Search

Background: The development of controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) is both important and challenging. The tension between end-of-life care and organ donation raises significant ethical issues for healthcare professionals in the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this prospective, multicenter, observational study is to better understand ICU physicians' and nurses' experiences with cDCD., Methods: In 32 ICUs in France, ICU physicians and nurses were invited to complete a questionnaire after the death of end-of-life ICU patients identified as potential cDCD donors who had either experienced the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies alone or with planned organ donation (OD(-) and OD( +) groups). The primary objective was to assess their anxiety (State Anxiety Inventory STAI Y-A) following the death of a potential cDCD donor. Secondary objectives were to explore potential tensions experienced between end-of-life care and organ donation., Results: Two hundred six ICU healthcare professionals (79 physicians and 127 nurses) were included in the course of 79 potential cDCD donor situations. STAI Y-A did not differ between the OD(-) and OD( +) groups for either physicians or nurses (STAI Y-A were 34 (27-38) in OD(-) vs. 32 (27-40) in OD( +), p = 0.911, for physicians and 32 (25-37) in OD(-) vs. 39 (26-37) in OD( +), p = 0.875, for nurses). The possibility of organ donation was a factor influencing the WLST decision for nurses only, and a factor influencing the WLST implementation for both nurses and physicians. cDCD experience is perceived positively by ICU healthcare professionals overall., Conclusions: cDCD does not increase anxiety in ICU healthcare professionals compared to other situations of WLST. WLST and cDCD procedures could further be improved by supporting professionals in making their intentions clear between end-of-life support and the success of organ donation, and when needed, by enhancing communication between ICU physician and nurses., Trial Registration: This research was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05041023, September 10, 2021)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The situation in France is unique, having a legal framework for continuous and deep sedation (CDS). However, its use in intensive care units (ICU), combined with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, still raises ethical issues, particularly its potential to hasten death. The legalization of assistance in dying, i.e., assisted suicide or euthanasia at the patient's request, is currently under discussion in France. The objectives of this national survey were first, to assess whether ICU professionals perceive CDS administered to ICU patients as a practice that hastens death, in addition to relieving unbearable suffering, and second, to assess ICU professionals' perceptions of assistance in dying., Methods: A national survey with online questionnaires for ICU physicians and nursesaddressed through the French Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine., Results: A total of 956 ICU professionals responded to the survey (38% physicians and 62% nurses). Of these, 22% of physicians and 12% of nurses (p < 0.001) felt that the purpose of CDS was to hasten death. For 20% of physicians, CDS combined with terminal extubation was considered an assistance in dying. For 52% of ICU professionals, the current framework did not sufficiently cover the range of situations that occur in the ICU. A favorable opinion on the potential legalization of assistance in dying was observed in 83% of nurses and 71% of physicians (p < 0.001), with no preference between assisted suicide and euthanasia., Conclusion: Our findings highlight the tension between CDS and assisted suicide/euthanasia in the specific context of intensive care and suggest that ICU professionals would be supportive of a legislative evolution., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: Continuous and deep sedation until death is a much highly debated end-of-life practice. France is unique in having a regulatory framework for it. However, there are no data on its practice in intensive care units (ICUs)., Aim: The aim is to describe continuous and deep sedation in relation to the framework in the specific context of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in ICUs, that is, its decision-making process and its practice compared to other end-of-life practices in this setting., Design and Setting: French multicenter observational study. Consecutive ICU patients who died after a decision to withdraw life-sustaining therapies., Results: A total of 343 patients in 57 ICUs, 208 (60%) with continuous and deep sedation. A formalized procedure for continuous and deep sedation was available in 32% of the ICUs. Continuous and deep sedation was not the result of a collegial decision-making process in 17% of cases, and did not involve consultation with an external physician in 29% of cases. The most commonly used sedative medicines were midazolam (10 [5-18] mg h -1 ) and propofol (200 [120-250] mg h -1 ). The Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) was -5 in 60% of cases. Analgesia was associated with sedation in 94% of cases. Compared with other end-of-life sedative practices ( n  = 98), medicines doses were higher with no difference in the depth of sedation., Conclusions: This study shows a poor compliance with the framework for continuous and deep sedation. It highlights the need to formalize it to improve the decision-making process and the match between the intent, the practice and the actual effect.

Background: Almitrine, a drug enhancing hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, has been proposed as a rescue therapy for refractory hypoxemia in COVID related acute respiratory distress syndrome (C-ARDS). We aimed at investigating the response to almitrine depending on the cause of ARDS (COVID vs. non-COVID)., Methods: Monocenter retrospective study from 2014 to 2021. All patients diagnosed with moderate to severe ARDS and treated with almitrine as rescue therapy for refractory hypoxemia were studied. Factor independently associated with oxygenation response to almitrine infusion were determined., Results: Sixty patients with ARDS and treated with almitrine were analyzed, 36 (60%) due to SARS-CoV-2 infection and 24 (40%) due to other causes. Baseline PaO2/FiO2 was 78 [61-101] mmHg, 76% had at least one prone positioning before the start of almitrine infusion. Median PaO2/FiO2 increased by +38 [7-142] mmHg (+61% [10-151]) after almitrine infusion. PaO2/FiO2 increased by +134 [12-186] mmHg in non-COVID ARDS (NC-ARDS) and by +19 [8-87] mmHg in C-ARDS. The increase in PaO2/FiO2 was lower in C-ARDS than in NC-ARDS (P=0.013). In multivariable analysis, C-ARDS, non-invasive ventilation and concomitant use of norepinephrine were independently associated with a decreased oxygenation response to almitrine infusion., Conclusions: Our study reports a highly variable response to almitrine infusion in ARDS patients with refractory hypoxemia. Independent factors associated with a reduced oxygenation response to almitrine infusion were: COVID ARDS, concomitant use of norepinephrine, and non-invasive ventilatory strategy.

Background and Purpose: Early cerebral infarction (ECI) is an independent factor associated with poor outcome following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). We aimed to test the association between ECI and prior global impairment of cerebral perfusion., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients admitted for aSAH in 2 centers. ECI was defined as any radiological cerebral infarction identified within 3 days from the onset of bleeding and not related to aneurysm repair. Global impairment of cerebral perfusion was defined as clinical or transcranial Doppler signs of brain hypoperfusion together with circulatory failure or intracranial hypertension in keeping with guidelines. The association between ECI and prior occurrence of global impairment of cerebral perfusion was tested using binary logistic regression adjusted for confounders identified in the univariate analysis., Results: Seven hundred fifty-three patients with aSAH were included. ECI was observed in 40 patients (5.3%; 95% CI = 3.7%-6.9%). Prior global impairment of cerebral perfusion occurred in 90% of them (60% in-hospital) versus in 11% of patients without ECI (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.5-3.6, P<0.001), global impairment of cerebral perfusion due to circulatory failure (OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 1.8-11, P = 0.001), or intracranial hypertension (OR = 11.1, 95% CI = 3.8-32.3, P<0.001) was an independent risk factor for ECI., Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that ECI is strongly associated with the prior occurrence of global impairment of cerebral perfusion, independent of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade. These patients may benefit from more intensive and systematic prevention of impaired cerebral perfusion, particularly in poor-grade patients., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

While the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic placed a heavy burden on healthcare systems worldwide, it also induced urgent mobilisation of research teams to develop treatments preventing or curing the disease and its consequences. It has, therefore, challenged critical care research to rapidly focus on specific fields while forcing critical care physicians to make difficult ethical decisions. This narrative review aims to summarise critical care research -from organisation to research fields- in this pandemic setting and to highlight opportunities to improve research efficiency in the future, based on what is learned from COVID-19. This pressure on research revealed, i.e., (i) the need to harmonise regulatory processes between countries, allowing simplified organisation of international research networks to improve their efficiency in answering large-scale questions; (ii) the importance of developing translational research from which therapeutic innovations can emerge; (iii) the need for improved triage and predictive scores to rationalise admission to the intensive care unit. In this context, key areas for future critical care research and better pandemic preparedness are artificial intelligence applied to healthcare, characterisation of long-term symptoms, and ethical considerations. Such collaborative research efforts should involve groups from both high and low-to-middle income countries to propose worldwide solutions. As a conclusion, stress tests on healthcare organisations should be viewed as opportunities to design new research frameworks and strategies. Worldwide availability of research networks ready to operate is essential to be prepared for next pandemics. Importantly, researchers and physicians should prioritise realistic and ethical goals for both clinical care and research., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) is considered by many as a potential response to the scarcity of donor organs. However, healthcare professionals may feel uncomfortable as end-of-life care and organ donation overlap in cDCD, creating a potential barrier to its development. The aim of this qualitative study was to gain insight on the perceptions and experiences of intensive care units (ICU) physicians and nurses regarding cDCD. We used thematic analysis of in-depth semi-structured interviews and 6-month field observation in a large teaching hospital. 17 staff members (8 physicians and 9 nurses) participated in the study. Analysis showed a gap between ethical principles and routine clinical practice, with a delicate balance between end-of-life care and organ donation. This tension arises at three critical moments: during the decision-making process leading to the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments (LST), during the period between the decision to withdraw LST and its actual implementation, and during the dying and death process. Our findings shed light on the strategies developed by healthcare professionals to solve these ethical tensions and to cope with the emotional ambiguities. cDCD implementation in routine practice requires a shared understanding of the tradeoff between end-of-life care and organ donation within ICU., Competing Interests: ML and FR are members of the steering committee of the French cDCD program. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Le Dorze, Martouzet, Cassiani-Ingoni, Roussin, Mebazaa, Morin and Kentish-Barnes.)

Introduction: In 2015, France authorised controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) according to a nationally approved protocol. The aim of this study is to provide an overview from the perspective of critical care specialists of cDCD. The primary objective is to assess how the organ donation procedure affects the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WLST) process. The secondary objective is to assess the impact of cDCD donors' diagnoses on the whole process., Material and Methods: This 2015-2019 prospective observational multicentre study evaluated the WLST process in all potential cDCD donors identified nationwide, comparing 2 different sets of subgroups: 1- those whose WLST began after organ donation was ruled out vs. while it was still under consideration; 2- those with a main diagnosis of post-anoxic brain injury (PABI) vs. primary brain injury (PBI) at the time of the WLST decision., Results: The study analysed 908 potential cDCD donors. Organ donation remained under consideration at WLST initiation for 54.5% of them with longer intervals between their WLST decision and its initiation (2 [1-4] vs. 1 [1-2] days, P < 0.01). Overall, 60% had post-anoxic brain injury. Time from ICU admission to WLST decision was longer for primary brain injury donors (10 [4-21] vs. 6 [4-9] days, P < 0.01). Median time to death (agonal phase) was 15 [15-20] min., Conclusions: French cDCD donors are mostly related to post-anoxic brain injury. The organ donation process does not accelerate WLST decision but increases the interval between the WLST decision and its initiation., (Copyright © 2022 Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)