Search

Aims: This investigation aims to elucidate the treatment status of advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients in Hunan Province of Central Southern China from November 2021 to December 2022. Methods: Data from 301 patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer were collected from the breast cancer investigation project in Hunan under the guidance of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncolfogy (CSCO). The data included the clinical characteristics of patients and the status of first-line and second-line rescue treatment. Results: First-line chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for mBC accounted for 40% (121/301) and 60% (180/301) of treatments, respectively. AI (21%), AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (28%), and fulvestrant (24%) or fulvestrant plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (18%) were the most common first-line endocrine therapies. Taxane-based chemotherapy was the most common first-line chemotherapy (59%). Second-line chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for mBC accounted for 43% (72/166) and 57% (94/166) of treatments, respectively. Fulvestrant (23%) or fulvestrant plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (29%) were the most common second-line endocrine therapies. The prevalences of AI and AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor decreased to 19% and 11%, respectively. T (taxane)-based chemotherapy was still the most common chemotherapy regimen (46%). Third-line chemotherapy was more prevalent than endocrine therapy (57% vs. 41%). T (taxane)-based chemotherapy was still the most common chemotherapy regimen (46%). Fulvestrant plus CDK4/6 inhibitor was the most common endocrine therapy (33%). AI, AI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor, and fulvestrant accounted for 21%, 12% and 18% of third-line endocrine therapies, respectively. Conclusions: Compared to chemotherapy, endocrine therapy was a more favorable choice for first-line and second-line treatment for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients in Hunan Province. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We used targeted capture sequencing to analyze TP53‐mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in metastatic breast cancer patients and to determine whether TP53 mutation has predictive value for anti‐human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) treatment for in HER2 amplification‐positive patients (HER2+) and HER2 mutation‐positive, amplification‐negative (HER2−/mut) patients. Patients and Methods: TP53 mutation features were analyzed in the Geneplus cohort (n = 1184). The MSK‐BREAST cohort was used to explore the value of TP53 mutation in predicting anti‐HER‐2 antibody efficacy. Sequencing of ctDNA in phase Ib, phase Ic, phase II clinical trials of pyrotinib (HER2+ patients), and an investigator‐initiated phase II study of pyrotinib (HER2−/mut patients) were performed to analyze the relationships between TP53 mutation and prognosis for HER2 TKIs. The MSK‐BREAST cohort, MutHER, and SUMMIT cohort were used for verification. Results: TP53 mutations were detected in 53.1% (629/1184) of patients in the Geneplus cohort. The TP53 mutation rate was higher in HR‐negative (p < 0.001) and HER2 amplification‐positive (p = 0.015) patients. Among patients receiving anti‐HER2 antibody therapy, those whose tumors carried TP53 mutations had a shorter PFS (p = 0.004). However, the value of TP53 mutation in predicting HER2 TKI response was inconsistent. In HER2+ patients, no difference in PFS was observed among patients with different TP53 statuses in the combined analysis of the pyrotinib phase Ib, phase Ic, and phase II clinical trials (p = 1.00) or in the MSK‐BREAST cohort (p = 0.62). In HER2−/mut patients, TP53 mutation‐positive patients exhibited a trend toward worse prognosis with anti‐HER2 TKI treatment than TP53‐wild‐type patients in our investigator‐initiated phase II study (p = 0.15), and this trend was confirmed in the combined analysis of the MutHER and SUMMIT cohorts (p = 0.01). Conclusions: TP53 mutation can be used to identify biomarkers of anti‐HER2 antibody drug resistance in HER2+ patients and HER2 TKI resistance in HER2−/mut patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The mechanism of acquired gene mutation plays a major role in resistance to endocrine therapy in hormone receptor (HR)-positive advanced breast cancer. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been allowed for the assessment of the genomic profiles of patients with advanced cancer. We performed this study to search for molecular markers of endocrine therapy efficacy and to explore the clinical value of ctDNA to guide precise endocrine therapy for HR-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-negative metastatic breast cancer patients., Methods: In this open-label, multicohort, prospective study, patients were assigned to four parallel cohorts and matched according to mutations identified in ctDNA: 1) activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway preferred mTOR inhibitor combined with endocrine therapy; 2) estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutation preferred fulvestrant; 3) HER-2 mutations preferred pyrotinib; and 4) no actionable mutations received treatment according to the clinical situation. In all cohorts, patients were divided into compliance group and violation group. The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcome measure was overall survival (OS)., Results: In all cohorts, the combined median PFS was 4.9 months, and median PFS for the compliance and violation groups was 6.0 and 3.0 months, respectively [P=0.022, hazard ratio (HR)=0.57]. Multivariate Cox regression model showed the risk of disease progression was lower in compliance group than in violation group (P=0.023, HR=0.55). Among the patients with HER-2 mutations, the median PFS was 11.1 months in the compliance group and 2.2 months in the violation group (P=0.011, HR=0.20). There was no significant difference in the median PFS between patients who did and did not comply with the treatment protocol in patients with activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR or ESR1 mutation., Conclusions: The results suggest that ctDNA may help to guide the optimal endocrine therapy strategy for metastatic breast cancer patients and to achieve a better PFS. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) detection could aid in distinguishing patients with HER-2 mutation and developing new treatment strategies., (© Chinese Journal of Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)