Search

Background: Breslow thickness (BT), ulceration, and microsatellitosis are critical prognostic parameters for cutaneous melanoma staging. These parameters can vary depending on the number of tissue levels examined from individual paraffin blocks. We sought to evaluate all prognostic histopathologic parameters in melanoma for their variations between levels, taken at regular intervals, in a single study., Methods: We analyzed 40 consecutive cases of primary cutaneous (nonacral) melanoma through five hematoxylin and eosin sections, taken at 100 μm intervals, for staging and prognostic parameters., Results: Examination of additional levels resulted in (a) an increase in BT in 47.5% (19 out of 40) of cases and (b) detection of ulceration in a further 5% (2/40). This resulted in upstaging for 20% (8 out of 40) of patients (15% because of BT, 2.5% because of ulceration, and 2.5% because of BT and ulceration). The upstaging effect was incremental, with approximately 5% of patients upstaged with each additional 100 μm interval (up to 400 μm). Incipient ulceration and epidermal consumption were infrequent (10% of cases); however, when present, ulceration was subsequently observed in half of cases. We encountered no cases where microsatellitosis was detected at deeper levels., Conclusion: The performance of additional tissue levels is a simple and inexpensive procedure that can improve the accuracy of staging for patients with thin (pT1) primary cutaneous melanomas. It may be pertinent for pathologists to consider additional levels for thin melanomas when a BT measurement is close to a staging threshold (e.g., within 0.1-0.3 mm for pT1a vs. pT1b, or pT1b vs. pT2a), or when incipient ulceration is encountered., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Cutaneous Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Treatment with anti-PD1 inhibitors may enhance the risk for developing low grade squamoproliferative skin tumors. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of the immune tumor microenvironment (TME) allows exploration of the pathogenesis and relationship with the PD1/PDL1 axis. Patients with eruptive keratoacanthoma (KA)-like lesions were recruited from the Melanoma Institute Australia, a tertiary referral specialist melanoma treatment center from January 2015 to August 2017. Clinicopathologic evaluation and IHC features of tumor cells (PDL1 expression) and peritumoral microenvironment (PD1, FOXP3, PDL1, CD4:CD8 expressing cells) in 12 eruptive KA-like lesions, were compared with solitary KAs in age and sex matched non-anti-PD1 treated controls. Four patients with repeated episodes of eruptive KA-like and lichenoid lesions developing 2-7 months after commencing pembrolizumab for AJCC stage IV melanoma, were recruited. Eruptive KA-like squamoproliferative lesions occurred in sun exposed sites and in areas of resolving, concomitant or delayed lichenoid reactions. Histologically, the lesions were well-differentiated squamoproliferative lesions resembling infundibulocystic squamous cell carcinoma or KA. IHC of cases and controls revealed low PDL1 expression of both squamous tumor cells and the TME immune cells. The numbers of immunosuppressive FOXP3 positive Tregs and PD1-expressing T-cells were higher in the cases than the controls but the CD4:CD8 ratio (2:1) was similar. The patients best responded to acitretin and were managed surgically if they demonstrated neoplastic features. Accelerated squamoproliferative growth in actinically damaged keratinocytes associated with lichenoid eruptions may be unmasked in patients treated with anti-PD1 immunotherapy potentially contributed to by a local cutaneous immunosuppressed TME., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Wide local excision (WLE) to achieve adequate clearance margins is the standard initial definitive treatment for patients with biopsy-proven primary cutaneous melanoma. Residual melanoma in WLE specimens after prior complete excision-biopsy (CEB) is reported in 0-6.3% of cases. However, studies evaluating the prevalence, clinicopathological features and relevance of persistent disease in WLE specimens are limited. This study sought to determine the frequency of and clinicopathological characteristics associated with residual melanoma in WLE specimens performed after a CEB of primary cutaneous or acral melanoma (in situ or invasive) with clinically and histologically tumour-free margins, and assess its relevance. A review of the research database and pathology archives of a large Australian tertiary referral melanoma treatment centre was performed. Eligible patients were those for whom a definitive WLE was performed after CEB of a primary melanoma (in situ or invasive) with negative clinical and histological margins, between May 2013 and May 2015. All partial biopsies were excluded. Of 640 eligible patients, 510 (79.7%) had invasive melanoma and 130 (20.3%) had melanoma in situ. Residual disease was identified in 20 cases (20/640, 3.1%), of which three (15%) were melanoma in situ on CEB and 17 (85%) were invasive melanoma. On univariate analysis, the presence of residual disease in WLE specimens was associated with lentigo maligna (LM)/LM melanoma (LMM) subtype [odds ratio (OR) 10.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.84-37.54; p=0.004], nodular melanoma (NM) subtype (OR 4.92; 95% CI 1.53-15.85; p=0.0076) and, for invasive tumours, higher tumour mitotic rate (mean 7.7, SD 7.51 vs 3.4, SD 4.83; OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.04-1.18; p=0.0014). Breslow thickness >4 mm was associated with a higher risk of residual disease (OR 7.30; 95% CI 1.88, 28.26; p=0.004). Cases with residual disease had primary tumours with a significantly larger diameter (median 14 mm, range 4-25) than those without residual disease (median 9 mm, range 2-60), (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.03-1.11; p≤0.001) and were also more likely to be amelanotic (38% vs 14%), (OR 3.69; 95% CI 1.17, 11.60; p=0.026). Residual disease was associated with assessment of >3 slides of tissue (OR 6.98; 95% CI 1.54-31.62; p=0.0118) and complete blocking of the scar (OR 31.69; 95% CI 3.98-252.21; p=0.0011). Residual melanoma in WLE specimens is an infrequent occurrence. Risk factors for residual disease are LM/LMM and NM melanoma subtypes, higher mitotic rate, larger lesion diameter and amelanosis. Tumours with these features warrant more extensive pathological sampling. WLE after CEB for melanoma remains an important procedure to reduce local recurrence; however, limited pathological sampling of the WLE scar is probably appropriate for cases lacking high risk features., (Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Targeted therapy (BRAF inhibitor plus MEK inhibitor) is now among the possible treatment options for patients with BRAF mutation-positive stage III or stage IV melanoma. This makes prompt BRAF mutation testing an important step in the management of patients diagnosed with stage III or IV melanoma; one that can help better ensure that the optimal choice of systemic treatment is initiated with minimal delay. This article offers guidance about when and how BRAF mutation testing should be conducted when patients are diagnosed with melanoma in Australia. Notably, it recommends that pathologists reflexively order BRAF mutation testing whenever a patient is found to have American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage III or IV melanoma (i.e., any metastatic spread beyond the primary tumour) and that patient's BRAF mutation status is hitherto unknown, even if BRAF mutation testing has not been specifically requested by the treating clinician (in Australia, Medicare-subsidised BRAF V600 mutation testing does not need to be requested by the treating clinician). When performed in centres with appropriate expertise and experience, immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the anti-BRAF V600E monoclonal antibody (VE1) can be a highly sensitive and specific means of detecting BRAF V600E mutations, and may be used as a rapid and relatively inexpensive initial screening test. However, VE1 immunostaining can be technically challenging and difficult to interpret, particularly in heavily pigmented tumours; melanomas with weak, moderate or focal BRAF V600E immunostaining should be regarded as equivocal. It must also be remembered that other activating BRAF V600 mutations (including BRAF V600K ), which account for ∼10-20% of BRAF V600 mutations, are not detected with currently available IHC antibodies. For these reasons, if available and practicable, we recommend that DNA-based BRAF mutation testing always be performed, regardless of whether IHC-based testing is also conducted. Advice about tissue/specimen selection for BRAF mutation testing of patients diagnosed with stage III or IV melanoma is also offered in this article; and potential pitfalls when interpreting BRAF mutation tests are highlighted., (Copyright © 2021 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)