Search

Purpose: The treatment of oligodendroglioma consists of tumor resection and radiochemotherapy. The timing of radiochemotherapy remains unclear, and predictive biomarkers are limited. Experimental Design: Adult patients diagnosed with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutated, 1p/19q-codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 oligodendroglioma at the Medical University of Vienna and the Kepler University Hospital Linz (Austria) in 1992 to 2019 were included. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between early postoperative treatment and initial observation were compared using propensity score–weighted Cox regression models. DNA methylation analysis of tumor tissue was performed using Illumina MethylationEPIC 850k microarrays. Results: One hundred thirty-one out of 201 (65.2%) patients with CNS WHO grade 2 and 70 of 201 (34.8%) with grade 3 oligodendroglioma were identified. Eighty-three of 201 (41.3%) patients underwent early postoperative treatment, of whom 56 of 83 (67.5%) received radiochemotherapy, 15 of 84 (18.1%) radiotherapy (RT) only and 12 of 83 (14.5%) chemotherapy only. Temozolomide-based treatment was administered to 64 of 68 (94.1%) patients, whereas RT + procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine (PCV) were applied in 2 of 69 (3.5%) patients. Early treatment was not associated with PFS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% CI, 0.33–1.65, P = 0.459] or OS (adjusted HR: 2.07; 95% CI, 0.52–8.21, P = 0.302) improvement. Unsupervised clustering analysis of DNA methylation profiles from patients receiving early treatment revealed two methylation clusters correlating with PFS, whereas no association of clustering with O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, CNS WHO grade, extent of resection, and treating center could be observed. Conclusions: In this retrospective study, early postoperative treatment was not associated with improved PFS/OS in oligodendroglioma. The potentially predictive value of whole-genome methylation profiling should be validated in prospective trials.

Purpose:The treatment of oligodendroglioma consists of tumor resection and radiochemotherapy. The timing of radiochemotherapy remains unclear, and predictive biomarkers are limited.Experimental Design:Adult patients diagnosed with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutated, 1p/19q-codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 oligodendroglioma at the Medical University of Vienna and the Kepler University Hospital Linz (Austria) in 1992 to 2019 were included. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between early postoperative treatment and initial observation were compared using propensity score–weighted Cox regression models. DNA methylation analysis of tumor tissue was performed using Illumina MethylationEPIC 850k microarrays.Results:One hundred thirty-one out of 201 (65.2%) patients with CNS WHO grade 2 and 70 of 201 (34.8%) with grade 3 oligodendroglioma were identified. Eighty-three of 201 (41.3%) patients underwent early postoperative treatment, of whom 56 of 83 (67.5%) received radiochemotherapy, 15 of 84 (18.1%) radiotherapy (RT) only and 12 of 83 (14.5%) chemotherapy only. Temozolomide-based treatment was administered to 64 of 68 (94.1%) patients, whereas RT + procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine (PCV) were applied in 2 of 69 (3.5%) patients. Early treatment was not associated with PFS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% CI, 0.33–1.65, P = 0.459] or OS (adjusted HR: 2.07; 95% CI, 0.52–8.21, P = 0.302) improvement. Unsupervised clustering analysis of DNA methylation profiles from patients receiving early treatment revealed two methylation clusters correlating with PFS, whereas no association of clustering with O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, CNS WHO grade, extent of resection, and treating center could be observed.Conclusions:In this retrospective study, early postoperative treatment was not associated with improved PFS/OS in oligodendroglioma. The potentially predictive value of whole-genome methylation profiling should be validated in prospective trials.

Purpose: Rechallenge with temozolomide (TMZ) at first progression of glioblastoma after temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ) has been studied in retrospective and single-arm prospective studies, applying temozolomide continuously or using 7/14 or 21/28 days schedules. The DIRECTOR trial sought to show superiority of the 7/14 regimen.Experimental Design: Patients with glioblastoma at first progression after TMZ/RT→TMZ and at least two maintenance temozolomide cycles were randomized to Arm A [one week on (120 mg/m2 per day)/one week off] or Arm B [3 weeks on (80 mg/m2 per day)/one week off]. The primary endpoint was median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) defined as progression, premature temozolomide discontinuation for toxicity, or death from any cause. O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation was prospectively assessed by methylation-specific PCR.Results: Because of withdrawal of support, the trial was prematurely closed to accrual after 105 patients. There was a similar outcome in both arms for median TTF [A: 1.8 months; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.8–3.2 vs. B: 2.0 months; 95% CI, 1.8–3.5] and overall survival [A: 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.7–13.0) vs. B: 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.1–11.6)]. Median TTF in patients with MGMT-methylated tumors was 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8–7.4) versus 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.8–2) in MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma. Progression-free survival rates at 6 months (PFS-6) were 39.7% with versus 6.9% without MGMT promoter methylation.Conclusions: Temozolomide rechallenge is a treatment option for MGMT promoter-methylated recurrent glioblastoma. Alternative strategies need to be considered for patients with progressive glioblastoma without MGMT promoter methylation. Clin Cancer Res; 21(9); 2057–64. ©2015 AACR.

Purpose: Preclinical data indicate anti-invasive activity of APG101, a CD95 ligand (CD95L)–binding fusion protein, in glioblastoma.Experimental Design: Patients (N = 91) with glioblastoma at first or second progression were randomized 1:2 between second radiotherapy (rRT; 36 Gy; five times 2 Gy per week) or rRT+APG101 (400 mg weekly i.v.). Patient characteristics [N = 84 (26 patients rRT, 58 patients rRT+APG101)] were balanced.Results: Progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6) rates were 3.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1–19.6] for rRT and 20.7% (95% CI, 11.2–33.4) for rRT+APG101 (P = 0.048). Median PFS was 2.5 (95% CI, 2.3–3.8) months and 4.5 (95% CI, 3.7–5.4) months with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.27–0.88; P = 0.0162) adjusted for tumor size. Cox regression analysis adjusted for tumor size revealed a HR of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.36–1.01; P = 0.0559) for rRT+APG101 for death of any cause. Lower methylation levels at CpG2 in the CD95L promoter in the tumor conferred a stronger risk reduction (HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06–0.58) for treatment with APG101, suggesting a potential biomarker.Conclusions: CD95 pathway inhibition in combination with rRT is an innovative concept with clinical efficacy. It warrants further clinical development. CD95L promoter methylation in the tumor may be developed as a biomarker. Clin Cancer Res; 20(24); 6304–13. ©2014 AACR.

Supplementary Figure 1. MMSE assessment at study entry, during treatment, and at follow-up

Acknowledgement. List of investigators and other study stuff at the individual sites.

CONSORT Statement

Suppl Figures S1-S4. S1: Genomic Localization of the CpG2 in the CD95 L promoter. S2: Survival probability according to CpG2 methylation status. S3: Survival probability according to CD95L expression as detected by IHC. S4 a and b: Cox regression data for CpG1 and 2 in the CD95L promoter.

Supplementary Tables 1-7. Supplementary Table 1. Safety and tolerability. Supplementary Table 2. Outcome by MGMT promoter methylation status and treatment arm. Supplementary Table 3. Outcome by interval from last TMZ administration and MGMT promoter methylation status. Supplementary Table 4. Adherence to Mini Mental Status data collection over the course of the study. Supplementary Table 5. Treatment effect (Arm B versus Arm A) on EORTC-QLQ-C30 and -BN20 scales evaluated at timepoint 90 days Supplementary Table 6. Absolute changes of (0-100) score points of quality of life (as assessed by the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and -BN20 scales) within one treatment cycle of 28 days in Arms A and B, along with local p-values for difference in slopes. Supplementary Table 7. Adherence to EORTC-QLQ-BN20 and -C30 data collection over the course of the study.

Background No systemic treatment has been established for meningioma progressing after local therapies. Methods This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II study included adult patients with recurrent WHO grade 2 or 3 meningioma. Patients were 2:1 randomly assigned to intravenous trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) or local standard of care (LOC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints comprised overall survival (OS), objective radiological response, safety, quality of life (QoL) assessment using the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 questionnaires, and we performed tissue-based exploratory molecular analyses. Results Ninety patients were randomized (n = 29 in LOC, n = 61 in trabectedin arm). With 71 events, median PFS was 4.17 months in the LOC and 2.43 months in the trabectedin arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42; 80% CI, 1.00-2.03; P = .294) with a PFS-6 rate of 29.1% (95% CI, 11.9%-48.8%) and 21.1% (95% CI, 11.3%-32.9%), respectively. Median OS was 10.61 months in the LOC and 11.37 months in the trabectedin arm (HR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.54-1.76; P = .94). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 44.4% of patients in the LOC and 59% of patients in the trabectedin arm. Enrolled patients had impeded global QoL and overall functionality and high fatigue before initiation of systemic therapy. DNA methylation class, performance status, presence of a relevant co-morbidity, steroid use, and right hemisphere involvement at baseline were independently associated with OS. Conclusions Trabectedin did not improve PFS and OS and was associated with higher toxicity than LOC treatment in patients with non-benign meningioma. Tumor DNA methylation class is an independent prognostic factor for OS.

INTRODUCTION The CeTeG/NOA-09 trial demonstrated superior median overall survival (mOS, 48.1 months) in MGMT-methylated glioblastoma treated with lomustine/temozolomide compared to temozolomide. We retrospectively analyzed an off-study cohort of patients treated with lomustine/temozolomide to gather real-world data on this new regimen. METHODS Adult patients from 20 centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland were included. Inclusion criteria were MGMT-methylated IDHwt glioblastoma newly diagnosed prior to end of 2020, and lomustine/temozolomide treatment as part of first-line therapy. RESULTS 321 patients with a median age of 57 years (range, 21-78) and a median follow-up of 19.9 months were included. In the whole cohort, mOS was 41.0 months (95%CI, 33.0 – not reached). In patients starting lomustine/temozolomide immediately upon initiation of radiotherapy strictly following the CeTeG protocol (88%), mOS was 52.8 months (35.8 – not reached) as compared to 24.6 months (17.6 – not reached) in patients starting lomustine/temozolomide after completion of radiotherapy/concomitant temozolomide (12%, logrank test: p = 0.06). Patients with a KPS < 80 had a shorter mOS of 19.7 months (95%CI, 16.6 – not reached) compared to 41.0 months (33.0 – not reached, p = 0.009) in KPS 80-100. Gross total resection (GTR, 53.9%) was associated with longer mOS (52.8 months, 95%CI 24.1 – not reached) compared to partial resection/biopsy (30.5 months, 95%CI 36.8 – not reached, p=0.004). Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed GTR (HR 0.66, p = 0.033) and younger age ( ≤ 50 years: HR 0.42, p = 0.001), but not KPS (80-100 vs. lower: HR 0.66, p = 0.12) as independent prognostic factors. DISCUSSION In this real-world multicenter cohort, survival was similar to the promising results of CeTeG/NOA-09. Further analyses should investigate a potentially reduced benefit from lomustine/temozolomide in patients with low KPS/no GTR and a possible detrimental effect from deferred lomustine/temozolomide initiation. The median follow-up is admittedly short, updated data will be presented.