Search

Objective: To report a reliable method in obtaining optimal cochlear basal turn and cross-section (c/s) of internal auditory canal (IAC) supporting Cochlear implantation (CI) procedure., Materials and Methods: Computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance image (MRI) scans of potential CI candidates from 2018 to 2022 from the tertiary center were considered for analysis. Slicer software was used in three-dimensional (3D) segmentation of inner ear and for capturing the cochlear basal turn., Results: A total of 1932 head scans were made available for the analysis and out of which 1866 scans had normal anatomy (NA) inner ear. Incomplete partition (IP) type-I was identified in 19 ears, IP type-II in 27 ears, IP type-III in 6 ears, cochlear hypoplasia (CH) type-I in 6 ears, CH type-II in 1 ear, CH type-III in 3 ears, and CH type-IV is 3 ears, and enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome in 1 ear. 3D segmented inner ear helped in successfully obtaining the cochlear basal turn and the c/s of IAC in all anatomical types. Time taken to capture the cochlear basal turn with the help of 3D segmented inner ear was <1 min. Within the NA category, five cases showed scalar ossification, and its extent was identified in the cochlear basal turn., Conclusion: The identification and the extent of ossification in the scala tympani, shape of the basal turn, and the cochlear size measurement in cochlear basal turn has high clinical relevance as this helps in surgical planning and in choosing appropriate electrode length. Level of evidence: Level 2 to the best of our understanding., Competing Interests: Andras Kedves and Anandhan Dhanasingh are full‐time employees of a hearing implant organization (MED‐EL) within research and development department with no marketing activities. All the other authors declare no conflict of interest and this study was performed truly for educational purpose., (© 2023 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society.)

Cochlear implantation (CI) is currently the recognized and most promising method of rehabilitation of patients suffering from profound hearing loss and deafness. During the surgical stage of CI, one of the most unpleasant intraoperative features is CSF leakage from the cochlea opening. Most often it occurs in patients with malformations of the inner ear, with temporal bone fractures and with cochlear otosclerosis. The difficulty of choosing the tactics of surgical intervention in these patients is caused by the large variability of the anatomical structures of the inner ear. In the period from 2017 to 2021, 1954 patients underwent CI, of which 83 were patients with cochlea malformations (65 intraoperative CSF leakages), 14 with the temporal bones fractures (2 intraoperative CSF leakage), 12 with cochlear otosclerosis (1 CSF leakage), while 3 spontaneous intraoperative CSF leakages were noted in patients with normal cochlea anatomy and hyperpnumotized temporal bone pyramid and enlarged vestibular aqueduct. The highest risk of intraoperative CSF leakage was observed in patients with inner ear malformations (common cavity - 10, incomplete partition type III - 15) and anomalies of the internal auditory canal - 5 (dilated IAC - more than 8.5 mm in diameter). Moderate risk of intraoperative CSF leakage was typical for patients with incomplete partition type I (15 patients) and type II (25 patients).

Auditory nerve dysplasia (AND) can encompass various conditions of the auditory nerve (AN), ranging from true aplasia to hypoplasia. The purpose of this review is to discuss the prospect of cochlear implantation (CI) and subsequent auditory speech rehabilitation for AN abnormality. Studies of different authors when working with this category of children, possible results and methods of diagnostics of the AN condition are presented.

Background and Objective: The cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion process is a key step in CI surgery. One of the aims of advances in robotic-assisted CI surgery (RACIS) is to realize better cochlear structure preservation and to precisely control insertion. The aim of this literature review is to gain insight into electrode selection for RACIS by acquiring a thorough knowledge of electrode insertion and related complications from classic CI surgery involving a manual electrode insertion process., Methods: A systematic electronic search of the literature was carried out using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science to find relevant literature on electrode tip fold over (ETFO), electrode scalar deviation (ESD), and electrode migration (EM) from both pre-shaped and straight electrode types., Results: A total of 82 studies that include 8,603 ears implanted with a CI, i.e., pre-shaped (4,869) and straight electrodes (3,734), were evaluated. The rate of ETFO (25 studies, 2,335 ears), ESD (39 studies, 3,073 ears), and EM (18 studies, 3,195 ears) was determined. An incidence rate (±95% CI) of 5.38% (4.4-6.6%) of ETFO, 28.6% (26.6-30.6%) of ESD, and 0.53% (0.2-1.1%) of EM is associated with pre-shaped electrodes, whereas with straight electrodes it was 0.51% (0.1-1.3%), 11% (9.2-13.0%), and 3.2% (2.5-3.95%), respectively. The differences between the pre-shaped and straight electrode types are highly significant ( p < 0.001). Laboratory experiments show evidence that robotic insertions of electrodes are less traumatic than manual insertions. The influence of round window (RW) vs. cochleostomy (Coch) was not assessed., Conclusion: Considering the current electrode designs available and the reported incidence of insertion complications, the use of straight electrodes in RACIS and conventional CI surgery (and manual insertion) appears to be less traumatic to intracochlear structures compared with pre-shaped electrodes. However, EM of straight electrodes should be anticipated. RACIS has the potential to reduce these complications., Competing Interests: MK is the chief surgeon and Director of Madras ENT Research Foundation Pvt. LTD., which is the organization he founded and for which he is currently working for. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Van de Heyning, Roland, Lassaletta, Agrawal, Atlas, Baumgartner, Brown, Caversaccio, Dazert, Gstoettner, Hagen, Hagr, Jablonski, Kameswaran, Kuzovkov, Leinung, Li, Loth, Magele, Mlynski, Mueller, Parnes, Radeloff, Raine, Rajan, Schmutzhard, Skarzynski, Skarzynski, Sprinzl, Staecker, Stöver, Tavora-Viera, Topsakal, Usami, Van Rompaey, Weiss, Wimmer, Zernotti and Gavilan.)