Search

Background: The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) has suggested the need for more studies on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-formoterol in the Emergency Department (ED)., Objectives: We aimed to compare the outcomes of budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 mcg/inhalation) turbuhaler versus pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) salbutamol (100 mcg/puff) in acute asthma in the outpatient ED., Methods: This single-centre, prospective, randomized, and open-label study involved adult asthma patients with mild to moderate asthma exacerbation who attended the outpatient ED of a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. The intervention arm received budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort ® 160/4.5 mcg) turbuhaler, while the control arm received pMDI salbutamol with a valved holding chamber. Stratified randomization with variable baseline ICS use was employed. Direct discharge rate from outpatient ED was the primary outcome. Vital signs pre- and post-treatment between the two arms were also compared., Results: Seventy-four ( n  = 37 for each arm) asthma patients were recruited. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the two arms. Direct discharge rates from ED were comparable between the intervention (94.6%) and the control (91.9%) arms ( p  = 1.000). Post-treatment outcomes (respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, peak expiratory flow rate) were similar between the two arms, except for the higher increment of heart rate ( p  < 0.001) and lesser reduction of blood pressure in the control arm ( p  = 0.013). Intravenous hydrocortisone use was significantly higher in the control arm ( n  = 19, 51.4%) than in the budesonide/formoterol arm ( n  = 6, 16.2%) ( p  = 0.001)., Conclusion: Budesonide/formoterol turbuhaler is as effective as pMDI salbutamol in treating asthma exacerbation in the outpatient ED with less effect on heart rate and lower usage of intravenous corticosteroids.

Understanding the patients' clinical profile, barriers to optimal inhaler use, and adherence are crucial in achieving the treatment goal for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to assess the inhaler technique and identify the predictors of inhaler adherence among asthma and COPD patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED). This prospective cross-sectional study recruited patients who presented to the outpatient ED of a tertiary hospital for mild-to-moderate exacerbation from March 2022 to February 2023. Convenience sampling was used in this study. The inhaler techniques and adherence of all subjects were evaluated. Regression analysis was used to identify predictors of inhaler adherence. We recruited 120 subjects with a mean age of 47.8 ± 16.0 and were predominantly asthma patients (n = 85, 70.8%). Most were on regular follow-up (n = 72, 60.0%) and adhered to their inhaler(s) (n = 86, 71.7%). Less than half of the subjects use their inhaler(s) correctly (n = 45, 37.5%). Three predictors of inhaler adherence were identified: regular follow-up (aOR 2.072, p = 0.041), correct inhaler technique (aOR 3.071, p = 0.039), and ability to explain inhalers' mode of action (aOR 10.906, p = 0.031). The high rate of wrong inhaler techniques among asthma and COPD patients is worrisome. Identified predictors of inhaler adherence should be targeted when managing this group of patients. In addition to the exacerbation treatment in the ED, referrals to public primary health clinics for regular follow-ups, evaluation of inhaler techniques, and counseling to enhance patient knowledge are crucial., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Società Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI).)

Background: Bleeding outcomes are crucial primary safety endpoints in studies involving thrombolytic agents. This study aimed to determine the incidence, characteristics and mortality outcomes of bleeding following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) thrombolysis in an Asian population., Methods: This single-centre retrospective study included all STEMI patients who received thrombolytic therapy from 2016 to 2020 in a Malaysian tertiary hospital. Total population sampling was used in this study. The primary outcome was bleeding events post-thrombolysis, categorised using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) bleeding criteria. Inferential statistics were used to determine the associations between relevant variables., Results: Data from 941 patients were analysed. A total of 156 (16.6%) STEMI patients bled post-thrombolysis. Major, minor, and minimal TIMI occurred in 7 (0.7%), 17 (1.8%), and 132 (14.0%) patients, respectively. Age 65 years ( P =0.031) and Malaysian Chinese ( P =0.008) were associated with a higher incidence of bleeding post-thrombolysis. Conversely, foreigners ( P =0.032) and current smoker ( P =0.007) were associated with a lower incidence of bleeding. Both TIMI major ( P <0.001) and TIMI minor ( P <0.001) were associated with a higher incidence of all-cause in-hospital mortality among STEMI patients. TIMI minor bleeding was significantly higher in the streptokinase recipients. The bleeding sites were comparable between streptokinase and tenecteplase recipients, except for a significantly higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding in the streptokinase recipients ( P =0.027)., Conclusion: In our Asian population, the incidence of total bleeding events following STEMI thrombolysis is comparable to that previously reported. The development of TIMI major and minor bleeding complications is associated with higher mortality., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © World Journal of Emergency Medicine.)

Pharmacological reperfusion remains the primary strategy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in low- and medium-income countries. Literature has reported inconsistent incidences and outcomes of failed thrombolysis (FT). This study aimed to identify the incidence, mortality outcomes and predictors of FT in STEMI pharmacological reperfusion. This single-centre retrospective cohort study analyzed data on consecutive STEMI patients who received thrombolytic therapy from 2016 to 2020 in a public tertiary hospital. Total population sampling was used in this study. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess independent predictors of the mortality outcomes and FT. We analyzed 941 patients with a mean age of 53.0 ± 12.2 years who were predominantly male (n = 846, 89.9%). The in-hospital mortality was 10.3% (n = 97). FT occurred in 86 (9.1%) patients and was one of the predictors of mortality (aOR 3.847, p < 0.001). Overall, tenecteplase use (aOR 1.749, p = 0.021), pre-existing hypertension (aOR 1.730, p = 0.024), history of stroke (aOR 4.176, p = 0.004), and heart rate ≥ 100 bpm at presentation (aOR 2.333, p < 0.001) were the general predictors of FT. The predictors of FT with streptokinase were Killip class ≥ II (aOR 3.197, p = 0.004) and heart rate ≥ 100 bpm at presentation (aOR 3.536, p = 0.001). History of stroke (aOR 6.144, p = 0.004) and heart rate ≥ 100 bpm at presentation (aOR 2.216, p = 0.015) were the predictors of FT in STEMI patients who received tenecteplase. Mortality following STEMI thrombolysis remained high in our population and was attributed to FT. Identified predictors of FT enable early risk stratification to evaluate the patients' prognosis to manage them better., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Società Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI).)

Introduction: Some guidelines had recommended "thrombolysis first" in ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. The impact of COVID-19 solely on STEMI thrombolysis is lacking as most studies reported outcomes related to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) setting. Thus, this study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on STEMI thrombolysis outcomes and the Emergency Department's performance in a non-PCI capable centre., Methods: This single-centre retrospective study analysed data on consecutive STEMI patients who received thrombolytic therapy from May 2019 to December 2020 (20 months) in a non-PCI capable tertiary hospital. Total population sampling was used in this study. We compared all patients' characteristics and outcomes ten months before and during the pandemic. Regression models were used to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on door-to-needle time (DNT), mortality, bleeding events, and the number of overnight stays., Results and Discussion: We analysed 323 patients with a mean age of 52.9 ± 12.9 years and were predominantly male (n = 280, 88.9%). There was a 12.5% reduction in thrombolysis performed during the pandemic. No significant difference in timing from symptoms onset to thrombolysis and DNT was observed. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher during the pandemic (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.02-4.00, p = 0.044). Bleeding events post thrombolysis remained stable and there was no significant difference in the number of overnight stays during the pandemic., Conclusion: STEMI thrombolysis cases were reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic, with an inverse increase in mortality despite the preserved Emergency Department performance in timely thrombolysis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fibrinolysis remains the primary reperfusion strategy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in many Asian countries. The outcomes and factors affecting mortality in STEMI fibrinolysis in the Asian population are lacking despite being widely used., Objectives: This study aimed to assess the clinical profile of patients and predictors affecting STEMI mortality in an Asian population., Methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed data from STEMI patients who received fibrinolytic therapy from 2016 to 2020 in a tertiary hospital. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the significant predictors of the 30-day all-cause mortality, the primary outcome., Results: A total of 859 patients were included. Their mean age was 53.6 ±12.1 years and they were predominantly male (n=769, 89.4%). The majority of them had anterior involvement STEMI (n = 477, 55.5%) and presented with Killip ≥ II (n = 424, 49.4%). The 30-day all-cause mortality was 12.0% (n =  103). The final model found six predictors for 30-day mortality: age ≥75 (aOR 4.784, p < 0.001), female gender (aOR 2.869, p = 0.001), pre-existing hypertension (aOR 1.623, p = 0.046), anterior myocardial infarction (MI) (aOR 1.947, p < 0.001), Killip class (p < 0.001) and heart rate ≥100 at presentation (aOR 1.823, p =  0.016). Following fibrinolytic therapy, five predictors were found to affect 30-day mortality, i.e. failed fibrinolysis (aOR 2.094, p = 0.041), bleeding events, congestive heart failure (aOR 3.554, p = 0.046), ventricular fibrillation/ tachycardia (aOR 5.920, p < 0.001), and atrial fibrillation/ flutter (aOR 2.968, p = 0.016)., Conclusion: Our STEMI patients were younger and more ill at presentation. The risk predictors on 30-day all-cause mortality identified in our Asian population allow the clinicians to better triage and manage STEMI patients., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Fibrinolysis using streptokinase or tenecteplase remains the primary reperfusion strategy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in many Asian countries, including Malaysia. Comparative outcomes of these two fibrinolytic agents in the Asian population were inconclusive despite being widely used. Aim We aimed to assess and compare the outcomes of streptokinase versus tenecteplase in STEMI reperfusion of an Asian population. Method This single-centre retrospective study analysed data on STEMI patients who received fibrinolytic therapy from 2016 to 2020 in the Emergency Department of the largest tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Total population sampling was used in this study. Based on the propensity score matching, 359 patients receiving streptokinase were matched against 359 patients receiving tenecteplase by incorporating 16 variables that potentially affect mortality. 30-day mortality, stroke and major bleeding were the primary outcome measures. Results There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between streptokinase (n = 39, 11.2%) and tenecteplase (n = 46, 13.2%) groups (p = 0.418). The rates of ischemic strokes [streptokinase (n = 1, 0.3%) versus tenecteplase (n = 3, 0.9%), p = 0.624], intracranial haemorrhage [streptokinase (n = 3, 0.9%) versus tenecteplase (n = 1, 0.3%), p = 0.624] and major bleeding [streptokinase (n = 4, 1.1%) versus tenecteplase (n = 3, 0.9%), p = 0.624], were comparable for the two groups. The incidences of failed thrombolysis were significantly higher in the tenecteplase arm. Hypotension and allergic reaction were significantly higher in the streptokinase arm. Conclusion Streptokinase and tenecteplase are fibrinolytic agents with similar efficacy and safety in STEMI reperfusion therapy in our Asian population., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)