Search

N-acetylaspartate (NAA) is a neuronal metabolite that can be extruded in extracellular fluids and whose blood concentration increases in several neurodegenerative disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Aspartoacylase (ASPA) is the enzyme responsible for NAA breakdown. It is abundantly expressed in skeletal muscle and most other human tissues, but the role of NAA catabolism in the periphery is largely neglected. Here we demonstrate that NAA treatment of differentiated C2C12 muscle cells increases lipid turnover, mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative metabolism at the expense of glycolysis. These effects were ascribed to NAA catabolism, as CRISPR/Cas9 ASPA KO cells are insensitive to NAA administration. Moreover, the metabolic switch induced by NAA was associated with an augmented resistance to atrophic stimuli. Consistently with in vitro results, SOD1-G93A ALS mice show an increase in ASPA levels in those muscles undergoing the glycolytic to oxidative switch during the disease course. The impact of NAA on the metabolism and resistance capability of myotubes supports a role for this metabolite in the phenotypical adaptations of skeletal muscle in neuromuscular disorders., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Microbial specialized metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (SMBGCs) are a formidable source of natural products of pharmaceutical interest. With the multiplication of genomic data available, very efficient bioinformatic tools for automatic SMBGC detection have been developed. Nevertheless, most of these tools identify SMBGCs based on sequence similarity with enzymes typically involved in specialised metabolism and thus may miss SMBGCs coding for undercharacterised enzymes. Here we present Synteruptor (https://bioi2.i2bc.paris-saclay.fr/synteruptor), a program that identifies genomic islands, known to be enriched in SMBGCs, in the genomes of closely related species. With this tool, we identified a SMBGC in the genome of Streptomyces ambofaciens ATCC23877, undetected by antiSMASH versions prior to antiSMASH 5, and experimentally demonstrated that it directs the biosynthesis of two metabolites, one of which was identified as sphydrofuran. Synteruptor is also a valuable resource for the delineation of individual SMBGCs within antiSMASH regions that may encompass multiple clusters, and for refining the boundaries of these SMBGCs., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics.)

Processivity clamps mediate polymerase switching for translesion synthesis (TLS). All three E. coli TLS polymerases interact with the β 2 processivity clamp through a conserved clamp-binding motif (CBM), which is indispensable for TLS. Notably, Pol IV also makes a unique secondary contact with the clamp through non-CBM residues. However, the role of this "rim contact" in Pol IV-mediated TLS remains poorly understood. Here we show that the rim contact is critical for TLS past strong replication blocks. In in vitro reconstituted Pol IV-mediated TLS, ablating the rim contact compromises TLS past 3-methyl dA, a strong block, while barely affecting TLS past N 2 -furfuryl dG, a weak block. Similar observations are also made in E. coli cells bearing a single copy of these lesions in the genome. Within lesion-stalled replication forks, the rim interaction and ssDNA binding protein cooperatively poise Pol IV to better compete with Pol III for binding to a cleft through its CBM. We propose that this bipartite clamp interaction enables Pol IV to rapidly resolve lesion-stalled replication through TLS at the fork, which reduces damage induced mutagenesis.

Processivity clamps tether DNA polymerases to DNA, allowing their access to the primer-template junction. In addition to DNA replication, DNA polymerases also participate in various genome maintenance activities, including translesion synthesis (TLS). However, owing to the error-prone nature of TLS polymerases, their association with clamps must be tightly regulated. Here we show that fork-associated ssDNA-binding protein (SSB) selectively enriches the bacterial TLS polymerase Pol IV at stalled replication forks. This enrichment enables Pol IV to associate with the processivity clamp and is required for TLS on both the leading and lagging strands. In contrast, clamp-interacting proteins (CLIPs) lacking SSB binding are spatially segregated from the replication fork, minimally interfering with Pol IV-mediated TLS. We propose that stalling-dependent structural changes within clusters of fork-associated SSB establish hierarchical access to the processivity clamp. This mechanism prioritizes a subset of CLIPs with SSB-binding activity and facilitates their exchange at the replication fork., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

During replication, the presence of unrepaired lesions results in the formation of single stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps that need to be repaired to preserve genome integrity and cell survival. All organisms have evolved two major lesion tolerance pathways to continue replication: Translesion Synthesis (TLS), potentially mutagenic, and Homology Directed Gap Repair (HDGR), that relies on homologous recombination. In Escherichia coli, the RecF pathway repairs such ssDNA gaps by processing them to produce a recombinogenic RecA nucleofilament during the presynaptic phase. In this study, we show that the presynaptic phase is crucial for modulating lesion tolerance pathways since the competition between TLS and HDGR occurs at this stage. Impairing either the extension of the ssDNA gap (mediated by the nuclease RecJ and the helicase RecQ) or the loading of RecA (mediated by RecFOR) leads to a decrease in HDGR and a concomitant increase in TLS. Hence, we conclude that defects in the presynaptic phase delay the formation of the D-loop and increase the time window allowed for TLS. In contrast, we show that a defect in the postsynaptic phase that impairs HDGR does not lead to an increase in TLS. Unexpectedly, we also reveal a strong genetic interaction between recF and recJ genes, that results in a recA deficient-like phenotype in which HDGR is almost completely abolished., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

The tumour suppressor SLX4 plays multiple roles in the maintenance of genome stability, acting as a scaffold for structure-specific endonucleases and other DNA repair proteins. It directly interacts with the mismatch repair (MMR) protein MSH2 but the significance of this interaction remained unknown until recent findings showing that MutSβ (MSH2-MSH3) stimulates in vitro the SLX4-dependent Holliday junction resolvase activity. Here, we characterize the mode of interaction between SLX4 and MSH2, which relies on an MSH2-interacting peptide (SHIP box) that drives interaction of SLX4 with both MutSβ and MutSα (MSH2-MSH6). While we show that this MSH2 binding domain is dispensable for the well-established role of SLX4 in interstrand crosslink repair, we find that it mediates inhibition of MutSα-dependent MMR by SLX4, unravelling an unanticipated function of SLX4., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.)

The DNA damage response (DDR) preserves the genetic integrity of the cell by sensing and repairing damages after a genotoxic stress. Translesion Synthesis (TLS), an error-prone DNA damage tolerance pathway, is controlled by PCNA ubiquitination. In this work, we raise the question whether TLS is controlled locally or globally. Using a recently developed method that allows to follow the bypass of a single lesion inserted into the yeast genome, we show that (i) TLS is controlled locally at each individual lesion by PCNA ubiquitination, (ii) a single lesion is enough to induce PCNA ubiquitination and (iii) PCNA ubiquitination is imperative for TLS to occur. More importantly, we show that the activation of the DDR that follows a genotoxic stress does not increase TLS at individual lesions. We conclude that unlike the SOS response in bacteria, the eukaryotic DDR does not promote TLS and mutagenesis., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.)