Search

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the prognostic values of Edmonton Frail Scale and Clinical Frailty Scale in the emergency department and determine their suitability for patient management. Materials and Method: This study was conducted as a single-center prospective observational study. Patients aged 65 and older who presented to the emergency department were included. Clinical Frailty Scale and Edmonton Frail Scale scores, the emergency department outcomes, length of stay in the emergency department, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission data of the patients were recorded. ROC analysis was performed to examine the predictive values on outcomes. DeLong Test was used to compare the predictive values. Results: This study included 400 patients. Intensive care unit admission was significantly more frequent in the frail group according to both Edmonton Frail Scale and Clinical Frailty Scale. The length of stay in the emergency department was significantly longer in the frail group in both classifications. The mortality rate was significantly higher in the frail group in both classifications. The optimal cut off value for predicting mortality was found to be 9 for Edmonton Frail Scale and 7 for Clinical Frailty Scale. There was no significant difference between the predictive values of two scales. Conclusion: We found that two frail scales have good predictive values for adverse outcomes, such as mortality and the need for Intensive care unit admission in the emergency department. We believe that both scores would be valuable in guiding decisions for the emergency department usage due to their similar predictive values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Recently, a cardiac sonography finding, early systolic notching (ESN), was reported with high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in a limited population. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of ESN finding for PE in emergency department (ED) patients. Method: This prospective multicenter study was conducted in 4 academic EDs. All patients who underwent computed tomography angiography for suspected PE were included in the study. After inclusion, cardiac ultrasound including the right ventricular outflow tract Doppler signal was performed. The diagnostic tests of ESN finding were used for PE and its subgroups. Results: In the study, 183 of 201 patients met the study criteria. Of all patients, 52.5% had PE (n = 96), and 19.7% (n = 36) had ESN finding. In all ED patients, the sensitivity of ESN for PE was 34% (95% CI 25–45), and the specificity was 97% (95% CI 90–99). In the subgroup analysis, the sensitivity of ESN for PE with high or intermediate‐high risk was 69% (95% CI 49–85), and the specificity was 90% (95% CI 84–94). Inter‐rater reliability for ESN finding between the cardiologist and emergency physician was strong with a kappa statistic of 0.87. Conclusion: The pulmonary Doppler flow of ESN was moderate to high specific but low sensitive for PE in all ED patients. In the subgroup analysis, this finding was moderate specific and low sensitive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Successful placement of a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) on the first attempt is an important outcome for difficult vascular access (DVA) patients. This study compared standard technique, ultrasonography (USG), and near-infrared light (NIR) in terms of success in the first attempt in patients with DVA. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized controlled study. The study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Emergency department patients who describe DVA history, have no visible or palpable veins, and were assessed by the nurse to have a difficult PIVC were included to study. The PIVC procedure was performed on patients by standard, USG, or NIR device techniques. For all approaches, the success of the first attempt was the primary aim. Total procedure time, the total number of attempts, and the need for rescue intervention were secondary aims. Results: This study evaluated 270 patients. The first attempt success rates for USG, standard, and NIR methods were 78.9%, 62.2%, and 58.9%, respectively. The rate of first attempt success was higher in patients who underwent USG (USG versus standard, P =.014; USG versus NIR, P =.004; standard versus NIR, P =.648). The total median (IQR) procedure time for USG, standard, and NIR methods was 107 (69-228), 72 (47-134), and 82 (61-163) seconds, respectively. The total procedure time was longer in patients undergoing USG (standard versus USG, P <.001; NIR versus USG, P =.035; standard versus NIR, P =.055). The total median (IQR) number of attempts of USG, standard, and NIR methods were 1 (1-1), 1 (1-2), and 1 (1-2), respectively. A difference was found among the groups regarding the total number of attempts (USG versus NIR, P =.015; USG versus standard P =.108; standard versus NIR, P =.307). No difference was found among groups in terms of the need for rescue methods. Conclusion: It was found that USG increases the success of the first attempt compared with the standard method and NIR in patients with DVA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This article aims to provide an up-to-date resource on disaster management by reporting about the destructive fea-tures of the earthquake that occurred on October 30, 2020, and about the hospital and emergency service organization during a pandemic., Methods: This study was carried out with a multicentered, cross-sectional retrospective design on the victims of the 2020 Aegean Sea - Izmir earthquake. Local ethics committee approval was obtained. The data obtained by obtaining permission from two hospitals and ambulance services (transport data) located in the region where earthquake-related destruction was most prominent were evalu-ated. Patient data including demographic data, time of arrival to the emergency department, duration of stay under the debris, triage codes (green: not urgent, slightly injured; yellow: may be delayed, injured; red: critically injured; and black: dead), type of injuries, dura-tion of stay in the emergency department, crush syndrome, rhabdomyolysis, need for invasive procedures (e.g., surgery and dialysis), intensive care admission, hospital admission, and discharge were evaluated., Results: In total, 313 patients (60.4% females) were included in the study according to the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the participants was 38.0±21.0 years, with the youngest being a 6-month-old baby and the oldest a 91-year-old individual. Approximately 41.5% of the earthquake victims presented to the emergency department within the first 3 h of the earthquake, and patients with yellow triage code were the most common in the 1st h. Further, 35.2% of the patients who were rescued from under the debris were discharged alive. Four patients were discharged alive after being rescued from under the debris 24 h following the earthquake, of whom three were rescued after >48 h (longest duration, 91 h). Further, 32 (15.9%) patients who survived upon presentation to the emergency department had rhabdomyolysis, 4 (1.9%) underwent hemodialysis in the emergency department due to acute renal failure, and 8 (3.8%) underwent other emergency operations such as fasciotomy and amputation. In total, 122 patients died and 191 patients were discharged from the hospitals. Furthermore, 139 patients were discharged from the emergency department, 15 were admitted to the intensive care unit, 41 were hospitalized in the relevant clinics, and 112 were directly transferred to the morgue following preliminary evaluation., Conclusion: Emergency services should be ready in terms of accurate registration, correct data entry, correct triage assignment, sufficient resources, adequate team, sufficient equipment, and adequate treatment areas for disasters such as earthquakes. Further, ade-quate disaster trainings should be provided, feasible disaster relief plans should be prepared, and regular exercises should be conducted.