Search

: Introduction: Lack of viral suppression (VS) among pregnant and breastfeeding women living with HIV poses challenges for maternal and infant health, and viral load (VL) monitoring via centralized laboratory systems faces many barriers. We aimed to determine the impact of point‐of‐care (POC) VL and targeted drug resistance mutation (DRM) testing in improving VS among pregnant and postpartum women on antiretroviral therapy. Methods: We conducted a pre/post‐intervention prospective cohort study among 820 pregnant women accessing HIV care at five public‐sector facilities in western Kenya from 2019 to 2022. The pre‐intervention or “control” group consisted of standard‐of‐care (SOC) centralized VL testing every 6 months and the post‐intervention or “intervention” group consisted of a combined strategy of POC VL every 3 months, targeted DRM testing, and clinical management support. The primary outcome was VS (VL ≤1000 copies/ml) at 6 months postpartum; secondary outcomes included uptake and turnaround times for VL testing and sustained VS. Results: At 6 months postpartum, 321/328 (98%) of participants in the intervention group and 339/347 (98%) in the control group achieved VS (aRR 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98, 1.02). When assessing VS using a threshold of 1000 copies/ml) who underwent successful DRM testing in the intervention group, all (46/46, 100%) had some DRMs and 20 (43%) had major DRMs (of which 80% were nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor mutations). POC VL testing uptake was high (>89%) throughout pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum periods, with a median turnaround time of 1 day (IQR 1, 4) for POC VL in the intervention group and 7 days (IQR 5, 9) for SOC VL in the control group. Sustained VS throughout follow‐up was similar between groups with either POC or SOC VL testing (90−91% for Conclusions: Our combined strategy markedly decreased turnaround time but did not increase VS rates, which were already very high, or sustained VS among pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV. Further research on how best to utilize POC VL and DRM testing is needed to optimize sustained VS among this population., INTRODUCTION Globally, an estimated 1.3 million pregnant women were living with HIV in 2021 [1]. Given the widespread scale‐up of universal antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation for all individuals, an estimated [...]

Point-of-care (POC) technologies—including HIV viral load (VL) monitoring—are expanding globally, including in resource-limited settings. Modelling could allow decision-makers to consider the optimal strategy(ies) to maximize coverage and access, minimize turnaround time (TAT) and minimize cost with limited machines. Informed by formative qualitative focus group discussions with stakeholders focused on model inputs, outputs and format, we created an optimization model incorporating queueing theory and solved it using integer programming methods to reflect HIV VL monitoring in Kisumu County, Kenya. We modelled three scenarios for sample processing: (1) centralized laboratories only, (2) centralized labs with 7 existing POC 'hub' facilities and (3) centralized labs with 7 existing and 1–7 new 'hub' facilities. We calculated total TAT using the existing referral network for scenario 1 and solved for the optimal referral network by minimizing TAT for scenarios 2 and 3. We conducted one-way sensitivity analyses, including distributional fairness in each sub-county. Through two focus groups, stakeholders endorsed the provisionally selected model inputs, outputs and format with modifications incorporated during model-building. In all three scenarios, the largest component of TAT was time spent at a facility awaiting sample batching and transport (scenarios 1–3: 78.7%, 89.9%, 91.8%) and waiting time at the testing site (18.7%, 8.7%, 7.5%); transportation time contributed minimally to overall time (2.6%, 1.3%, 0.7%). In scenario 1, the average TAT was 39.8 h (SD: 2.9), with 1077 h that samples spent cumulatively in the VL processing system. In scenario 2, the average TAT decreased to 33.8 h (SD: 4.8), totalling 430 h. In scenario 3, the average TAT decreased nearly monotonically with each new machine to 31.1 h (SD: 8.4) and 346 total hours. Frequency of sample batching and processing rate most impacted TAT, and inclusion of distributional fairness minimally impacted TAT. In conclusion, a stakeholder-informed resource allocation model identified optimal POC VL hub allocations and referral networks. Using existing—and adding new—POC machines could markedly decrease TAT, as could operational changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: HIV‐positive individuals who maintain an undetectable viral load cannot transmit the virus to others. In 2012, an HIV population‐based survey was conducted in Ndhiwa sub‐county (Kenya) to provide information on the HIV local epidemic. We carried out a second survey 6 years after the first one, to assess progress in HIV diagnosis and care and differences in the HIV prevalence and incidence between the two surveys. Methods: A cross‐sectional, population‐based survey using cluster sampling and geospatial random selection was implemented in 2018, using the same design as 2012. Consenting participants aged 15–59 years were interviewed and tested for HIV at home. HIV‐positive individuals received viral load testing (viral suppression defined as <1000 copies/ml) and Lag‐Avidity EIA assay (to measure recent infection). The 90–90–90 UNAIDS indicators were also assessed. Results: Overall, 6029 individuals were included in 2018. HIV prevalence was 16.9%. Viral suppression among all HIV‐positive was 88.3% in 2018 (vs. 39.9% in 2012, p < 0.001). HIV incidence was 0.75% in 2018 vs. 1.90% in 2012 (p = 0.07). In 2018, the 90–90–90 indicators were 93%–97%–95% (vs. 60%–68%–83% in 2012). Conclusion: A two‐fold increase in the HIV viral load suppression rate along with a decreasing trend in incidence was observed over 6 years in Ndhiwa sub‐county. Achieving high rates of viral suppression in HIV populations that can lead to reducing HIV transmission in sub‐Saharan contexts is feasible. Nevertheless, we will need further efforts to sustain this progress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Routine HIV viral load testing is important for evaluating HIV treatment outcomes, but conventional viral load testing has many barriers including expensive laboratory equipment and lengthy results return times to patients. A point-of-care viral load testing technology, such as GeneXpert HIV-1 quantification assay, could reduce these barriers by decreasing cost and turnaround time, however real-world performance is limited. We conducted a secondary analysis using 900 samples collected from participants in two studies to examine the performance of GeneXpert as point-of-care viral load compared to standard-of-care testing (which was conducted with two centralized laboratories using traditional HIV-1 RNA PCR quantification assays). The two studies, Opt4Kids (n = 704 participants) and Opt4Mamas (n = 820 participants), were conducted in western Kenya from 2019-2021 to evaluate the effectiveness of a combined intervention strategy, which included point-of-care viral load testing. Paired viral load results were compared using four different thresholds for virological non-suppression, namely ≥50, ≥200, ≥400, ≥1000 copies/ml. At a threshold of ≥1000 copies/mL, paired samples collected on the same day: demonstrated sensitivities of 90.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68.3, 98.8) and 66.7% (9.4, 99.2), specificities of 98.4% (95.5, 99.7) and 100% (96.5, 100), and percent agreements of 97.7% (94.6, 99.2) and 99.1% (95.0, 100) in Opt4Kids and Opt4Mamas studies, respectively. When lower viral load thresholds were used and the paired samples were collected an increasing number of days apart, sensitivity, specificity, and percent agreement generally decreased. While specificity and percent agreement were uniformly high, sensitivity was lower than expected. Non-specificity of the standard of care testing may have been responsible for the sensitivity values. Nonetheless, our results demonstrate that GeneXpert may be used reliably to monitor HIV treatment in low- and middle- income countries to attain UNAID's 95-95-95 HIV goals., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Giang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Estimating cause-related mortality among the dead is not common, yet for clinical and public health purposes, a lot can be learnt from the dead. HIV/AIDS accounted for the third most frequent cause of deaths in Kenya; 39.7 deaths per 100,000 population in 2019. OraQuick Rapid HIV-1/2 has previously been validated on oral fluid and implemented as a screening assay for HIV self-testing in Kenya among living subjects. We assessed the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of OraQuick Rapid HIV-1/2 for HIV screening among decedents., Methods: Trained morticians collected oral fluid from 132 preembalmed and postembalmed decedents aged >18 months at Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital mortuary in western Kenya and tested for HIV using OraQuick Rapid HIV-1/2. Test results were compared with those obtained using the national HIV Testing Services algorithm on matched preembalming whole blood specimens as a gold standard (Determine HIV and First Response HIV 1-2-O). We calculated positive predictive values, negative predictive values, area under the curve, and sensitivity and specificity of OraQuick Rapid HIV-1/2 compared with the national HTS algorithm., Results: OraQuick Rapid HIV-1/2 had similar sensitivity of 92.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 75.7 to 99.1] on preembalmed and postembalmed samples compared with the gold standard. Specificity was 97.1% (95% CI: 91.9 to 99.4) and 95.2% (95% CI: 89.2 to 98.4) preembalming and postembalming, respectively. Preembalming and postembalming positive predictive value was 89.3% (95% CI: 71.8 to 97.7) and 83.3% (95% CI: 65.3 to 94.4), respectively. The area under the curve preembalming and postembalming was 94.9% (95% CI: 89.6 to 100) and 93.9% (95% CI: 88.5 to 99.4), respectively., Conclusions: The study showed a relatively high-performance sensitivity and specificity of OraQuick Rapid HIV-1/2 test among decedents, similar to those observed among living subjects. OraQuick Rapid HIV-1/2 presents a convenient and less invasive screening test for surveillance of HIV among decedents within a mortuary setting., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)