Search

Dynamics and energetic structure of largely fluctuating nonadiabatic electron wavepackets are studied in terms of Energy Natural Orbitals (ENOs) [K. Takatsuka and Y. Arasaki, J. Chem. Phys. 154, 094103 (2021)]. Such huge fluctuating states are sampled from the highly excited states of clusters of 12 boron atoms (B12), which have densely quasi-degenerate electronic excited-state manifold, each adiabatic state of which gets promptly mixed with other states through the frequent and enduring nonadiabatic interactions within the manifold. Yet, the wavepacket states are expected to be of very long lifetimes. This excited-state electronic wavepacket dynamics is extremely interesting but very hard to analyze since they are usually represented in large time-dependent configuration interaction wavefunctions and/or in some other complicated forms. We have found that ENO gives an invariant energy orbital picture to characterize not only the static highly correlated electronic wavefunctions but also those time-dependent electronic wavefunctions. Hence, we first demonstrate how the ENO representation works for some general cases, choosing proton transfer in water dimer and electron-deficient multicenter chemical bonding in diborane in the ground state. We then penetrate with ENO deep into the analysis of the essential nature of nonadiabatic electron wavepacket dynamics in the excited states and show the mechanism of the coexistence of huge electronic fluctuation and rather strong chemical bonds under very random electron flows within the molecule. To quantify the intra-molecular energy flow associated with the huge electronic-state fluctuation, we define and numerically demonstrate what we call the electronic energy flux.

Intra- and inter-molecular electronic energy current is formulated by defining the probability current of electronic energy, called the energy flux. Among vast possible applications to electronic energy transfer phenomena, including chemical reaction dynamics, here we present a first numerical example from highly excited nonadiabatic electron wavepacket dynamics of a boron cluster B12.

We propose a methodology to unify electronic and nuclear quantum wavepacket dynamics in molecular processes including nonadiabatic chemical reactions. The canonical and traditional approach in the full quantum treatment both for electrons and nuclei rests on the Born–Oppenheimer fixed nuclei strategy, the total wavefunction of which is described in terms of the Born–Huang expansion. This approach is already realized numerically but only for small molecules with several number of coupled electronic states for extremely hard technical reasons. Besides, the stationary-state view of the relevant electronic states based on the Born–Oppenheimer approximation is not always realistic in tracking real-time electron dynamics in attosecond scale. We therefore incorporate nuclear wavepacket dynamics into the scheme of nonadiabatic electron wavepacket theory, which we have been studying for a long time. In this scheme thus far, electron wavepackets are quantum mechanically propagated in time along nuclear paths that can naturally bifurcate due to nonadiabatic interactions. The nuclear paths are in turn generated simultaneously by the so-called matrix force given by the electronic states involved, the off-diagonal elements of which represent the force arising from nonadiabatic interactions. Here we advance so that the nuclear wavepackets are directly taken into account in place of path (trajectory) approximation. The nuclear wavefunctions are represented in terms of the Cartesian Gaussians multiplied by plane waves, which allows for feasible calculations of atomic and molecular integrals together with the electronic counterparts in a unified manner. The Schrödinger dynamics of the simultaneous electronic and nuclear wavepackets are to be integrated by means of the dual least action principle of quantum mechanics [K. Takatsuka, J. Phys. Commun. 4, 035007 (2020)], which is a time-dependent variational principle. Great contributions of Vincent McKoy in the electron dynamics in the fixed nuclei approximation and development in time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy are briefly outlined as a guide to the present work.

Physical nature of the chemical bond and potential barrier is studied in terms of energy natural orbitals (ENOs), which are extracted from highly correlated electronic wavefunctions. ENO provides an objective one-electron picture about energy distribution in a molecule, just as the natural orbitals (NOs) represent one electron view about electronic charge distribution. ENO is invariant in the same sense as NO is, that is, ENOs converge to the exact ones as a series of approximate wavefunctions approach the exact one, no matter how the methods of approximation are adopted. Energy distribution analysis based on ENO can give novel insights about the nature of chemical bonding and formation of potential barriers, besides information based on the charge distribution alone. With ENOs extracted from full configuration interaction wavefunctions in a finite yet large enough basis set, we analyze the nature of chemical bonding of three low-lying electronic states of a hydrogen molecule, all being in different classes of the so-called covalent bond. The mechanism of energy lowering in bond formation, which gives a binding energy, is important, yet not the only concern for this small molecule. Another key notion in chemical bonding is whether a potential basin is well generated stiff enough to support a vibrational state(s) on it. Based on the virial theorem in the adiabatic approximation and in terms of the energy and force analyses with ENOs, we study the roles of the electronic kinetic energy and its nuclear derivative(s) on how they determine the curvature (or the force constant) of the potential basins. The same idea is applied to the potential barrier and, thereby, the transition states. The rate constant within the transition-state theory is formally shown to be described in terms of the electronic kinetic energy and the nuclear derivatives only. Thus, the chemical bonding and rate process are interconnected behind the scenes. Besides this aspect, we pay attention to (1) the effects of electron correlation that manifests itself not only in the orbital energy but also in the population of ENOs and (2) the role of nonadiabaticity (diabatic state mixing), resulting in double basins and a barrier on a single potential curve in bond formation. These factors differentiate a covalent bond into subclasses.