Search

IntroductionThe interaction between blood and dialysis membrane increases the risk of clot formation. Membrane properties can interfere with coagulation activation during dialysis. Heparin is usually used to ensure anticoagulation, which can be monitored by the Activated Clotting Time (ACT) test. The purpose of this study was to compare the ACT of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing hemodialysis with high-flux (HF) and medium cut-off (MCO) membranes.MethodsThis is a prospective, randomized, crossover study in which 32 CKD patients were dialyzed for 12 weeks with each membrane. Blood clotting measured by ACT was evaluated at the beginning, 2nd, and 4th hour of the dialysis session. Throughout the study, there were no changes in the dose or administration method of heparin.ResultsPatients mainly were middle-aged, non-black males on hemodialysis for eight years. Before randomization, ACT values were 132 ± 56, 195 ± 60, and 128 ± 32 seconds at pre-heparinization, 2nd and 4th hour, respectively. After 12 weeks, ACT values in HF and MCO groups were 129 ± 17, 205 ± 65 and 139 ± 38 seconds, and 143 ± 54, 219 ± 68 and 142 ± 45 seconds, respectively. An ANOVA model adjusted and unadjusted for repeated measures showed a significant time but no treatment or interaction effects. In an additional paired-sample analysis, no difference between ACT values of HF and MCO Groups was observed.Discussion and ConclusionThere was no difference regarding the ACT test during dialysis therapy using HF or MCO membranes. This data suggests that no adjustment in the dose or administration method of heparin is necessary with the use of MCO dialysis membranes.

BackgroundAnemia is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with outcomes. In addition, serum soluble Fas (sFas) levels are related to anemia and erythropoietin (EPO) resistance.ObjectivesFirstly, to compare clinical data and serum levels of sFas, EPO, and pro-inflammatory markers between patients with non-dialytic CKD (NDD-CKD) and healthy subjects. Subsequently, to compare and evaluate the relationship of serum EPO, sFas levels with anemia, and outcomes in patients with NDD-CKD over a long follow-up period.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study in 58 NDD-CKD patients compared with 20 healthy subjects on complete blood count, kidney function, serum EPO, sFas, and inflammatory markers (CRP, IL- 6, and IFN-γ) at baseline. We then compared the same baseline data between patients with NDD-CKD who evolved to anemia and those who did not have anemia over the follow-up. We also evaluated the frequency of outcomes in patients with CKD with higher sFas levels. Finally, we performed a multivariate analysis of factors associated with CKD anemia.ResultsThere were lower eGFR and Hb but higher serum inflammatory markers, sFas levels, sFas/eGFR, and EPO/Hb ratios in patients with NDD-CKD. Comparatively, on the other hand, NDD-CKD patients with anemia had lower eGFR but were older, had more diabetes, and had higher sFas/ eGFR, EPO/Hb ratios, and serum levels of IL-6 and sFas than NDD-CKD without anemia for an extended period. In addition, there was an association in a multivariate analysis of diabetes, age, and sFas levels with kidney anemia. Furthermore, there were higher frequencies of outcomes in increased serum sFas levels.ConclusionAs an elective risk factor, serum sFas levels, in addition to age and diabetes, were independently associated with kidney anemia for an extended period. Thus, more studies are necessary to analyze the proper relationship of sFas with kidney anemia and its outcomes and therapy in CKD.