Search

Abstract Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a common complication associated with endoscopic endonasal skull-base surgery (EESBS). Postoperative mobilization-associated postural changes are considered to cause CSF leakage. However, no study has demonstrated a robust relationship between postural changes and CSF leakage. We used upright computed tomography (CT) to clarify the effects of postural changes on the reconstructed skull base (RSB) after EESBS. Thirty patients who underwent EESBS at our institution were prospectively included, and their upright and supine CTs were compared to measure morphological changes in the RSB. Patient clinical data were also collected from medical charts and surgical videos, and their relationships with morphological changes were assessed. In upright CTs, the RSB shifted intracranially by 0.94 (0.0–2.9) mm on average. This shift was larger in cases with lesions extending to the sphenoid sinus, dural defects, intraoperative pulsation of the RSB, and large bone windows. The direction of the change was opposite to intuitive movement driven by gravity because of reduced intracranial pressure in the sitting position. Thus, these shifts can be directly associated with postoperative CSF leakage caused by reconstruction material displacement. Skull-base reconstruction and postoperative postural management accounting for these morphological changes may be necessary for preventing CSF leakage.

Abstract Only few studies have assessed brain shift caused by positional change. This study aimed to identify factors correlated with a large postneurosurgical positional brain shift (PBS). Sixty-seven patients who underwent neurosurgical procedures had upright computed tomography (CT) scan using settings similar to those of conventional supine CT. The presence of a clinically significant PBS, defined as a brain shift of ≥ 5 mm caused by positional change, was evaluated. The clinical and radiological findings were investigated to identify factors associated with a larger PBS. As a result, twenty-one patients had a clinically significant PBS. The univariate analysis showed that supratentorial lesion location, intra-axial lesion type, craniectomy procedure, and residual intracranial air were the predictors of PBS. Based on the multivariate analysis, craniectomy procedure (p

BackgroundPatients with generalized epilepsy who had lateralized EEG abnormalities after corpus callosotomy (CC) occasionally undergo subsequent surgeries to control intractable epilepsy.ObjectivesThis study evaluated retrospectively the combination of EEG multiscale entropy (MSE) and FDG-PET for identifying lateralization of the epileptogenic zone after CC.MethodsThis study included 14 patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy who underwent curative epilepsy surgery after CC. Interictal scalp EEG and FDG-PET obtained after CC were investigated to determine (1) whether the MSE calculated from the EEG and FDG-PET findings was lateralized to the surgical side, and (2) whether the lateralization was associated with seizure outcomes.ResultsSeizure reduction rate was higher in patients with lateralized findings to the surgical side than those without (MSE: p < 0.05, FDG-PET: p < 0.05, both: p < 0.01). Seizure free rate was higher in patients with lateralized findings in both MSE and FDG-PET than in those without (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that patients with lateralization of MSE and FDG-PET to the surgical side had better seizure outcomes. The combination of MSE and conventional FDG-PET may help to select surgical candidates for additional surgery after CC with good postoperative seizure outcomes.

Low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors (LEATs) are common in the temporal lobe and can cause drug-resistant epilepsy. Complete resection of LEATs is sufficient for seizure relief. However, hippocampal resection might result in postoperative cognitive impairment. This study aimed to clarify the necessity of hippocampal resection for seizure and cognitive outcomes in patients with temporal lobe LEATs and a normal hippocampus. The study included 32 patients with temporal lobe LEATs and without hippocampal abnormalities. All patients underwent gross total resection as treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy at our tertiary epilepsy center from 2005 to 2020, followed by at least a 12-month follow-up period. Seizure and cognitive outcomes were compared between patients who underwent additional hippocampal resection (Resected group) and those who did not (Preserved group). Among the participants, 14 underwent additional hippocampal resection and 28 (87.5%) achieved seizure freedom irrespective of hippocampal resection. The seizure-free periods were not different between the two groups. Additional hippocampal resection resulted in a significantly negative impact on the postoperative verbal index. In conclusion, additional hippocampal resection in patients with temporal lobe LEATs without hippocampal abnormalities is unnecessary because lesionectomy alone results in good seizure control. Additional hippocampal resection may instead adversely affect the postoperative language function.