Search

Objectives: Under the classification of multicategory survival outcomes of cancer patients, it is crucial to identify biomarkers that affect specific outcome categories. The classification of multicategory survival outcomes from transcriptomic data has been thoroughly investigated in computational biology. Nevertheless, several challenges must be addressed, including the ultra-high-dimensional feature space, feature contamination, and data imbalance, all of which contribute to the instability of the diagnostic model. Furthermore, although most methods achieve accurate predicted performance for binary classification with high-dimensional transcriptomic data, their extension to multi-class classification is not straightforward. Methods: We employ the One-versus-One strategy to transform multi-class classification into multiple binary classification, and utilize the overlapping group screening procedure with binary logistic regression to include pathway information for identifying important genes and gene-gene interactions for multicategory survival outcomes. Results: A series of simulation studies are conducted to compare the classification accuracy of our proposed approach with some existing machine learning methods. In practical data applications, we utilize the random oversampling procedure to tackle class imbalance issues. We then apply the proposed method to analyze transcriptomic data from various cancers in The Cancer Genome Atlas, such as kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Our aim is to establish an accurate microarray-based multicategory cancer diagnosis model. The numerical results illustrate that the new proposal effectively enhances cancer diagnosis compared to approaches that neglect pathway information. Conclusions: We showcase the effectiveness of the proposed method in terms of class prediction accuracy through evaluations on simulated synthetic datasets as well as real dataset applications. We also identified the cancer-related gene-gene interaction biomarkers and reported the corresponding network structure. According to the identified major genes and gene-gene interactions, we can predict for each patient the probabilities that he/she belongs to each of the survival outcome classes.

Abstract Background Vitamin D deficiency has been linked with several adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Objective To summarize systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the effects of vitamin D deficiency and of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy on maternal and offspring health-related outcomes. Methods Prior to conducting this umbrella review, we registered the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42022368003). We conducted searches in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on vitamin D in pregnancy, from database inception to October 2, 2023. All outcomes related to vitamin D in pregnancy obtained from the systematic reviews and meta-analyses were extracted. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently chose studies and collected information on health outcomes. The quality of the included articles’ methodology was assessed using AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews–2). Results We identified 16 eligible systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which included 250,569 women. Our results demonstrated that vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy is associated with increased risk of preterm birth, small-for gestational age/low birth weight infants, recurrent miscarriage, bacterial vaginosis and gestational diabetes mellitus. Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy increases birth weight, and reduces the risk of maternal pre-eclampsia, miscarriage, and vitamin D deficiency, fetal or neonatal mortality, as well as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorder in childhood. In women with gestational diabetes mellitus, vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy can reduce the risk of maternal hyperbilirubinemia, polyhydramnios, macrosomia, fetal distress, and neonatal hospitalization. Conclusion Due to the association with adverse maternal and offspring health outcomes, we recommend the vitamin D status in pregnancy should be monitored, particularly in women at high risk of vitamin D deficiency. It is suggested that pregnant women take a dose of >400 IU/day of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy to prevent certain adverse outcomes.

The complexity of cancer development involves intricate interactions among multiple biomarkers, such as gene-environment interactions. Utilizing microarray gene expression profile data for cancer classification is anticipated to be effective, thus drawing considerable interest in the fields of bioinformatics and computational biology. Due to the characteristics of genomic data, problems of high-dimensional interactions and noise interference do exist during the analysis process. When building cancer diagnosis models, we often face the dilemma of model adaptation errors due to an imbalance of data types. To mitigate the issues, we apply the SMOTE-Tomek procedure to rectify the imbalance problem. Following this, we utilize the overlapping group screening method alongside a binary logistic regression model to integrate gene pathway information, facilitating the identification of significant biomarkers associated with clinically imbalanced cancer or normal outcomes. Simulation studies across different imbalanced rates and gene structures validate our proposed method’s effectiveness, surpassing common machine learning techniques in terms of classification prediction accuracy. We also demonstrate that prediction performance improves with SMOTE-Tomek treatment compared to no imbalance treatment and SMOTE treatment across various imbalance rates. In the real-world application, we integrate clinical and gene expression data with prior pathway information. We employ SMOTE-Tomek and our proposed methods to identify critical biomarkers and gene-environment interactions linked to the imbalanced binary outcomes (cancer or normal) in patients from the Cancer Genome Atlas datasets of lung adenocarcinoma and breast invasive carcinoma. Our proposed method consistently achieves satisfactory classification accuracy. Additionally, we have identified biomarkers indicative of gene-environment interactions relevant to cancer and have provided corresponding estimates of odds ratios. Moreover, in high-dimensional imbalanced data, for achieving good prediction results, we recommend considering the order of balancing processing and feature screening.

Analyzing treatment or exposure effect is a major research theme in scientific studies. In the current big-data era where multiple sources of data are available, it is of interest to perform a synthesized analysis of treatment effects by integrating information from different data sources or studies. However, studies may contain heterogeneous and incomplete covariate sets, and individual data therein may not be accessible. We apply and extend the generalized meta-analysis method to integrate summary results (e.g., regression coefficients) of outcome and treatment (propensity score, PS) regression analyses across different datasets that may contain heterogeneous covariate sets. The proposed integrated analysis utilizes a reference dataset, which contains data on the complete set of covariates. The asymptotic distribution for the proposed integrated estimator is established. Simulations reveal that the proposed estimator performs well. We apply the proposed method to obtain the causal effect of waist circumference on hypertension by integrating two existing outcomes and PS regression analyses with different sets of covariates.

Abstract Background In the context of biomedical and epidemiological research, gene-environment (G-E) interaction is of great significance to the etiology and progression of many complex diseases. In high-dimensional genetic data, two general models, marginal and joint models, are proposed to identify important interaction factors. Most existing approaches for identifying G-E interactions are limited owing to the lack of robustness to outliers/contamination in response and predictor data. In particular, right-censored survival outcomes make the associated feature screening even challenging. In this article, we utilize the overlapping group screening (OGS) approach to select important G-E interactions related to clinical survival outcomes by incorporating the gene pathway information under a joint modeling framework. Results Simulation studies under various scenarios are carried out to compare the performances of our proposed method with some commonly used methods. In the real data applications, we use our proposed method to identify G-E interactions related to the clinical survival outcomes of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and esophageal carcinoma in The Cancer Genome Atlas clinical survival genetic data, and further establish corresponding survival prediction models. Both simulation and real data studies show that our method performs well and outperforms existing methods in the G-E interaction selection, effect estimation, and survival prediction accuracy. Conclusions The OGS approach is useful for selecting important environmental factors, genes and G-E interactions in the ultra-high dimensional feature space. The prediction ability of OGS with the Lasso penalty is better than existing methods. The same idea of the OGS approach can apply to other outcome models, such as the proportional odds survival time model, the logistic regression model for binary outcomes, and the multinomial logistic regression model for multi-class outcomes.

Background In high-dimensional survival genomic data, identifying cancer-related genes is a challenging and important subject in the field of bioinformatics. In recent years, many feature screening approaches for survival outcomes with high-dimensional survival genomic data have been developed; however, few studies have systematically compared these methods. The primary purpose of this article is to conduct a series of simulation studies for systematic comparison; the second purpose of this article is to use these feature screening methods to further establish a more accurate prediction model for patient survival based on the survival genomic datasets of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Results Simulation studies prove that network-adjusted feature screening measurement performs well and outperforms existing popular univariate independent feature screening methods. In the application of real data, we show that the proposed network-adjusted feature screening approach leads to more accurate survival prediction than alternative methods that do not account for gene-gene dependency information. We also use TCGA clinical survival genetic data to identify biomarkers associated with clinical survival outcomes in patients with various cancers including esophageal, pancreatic, head and neck squamous cell, lung, and breast invasive carcinomas. Conclusions These applications reveal advantages of the new proposed network-adjusted feature selection method over alternative methods that do not consider gene-gene dependency information. We also identify cancer-related genes that are almost detected in the literature. As a result, the network-based screening method is reliable and credible.

Background: In biomedical and epidemiological studies, gene-environment (G-E) interactions play an important role in the etiology and progression of many complex diseases. In ultra-high-dimensional survival genomic data, two common approaches (marginal and joint models) are proposed to determine important interaction biomarkers. Most existing methods for detecting G-E interactions (marginal Cox model and marginal accelerated failure time model) are limited by a lack of robustness to contamination/outliers in response outcome and prediction biomarkers. In particular, right-censored survival outcomes and ultra-high-dimensional feature space make relevant feature screening even more challenging. Methods: In this paper, we utilize the non-parametric Kendall’s partial correlation method to obtain pure correlation to determine the importance of G-E interactions concerning clinical survival data under a marginal modeling framework. Results: A series of simulated scenarios are conducted to compare the performance of our proposed method (Kendall’s partial correlation) with some commonly used methods (marginal Cox’s model, marginal accelerated failure time model, and censoring quantile partial correlation approach). In real data applications, we utilize Kendall’s partial correlation method to identify G-E interactions related to the clinical survival results of patients with esophageal, pancreatic, and lung carcinomas using The Cancer Genome Atlas clinical survival genetic data, and further establish survival prediction models. Conclusions: Overall, both simulation with medium censoring level and real data studies show that our method performs well and outperforms existing methods in the selection, estimation, and prediction accuracy of main and interacting biomarkers. These applications reveal the advantages of the non-parametric Kendall’s partial correlation approach over alternative semi-parametric marginal modeling methods. We also identified the cancer-related G-E interactions biomarkers and reported the corresponding coefficients with p-values.