Background: The advantages of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RA-MIE) over conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (C-MIE) are unknown. This nationwide large-scale study aimed to compare surgical outcomes between RA-MIE and C-MIE using rigorous propensity score methods, including detailed covariates and relevant outcomes., Methods: This Japanese nationwide retrospective cohort study included RA-MIE or C-MIE for esophageal malignant tumors performed between October 2018 and December 2019 and registered in the Japanese National Clinical Database. The primary outcome measure was postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade IIIa or higher. Propensity score matching was performed to create a balanced covariate distribution between the two groups., Results: After propensity score matching, 1092 patients were selected. The RA-MIE group had a significantly longer operation time and greater blood loss than the C-MIE group (565 vs. 477 min and 120 vs. 90 mL). Furthermore, the R0 resection rate was lower in the RA-MIE group than in the C-MIE group (95.1% vs. 97.8%). The RA-MIE and C-MIE groups had no differences regarding overall complications ≥ Grade IIIa (22.0% vs. 20.3%, p = 0.52), 30-day mortality rates (0.4% vs. 0.5%), and operative mortality rates (0.7% vs. 0.7%). Deep SSI was less frequent (2.7% vs. 6.0%) and pulmonary embolism was more frequent (2.4% vs. 0.5%) in the RA-MIE group than in the C-MIE group., Conclusions: In the initial phase of implementation, RA-MIE and C-MIE demonstrated comparable morbidity rates when performed by skilled board-certified endoscopic surgeons., Competing Interests: K.O. received lecture fees from Intuitive Surgical, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., outside the submitted work. H.K. reports receiving consultation fees from EPS Corporation and speaker fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. H.K. and H.M. are affiliated with the Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment at the University of Tokyo, which is a social collaboration department supported by grants from NCD, Johnson & Johnson K.K., Nipro Corporation, and Intuitive Surgical Sàrl. K.S. was funded by Sysmex, Co., in relation to the Collaborative Laboratory for Research and Development in Advanced Surgical Intelligence, Fujita Health University. S.T. received lecture fees from Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Covidien Japan Inc., Ethicon Inc., and Olympus Corporation. T.T. and I.U. were also funded by Medicaroid, Inc., in relation to the Collaborative Laboratory for Research and Development in Advanced Surgical Technology, Fujita Health University. K.S. received advisory fees from Medicaroid, Inc., outside the submitted work. I.U. reports holding stocks in Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Y.K. reports grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., grants from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, grants from Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd., grants from Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, grants from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., grants from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., grants from Ono Pharmaceutical CO., Ltd., grants from Tsumura & CO., grants from Kyouwa Hakkou Kirin Co., Ltd., grants from EA Pharma Co., Ltd., grants from Medicon INC., grants from Kaken Pharmaceutical co. Ltd., grants from Eisai Co., Ltd., grants from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory Inc., grants from Teijin Pharma Limited., grants from Nihon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., grants from Nippon Covidien Inc., personal fees from Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, personal fees from AstraZeneca K.K., personal fees from Ethicon Inc., personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical CO., Ltd., personal fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc., personal fees from Olympus Corporation, personal fees from Nippon Covidien Inc., personal fees from Shionogi & Co., Ltd., personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., personal fees from Bristol‐Myers Squibb K.K., personal fees from MSD K.K., personal fees from Smith & Nephew KK, personal fees from Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., personal fees from Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Co., LTD., and personal fees from ASKA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. outside the submitted work. I.U. received lecture fees from Intuitive Surgical, Inc., outside the submitted work. Y.K., M.I., and Y.K. are editorial board members of Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery. The remaining authors have no commercial association with or financial involvement that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article., (© 2024 The Author(s). Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery.)