Search

Objective: Real-world data for patients with endometrial cancer (EC) are limited, particularly in Latin America. We present treatment pattern findings from ECHOS-A - Endometrial Cancer Health Outcomes Study in Argentina., Materials and Methods: A retrospective study using clinical data from privately insured patients with EC diagnosed from 2010 to 2019. Index (diagnosis proxy) was first date of an EC-related health term or treatment. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and FIGO staging were described. Disease progression and survival were assessed until study end, loss to follow-up, or death., Results: Of 805 patients with EC, 77.4 % (n = 623/805) received any treatment and 22.6 % (n = 182/805) received none. Among those treated, 31.8 % (n = 198/623) had first-line (1L) systemic therapy, and 45.5 % (n = 90/198) proceeded to second-line (2L) therapy. Mean follow-up was 33.6 (SD 31.8) months. Of those receiving any treatment, 87.3 % (n = 544/623) had FIGO stage data (I, 62.9 %; II, 18.6 %; III, 13.6 %; IV, 5.0 %). Treatment by class in 1L and 2L, respectively, were platinum chemotherapy, 73.7 %, 36.7 %; non-platinum chemotherapy, 73.7 %, 62.2 %; immunotherapy, 1.0 %, 11.1 %; hormone therapy, 17.7 %, 26.7 %. Carboplatin/paclitaxel was the most frequent 1L (52.5 %) and 2L (14.4 %) regimen. Mean time to progression was 14.1 (SD 16.3) and 8.8 (SD 8.3) months in 1L and 2L, respectively. Adjusted 1- to 5-year risk of progression/death was 46.5-77.5 % and 65.0-86.2 % in 1L and 2L, respectively., Conclusions: Approximately one-quarter of patients with EC received no treatment, and approximately two-thirds were not treated with 1L systemic therapy. Efforts to better understand the reasons for these treatment patterns are crucial for improving patient outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: CS, PM, MC, and LJ are employees of and hold financial equities in GSK. GA, JQ, and TLNS are complementary employees of and do not hold financial equities in GSK. MCR reports receiving speaker fees and/or congress attendance support from AstraZeneca, GSK, and Roche. PS, NES, VAS, DO, and FC have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Aim: To evaluate real-world data on treatment patterns in Argentina and Brazil in patients with ovarian cancer. Methods: This study evaluated de-identified antineoplastic exposure data from a private healthcare provider in Argentina and health claims database (Orizon) in Brazil from 2010 to 2019 and 2015 to 2020, respectively. Results: Platinum-based chemotherapy was the most common first-line therapy (Argentina: n =311 [87.6%]; Brazil: n = 1142 [79.3%]). The proportion of patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy declined across both populations from first- to second-line, while use of non-platinum-based, targeted, and hormone therapies increased. Duration of platinum-based treatment and time to next treatment decreased from first- to fourth-line. Conclusion: There is an unmet need for effective therapies that can prolong time to next treatment in ovarian cancer in Argentina and Brazil.