) and mitotic score (geometric mean expression of 65 mitosis-associated genes) were calculated from DNA and RNA sequencing. Results: ctKRAS shedding (dichotomized at median mutant copies/mL) was associated with OS for G12D bearing tumors (p = 0.03) but not G12V (p = 0.17, log-rank test). To identify variant-specific features of shedding, we examined the Spearman correlation for total tumor burden and ctKRAS shedding; G12D but not G12V shedding was correlated with tumor burden (p = 0.01 and p = 0.22 respectively). However, the higher tVAF in G12V compared to G12D tumors (p = 0.048, Mann-Whitney test) could result from differences in purity, ploidy, and KRAS copy number. Thus, we used tVAF as a scalar to calculate an adjusted tumor burden which was significantly correlated with both G12D and G12V ctDNA shedding (p = 0.004 and 0.02, respectively). When a patient’s distal vs. pancreatic lesions were analyzed separately, pancreatic tumor burden was not correlated with G12D or G12V shedding (p = 0.10 and 0.33, respectively) but distal burden was correlated with both (p = 0.001 and 0.02, respectively). While there was no difference by KRAS variant for the correlation between adjusted tumor burden and shedding, these results do suggest that, in patients with mPDAC, distal rather than primary tumor burden may drive ctDNA shedding. Finally, tumor mitotic rate was combined with adjusted total tumor burden in a linear regression model; both were significant for predicting G12D shedding (p = 0.007 and p < 0.0001, respectively) but not for G12V (p = 0.045 and p = 0.16, respectively). Conclusions: These data suggest that ctDNA shedding and survival associations may be KRAS variant-specific in mPDAC. Tumor mitotic score and location of tumors may explain some variant-specific differences in shedding. As clinical ctDNA tests become more widely used, further investigation of variant-specific shedding in KRAS and other genes may be key for proper interpretation of ctDNA tests.

4131 Background: We recently reported the results of a single arm phase II study of maintenance rucaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive advanced pancreatic cancer and a pathogenic variant in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 (NCT 03140670; Reiss, JCO 2021). However, optimal treatment following progression on PARP inhibitors (PARPi) has not been defined. Here, we report a descriptive study of post-progression treatment and outcomes of this patient population. Methods: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and germline or somatic BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2mutations treated with at least 16 weeks of platinum-based chemotherapy without progression were enrolled and treated with rucaparib until progression or unacceptable toxicity. At the time of progression, patients were treated with physician-choice chemotherapy. Here we evaluate the objective response rates (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Overall survival (OS) and time to second progression (PFS2) calculated from trial enrollment and progression free survival on chemotherapy (PFS) by regimen were secondary endpoints. Time-to-event was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and censored at date of last clinic visit, with a cutoff date of 12/10/21. Results: The trial enrolled 42 patients; 31 patients had progressed. Of these, 22 received second-line chemotherapy: nine were treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen, nine were treated with a cisplatin-based regimen, and four were treated with non-platinum regimens. Demographics were balanced between those who received platinum versus non-platinum. All patients who received second-line chemotherapy regimens met the PFS2 endpoint and all but one patient had died at time of data cutoff. No patients had a complete response, five patients had a partial response (PR). By regimen, 1/9 patients treated with cisplatin had a PR, 3/9 treated with oxaliplatin had a PR, and 1/4 patients treated with non-platinum had a PR. OS, PFS2, PFS, and ORR results by regimen are shown in the table. Conclusions: In this small sample of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer with progressive disease on PARPi, chemotherapy retains some activity. Further study to identify predictors of response and/or resistance to post-PARPi treatment are underway. [Table: see text]

4021 Background: Establishing alternatives to perpetual chemotherapy for pts with aPDAC has been proposed to address inevitable chemotherapy resistance and cumulative toxicity. Poly (ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown clinical efficacy in this setting, and preclinical data suggest that the addition of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) may offer synergistic tumor control. We performed a randomized, phase Ib/II study of nira plus anti-PD-1 (nivo) or nira plus anti-CTLA-4 (ipi) maintenance for pts with aPDAC who had not progressed after >4 mo of platinum-based therapy. Methods: After discontinuation of chemotherapy, pts were randomized 1:1 to nira 200mg PO daily plus either nivo 240mg IV q2 weeks (later amended to 480mg IV q4 weeks) or ipi 3mg/kg IV q3 weeks for four doses. Nira could be escalated to 300mg PO daily if tolerated. Pts were treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression free survival at six months (PFS6) in each arm. Secondary endpoints included safety, OS, ORR, and outcomes by DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiencies. Pts were evaluable for safety if they had received > 1 dose of study treatment and for efficacy if they had also received > 1 follow-up imaging study. Based on historical data, the null hypothesis of PFS6 = 44% vs a 2-sided alternative hypothesis of PFS ≠ 44% was tested. 42 pts per arm provided 81% power for testing at a 5% significance level to detect inferior PFS6 < 27% or superior PFS6 > 61%. Results: As of Oct 2021, 91 pts were enrolled, of whom 84 were evaluable for efficacy (44 nira/nivo; 40 nira/ipi). The median potential follow-up was 23 mos. Most common treatment-related AEs were nira/nivo: thrombocytopenia (28%), arthralgia (25%), nausea (23%), and fatigue (23%) and nira/ipi: thrombocytopenia (45%), anemia (43%), fatigue (43%), nausea, (41%), AST increase (36%), rash (34%) and ALT increase (29%). 88% of AEs were grade 1-2. Efficacy results were: nira/nivo: PFS6 20.6% (95% CI 8.3-32.9, p = 0.0002), mPFS 1.9 mo and nira/ipi: PFS6 59.6% (95% CI 44.3-74.9, p = 0.045), mPFS 8.1 mo. Fifteen pts (8 nira/nivo; 7 nira/ipi) had pathogenic variants in BRCA or PALB2 . Excluding these: mPFS on nira/nivo was 1.9 mo (95% CI 1.8-1.9) and mPFS on nira/ipi was 7.6 mo (95% CI 4.0 – 11.1). Conclusions: In a randomized phase 1B/II study, nira/ipi as maintenance therapy met the primary endpoint of superior PFS6 while nira/nivo yielded inferior PFS6 for pts with aPDAC who had not progressed on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The benefit of nira/ipi maintenance persisted in pts without known DDR variants. Clinical trial information: NCT03404960. [Table: see text]

4010 Background: Preclinical and small clinical studies of chemoimmunotherapy for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) point to a yet unrealized potential of clinically significant immune activation. In our phase II study of the CD40 agonist antibody sotigalimab (sotiga) and/or nivolumab (nivo) with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (chemo), we observed promising improvements in overall survival (OS) in 105 patients with newly diagnosed mPDAC (NCT03214250); the primary endpoint of 1-year OS rate was 57.7% (p = 0.006) in the nivo/chemo arm, 48.1% (p = 0.062) in the sotiga/chemo arm and 41.3% (p = 0.233) in the nivo/sotiga/chemo arm (O’Hara, ASCO 2021) as compared to a historical control of 35%. Here, we report results of multi-omic translational analyses designed to identify signatures predictive of OS benefit. Methods: Longitudinal blood and tumor tissue samples were collected for immune and tumor biomarker analysis. Tumor samples underwent RNA sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF). Peripheral blood was analyzed by mass cytometry time of flight (CyTOF), high parameter flow cytometry, and proteomics. Machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied to the data to identify biosignatures related to OS in each arm. Results: Comprehensive multi-omic, multi-parameter immune and tumor biomarker analyses identified distinct pretreatment immune signatures predictive of longer OS specific to nivo/chemo or sotiga/chemo (Table, representative examples). Because patients in each arm received chemotherapy, these and other arm-unique biomarkers suggest a relationship to the immunotherapy rather than chemotherapy in this randomized study. There was evidence of immune exhaustion in the sotiga/nivo/chemo arm that may explain the lack of survival benefit. Conclusions: From in-depth translational and ML analyses of randomized phase II trial of first-line chemoimmunotherapy in mPDAC patients, we identified novel biomarkers that associated with OS distinctly in each arm. Clinical trials in first-line mPDAC exploiting these previously unappreciated biomarkers and aiming to enrich patients for response, are warranted to further advance chemoimmunotherapy in this disease. Clinical trial information: NCT03214250. [Table: see text]