Search

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation treatment. First-pass pulmonary vein isolation is defined as isolation achieved with only a single lesion in every part of the isolation lines., Aims: The primary aim was to assess the frequency of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation after ablation index-guided (AI) and very-high-power, short-duration (vHPSD) ablation. The secondary goals were to detect areas of additional lesions and the correlation between them and used methods and to access efficiency of the procedure., Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, we included 105 consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Based on the operators' decisions, 51 patients underwent AI-guided, and 54 patients underwent vHPSD ablation. The ipsilateral pulmonary veins were divided into four areas, and the anatomical region and several additional applications were evaluated., Results: Bilateral first-pass pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 34.3% of patients, with no significant difference between AI-guided and vHPSD ablation (37.0% vs. 31.4%; P = 0.68). In both groups, the most common region of additional applications was the posterior part of the right-sided carina (AI: 25.5% [13/51] vs. vHPSD: 25.9% [14/54]; P = 0.89). There was a significant difference (P = 0.049) between techniques in the highest frequency of additional applications in the left-sided pulmonary veins: in the anterior part of the carina (AI: 15.7% vs. vHPSD: 7.4%) and the posterior part of the carina (AI: 5.9% vs. vHSPD: 22.2%)., Conclusions: Lesions made with AI-guided and vHPSD protocols differed in areas of additional applications, which was most significant in the left-sided pulmonary veins.

Aims: Reduction of atrial fibrillation (AF) burden is the preferred outcome measure over categorical AF rhythm recurrence after AF ablation. In this sub-analysis of the TeleCheck-AF project, we tested the feasibility of smartphone app-based approximation of time spent with AF and/or symptoms., Methods and Results: Patients scheduled for at least one teleconsultation during the 12-month follow-up after AF ablation were instructed to use a smartphone photoplethysmography-based application for simultaneous symptom and rhythm monitoring three times daily for 1 week. Proxies of time spent with AF and/or symptoms (% recordings, load, and % days), temporal aggregation of AF and/or symptoms (density), and symptom-rhythm correlation (SRC) were assessed. In total, 484 patients (60% male, 62 ± 9.9 years) were included. Adherence, motivation, and patient satisfaction were high. %AF recordings, AF load, and %AF days (rs = 0.88-0.95) and %symptom recordings, symptom load, and %symptom days (rs = 0.95-0.98) showed positive correlations. The SRC correlated negatively with time spent with symptoms (rs = -0.65-0.90) and with time spent with AF (rs = -0.31-0.34). In patients with paroxysmal AF before ablation and AF during the monitoring period, 87% (n = 39/44) had a low-density score <50% ('paroxysmal AF pattern') while 5% (n = 2/44) had a high-density score >90% ('persistent AF pattern'). Corresponding numbers for patients with persistent AF before ablation were 48% (n = 11/23) and 43% (n = 10/23), respectively., Conclusion: On-demand, app-based simultaneous rhythm and symptom assessment provides objective proxies of time spent with AF and/or symptoms and SRC, which may assist in assessing AF and symptom outcomes after AF ablation., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: E.S., A.N.L.H., M.G., K.B., A.So., C.H.F., R.M.J.v.d.V., D.V., D.Sc., A.Su., D.St., R.P., M.H., P.L., D.G., H.G., N.A.H.A.P., J.M.H., M.N., M.M., and D.L. declared no conflict of interests. D.D. received modest lecture honorary, travel grants, and/or a fellowship grant from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CVRx, Medtronic, Microport, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Zoll. H.A.K.H. received modest lecture honorary and/or a fellowship grant from AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, and Zoll., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Introduction: Electronic health records (EHR) are of great value for clinical research. However, EHR consists primarily of unstructured text which must be analysed by a human and coded into a database before data analysis- a time-consuming and costly process limiting research efficiency. Natural language processing (NLP) can facilitate data retrieval from unstructured text. During AssistMED project, we developed a practical, NLP tool that automatically provides comprehensive clinical characteristics of patients from EHR, that is tailored to clinical researchers needs., Material and Methods: AssistMED retrieves patient characteristics regarding clinical conditions, medications with dosage, and echocardiographic parameters with clinically oriented data structure and provides researcher-friendly database output. We validate the algorithm performance against manual data retrieval and provide critical quantitative and qualitative analysis., Results: AssistMED analysed the presence of 56 clinical conditions, medications from 16 drug groups with dosage and 15 numeric echocardiographic parameters in a sample of 400 patients hospitalized in the cardiology unit. No statistically significant differences between algorithm and human retrieval were noted. Qualitative analysis revealed that disagreements with manual annotation were primarily accounted to random algorithm errors, erroneous human annotation and lack of advanced context awareness of our tool., Conclusions: Current NLP approaches are feasible to acquire accurate and detailed patient characteristics tailored to clinical researchers' needs from EHR. We present an in-depth description of an algorithm development and validation process, discuss obstacles and pinpoint potential solutions, including opportunities arising with recent advancements in the field of NLP, such as large language models., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is at the forefront of rhythm control strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A very-high-power, short-duration (vHPSD) catheter, QDot MicroTM (Biosense Webster) was designed to improve the effectiveness of AF ablation within a shorter procedure time. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of PVI ablation between this vHPSD ablation mode and conventional ablation-index-guided ablation (ThermoCool Smarttouch SF catheter)., Methods: This single-center, retrospective, observational study enrolled 108 patients with AF, referred for catheter ablation between December 16, 2019 and December 3, 2021. In 54 procedures (mean age: 58.0 ± 12.3; 66.67% male), a QDot MicroTM catheter was used (vHPSD-group), and 54 patients (mean age: 57.2 ± 11.8; 70.37% male) were treated with a ThermoCool SmarttouchTM SF catheter (AI-group). The primary endpoint was freedom from AF 3 months after ablation., Results: Atrial fibrillation was found to recur in 14.81% of patients in the vHPSD-group and in 31.48% of patients in the AI-group (p = 0.07). There was no difference in treatment-emergent adverse events between the two groups (6.3% vs. 0%; p = 0.10). One severe adverse event (a cerebral vascular accident) was observed in the vHPSD-group. The mean dose of remifentanil was reported to be lower during QDot MicroTM catheter-based PVI (p < 0.01). The vHPSD-based PVI was associated with shorter radiofrequency application time (p < 0.001), fluoroscopy time (p < 0.0001), and total procedure time (p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: This study suggests vHPSD ablation is safe, can reduce the dosage of analgesics during significantly shorter procedures and may enhance the success rate of catheter-based PVI.

Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) coexisting with atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of hemorrhage and ischemia. The study aimed to determine the relationship between different CKD stages and clinical outcomes of patients suffering from both CKD and AF and to determine the predictors of outcome. Methods The data was derived from multicenter CRAFT trial (NCT02987062). We have conducted a retrospective analysis of hospital records of 2663 AF patients divided in three groups according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) which was <30ml/min/1,73 m2 for group I (n=63), ≥30 and <60 ml/min/1,73 m 2 for group II (n=947) and ≥60 ml/min/1,73 m 2 for group III (n=1653). The primary study endpoint was major adverse event (MAE) during the mean four-year follow-up. Results The highest rate of MAE was observed in group I followed by group II and III. The rate of all-cause death was 60% in group I, 32% in group II and 15% in group III (p<0.001). Bleeding complications occurred in 25% of patients from group I, 23% from group II and 21% from group III (p=0.14). Thromboembolic events occurred in those groups at the rate of 21%, 14% and 12% respectively (p=0.011). The risk of death was 5 times higher in patients with eGFR<30 treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (HR: 5.016, 95% CI: 1.533-16.417; p=0.007). Conclusions AF patients with CKD are at higher risk of MAE and that risk depends on the CKD stage. VKA treatment was linked to a higher mortality in AF patients with the lowest eGFR values., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Aims: The aim of this TeleCheck-AF sub-analysis was to evaluate motivation and adherence to on-demand heart rate/rhythm monitoring app in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)., Methods and Results: Patients were instructed to perform 60 s app-based heart rate/rhythm recordings 3 times daily and in case of symptoms for 7 consecutive days prior to teleconsultation. Motivation was defined as number of days in which the expected number of measurements (≥3/day) were performed per number of days over the entire prescription period. Adherence was defined as number of performed measurements per number of expected measurements over the entire prescription period.Data from 990 consecutive patients with diagnosed AF [median age 64 (57-71) years, 39% female] from 10 centres were analyzed. Patients with both optimal motivation (100%) and adherence (≥100%) constituted 28% of the study population and had a lower percentage of recordings in sinus rhythm [90 (53-100%) vs. 100 (64-100%), P < 0.001] compared with others. Older age and absence of diabetes were predictors of both optimal motivation and adherence [odds ratio (OR) 1.02, 95% coincidence interval (95% CI): 1.01-1.04, P < 0.001 and OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28-0.86, P = 0.013, respectively]. Patients with 100% motivation also had ≥100% adherence. Independent predictors for optimal adherence alone were older age (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04, P = 0.014), female sex (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.29-2.23, P < 0.001), previous AF ablation (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03-1.07, P = 0.028)., Conclusion: In the TeleCheck-AF project, more than one-fourth of patients had optimal motivation and adherence to app-based heart rate/rhythm monitoring. Older age and absence of diabetes were predictors of optimal motivation/adherence., Competing Interests: Conflict of interests: M.G., A.N.L.H., R.M.J.v.d.V., K.B., D.V.M.V., H.A.K.Hi., D.Sc., J.M., A.Su., D.St., E.T., R.P., M.H., L.V., P.L., B.K., L.P., H.G., L.D., H.He., T.d.P., N.A.H.A.P., A.So., D.L., J.M.H. declared no conflicts of interest. D.G. received PI for institutional research grants from Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. N.K. has received research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (P400PM-194477), Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner-Stiftung, and the European Society of Cardiology. S.E. was employed by Qompium NV. K.V. is a consultant for Medronic, Abbott, Biosense Webster, Philips. M.M. has received speaker honoraria and/or travel grants from Biosense Webster, Abbott, Biotronik, Zoll, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Pfizer, Amomed, as well as research grants from Biosense Webster. D.D. received lecture honorary, travel grants and/or a fellowship grant from Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Medtronic, Microport, Pfizer, Zoll. E.S. has received institutional lecture/consulting fees from lecture fees from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer, Boehringer- Ingelheim, Johnson & Johnson, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Sanofi., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: This study aimed to determine the impact of heart failure (HF) on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)., Methods and Results: We analysed data from Polish participants of the EURObservational Research Programme-AF General Long-Term Registry. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, and the secondary endpoints included hospital readmissions, cardiovascular (CV) interventions, thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events, rhythm control interventions, and other CV or non-CV diseases development during one-year follow up. Overall, 688 patients with available data on HF were included into analysis; 51% (n = 351) had HF; of these 48% (n = 168) had reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 22% (n = 77) mid-range EF (HFmrEF), and 30% (n = 106) preserved EF (HFpEF). Compared with patients without HF, those with HF had higher mortality rate (aHR 5.61; 95% CI 1.94-16.22, P < 0.01). Patients with HF (vs. without HF) had more often CV interventions (10% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.046) and events (14% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.02), and had less often atrial arrhythmia-related hospital admissions (6.8% vs. 15%, P < 0.01). Over follow-up, patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF had similar mortality rate versus HFrEF (aHR 0.45, 95% CI 0.13-1.57, P = 0.45 for HFmrEF and aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.20-1.48, P = 0.54 for HFpEF). Mortality rate was similar among rhythm versus rate control group (aHR 0.34; 95% CI 0.10-1.16; P = 0.34)., Conclusions: AF patients with HF have greater mortality rate and more CV interventions/events. No statistically significant difference in long-term outcomes between patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF highlights the need to develop therapeutic strategies targeting functional status and survival for patients with HF and AF., (© 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia. To date, a lot of research has been conducted to investigate the underlying mechanisms of this disease at both molecular and cellular levels. There is increasing evidence suggesting that autoimmunity is an important factor in the initiation and perpetuation of AF. Autoantibodies are thought to play a pivotal role in the regulation of heart rhythm and the conduction system and, therefore, are associated with AF development. In this review, we have summarized current knowledge concerning the role of autoantibodies in AF development as well as their prognostic and predictive value in this disease. The establishment of the autoantibody profile of separate AF patient groups may appear to be crucial in terms of developing novel treatment approaches for those patients; however, the exact role of various autoantibodies in AF is still a matter of ongoing debate.

(1) Background: Administrative data allows for time- and cost-efficient acquisition of large volumes of individual patient data invaluable for evaluation of the prevalence of diseases and clinical outcomes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of data collected from the Polish National Health Fund (NHF), from a researcher's perspective, in regard to a cohort of atrial fibrillation patients. (2) Methods: NHF data regarding atrial fibrillation and common cardiovascular comorbidities was compared with the data collected manually from the individual patients' health records (IHR) collected in the retrospective CRAFT registry (NCT02987062). (3) Results: Data from the NHF underestimated the proportion of patients with AF (NHF = 83% vs. IHR = 100%) while overestimating the proportion of patients with other cardiovascular comorbidities in the cohort. Significantly higher CHA2DS2VASc (Median, [Q1-Q3]) (NHF: 1, [0-2]; vs. IHR: 1, [0-1]; p < 0.001) and HAS-BLED (Median, [Q1-Q3]) (NHF: 4, [2-6] vs. IHR: 3, [2-5]; p < 0.001) scores were calculated according to NHF in comparison to IHR data, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Clinical researchers should be aware that significant differences between IHR and billing data in cardiovascular research can be observed which should be acknowledged while drawing conclusions from administrative data-based cohorts. Natural Language Processing of IHR could further increase administrative data quality in the future.

Extracellular vesicles are particles released from cells and delimited by a lipid bilayer. They have been widely studied, including extensive investigation in cardiovascular diseases. Many scientists have explored their role in atrial fibrillation. Patients suffering from atrial fibrillation have been evidenced to present altered levels of these particles as well as changed amounts of their contents such as micro-ribonucleic acids (miRs). Although many observations have been made so far, a large randomized clinical trial is needed to assess the previous findings. This review aims to thoroughly summarize current research regarding extracellular vesicles in atrial fibrillation.

Background: Increased resting heart rate (RHR) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common observation, possibly resulting from ganglionated plexus modification during ablation. Previous trials have suggested that an increase in RHR after ablation might be related to higher efficacy of the procedure. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not higher increase in RHR after radiofrequency (RF) PVI might predict better long-term outcome of the procedure in a real-life cohort of patients in whom index ablation for paroxysmal AF was performed. Material and methods: The health records of patients who underwent index point-by-point or drag lesion RF PVI for paroxysmal AF in our department between January 2014 and November 2018 were analyzed. Resting heart rate (RHR) was determined from 12-lead ECG recorded prior to the ablation and before discharge to evaluate changes in RHR after PVI. Only patients in sinus rhythm before the procedure and at discharge were included in the analysis. Telephone follow-up was collected for evaluation of arrhythmia recurrence status. Results: A total of 146 patients who underwent PVI for paroxysmal AF were included. Mean follow-up time was 3.5 years. RHR increased from 64 [58.5−70], prior to procedure, to 72 [64.25−80] bpm at discharge (p < 0.001). Higher increase in RHR was not protective from arrhythmia recurrence in long-term observation in both univariable HR = 1.001 (CI 0.99−1.017, p = 0.857) and multivariable analyses HR = 1.001 (CI 0.99−1.02, p = 0.84). Conclusions: RHR after PVI increased in comparison to baseline in our cohort. However, we did not observe higher increase in RHR to be associated with more favorable long-term effectiveness of the procedure.