Search

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected medical practice. More than 7,000,000 patients died worldwide after being infected with COVID-19; however, no specific laboratory markers have yet been established to predict death related to this disease. In contrast, electrocardiographic changes due to COVID-19 include QT prolongation and ST-T changes; however, there have not been studies on the ambulatory electrocardiographic markers of COVID-19. We encountered three patients diagnosed as having COVID-19 who did not have a prior history of significant structural heart diseases. All patients had abnormalities in ambulatory echocardiogram parameters detected by high-resolution 24 h electrocardiogram monitoring: positive late potentials (LPs) and T-wave alternans (TWA), abnormal heart rate variability (HRV), and heart rate turbulence (HRT). Case 1 involved a 78-year-old woman with a history of chronic kidney disease, Case 2 involved a 76-year-old man with hypertension and diabetes, and Case 3 involved a 67-year-old man with renal cancer, lung cancer, and diabetes. None of them had a prior history of significant structural heart disease. Although no significant consistent increases in clinical markers were observed, all three patients died, mainly because of respiratory failure with mild heart failure. The LP, TWA, HRV, and HRT were positive in all three cases with no significant structural cardiac disease at the initial phase of admission. The further accumulation of data regarding ambulatory electrocardiographic markers in patients with COVID-19 is needed. Depending on the accumulation of data, the LP, TWA, HRV, and HRT could be identified as potential risk factors for COVID-19 pneumonia in the early phase of admission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Blast injuries in modern society often occur owing to terrorist attacks in confined spaces, particularly in urban settings, indoors, and in vehicles, leading to significant damage. Therefore, it is important to focus on blast injuries in confined spaces rather than in conventional open-field experiments. Materials and methods We used an air-driven shock wave generator (blast tube) established indoors in 2017 and conducted basic research to potentially save the lives of patients with blast injuries. Under general anesthesia, pigs were divided into with body armor (BA) and without BA groups. The pigs were fixed in the measurement chamber with their dorsal chest directly exposed to the shock wave. The driving pressure was set at 3.0 MPa to achieve a mortality rate of approximately 50%. A generated shock wave was directly applied to the pigs. Comparisons were made between the groups with respect to cardiac arrest and survival, as well as apnea, bradycardia, and hypotension, which are the triad of blast lung. Autopsies were performed to confirm the extent of the organ damage. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test, and statistical significance was set at p <0.05. The animal experimentation was conducted according to the protocol reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the National Defense Medical College Hospital (approval number 19041). Results Eight pigs were assigned to the BA group and seven pigs to the non-BA group. In the non-BA group, apnea was observed in four of seven cases, three of which resulted in death. None of the eight pigs in the BA group had respiratory arrest; notably, all survived. Hypotension was observed in some pigs in each group; however, there were no cases of bradycardia in either group. Statistical analysis showed that wearing BA significantly reduced the occurrence of respiratory and cardiac arrest ( p =0.026) but not survival ( p =0.077). No significant differences were found in other vital signs. Conclusions Wearing BA with adequate neck and chest protection reduced mortality and it was effective to reduce cardiac and respiratory arrest against shock wave exposure. Mortality from shock wave injury appears to be associated with respiratory arrest, and the avoidance of respiratory arrest may lead to survival., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Kiriu et al.)