Search

Background Clinician burnout, stress and job dissatisfaction among Advance Practice Registered Nurses (APRNS) may have impacted work-related quality of life (WRQoL) during the COVID-19 pandemic. No studies describe burnout and resilience in APRNs who manage care for patients with HF. Objectives Among APRNs who manage care for patients with HF, study aims included: 1) Describe burnout and WRQoL levels; 2) Determine the relationship between burnout and WRQoL; 3) Examine whether resilience moderates the association between WRQoL and burnout.An online survey of American Association of Heart Failure Nurses and the Heart Failure Society of America APRN members were queried.APRN's who practiced in ambulatory or inpatient cardiology settings at least 8 h weekly.Burnout, WRQoL, and resilience. Results Participants' (N = 101) mean age was 50 (±10) years and 93% identified as female. APRNs worked more than 42 h weekly and reported moderate levels of resilience, high levels of personal (M = 51.7, norm-referenced mean: 35.9) and work-related burnout (M = 50.1, norm-referenced mean: 33.0). Correlations between high levels of burnout and low WRQoL (r range: -0.74 - -0.39 -, p.001) were found. Burnout moderated the relationships among resilience and WRQoL. Conclusion APRNs had high levels of burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient-related burnout was not high. Level of burnout influenced the relationships among resilience and WRQoL suggesting that burnout is from workplace and personal sources, and that level of resilience could not overcome the effect of burnout. Interventions are needed regarding systems changes to uplift and support our workforce.

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves health outcomes and quality of life for patients with cardiovascular disease, yet only a quarter of eligible patients enroll. A myriad of CR models that use either an alternative location (ie, home-based) and/or an alternative exercise have been developed to overcome known attendance and physical limitation barriers; however, patient experiences with these models have not been systematically reviewed. Our aim is to review patient experiences with these models of CR.We conducted a systematic review and thematic analysis of qualitative studies published between 2009 and January of 2022 from CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO.Twenty-five studies were included, representing the perspectives of 487 individuals who participated in an alternative model of CR. Exercises included walking, tai chi, yoga, aquatic exercise, exergaming, chair-based exercises, aerobics, physical activity trackers, and individualized exercise plans. Nineteen of 25 studies used home-based models and two used live video. Twelve studies included patients with heart failure. Patient perspectives comprised three central themes: exercise benefits, exercise facilitators, and participation barriers. Some thematic categories were reported variably by particular model/study design (eg, home-based) than by others. All alternative models of CR were found to be physically, psychologically, and/or socially beneficial to patients. Participants described facilitators and barriers that were influential in the decision to initiate or continue exercise. These patient insights are critical for innovative delivery of CR that is appealing, accommodates physical limitations, and broadens access to improve health equity.