Search

Bacterial osteomyelitis, an inflammatory response in the bone caused by microorganisms, typically affects the metaphysis in the skeletally immature. Bacterial osteomyelitis possesses a significant diagnostic challenge in pediatric patients due to its nonspecific clinical presentation. Because the metaphysis is the primary focus of infection in skeletally immature patients, understanding the normal physiologic, maturation process of bones throughout childhood allows to understand the pathophysiology of osteomyelitis. Timely and accurate diagnosis is crucial to initiate appropriate treatment, and prevent long-term sequelae and efforts must be made to isolate the causative organism. The potential causative organism changes according to the age of the patient and underlying medical conditions. Staphylococcus Aureus is the most common isolated bacteria in pediatric pyogenic osteomyelitis whereas Kingella Kingae is the most common causative agent in children aged 6 months to 4 years. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis, characterization, evaluation of complications, and follow up of bacterial osteomyelitis. Imaging also plays a pivotal role in the evaluation of potential neoplastic and non-neoplastic mimickers of osteomyelitis. In children, MRI is currently the gold standard imaging modality when suspecting bacterial osteomyelitis, whereas surgical intervention may be required in order to isolate the microorganism, treat complications, and exclude mimickers., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Skeletal Society (ISS).)

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common neoplasm in children, but it may mimic other types of vascular anomalies or nonvascular benign and malignant tumors. In most cases, the clinical appearance, time of onset, and pattern of involution facilitate its diagnosis. Imaging evaluation is not always needed since the IH features at clinical presentation are usually characteristic, but when needed, US and frequently MRI are the imaging modalities of choice. Clinical photography or photographic documentation plays a central role in monitoring these lesions over their clinical course. Photographic documentation can also add confidence and alert the radiologist when interpreting imaging studies. Some vascular anomalies, especially vascular malformations, are a frequent source of confusion, as these may resemble IHs clinically and at imaging. The lack of uniform terminology also hinders an accurate diagnosis. To unify the terminology and minimize confusion, the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies created a helpful classification in 1994. In addition, radiologists need to be aware of and become familiar with other neoplasms in children that may resemble IH to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary procedures. Fibrous and lipomatous tumors are examples of benign tumors that can mimic IHs clinically and at imaging, whereas rhabdomyosarcoma, infantile fibrosarcoma, neuroblastoma, and lymphoproliferative disorders are examples of malignant neoplasms. The authors review the features of IH at clinical presentation and imaging evaluation, highlighting its different phases of evolution and stressing the importance of photographic documentation. The authors also review pitfalls of IH with helpful pearls for differentiation. © RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Khanna and Briones in this issue.