Search

e18559 Background: Real-world data on practice patterns in Black pts with CLL are limited. We evaluated treatment (tx) patterns and prognostic biomarker testing in Black pts enrolled in the informCLL registry. Methods: Pts who initiated FDA-approved tx for CLL/SLL (index tx) were enrolled from October 2015 to June 2019. Baseline (BL) characteristics, FISH testing rates, BL factors associated with FISH testing, and patterns of index tx are summarized by line of therapy (LOT; previously untreated [1L] and relapsed/refractory [R/R]). Results: Of 1462 enrolled pts (overall registry population), 106 (7%) were Black (Table). Community-based practices enrolled 87% of Black pts, similar to the overall population (93%). Black pts were predominantly enrolled in the South (69%). Among Black pts, median age was 66 y, 65% had ECOG status ≥1, 64% had Rai stage III-IV, and median time from diagnosis to tx on registry was 40 mo (7 mo for 1L). In the overall population, median age was 71 y, 53% had ECOG status ≥1, 51% had Rai stage III-IV, and median time from diagnosis to tx was 41 mo (19 mo for 1L). FISH testing was performed in 25% of Black pts, similar to the testing rate in the overall population (28%). In a multivariate analysis, BL factors significantly associated with FISH testing were shorter time from initial diagnosis to tx, better ECOG status, earlier LOT (1L), community practice setting, and prior malignancy (p

7044 Background: Venetoclax (Ven), a highly selective BCL-2 inhibitor, combined with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) azacitidine (Aza) or decitabine (Dec) is approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND AML) in patients (pts) who are ineligible to receive intensive chemotherapy. Previous clinical studies initiated Ven + HMA in an inpatient setting due to concerns of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). This Phase 3b, single-arm, multicenter, open-label study (NCT03941964) evaluated the efficacy and safety of Ven + HMA in a US community-based outpatient setting. Methods: Pts with ND AML who were ineligible to receive intensive chemotherapy, had no evidence of spontaneous TLS at screening, and were deemed an appropriate candidate for outpatient initiation of Ven + HMA by the investigator were eligible. Pts received Ven (400 mg) in combination with Aza (75 mg/m2) or Dec (20 mg/m2) for up to 6 cycles during the study period. Pts could continue receiving commercially acquired Ven after the study period. All pts received TLS prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the composite complete remission (CR) rate (CR + CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi]) per modified International Working Group criteria. Secondary endpoints included CR or CRi rates and transfusion independence (TI). TLS was assessed per Howard criteria (Howard. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1844). Results: At the 19 Oct 2021 cutoff date, 60 pts were enrolled and treated (Ven + Aza, n=30; Ven + Dec, n=30). Efficacy outcomes are shown in the Table. The composite CR rate was 58%. CR and CRi rates were 13% and 45%, respectively. Most pts (>50%) maintained TI, and 41% and 57% of pts dependent on red blood cells or platelets, respectively, converted to TI. Bone marrow blast clearance was achieved in 42 pts (70%) at a median 26 days after treatment initiation. The most common (≥50%) AEs were anemia (75%), neutrophil count decrease (55%), white blood cell count decrease (52%), and nausea (50%). Serious AEs occurred in 67% of pts, most commonly (≥15%) febrile neutropenia (28%) and sepsis (15%). Two pts (3%) had TLS; neither event led to treatment discontinuation. Of pts who achieved blast clearance, 12/42 (29%) had a new event of myelosuppression post-blast clearance and prior to the next cycle. Conclusions: The results of this US community-based study indicate that Ven + HMA is an effective treatment option for pts with ND AML and, with appropriate TLS prophylaxis and monitoring, can safely be initiated in an outpatient setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03941964. [Table: see text]

7558 Background: In the pivotal Phase III POLARIX trial, Pola-R-CHP demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with R-CHOP, with a similar safety profile in patients with previously untreated DLBCL (Tilly et al. 2022). An Asia subpopulation analysis was included as part of the trial design; patients enrolled in Asia were analyzed for the purpose of registration in China of POLARIX (NCT03274492). Methods: Patients from mainland China, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan (enrolled during the global phase), and from the China extension cohort were included in the Asia subpopulation. POLARIX methods were previously described (Tilly et al. 2022). Briefly, patients with untreated DLBCL were randomized 1:1 using the same stratification factors to receive six cycles of Pola-R-CHP or R-CHOP, plus two cycles of rituximab alone. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate consistency of PFS (defined as ≥50% risk reduction in PFS) in the Asia subpopulation with the global population. Results: Overall, 281 patients (intent-to-treat population; 150, 85, 31 and 15 patients in mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, respectively) were analyzed (141 received Pola-R-CHP and 140 received R-CHOP); 160 patients from the global population and 121 from the China extension cohort. Median age was 63 (range 19–79) years, and most patients had an International Prognostic Index of 3–5 (61.9%). At the data cut-off of June 28, 2021, (median follow-up of 24.2 months) PFS was superior with Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–1.03) and met the consistency definition with the global population. The 2-year PFS rate was 74.2% (95% CI: 65.7–82.7) with Pola-R-CHP vs 66.5% (95% CI: 57.3–75.6) with R-CHOP. Other key efficacy results were similar to the global study results (Table). The safety profile was generally comparable for Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP, including rates of grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs; 72.9% vs 66.2%), serious AEs (32.9% vs 32.4%), grade 5 AEs (1.4% vs 0.7%), AEs leading to discontinuation of any study treatment (5.0% vs 7.2%), and incidence of peripheral neuropathy (all grades, 44.3% vs 50.4%), respectively. Key efficacy results. CR, complete response. Conclusions: The results from the Asia subpopulation of POLARIX were consistent with the global study, with a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS (risk of disease progression, relapse or death reduced by 36%) following treatment with Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP, and a comparable safety profile in Asian patients with previously untreated DLBCL. Clinical trial information: NCT03274492. [Table: see text]

7539 Background: For ELEVATE-TN (NCT02475681), we previously reported superior efficacy of acalabrutinib (A) ± obinutuzumab (O) vs O + chlorambucil (Clb) in patients (pts) with treatment-naive (TN) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) at 28.3 and 46.9 months (mo) median follow-up. Now, we report results from a 5-y update. Methods: Pts were randomized to A+O, A, or O+Clb. Pts who progressed on O+Clb could cross over to A monotherapy. Investigator-assessed (INV) progression-free survival (PFS), INV overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety were evaluated. Results: A total of 535 pts (A+O, n=179; A, n=179; O+Clb, n=177) had a median age of 70 y. At a median follow-up of 58.2 mo (range, 0.0–72.0; data cutoff Oct 1, 2021), median PFS was not reached (NR) (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.11) for A+O and A (HR: 0.21) vs 27.8 mo for O+Clb (both P