Search

Background Aortic valve disease is the most prevalent valvular abnormality in the developed world and carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is favoured over open-heart surgery in high-risk patient categories and is increasingly used in lower-risk groups. End stage kidney disease (ESKD) is associated with premature calcific degeneration of bioprosthetic heart valves. Redo-TAVR requires meticulous pre-procedural planning to avoid the important risks of sinus sequestration and impaired coronary access. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Acurate Neo transcatheter heart valve (THV) has been clinically available for a short time only and there are limited reports describing redo-TAVR in the Acurate Neo. Case summary We present a case of early, rapid onset, structural valve degeneration in a Acurate Neo, supra-annular, self-expanding THV in a dialysis patient. The patient presented with chest pain and breathlessness 4 years after TAVR with a Acurate Neo for severe stenosis of a bicuspid aortic valve. Echocardiogram now showed severe stenosis of the THV and computed tomography revealed severe THV leaflet calcification but no pannus or leaflet thrombus. After careful pre-procedural planning a S3 Ultra balloon-expandable valve was selected and positioned relatively high to pin the first THV leaflets in a fully open position without compromising coronary artery flow or coronary access. Discussion End stage kidney disease may cause rapid, calcific degeneration of TAVR valves leading to presentation with severe aortic stenosis. Redo-TAVR in the Acurate Neo THV with a Sapien 3 Ultra is feasible with careful pre-procedural planning to mitigate the risks of sinus sequestration and impaired coronary access. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: For patients with severe aortic stenosis, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a less invasive but equally effective treatment option compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). In 2019, we reported low rates of TAVI in the UK compared with other countries in western Europe and highlighted profound geographical variation in TAVI care. Here, we provide contemporary data on access to aortic valve replacement by either TAVI or SAVR across clinical commissioning groups in England., Methods: We obtained aggregated data from the UK TAVI registry and the National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit between 2019 and 2023. Rates of TAVI and SAVR procedures per million population were reported by clinical commissioning groups. The relationship between TAVI and SAVR rates was determined using Pearson correlation coefficients., Results: In 2022/23, the rates of TAVI and SAVR in England were 136 per million population and 60 per million population, respectively. The observed increase in TAVI rates since 2019/20 corresponded with a decline in SAVR rates. There remains substantial variation in access to both procedures, with an over tenfold variation in TAVI rates, and an over fourfold variation in SAVR rates across clinical commissioning groups in England. No relationship was identified between the rates of TAVI and those for SAVR (correlation coefficient 0.06)., Conclusion: Geographical heterogeneity in access to TAVI persists over time, with the low rates of TAVI in many areas not compensated for by higher rates of SAVR, indicating an overall inequality in the treatment of severe aortic stenosis., Competing Interests: Disclosure: SA has received an educational grant from the European Society of Cardiology. NA has received speaker fees from Abbott and Medtronic. NC has received grants from Boston Scientific, Beckman Coulter, Heartflow and Haemonetics, consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, speaker fees from HeartFlow and Abbott Vascular, educational meeting support from Abbott and Edwards and is on the Interventional Cardiology editorial board; this did not influence peer review. ATG is the Clinical Lead of the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit and a member of the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgeons. DHS is the president of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society and a proctor/advisory to Medtronic, Abbott, Boston and Edwards. RKK has received institutional grants for trials from Boston Scientific, speaker fees from Boston and Medtronic and is on the advisory board for Boston Scientific and Medtronic. DJB has received institutional research grants from Medtronic and consulting fees from Abbott Vascular and Medtronic and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Medtronic. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Data availability: These data are available as part of the series of annual reports of the National Cardiac Audit Program produced by NICOR. Authors’ contributions: Conceptualisation: DJB, DHS, PFL, RKK, ATG; data curation: SA, PDJ; formal analysis: PDJ, SM, SP; investigation: DJB, SA, NA; methodology: DJB, SA, NA; resources: PFL, RKK; software: PDJ, SM, SP; supervision: DJB; validation: DJB, DHS, PFL, RKK, ATG; writing – original draft preparation: SA, NA; writing – review & editing: DB, SA, NA, PL, NC, AG, DHS, RK, PJ, SM, SP. Ethics: This is an observational study. The NICOR Research Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required. Consent: All National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR) audits and registries have approval under Section 251 of the NHS Act 2006 to use patient data, without obtaining patient consent., (Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Radcliffe Group Ltd.)

Background: Isoprenaline is widely used in the treatment of symptomatic bradycardia. Myocardial infarction precipitated by the therapeutic use of isoprenaline has not been reported in the literature., Case Summary: We describe the case of a 67-year-old male patient who presented to our institution with symptomatic Mobitz type II 2:1 atrioventricular block. He had a several-month history of unexplained syncope. He had several cardiovascular risk factors but did not have a diagnosis of coronary artery disease. On admission, he was symptomatic with dizziness but had no chest pain. High-sensitivity troponin I was normal. After initiation of an isoprenaline infusion, he developed cardiac-sounding chest pain and an ischaemic electrocardiogram. Emergency coronary angiography was performed that demonstrated a severe mid-vessel stenosis in his right coronary artery that was treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and the deployment of one drug-eluting stent. He remained in Mobitz type II 2:1 atrioventricular block 48 hours after the procedure, and a dual-chamber permanent pacemaker was implanted. He was discharged in a stable condition with no further chest pain or bradyarrhythmia., Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of myocardial infarction precipitated by the therapeutic use of isoprenaline. Our hypothesis is that isoprenaline increased myocardial oxygen demand and induced a type 2 myocardial infarction in this patient with occult coronary artery disease. Isoprenaline should be used with caution in patients with confirmed or suspected coronary artery disease., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)