17 results on '"Katrina E Donahue"'
Search Results
2. When Less Is More: Identifying Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Engaging in Unnecessary Blood Glucose Monitoring
- Author
-
Marcella H. Boynton, Katrina E. Donahue, Erica Richman, Asia Johnson, Jennifer Leeman, Maihan B. Vu, Jennifer Rees, and Laura A. Young
- Subjects
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Internal Medicine ,Feature Articles - Abstract
This study examined whether certain patient characteristics are associated with the prescribing of self-monitoring of blood glucose for patients with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin and have well-controlled blood glucose. Against recommendations, one-third of the patient sample from a large health network in North Carolina (N = 9,338) received a prescription for testing supplies (i.e., strips or lancets) within the prior 18 months. Women, African Americans, individuals prescribed an oral medication, nonsmokers, and those who were underweight or normal weight all had greater odds of receiving such a prescription. These results indicate that providers may have prescribing tendencies that are potentially biased against more vulnerable patient groups and contrary to guidelines.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Collaboration and Shared Decision-Making Between Patients and Clinicians in Preventive Health Care Decisions and US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations
- Author
-
Karina W. Davidson, Carol M. Mangione, Michael J. Barry, Wanda K. Nicholson, Michael D. Cabana, Aaron B. Caughey, Esa M. Davis, Katrina E. Donahue, Chyke A. Doubeni, Martha Kubik, Li Li, Gbenga Ogedegbe, Lori Pbert, Michael Silverstein, James Stevermer, Chien-Wen Tseng, and John B. Wong
- Subjects
Obstetrics and Gynecology ,General Medicine - Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
- Author
-
Carol M, Mangione, Michael J, Barry, Wanda K, Nicholson, Michael, Cabana, David, Chelmow, Tumaini, Rucker Coker, Karina W, Davidson, Esa M, Davis, Katrina E, Donahue, Carlos Roberto, Jaén, Martha, Kubik, Li, Li, Gbenga, Ogedegbe, Lori, Pbert, John M, Ruiz, James, Stevermer, and John B, Wong
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Sleep Apnea, Obstructive ,Advisory Committees ,Middle Aged ,Risk Assessment ,United States ,Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ,Prevalence ,Quality of Life ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,Female ,Aged - Abstract
Current prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the US is not well established; however, based on cohort and survey data, in 2007-2010 the estimated prevalence of at least mild OSA (defined as an apnea-hypoxia index [AHI] ≥5) plus symptoms of daytime sleepiness among adults aged 30 to 70 years was 14% for men and 5% for women, and the estimated prevalence of moderate to severe OSA (defined as AHI ≥15) was 13% for men and 6% for women. Severe OSA is associated with increased all-cause mortality. Other adverse health outcomes associated with untreated OSA include cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular events, type 2 diabetes, cognitive impairment, decreased quality of life, and motor vehicle crashes.To update its 2017 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the benefits and harms of screening for OSA in adults.Asymptomatic adults (18 years or older) and adults with unrecognized symptoms of OSA.The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for OSA in the general adult population.The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for OSA in the general adult population. (I statement).
- Published
- 2022
5. Hormone Therapy for the Primary Prevention of Chronic Conditions in Postmenopausal Persons: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
- Author
-
Carol M, Mangione, Michael J, Barry, Wanda K, Nicholson, Michael, Cabana, Aaron B, Caughey, David, Chelmow, Tumaini Rucker, Coker, Esa M, Davis, Katrina E, Donahue, Carlos Roberto, Jaén, Martha, Kubik, Li, Li, Gbenga, Ogedegbe, Lori, Pbert, John M, Ruiz, James, Stevermer, and John B, Wong
- Subjects
Postmenopause ,Primary Prevention ,Hormone Replacement Therapy ,Chronic Disease ,Humans ,Female ,Estrogens ,Progestins ,Hormones - Abstract
Menopause is defined as the cessation of a person's menstrual cycle. It is defined retrospectively, 12 months after the final menstrual period. Perimenopause, or the menopausal transition, is the few-year time period preceding a person's final menstrual period and is characterized by increasing menstrual cycle length variability and periods of amenorrhea, and often symptoms such as vasomotor dysfunction. The prevalence and incidence of most chronic diseases (eg, cardiovascular disease, cancer, osteoporosis, and fracture) increase with age, and US persons who reach menopause are expected on average to live more than another 30 years.To update its 2017 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the benefits and harms of systemic (ie, oral or transdermal) hormone therapy for the prevention of chronic conditions in postmenopausal persons and whether outcomes vary by age or by timing of intervention after menopause.Asymptomatic postmenopausal persons who are considering hormone therapy for the primary prevention of chronic medical conditions.The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that the use of combined estrogen and progestin for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in postmenopausal persons with an intact uterus has no net benefit. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that the use of estrogen alone for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in postmenopausal persons who have had a hysterectomy has no net benefit.The USPSTF recommends against the use of combined estrogen and progestin for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in postmenopausal persons. (D recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against the use of estrogen alone for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in postmenopausal persons who have had a hysterectomy. (D recommendation).
- Published
- 2022
6. Screening for Syphilis Infection in Nonpregnant Adolescents and Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Reaffirmation Recommendation Statement
- Author
-
Carol M, Mangione, Michael J, Barry, Wanda K, Nicholson, Michael, Cabana, David, Chelmow, Tumaini Rucker, Coker, Esa M, Davis, Katrina E, Donahue, Carlos Roberto, Jaén, Martha, Kubik, Li, Li, Gbenga, Ogedegbe, Lori, Pbert, John M, Ruiz, James, Stevermer, and John B, Wong
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Adolescent ,Advisory Committees ,Preventive Health Services ,Sexually Transmitted Diseases ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,Female ,Syphilis ,United States - Abstract
Syphilis is a sexually transmitted infection that can progress through different stages (primary, secondary, latent, and tertiary) and cause serious health problems if left untreated. Reported cases of primary and secondary syphilis in the US increased from a record low of 2.1 cases per 100 000 population in 2000 and 2001 to 11.9 cases per 100 000 population in 2019. Men account for the majority of cases (83% of primary and secondary syphilis cases in 2019), and rates among women nearly tripled from 2015 to 2019.To reaffirm its 2016 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a reaffirmation evidence update focusing on targeted key questions evaluating the performance of risk assessment tools and the benefits and harms of screening for syphilis in nonpregnant adolescents and adults.Asymptomatic, nonpregnant adolescents and adults who have ever been sexually active and are at increased risk for syphilis infection.Using a reaffirmation process, the USPSTF concludes with high certainty that there is a substantial net benefit of screening for syphilis infection in nonpregnant persons who are at increased risk for infection.The USPSTF recommends screening for syphilis infection in persons who are at increased risk for infection. (A recommendation).
- Published
- 2022
7. Behavioral Counseling Interventions to Promote a Healthy Diet and Physical Activity for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Adults Without Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
- Author
-
Carol M, Mangione, Michael J, Barry, Wanda K, Nicholson, Michael, Cabana, Tumaini Rucker, Coker, Karina W, Davidson, Esa M, Davis, Katrina E, Donahue, Carlos Roberto, Jaén, Martha, Kubik, Li, Li, Gbenga, Ogedegbe, Lori, Pbert, John M, Ruiz, James, Stevermer, and John B, Wong
- Subjects
Adult ,Counseling ,Advisory Committees ,Clinical Decision-Making ,General Medicine ,Health Promotion ,Psychosocial Intervention ,United States ,Glucose ,Behavior Therapy ,Cardiovascular Diseases ,Risk Factors ,Hypertension ,Humans ,Diet, Healthy ,Precision Medicine ,Exercise ,Dyslipidemias - Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD), which includes heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke, is the leading cause of death in the US. A large proportion of CVD cases can be prevented by addressing modifiable risk factors, including smoking, obesity, diabetes, elevated blood pressure or hypertension, dyslipidemia, lack of physical activity, and unhealthy diet. Adults who adhere to national guidelines for a healthy diet and physical activity have lower rates of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality than those who do not; however, most US adults do not consume healthy diets or engage in physical activity at recommended levels.To update its 2017 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a review of the evidence on the benefits and harms of behavioral counseling interventions to promote healthy behaviors in adults without CVD risk factors.Adults 18 years or older without known CVD risk factors, which include hypertension or elevated blood pressure, dyslipidemia, impaired fasting glucose or glucose tolerance, or mixed or multiple risk factors such as metabolic syndrome or an estimated 10-year CVD risk of 7.5% or greater.The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that behavioral counseling interventions have a small net benefit on CVD risk in adults without CVD risk factors.The USPSTF recommends that clinicians individualize the decision to offer or refer adults without CVD risk factors to behavioral counseling interventions to promote a healthy diet and physical activity. (C recommendation).
- Published
- 2022
8. Vitamin, Mineral, and Multivitamin Supplementation to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
- Author
-
Carol M, Mangione, Michael J, Barry, Wanda K, Nicholson, Michael, Cabana, David, Chelmow, Tumaini Rucker, Coker, Esa M, Davis, Katrina E, Donahue, Chyke A, Doubeni, Carlos Roberto, Jaén, Martha, Kubik, Li, Li, Gbenga, Ogedegbe, Lori, Pbert, John M, Ruiz, James, Stevermer, and John B, Wong
- Subjects
Adult ,Minerals ,Advisory Committees ,General Medicine ,Vitamins ,Nutrition Surveys ,beta Carotene ,Risk Assessment ,Cardiovascular Diseases ,Neoplasms ,Dietary Supplements ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,Vitamin E - Abstract
According to National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, 52% of surveyed US adults reported using at least 1 dietary supplement in the prior 30 days and 31% reported using a multivitamin-mineral supplement. The most commonly cited reason for using supplements is for overall health and wellness and to fill nutrient gaps in the diet. Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the 2 leading causes of death and combined account for approximately half of all deaths in the US annually. Inflammation and oxidative stress have been shown to have a role in both cardiovascular disease and cancer, and dietary supplements may have anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects.To update its 2014 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a review of the evidence on the efficacy of supplementation with single nutrients, functionally related nutrient pairs, or multivitamins for reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and mortality in the general adult population, as well as the harms of supplementation.Community-dwelling, nonpregnant adults.The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that the harms of beta carotene supplementation outweigh the benefits for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. The USPSTF also concludes with moderate certainty that there is no net benefit of supplementation with vitamin E for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to determine the balance of benefits and harms of supplementation with multivitamins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. Evidence is lacking and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to determine the balance of benefits and harms of supplementation with single or paired nutrients (other than beta carotene and vitamin E) for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. Evidence is lacking and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined.The USPSTF recommends against the use of beta carotene or vitamin E supplements for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. (D recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of the use of multivitamin supplements for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. (I statement) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of the use of single- or paired-nutrient supplements (other than beta carotene and vitamin E) for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. (I statement).
- Published
- 2022
9. Screening for Impaired Visual Acuity in Older Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
- Author
-
Carol M, Mangione, Michael J, Barry, Wanda K, Nicholson, Michael, Cabana, David, Chelmow, Tumaini Rucker, Coker, Esa M, Davis, Katrina E, Donahue, John W, Epling, Carlos Roberto, Jaén, Alex H, Krist, Martha, Kubik, Li, Li, Gbenga, Ogedegbe, Lori, Pbert, John M, Ruiz, Melissa A, Simon, James, Stevermer, and John B, Wong
- Subjects
Aged, 80 and over ,Vision Screening ,Primary Health Care ,Activities of Daily Living ,Advisory Committees ,Quality of Life ,Vision Disorders ,Visual Acuity ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,General Medicine ,Risk Assessment ,Aged - Abstract
Impairment of visual acuity is a serious public health problem in older adults. The number of persons 60 years or older with impaired visual acuity (defined as best corrected visual acuity worse than 20/40 but better than 20/200) was estimated at 2.91 million in 2015, and the number who are blind (defined as best corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or worse) was estimated at 760 000. Impaired visual acuity is consistently associated with decreased quality of life in older persons, including reduced ability to perform activities of daily living, work, and drive safely, as well as increased risk of falls and other unintentional injuries.To update its 2016 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the benefits and harms of screening for impaired visual acuity in older adults.Asymptomatic adults 65 years or older who present in primary care without known impaired visual acuity and are not seeking care for vision problems.The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for impaired visual acuity in asymptomatic older adults. The evidence is lacking, and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined. More research is needed.The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for impaired visual acuity in older adults. (I statement).
- Published
- 2022
10. Screening for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: US Preventive Services Task Force Reaffirmation Recommendation Statement
- Author
-
Carol M, Mangione, Michael J, Barry, Wanda K, Nicholson, Michael, Cabana, Aaron B, Caughey, David, Chelmow, Tumaini Rucker, Coker, Esa M, Davis, Katrina E, Donahue, Carlos Roberto, Jaén, Martha, Kubik, Li, Li, Gbenga, Ogedegbe, Lori, Pbert, John M, Ruiz, James, Stevermer, Chien-Wen, Tseng, and John B, Wong
- Subjects
Adult ,Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive ,Advisory Committees ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,General Medicine ,Risk Assessment ,United States - Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an irreversible reduction of airflow in the lungs. Progression to severe disease can prevent participation in normal activities because of deterioration of lung function. In 2020 it was estimated that approximately 6% of US adults had been diagnosed with COPD. Chronic lower respiratory disease, composed mainly of COPD, is the sixth leading cause of death in the US.To update its 2016 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a reaffirmation evidence update that focused on targeted key questions for benefits and harms of screening for COPD in asymptomatic adults and treatment in screen-detected or screen-relevant adults.Asymptomatic adults who do not recognize or report respiratory symptoms.Using a reaffirmation process, the USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for COPD in asymptomatic adults has no net benefit.The USPSTF recommends against screening for COPD in asymptomatic adults. (D recommendation).
- Published
- 2022
11. Aspirin Use to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
- Author
-
Karina W, Davidson, Michael J, Barry, Carol M, Mangione, Michael, Cabana, David, Chelmow, Tumaini Rucker, Coker, Esa M, Davis, Katrina E, Donahue, Carlos Roberto, Jaén, Alex H, Krist, Martha, Kubik, Li, Li, Gbenga, Ogedegbe, Lori, Pbert, John M, Ruiz, James, Stevermer, Chien-Wen, Tseng, and John B, Wong
- Subjects
Adult ,Primary Prevention ,Stroke ,Aspirin ,Cardiovascular Diseases ,Myocardial Infarction ,Humans ,Computer Simulation ,Hemorrhage ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Colorectal Neoplasms ,Risk Assessment - Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in the US, accounting for more than 1 in 4 deaths. Each year, an estimated 605 000 people in the US have a first myocardial infarction and an estimated 610 000 experience a first stroke.To update its 2016 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review on the effectiveness of aspirin to reduce the risk of CVD events (myocardial infarction and stroke), cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality in persons without a history of CVD. The systematic review also investigated the effect of aspirin use on colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality in primary CVD prevention populations, as well as the harms (particularly bleeding) associated with aspirin use. The USPSTF also commissioned a microsimulation modeling study to assess the net balance of benefits and harms from aspirin use for primary prevention of CVD and CRC, stratified by age, sex, and CVD risk level.Adults 40 years or older without signs or symptoms of CVD or known CVD (including history of myocardial infarction or stroke) who are not at increased risk for bleeding (eg, no history of gastrointestinal ulcers, recent bleeding, other medical conditions, or use of medications that increase bleeding risk).The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD events in adults aged 40 to 59 years who have a 10% or greater 10-year CVD risk has a small net benefit. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that initiating aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD events in adults 60 years or older has no net benefit.The decision to initiate low-dose aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD in adults aged 40 to 59 years who have a 10% or greater 10-year CVD risk should be an individual one. Evidence indicates that the net benefit of aspirin use in this group is small. Persons who are not at increased risk for bleeding and are willing to take low-dose aspirin daily are more likely to benefit. (C recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against initiating low-dose aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD in adults 60 years or older. (D recommendation).
- Published
- 2022
12. Collaboration and Shared Decision-Making Between Patients and Clinicians in Preventive Health Care Decisions and US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations
- Author
-
Karina W, Davidson, Carol M, Mangione, Michael J, Barry, Wanda K, Nicholson, Michael D, Cabana, Aaron B, Caughey, Esa M, Davis, Katrina E, Donahue, Chyke A, Doubeni, Martha, Kubik, Li, Li, Gbenga, Ogedegbe, Lori, Pbert, Michael, Silverstein, James, Stevermer, Chien-Wen, Tseng, and John B, Wong
- Subjects
Preventive Health Services ,Humans ,General Medicine ,Decision Making, Shared - Abstract
The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) works to improve the health of people nationwide by making evidence-based recommendations for preventive services. Patient-centered care is a core value in US health care. Shared decision-making (SDM), in which patients and clinicians make health decisions together, ensures patients' rights to be informed and involved in preventive care decisions and that these decisions are patient-centered. SDM has a role across the spectrum of USPSTF recommendations. For A or B recommendations (judged by the USPSTF to have high or moderate certainty of a moderate or substantial net benefit at the population level), SDM allows individual patients to decide whether to accept such services based on their personal values and preferences. For C recommendations (indicating at least moderate certainty of a small net benefit at the population level), SDM is critical for individual patients to decide whether the net benefit for them is worthwhile. For D recommendations (reflecting at least moderate certainty of a zero or negative net benefit) or I statements (low certainty of net benefit), clinicians should be prepared to discuss these services if patients ask. More evidence is needed to determine if, in addition to promoting patient-centeredness, SDM reduces inequities in preventive care, as well as to define new strategies to find time for discussion of preventive services in primary care.
- Published
- 2022
13. Clinical Team Response to the Impact of COVID-19 on Diabetes Self-Management: Findings From a Qualitative Study
- Author
-
Lily Hale, Thomas C. Cameron, Katrina E. Donahue, Maihan B. Vu, Jennifer Leeman, Asia Johnson, Erica Richman, Jennifer Rees, and Laura Young
- Abstract
The aims of this study were to explore providers’ perceptions of how COVID-19 affected patients’ psychological wellbeing and diabetes self-care and discover how providers responded to sustain and improve patients’ psychological health and diabetes management during the pandemic. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were completed with primary care providers (n=14) and endocrine specialty clinicians (n=10) across sixteen clinics in North Carolina. Interview topics included: (1) current glucose monitoring approaches and diabetes management strategies for people with diabetes (2) barriers and unintended consequences encountered with respect to diabetes self-management, and (3) innovative strategies developed to overcome barriers. Interview transcripts were coded using qualitative analysis software and analyzed to identify cross-cutting themes and differences between participants. Primary care providers and endocrine specialty clinicians reported that people with diabetes experienced increased mental health symptoms, increased financial challenges and positive and negative changes in self-care routines due to COVID-19. To offer support, primary care providers and endocrine specialty providers focused discussions on lifestyle management and utilized telemedicine to connect with patients. Additionally, endocrine specialty clinicians helped patients access financial assistance programs. Findings indicate that people with diabetes experienced unique challenges to self-management during the pandemic and providers responded with targeted support strategies. Future research should explore the effectiveness of these provider interventions as the pandemic continues to evolve.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents
- Author
-
Carol M, Mangione, Michael J, Barry, Wanda K, Nicholson, Michael, Cabana, David, Chelmow, Tumaini Rucker, Coker, Karina W, Davidson, Esa M, Davis, Katrina E, Donahue, Carlos Roberto, Jaén, Martha, Kubik, Li, Li, Gbenga, Ogedegbe, Lori, Pbert, John M, Ruiz, James, Stevermer, Chien-Wen, Tseng, and John B, Wong
- Subjects
Prediabetic State ,Adolescent ,Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ,Advisory Committees ,Preventive Health Services ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,General Medicine ,Child ,Risk Assessment - Abstract
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 210 000 children and adolescents younger than 20 years had diabetes as of 2018; of these, approximately 23 000 had type 2 diabetes. Youth with type 2 diabetes have an increased prevalence of associated chronic comorbid conditions, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Data indicate that the incidence of type 2 diabetes is rising; from 2002-2003 to 2014-2015, incidence increased from 9.0 cases per 100 000 children and adolescents to 13.8 cases per 100 000 children and adolescents.The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a review of the evidence on screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in asymptomatic, nonpregnant persons younger than 18 years. This is a new recommendation.Children and adolescents younger than 18 years without known diabetes or prediabetes or symptoms of diabetes or prediabetes.The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. There is a lack of evidence on the effect of screening for, and early detection and treatment of, type 2 diabetes on health outcomes in youth, and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined.The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. (I statement).
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Screening for Eating Disorders in Adolescents and Adults
- Author
-
Karina W, Davidson, Michael J, Barry, Carol M, Mangione, Michael, Cabana, David, Chelmow, Tumaini Rucker, Coker, Esa M, Davis, Katrina E, Donahue, Carlos Roberto, Jaén, Martha, Kubik, Li, Li, Gbenga, Ogedegbe, Lori, Pbert, John M, Ruiz, Michael, Silverstein, James, Stevermer, and John B, Wong
- Subjects
Feeding and Eating Disorders ,Male ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,Female ,General Medicine - Abstract
Eating disorders (eg, binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, and anorexia nervosa) are a group of psychiatric conditions defined as a disturbance in eating or eating-related behaviors that impair physical or psychosocial functioning. According to large US cohort studies, estimated lifetime prevalences for anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder in adult women are 1.42%, 0.46%, and 1.25%, respectively, and are lower in adult men (anorexia nervosa, 0.12%; bulimia nervosa, 0.08%; binge eating disorder, 0.42%). Eating disorder prevalence ranges from 0.3% to 2.3% in adolescent females and 0.3% to 1.3% in adolescent males. Eating disorders are associated with short-term and long-term adverse health outcomes, including physical, psychological, and social problems.The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the benefits and harms of screening for eating disorders in adolescents and adults with a normal or high body mass index. Evidence limited to populations who are underweight or have other physical signs or symptoms of eating disorders was not considered. The USPSTF has not previously made a recommendation on this topic.Adolescents and adults (10 years or older) who have no signs or symptoms of eating disorders (eg, rapid weight loss, weight gain, or pronounced deviation from growth trajectory; pubertal delay; bradycardia; oligomenorrhea; and amenorrhea).The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for eating disorders in adolescents and adults. The evidence is limited and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined.The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for eating disorders in adolescents and adults. (I statement).
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Screening for Atrial Fibrillation
- Author
-
Karina W, Davidson, Michael J, Barry, Carol M, Mangione, Michael, Cabana, Aaron B, Caughey, Esa M, Davis, Katrina E, Donahue, Chyke A, Doubeni, John W, Epling, Martha, Kubik, Li, Li, Gbenga, Ogedegbe, Lori, Pbert, Michael, Silverstein, James, Stevermer, Chien-Wen, Tseng, and John B, Wong
- Subjects
Stroke ,Electrocardiography ,Ischemic Attack, Transient ,Asymptomatic Diseases ,Atrial Fibrillation ,Anticoagulants ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Aged - Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. The prevalence of AF increases with age, from less than 0.2% in adults younger than 55 years to about 10% in those 85 years or older, with a higher prevalence in men than in women. It is uncertain whether the prevalence of AF differs by race and ethnicity. Atrial fibrillation is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke and is associated with a substantial increase in the risk of stroke. Approximately 20% of patients who have a stroke associated with AF are first diagnosed with AF at the time of the stroke or shortly thereafter.To update its 2018 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review on the benefits and harms of screening for AF in older adults, the accuracy of screening tests, the effectiveness of screening tests to detect previously undiagnosed AF compared with usual care, and the benefits and harms of anticoagulant therapy for the treatment of screen-detected AF in older adults.Adults 50 years or older without a diagnosis or symptoms of AF and without a history of transient ischemic attack or stroke.The USPSTF concludes that evidence is lacking, and the balance of benefits and harms of screening for AF in asymptomatic adults cannot be determined.The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for AF. (I statement).
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Actions to Transform US Preventive Services Task Force Methods to Mitigate Systemic Racism in Clinical Preventive Services
- Author
-
Karina W. Davidson, Melissa A. Simon, Lori Pbert, Katrina E Donahue, Michael J. Barry, Aaron B. Caughey, Carol M. Mangione, John B. Wong, Gbenga Ogedegbe, Li Li, Martha Kubik, Michael Silverstein, Alex H. Krist, James J. Stevermer, Chien-Wen Tseng, Michael D. Cabana, Esa M. Davis, Chyke A. Doubeni, and US Preventive Services Task Force
- Subjects
Health Equity ,Task force ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Advisory Committees ,MEDLINE ,General Medicine ,Disease ,Public relations ,Health outcomes ,Racism ,Organizational Policy ,United States ,Preventive care ,Preventive Health Services ,Life expectancy ,Humans ,Relevance (law) ,Medicine ,business ,Systemic Racism ,media_common - Abstract
Importance US life expectancy and health outcomes for preventable causes of disease have continued to lag in many populations that experience racism. Objective To propose iterative changes to US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) processes, methods, and recommendations and enact a commitment to eliminate health inequities for people affected by systemic racism. Design and evidence In February 2021, the USPSTF began operational steps in its work to create preventive care recommendations to address the harmful effects of racism. A commissioned methods report was conducted to inform this process. Key findings of the report informed proposed updates to the USPSTF methods to address populations adversely affected by systemic racism and proposed pilots on implementation of the proposed changes. Findings The USPSTF proposes to consider the opportunity to reduce health inequities when selecting new preventive care topics and prioritizing current topics; seek evidence about the effects of systemic racism and health inequities in all research plans and public comments requested, and integrate available evidence into evidence reviews; and summarize the likely effects of systemic racism and health inequities on clinical preventive services in USPSTF recommendations. The USPSTF will elicit feedback from its partners and experts and proposed changes will be piloted on selected USPSTF topics. Conclusions and relevance The USPSTF has developed strategies intended to mitigate the influence of systemic racism in its recommendations. The USPSTF seeks to reduce health inequities and other effects of systemic racism through iterative changes in methods of developing evidence-based recommendations, with partner and public input in the activities to implement the advancements.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.