Search

The misuse and overtreatment of antibiotics in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) can cause multi-drug resistance and worsen clinical outcomes. We aimed to analyze the trends and appropriateness of antibiotic changes in hospitalized patients with CAP and their impact on clinical outcomes. This retrospective study enrolled patients with CAP, aged > 18 years, admitted from January 2017 to December 2021 at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, South Korea. We examined the pathogens identified, antibiotics prescribed, and the appropriateness of antibiotic changes as reviewed by infectious disease specialists. Antibiotic appropriateness was assessed based on adherence to the 2019 ATS/IDSA guidelines and the 2018 Korean national guidelines for CAP, targeting appropriate pathogens, proper route, dosage, and duration of therapy. Outcomes measured included time to clinical stability (TCS), length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic treatment, and in-hospital mortality. The study included 436 patients with a mean age of 72.11 years, of whom 35.1% were male. The average duration of antibiotic treatment was 13.5 days. More than 55% of patients experienced at least one antibiotic change, and 21.7% had consecutive changes. Throughout their hospital stay, 273 patients (62.6%) received appropriate antibiotic treatment, while 163 patients (37.4%) received at least one inappropriate antibiotic prescription. Those who received at least one inappropriate prescription experienced longer antibiotic treatment durations and extended hospital stays, despite having similar TCS. In conclusion, inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in hospitalized patients with CAP is associated with prolonged antibiotic treatment and increased length of stay. Emphasizing the appropriate initial antibiotic selection may help mitigate these negative effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Older patients have a higher risk of aspiration pneumonia and mortality if they are hospitalized. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of an aspiration prevention quality improvement (QI) program that utilizes the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) in older patients. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in an acute medical care unit of a tertiary hospital in South Korea. The study used one-to-one propensity matching and included 96 patients who received the QI program and 96 who did not. All patients were aged 65 years or older and had risk factors for aspiration, including neurological and non-neurological disorders, neuromuscular disorders, impaired airway defenses, and dysphagia due to esophageal or gastrointestinal disorders. The primary outcomes included the duration of the fasting period during hospitalization, changes in nutritional status before admission and at discharge, in-hospital mortality, and readmission due to pneumonia within 90 days. Results: Fasting period, changes in weight and albumin levels upon discharge after hospitalization, and length of stay did not differ significantly between patients in the GUSS and non-GUSS groups. However, the risk of readmission within 90 days was significantly lower in patients who underwent the GUSS than in those who did not (hazard ratio, 0.085; 95% confidence interval, 0.025– 0.290; p = 0.001). Conclusion: The GUSS aspiration prevention program effectively prevented readmission due to pneumonia within 90 days in older patients with acute illnesses. This implies that the adoption of efficient aspiration prevention methods in older patients with acute illnesses could play a pivotal role by enhancing patient outcomes and potentially mitigating the healthcare costs linked to readmissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thus, we aimed to investigate how real-time documentation of in-hospital medication changes prevents undocumented medication changes at discharge and improves physician-pharmacist communication. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary hospital. Two pharmacists reviewed medical records of patients admitted to the acute medical unit from April to June 2020. In-hospital medication discrepancies were determined by comparing preadmission and hospitalization medication lists and it was verified whether the physician's intent of medication changes was clarified by documentation. By a documentation rate of medication changes of 100% and < 100%, respectively, fully documented (FD) and partially documented (PD) groups were defined. Any undocumented medication changes at discharge were considered a "documentation error at discharge". Pharmacists' survey was conducted to assess the impact of appropriate documentation on the pharmacists. Results: After reviewing 400 medication records, patients were categorized into FD (61.3%) and PD (38.8%) groups. Documentation errors at discharge were significantly higher in the PD than in the FD group. Factors associated with documentation errors at discharge included belonging to the PD group, discharge from a non-hospitalist-managed ward, and having three or more intentional discrepancies. Pharmacists showed favorable attitudes towards physician's documentation. Conclusion: Appropriate documentation of in-hospital medication changes, facilitated by free-text communication, significantly decreased documentation errors at discharge. This analysis underlines the importance of communication between pharmacists and hospitalists in improving patient safety during transitions of care. Plain Language Summary: During transitions of care, communication failures among healthcare professionals can lead to medication errors. Therefore, effective sharing of information is essential, especially when intentional changes in prescription orders are made. Documenting medication changes facilitates real-time communication, potentially improving medication reconciliation and reducing discrepancies. However, inadequate documentation of medication changes is common in clinical practice. This retrospective cohort study underlines the importance of real-time documentation of in-hospital medication changes. There was a significant reduction in documentation errors at discharge in fully documented group, where real-time documentation of medication changes was more prevalent. Pharmacists showed favorable attitudes toward the physician's real-time documenting of medication changes because it provided valuable information on understanding the physician's intent and improving communication and also saved time for pharmacists. This study concludes that physicians' documentation on medication changes may reduce documentation errors at discharge, meaning that proper documentation of medication changes could enhance patient safety through effective communication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]