Search

Background: Despite therapeutic hypothermia, neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy still develop neurological disabilities. We have previously investigated neuroprotection by remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPC) in newborn piglets following hypoxia-ischemia (HI). The aim of this study was to further investigate potential effects of RIPC on cerebral immunohistochemical markers related to edema, apoptosis, and angiogenesis., Methods: Brain expression of aquaporin 4, caspase-3, B-cell lymphoma 2, and vascular endothelial growth factor was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 23 piglets, randomly selected from a larger study of RIPC after HI. Twenty animals were subjected to 45 minutes of HI and randomized to treatment with and without RIPC, while three animals were randomized to sham procedures. RIPC was conducted by four conditioning cycles of 5-minute ischemia and reperfusion. Piglets were euthanized 72 hours after the HI insult., Results: Piglets subjected to HI treated with and without RIPC were similar at baseline and following the HI insult. However, piglets randomized to HI alone had longer duration of low blood pressure during the insult. We found no differences in the brain expression of the immunohistochemical markers in any regions of interest or the whole brain between the two HI groups., Conclusion: RIPC did not influence brain expression of markers related to edema, apoptosis, or angiogenesis in newborn piglets at 72 hours after HI. These results support previous findings of limited neuroprotective effect by this RIPC protocol. Our results may have been affected by the time of assessment, use of fentanyl as anesthetic, or limitations related to our immunohistochemical methods., Competing Interests: None declared., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background: We have previously investigated neurological outcomes following remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPC) in a newborn piglet model of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. The aim of this study was to further investigate potential mechanisms of neuroprotection by comparing newborn piglets subjected to global hypoxia-ischemia (HI) treated with and without RIPC with regards to measures of cerebral blood flow and oxygenation assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging., Materials and Methods: A total of 50 piglets were subjected to 45 min global HI and randomized to either no treatment or RIPC treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed 72 h after the HI insult with perfusion-weighted (arterial spin labeling, ASL) and oxygenation-weighted (blood-oxygen-level-dependent, BOLD) sequences in the whole brain, basal ganglia, thalamus, and cortex. Four sham animals received anesthesia and mechanical ventilation only., Results: Piglets treated with RIPC had higher measures of cerebral blood flow in all regions of interest and the whole brain (mean difference: 2.6 ml/100 g/min, 95% CI: 0.1; 5.2) compared with the untreated controls. They also had higher BOLD values in the basal ganglia and the whole brain (mean difference: 4.2 T2*, 95% CI: 0.4; 7.9). Measures were similar between piglets treated with RIPC and sham animals., Conclusion: Piglets treated with RIPC had higher measures of cerebral blood flow and oxygenation assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the whole brain and several regions of interest compared with untreated controls 72 h after the HI insult. Whether this reflects a potential neuroprotective mechanism of RIPC requires further study., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Kerrn-Jespersen, Andersen, Bennedsgaard, Andelius, Pedersen, Kyng and Henriksen.)