Search

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) have been extensively used to treat obesity in recent years. These novel drugs are effective at reducing body weight and also the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes. However, the data of its efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events in individuals without type 2 diabetes is not as robust. We aim to update and conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the same., Methods: The study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guideline. Researchers searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Clinicaltrails.gov for English literature from inception to 2024. Randomized Controlled trails enrolling adult participants (age ≥ 18 years) who are overweight or obese (BMI > 25 Kg/m 2 ) with a comparison of all cardiovascular events between patients taking GLP1-RA and placebo were included. The analysis was done by Revman version 5.4., Results: A total of 17 RCTs among 34,419 participants were included in the analysis. The pooled risk ratio from 17 studies illustrated that patients with GLP-1 RA had a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events compared to patients who had a placebo (RR = 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.89, p -value = 0.0008). Semaglutide was found to have a statistically significant greatest risk reduction than other drug types., Conclusions: This meta-analysis found that GLP-1 RA significantly reduced all types of cardiovascular events in overweight and obese patients without diabetes. Semaglutide was found to be superior to others in CV event reductions. But still, the results of ongoing trials are needed., Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=553048, PROSPERO (CRD42024553048)., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2024 Kelkar, Barve, Kelkar, Kharel, Khanapurkar and Yadav.)

Background Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasingly recognized as a cause of chronic liver disease. It can lead to complications such as decompensated liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Objectives This study aimed to assess liver stiffness using point shear wave elastography in patients with diabetes and NAFLD and to compare the results with the FIB-4 (fibrosis-4) score, AST/ALT (aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase) ratio, and APRI (AST-to-Platelet Ratio Index). Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on type 2 diabetes patients who underwent point shear wave liver elastography for liver stiffness estimation between January 2020 and February 2023. Demographic data such as age, sex, and laboratory data (AST, ALT, and platelet count) were recorded. FIB-4 score, APRI, and AST/ALT ratio were calculated for these patients. The results of the FIB-4 score and APRI were then compared with the shear wave liver elastography fibrosis scores. Results The analysis included 60 patients, of whom 50 (83.33%) were male, with a mean age of 44.8 years (SD: 11.02; range: 21-69). Thirty-six patients (60%) had significant fibrosis. There was a significant positive correlation between the shear wave elastography results and the FIB-4 and APRI scores. Conclusion The findings revealed that nearly two-thirds of the study group had significant fibrosis (≥F2), highlighting the need for early NAFLD diagnosis and treatment. Noninvasive laboratory serum markers, in conjunction with shear wave liver elastography, are useful for diagnosing severe fibrosis., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Sahyadri Hospitals Private Limited Biomedical and Health Research Committee issued approval N/A. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Kelkar et al.)

Introduction Pulmonary symptoms are the most prominent manifestations of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms have been reported widely as well. Literature describing the relation of these symptoms with outcomes of COVID-19 patients is limited in terms of sample size, geographic diversity, and the spectrum of GI symptoms included. We aim to evaluate the association of GI symptoms with outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies assessing GI symptoms and outcomes in COVID-19 patients were undertaken using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) checklist. Details on outcomes included ICU vs. non-ICU admission, severe vs. non-severe disease, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) vs. no-IMV use, oxygen saturation <90% vs. >90%, in-hospital mortality vs. discharged alive and survivors. We obtained the odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (95%CI), and forest plots. Sensitivity analysis was used to analyze publication bias and heterogeneity. Results In 35 studies with 7931 confirmed COVID-19 patients, we found that anorexia (pooled OR:2.05; 95%CI: 1.36-3.09, p=0.0006) and abdominal pain (OR 2.80; 95%CI: 1.41-5.54, p=0.003) were associated with a higher risk of poor outcomes and no such association was found for diarrhea (OR 1.04; 95%CI: 0.85-1.26, p=0.71), nausea (OR 0.73; 95%CI: 0.38-1.39, p=0.34) and vomiting (OR 1.24; 95%CI 0.86-1.79, p=0.25). Conclusion The meta-analysis concludes that anorexia and abdominal pain are associated with poor outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, while diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting have no association. Future research should focus on whether detecting GI invasion in conjunction with fecal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing can aid in the early triage of high-risk individuals and improve outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Mehta et al.)