Search

Purpose: Checkpoint-inhibitors have limited efficacy for children with unselected solid and brain tumors. We report the first prospective pediatric trial (NCT02992964) using nivolumab exclusively for refractory non-hematological cancers harboring tumor mutation burden (TMB) ≥5 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb) and/or mismatch-repair deficiency (MMRD). Patients and methods: Twenty patients were screened, and ten ultimately included in the response cohort of whom nine had TMB >10mut/Mb (three initially eligible based on MMRD) and one patient had TMB between 5-10 mut/Mb. Results: Delayed immune responses contributed to best overall response of 50%, improving on initial objective responses (20%) and leading to 2-year overall survival (OS) of 50% (95% CI; 27, 93). Four children, including three with refractory malignant gliomas are in complete remission at a median follow-up of 37-months (range: 32.4-60), culminating in 2-year OS of 43% (95% CI; 18.2, 100). Biomarker analyses confirmed benefit in children with germline MMRD, microsatellite instability, higher activated and lower regulatory circulating T-cells. Stochastic mutation accumulation driven by underlying germline MMRD impacted the tumor microenvironment, contributing to delayed responses. No benefit was observed in the single patient with a MMR-proficient tumour and TMB 7.4 mut/Mb. Conclusions: Nivolumab resulted in durable responses and prolonged survival for the first time in a pediatric trial of refractory hypermutated cancers including malignant gliomas. Novel biomarkers identified here need to be translated rapidly to clinical care to identify children who can benefit from checkpoint-inhibitors, including for upfront management of their cancers.

POLE germline mutations from the IRRDC and literature

Supplementary Figure S1 (related to Figure 1): PoleP286R mouse model design, validation, and tumor findings. Supplementary Figure S2 (related to Figure 1): PoleS459F mouse model design, validation, and tumor findings. Supplementary Figure S3 (related to Figure 2): WES analysis reveals a stochastic accumulation of mutations in Pole mutant tumors. Supplementary Figure S4 (related to Figure 2): Tumors from Pole mutant mice exhibit mutational signatures found in POLE driven human cancers. Supplementary Figure S5 (related to Figure 2): Exome data from tumor fractions from a single mouse were compared for 3 additional mice. Supplementary Figure S6. Determination of cell of origin for PoleS459F/S459F and PoleS459F/+ mice lymphomas (Related to Figure 3). Supplementary Figure S7. Characterization of T cell malignancies in PoleS459F/S459F and PoleS459F/+ mice (Related to Figure 3). Supplemental Figure S8. Extrinsic effect of 'Group B' malignant T cells on B cell population; (Related to Figure 3).

POLE mutations are a major cause of hypermutant cancers, yet questions remain regarding mechanisms of tumorigenesis, genotype–phenotype correlation, and therapeutic considerations. In this study, we establish mouse models harboring cancer-associated POLE mutations P286R and S459F, which cause rapid albeit distinct time to cancer initiation in vivo, independent of their exonuclease activity. Mouse and human correlates enabled novel stratification of POLE mutations into three groups based on clinical phenotype and mutagenicity. Cancers driven by these mutations displayed striking resemblance to the human ultrahypermutation and specific signatures. Furthermore, Pole-driven cancers exhibited a continuous and stochastic mutagenesis mechanism, resulting in intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity. Checkpoint blockade did not prevent Pole lymphomas, but rather likely promoted lymphomagenesis as observed in humans. These observations provide insights into the carcinogenesis of POLE-driven tumors and valuable information for genetic counseling, surveillance, and immunotherapy for patients.Significance:Two mouse models of polymerase exonuclease deficiency shed light on mechanisms of mutation accumulation and considerations for immunotherapy.See related commentary by Wisdom and Kirsch p. 5459

CyTOF panel antibodies

Tumor incidence of Pole mutant mice

Supplemental Titles and Figure Legends

PURPOSE Diagnosis of Mismatch Repair Deficiency (MMRD) is crucial for tumor management and early detection in patients with the cancer predisposition syndrome constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD). Current diagnostic tools are cumbersome and inconsistent both in childhood cancers and in determining germline MMRD. PATIENTS AND METHODS We developed and analyzed a functional Low-pass Genomic Instability Characterization (LOGIC) assay to detect MMRD. The diagnostic performance of LOGIC was compared with that of current established assays including tumor mutational burden, immunohistochemistry, and the microsatellite instability panel. LOGIC was then applied to various normal tissues of patients with CMMRD with comprehensive clinical data including age of cancer presentation. RESULTS Overall, LOGIC was 100% sensitive and specific in detecting MMRD in childhood cancers (N = 376). It was more sensitive than the microsatellite instability panel (14%, P = 4.3 × 10−12), immunohistochemistry (86%, P = 4.6 × 10−3), or tumor mutational burden (80%, P = 9.1 × 10−4). LOGIC was able to distinguish CMMRD from other cancer predisposition syndromes using blood and saliva DNA ( P < .0001, n = 277). In normal cells, MMRDness scores differed between tissues (GI > blood > brain), increased over time in the same individual, and revealed genotype-phenotype associations within the mismatch repair genes. Importantly, increased MMRDness score was associated with younger age of first cancer presentation in individuals with CMMRD ( P = 2.2 × 10−5). CONCLUSION LOGIC was a robust tool for the diagnosis of MMRD in multiple cancer types and in normal tissues. LOGIC may inform therapeutic cancer decisions, provide rapid diagnosis of germline MMRD, and support tailored surveillance for individuals with CMMRD.

OBJECTIVE Gliomas in adolescents and young adults (AYA) are commonly treated with a standard chemo-radiation approach. Molecular alterations have not been comprehensively described to date. METHODS We compiled a multi-institutional cohort of patients diagnosed with glioma between 15-39.9 years over 20 years. Molecular analysis, therapeutic data and outcome was collected. For specific alterations, analysis included patients aged 0-39.9 years. RESULTS A total of 1900 patients with 876 AYA gliomas were included. Ongoing analysis reveals genetic alterations in 95% of available tumours. IDH p.R132H was found in 49% of tumours, while non-canonical IDH mutations were found in 7%. Paediatric-type mutations were found in 33% of AYA tumours with IDH-WT GBM accounting for the remaining 11%. The most common paediatric alterations in AYAs included BRAF p.V600E (11%) and FGFR alterations (7%) while BRAF fusions, H3 p.K27M and H3.3 p.G34R were rarely observed (4%, 4% and 1% respectively). BRAF fused tumours with non-canonical binding partners were enriched in AYAs. Analysis of BRAF-V600E gliomas between ages 0-40 revealed increased tendency for malignant tumours in patients > 20 years suggesting malignant transformation possibly due to higher rate of secondary hits. This resulted in worse overall-survival for AYA patients with BRAF-V600E glioma when compared to children under 20 years (p=0.0032). Ten-year OS of 100%, 90% and 95% was seen for BRAF fused, BRAF-V600E and FGFR-altered AYA low grade glioma respectively, compared to 14% and 25% for BRAF-V600E and FGFR-altered high grade glioma. In contrast, continuous decline was observed in the IDH-mutant gliomas with 10-year OS of 50% which declined to 29% at 15 years. CONCLUSIONS Gliomas in AYA often have non-canonical alterations that may evade standard molecular analysis. They are enriched for paediatric-type alterations with distinct molecularly-based outcomes. These tumours may respond to targeted inhibitors and would benefit from comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Mismatch repair deficiency (MMRD) is a pan-cancer mechanism resulting in universal hypermutation and aggressive cancers that are resistant to chemoradiation yet sensitive to immunotherapy. MMRD mutations can occur somatically or be inherited as a part of Lynch Syndrome or Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency (CMMRD). Although MMRD affects children, adolescents and young adults (CAYA, ages 0-40) with gliomas, its prevalence and impact of germline inheritance is unknown. Given that high microsatellite instability (MSI) is a key characteristic of MMRD, we previously developed a robust low-coverage whole genome-based tool to quantify MSI, which allows for accurate MMRD detection. We are therefore performing a large-scale MMRD screen of CAYA high grade gliomas (HGGs) and utilizing data from the International Replication Repair Deficiency Consortium (IRRDC) to determine the impact of germline mutations in MMRD gliomas. Ongoing data on 346 HGGs from CAYA patients reveals that MMRD is identified in 6% of HGGs and is not present in tumors with pediatric type alterations. Moreover, of MMRD tumors with IDH1 mutations, none harbor 1p/19q co-deletions. Of patients with available information, all are diagnosed with Lynch Syndrome (69%) or CMMRD (31%), with all Lynch Syndrome diagnoses occurring in patients above 18 years of age. Complementary data from the IRRDC on 113 MMRD patients with gliomas reveal that the median age of glioma is 9.7 and 17.5 years in CMMRD and Lynch Syndrome, respectively (p < 0.001). Strikingly, CMMRD gliomas are enriched for secondary polymerase mutations (60%, p < 0.001) and exhibit ultra-hypermutation, while MMRD gliomas with Lynch Syndrome are enriched for IDH1 mutations (32%, p < 0.025) and harbor a lower mutational burden. Our data reveal a high prevalence of MMRD in CAYA HGGs with alarming impact of germline predisposition. These data can support universal screening for MMRD in high grade glioma diagnostics and identify patients for precision therapeutics.

OBJECTIVE: Gliomas in adolescents and young adults (AYA) are commonly treated with a standard chemo-radiation approach based on data from adults. The clinical impact of paediatric-type alterations in these tumours is unknown. METHODS: We compiled a multi-institutional cohort of patients diagnosed with glioma between 15-39.9 years over 20 years. Complete molecular analysis, therapeutic data and outcome was collected. For specific alterations, analysis included patients aged 0-39.9 years. RESULTS: A total of 1900 patients with 876 AYA gliomas were included. Ongoing analysis reveals genetic alterations in 95% of available tumours. IDH-mutant tumours account for only 53%, while paediatric-type mutations were found in 35% of AYA tumours with IDH-WT GBM accounting for the remaining 12%. The most common paediatric alterations in AYAs included BRAF p.V600E (11%) and FGFR alterations (6%) while BRAF fusions, H3 p.K27M and H3.3 p.G34R were rarely observed (4%, 4% and 1% respectively). BRAF fused tumours with non-canonical binding partners were enriched in AYAs. Analysis of BRAF-V600E gliomas between ages 0-40 revealed increased tendency for malignant tumours in patients >20 years suggesting malignant transformation possibly due to higher rate of secondary hits including TP53, CDKN2A and ATRX mutations. This resulted in worse overall-survival for AYA patients with BRAF-V600E glioma when compared to children under 20 years (p=0.0032). Ten-year OS of 100%, 90% and 95% was seen for BRAF fused, BRAF-V600E and FGFR-altered AYA low grade glioma respectively, compared to 14% and 25% for BRAF-V600E and FGFR-altered high grade glioma. In contrast, continuous decline was observed in the IDH-mutant gliomas with 10-year OS of 50% which declined to 29% at 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: Gliomas in AYA are enriched for paediatric-type alterations with distinct molecularly-based outcomes. As these tumours carry different outcomes than childhood glioma and may respond to targeted inhibitors, AYA gliomas would benefit from comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.