Search

Background: Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a common condition, yet there is no defined, objective, and reproducible intervention with which to make a diagnosis. There are many different treatment options available, but without the correct diagnosis, affected women are unable to access the right therapy. This paper reports on the questionnaire arm of the VAN study (VAginal Health - What's N ormal? ) which aimed to evaluate the performance and acceptability of the methods of assessment of GSM, described below., Objectives: To determine the value of the Day-to-Day Impact of Vaginal Aging (DIVA) questionnaire: a multidimensional measure of the impact of vaginal symptoms on functioning and well-being in postmenopausal women, in a prospective, observational, feasibility study., Methods: 60 women were recruited to the study (20 premenopausal, asymptomatic women (control group) and 40 peri- and postmenopausal, symptomatic women). All women had a baseline assessment, using three different interventions, in addition to the DIVA questionnaire and symptomatic women were offered treatment, followed by a second assessment undertaken at 16 weeks, using the same interventions. This paper focusses on the outcomes for the questionnaire and specifically on the paired data sets, before and after treatment., Results: An improvement in the score for all four sections of DIVA (Activities of daily living, Emotions, Sexual Activity, and Feelings about yourself and your body (female embodiment)) was observed, following any treatment. Additional questions were added to DIVA, to assess patient preference in relation to the different diagnostic interventions. These included a speculum examination as part of the clinical assessment, a smear taken from the lateral vaginal wall to assess the vaginal maturation index, both undertaken by a clinician and a self-administered tampon to collect vaginal secretions, to determine the small molecule metabolite profile, using NMR spectroscopy, and to enable analysis of the vaginal microbiome. The medical standard tampon was the preferred intervention, before and after treatment, for women eligible for treatment., Conclusion: The VAN study demonstrates that DIVA, a previously tested questionnaire, is an easily accessible intervention, to assess the impact of urogenital symptoms on quality-of-life indicators in women in the United Kingdom with GSM and that women prefer to use a tampon themselves, rather than have a clinician performed vaginal speculum examination or a vaginal smear., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Sub-Saharan Africa bears the burden of 70% of maternal deaths worldwide, of which ∼10% are attributable to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, primarily complications of preeclampsia. In other global settings, outcomes of pregnancies affected by preeclampsia are improved with timely and effective medical care., Objective: This study aimed to explore the perspectives of local health care professionals on how preeclampsia care is currently delivered in the study setting and what challenges they experience in providing prompt and safe care. We identified specific objectives of exploring stakeholder perceptions of (1) recognizing preeclampsia and (2) timely intervention when preeclampsia is diagnosed. We also explored the wider system factors (eg, cultural, financial, and logistic challenges) that health care professionals perceived as affecting their ability to deliver optimal preeclampsia care., Study Design: Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with health care professionals and stakeholders. The findings were analyzed using thematic analysis., Results: Thirty-three participants contributed to the study, including doctors and midwives with varying degrees of clinical experience and external stakeholders. The following 5 key themes emerged: delayed patient presentation, recognizing the unwell patient with preeclampsia, the challenges of the existing triage system, stakeholder disconnect, and ways of learning from each other. Health care professionals referenced an important psychosocial perspective associated with preeclampsia in the study setting, which may influence the likelihood of seeking care through traditional healers rather than hospital-based routes., Conclusion: We identify the key barriers to improving maternal and neonatal outcomes of preeclampsia, described at both the institutional level and within the wider setting. The study provides invaluable contextual information that suggests that a systems-based approach to health care quality improvement may be effective in reducing rates of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Objective: To review the available literature on the effect of cannabis-based products on the female reproductive system and establish whether there is any evidence that they benefit or harm patients with endometriosis and, therefore, whether there is sufficient evidence to recommend them., Data Sources: An electronic-based search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database. Reference lists of articles retrieved were reviewed, and a gray literature search was also performed., Methods of Study Selection: The original database search yielded 264 articles from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database, of which 41 were included. One hundred sixty-one studies relating to gynecologic malignancy, conditions unrelated to endometriosis, or therapies unrelated to cannabis-based products were excluded. Twelve articles were included from a gray literature search and review of references., Tabulation, Integration, and Results: Most available evidence is from laboratory studies aiming to simulate the effects of cannabis-based products on preclinical endometriosis models. Some show evidence of benefit with cannabis-based products. However, results are conflicting, and the impact in humans cannot necessarily be extrapolated from these data. Few studies exist looking at the effect of cannabis or its derived products in women with endometriosis; the majority are in the form of surveys and are affected by bias. National guidance was also reviewed: at present, this dictates that cannabis-based products can only be prescribed for conditions in which there is clear published evidence of benefit and only when all other treatment options have been exhausted., Conclusion: Current treatment options for endometriosis often affect fertility and/or have undesirable side effects that impede long-term management. Cannabis-based products have been suggested as a novel therapeutic option that may circumvent these issues. However, there is a paucity of well-designed, robust studies and randomized controlled trials looking at their use in the treatment of endometriosis. In addition, cannabis use has a potential for harm in the long term, with a possible association with "cannabis use disorder," psychosis, and mood disturbances. At present, national guidance cannot recommend cannabis-based products to patients in the UK owing to lack of clear evidence of benefit. More comprehensive research into the impact of endocannabinoids in the context of endometriosis is required before their use can be recommended or prescribed., (Copyright © 2021 AAGL. All rights reserved.)