Search

Study Design: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study., Objective: The objective was to present demographic characteristics, mechanism of injuries, lengths of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) days, discharge locations, and causes of 90-day readmission for patients with subaxial spinal cord injuries resulting in paraplegia or tetraplegia., Summary of Background Data: Spinal cord injuries resulting in paraplegia or tetraplegia are rare injuries with debilitating outcomes. Numerous advances have occurred in caring for these patients, but patients still experience multiple complications. The severity of these injuries and numerous complications result in prolonged hospital stays and the need for extensive rehabilitation., Methods: Twelve patients with subaxial spinal cord injury resulting in paraplegia or tetraplegia from a level 1 adult trauma center were reviewed. The primary outcomes included hospital length of stay, ICU days, intrahospital complications, 90-day readmission rates, and discharge location. We reviewed the literature for these outcomes in spinal cord injuries., Results: For patients with subaxial spinal cord injuries resulting in paraplegia and tetraplegia, the average age was 36.0 years, and most were male [91.7% (11/12)]. The most common mechanism of injury was gunshot wounds[41.7% (5/12)]. Patients spent an average of 46.3 days in the hospital and 30.7 days in the ICU. Respiratory complications were the most common (9 patients). Fifty percent of patients (6/12) were discharged to the inpatient spinal cord rehab center, and 16.7% (2/12) expired while in the hospital. Two patients (20.0%) were readmitted within 90 days of discharge., Conclusions: Most patients with subaxial spinal cord injuries resulting in paraplegia or tetraplegia were young males with high-energy traumas. Many patients had intrahospital complications, and most were discharged to the hospital spinal rehab center. These findings likely stem from the severity of paraplegia and tetraplegia injuries and the need for rehabilitation., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: With the increasing use of the internet for health information, it is essential to prioritize resources that match the reading level of patients and parents. Limited health literacy is a notable issue in the United States, creating a financial burden and negatively affecting patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess the availability and readability of pediatric hospital web pages concerning two prevalent spine conditions in children, spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis, specifically examining whether the available resources meet the recommended sixth grade reading level., Methods: A total of 179 pediatric hospital web pages were assessed for their availability and readability of spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis patient information. The web pages' readability was assessed using five readability formulae. Descriptive statistics and Student t-tests were performed on the collected scores with significance set at P < 0.05., Results: Among the analyzed hospitals, 40.2% had no information on spondylolisthesis or spondylolysis, 20.1% mentioned treating these conditions, 7.8% had < 100 dedicated words, and only 31.8% had dedicated web pages with more than 100 words on these conditions. The average reading grade level for the evaluated web pages was 12.0, indicating a high school education level is required for comprehension. None of the web pages were written below the recommended sixth grade reading level., Discussion: The readability of the limited resources was markedly higher than the recommended reading level. In addition, this study emphasizes the need for enhanced accessibility and readability of online patient information from pediatric hospitals to improve parental comprehension and informed decision-making. Physicians should consider identifying online resources that they consider of high quality and acceptable readability to support better patient understanding and outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: Thoracolumbar fractures (TLFs) are the most common spinal fractures seen in patients with trauma. The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) classification system is commonly used to help clinicians make more consistent and objective decisions in assessing the indications for surgical intervention in patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Patients with TLICS scores <4 are treated conservatively, but a percentage of them will have failed conservative treatment and require surgery at a later date., Methods: All patients who received an orthopaedic consult between January 2016 and December 2020 were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. For patients meeting the study requirements, deidentified data were collected including demographics, diagnostics workup, and hospital course. Data analysis was conducted comparing length of stay, time between first consult and surgery, and time between surgery and discharge among each group., Results: 1.4% of patients with a TLICS score <4 not treated surgically at initial hospital stay required surgery at a later date. Patients with a TLICS score <4 treated conservatively had a statistically significant shorter hospital stay compared with those treated surgically. However, when time between initial consult and surgery was factored into the total duration of hospital stay for those treated surgically, the duration was statistically equivalent to those treated nonsurgically., Conclusion: For patients with a TLICS score <4 with delayed mobilization after 3 days in the hospital or polytraumatic injuries, surgical stabilization at initial presentation can decrease the percentage of patients who fail conservative care and require delayed surgery. Patients treated surgically have a longer length of stay than those treated conservatively, but there is no difference in stay when time between consult and surgery was accounted for. In addition, initial surgery in patients with delayed mobilization can prevent long waits to surgery, while conservative measures are exhausted., Level Iii Evidence: Retrospective cohort study., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)