Search

Background: The birth plan is a document expressing a pregnant woman's childbirth preferences, enabling communication of expectations and facilitating discussions among women, their partners, and healthcare providers for key birthing decisions. There has been limited research on the role of birth plans in shared decision-making (SDM). Our study aims to explore how the use of birth plans can contribute to SDM from women's, partners, and healthcare providers' perspectives., Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with women, their partners, and their healthcare providers. We used a thematic analysis to identify themes and subthemes. Furthermore, we created a grounded theory about the role of birth plans as a tool in SDM., Results: Three main themes were created: ''Creating a birth plan", ''Getting all on board" and ''Birth plans in the daily practice of decision-making". Most women, partners, and healthcare providers agreed that birth plans can facilitate communication and SDM. Women and their partners viewed the birth plan as a tool to prepare for birth. Most healthcare providers mentioned the birth plan as a tool to get to know the women, their partners, and their preferences. Barriers are the attitude of healthcare providers toward birth plans, such as their evident resistance to the birth plan itself or to certain preferences. Another barrier is the assumption women and their partners may have that these plans can accurately predict the childbirth experience, enhancing the chance of a disappointing, negative experience. Some healthcare providers view birth plans as barriers to SDM., Conclusion: The use of a birth plan seems to promote women's, partners', and healthcare providers' involvement in the birth process, and seems suitable to facilitate SDM. Further research is required to explore strategies for overcoming barriers, including healthcare providers' attitudes toward birth plans and the expectations of women and their partners regarding their role., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Shareef et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: The World Health Organization recommends the implementation of maternity waiting homes (MWH) to reduce delays in access to obstetric care, particularly for high-risk pregnancies and mothers living far from health facilities, and as a result, several countries have rolled out MWHs. However, Rwanda has not implemented this recommendation on a large scale. There is only one MWH in the country, hence a gap in knowledge regarding the potential utilisation and benefits of MWHs., Objective: To explore providers' and clients' perspectives on facilitators and barriers to the use of MWH in rural Rwanda., Methods: We conducted a qualitative study to explore health providers' and clients' perspectives on facilitators and barriers to the use of MWH in Rwanda, between December 2020 and January 2021. We used key informant interviews and focus group discussions to collect data. Data were analysed using NVivo qualitative analysis software version 11., Results: Facilitators included perceptions that the MWH offered either a peaceful and home-like environment, good-quality services, or timely obstetric services, and was associated with good maternal and neonatal outcomes. Barriers included limited awareness of the MWH among pregnant women, fear of health providers to operate the MWH at full capacity, women's lack of autonomy, uncertainty over funding for the MWH, and perceived high user fees., Conclusion: The Ruli MWH offers a peaceful environment for pregnant women while providing quality and timely obstetric care, resulting in positive maternal and neonatal outcomes for women. However, its existence and benefits are not widely known, and its use is limited due to inadequate resources. There is a need for increased awareness of the MWH among healthcare providers and the community, and lessons from this MWH could inform the scale up of MWHs in Rwanda.

Background: Birth plans can be used to facilitate shared decision-making in childbirth. A birth plan is a document reflecting women's preferences for birth, which they discuss with their maternity care provider., Aim: This scoping review aims to synthesize current findings on the role of birth plans for shared decision-making around birth choices of pregnant women in maternity care., Methods: We conducted a scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute three-step search strategy in multiple databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO. We synthesized the results using a metasynthesis approach to identify themes and subthemes., Results: From the 21 articles included, five themes were identified: birth plan as a tool for shared decision-making, autonomy, sense of control, professionalism of the care provider, and trust. Primarily, midwives seemed to use birth plans to explore and facilitate women's choices around birth. Other healthcare providers involved in studies were obstetricians and nurses. The interrelationship between care providers and women, the attitude of care providers and women towards each other and the birth plan, and how providers and women use the birth plan influence shared decision-making., Discussion and Conclusion: Birth plans can facilitate shared decision-making, and women's sense of autonomy and control before, during, and after giving birth. When discussing the birth plan, exploring different scenarios may help women prepare for unforeseen circumstances. This will likely facilitate shared decision-making even if the birth process is not unfolding as hoped for., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Not declared., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labour (IOL) at 41 weeks and expectant management (EM) until 42 weeks., Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis from a healthcare perspective alongside a randomised controlled trial (INDEX)., Setting: 123 primary care midwifery practices and 45 obstetric departments of hospitals in the Netherlands., Population: We studied 1801 low-risk women with late-term pregnancy, randomised to IOL at 41 weeks (N = 900) or EM until 42 weeks (N = 901)., Methods: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was expressed as the ratio of the difference in costs and the difference in main perinatal outcomes. A Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curve (CEAC) was constructed to assess whether induction is cost-effective for a range of monetary values as thresholds. We performed subgroup analysis for parity., Main Outcome Measures: Direct medical costs, composite adverse perinatal outcome (CAPO) (perinatal mortality, NICU admission, Apgar 5 min < 7, plexus brachialis injury and/or meconium aspiration syndrome) and composite severe adverse perinatal outcome (SAPO) (including Apgar 5 min < 4 instead of < 7)., Results: The average costs were €3858 in the induction group and €3723 in the expectant group (mean difference €135; 95 % CI -235 to 493). The ICERs of IOL compared to EM to prevent one additional CAPO and SAPO was €9436 and €14,994, respectively. The CEAC showed a 80 % chance of IOL being cost-effective with a willingness-to-pay of €22,000 for prevention of one CAPO and €50,000 for one SAPO. Subgroup analysis showed a willingness-to-pay to prevent one CAPO for nulliparous of €47,000 and for multiparous €190,000. To prevent one SAPO the willingness-to-pay is €62,000 for nulliparous and €970,000 for multiparous women., Conclusions: Induction at 41 weeks has an 80 % chance of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of €22,000 for prevention of one CAPO and €50,000 for prevention of one SAPO. Subgroup analysis suggests that induction could be cost-effective for nulliparous women while it is unlikely cost-effective for multiparous women.Cost-effectiveness in other settings will depend on baseline characteristics of the population and health system organisation and funding., Competing Interests: BWM is supported by a NHMRC Investigator grant (GNT1176437). BWM reports consultancy for ObsEva. BMW has received research funding from Ferring and Merck., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Objective: To assess adverse perinatal outcomes and caesarean section of low-risk women receiving elective induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks according to their preferred and actual management strategy., Design: Multicentre prospective cohort study alongside RCT., Setting: 90 midwifery practices and 12 hospitals in the Netherlands., Population: 3642 low-risk women with uncomplicated singleton late-term pregnancy., Main Outcome Measures: Composite adverse outcome (perinatal death, Apgar score 5' < 7, NICU admission, meconium aspiration syndrome), composite severe adverse perinatal outcome (all above with Apgar score 5' < 4 instead of < 7) and caesarean section., Results: From 2012-2016, 3642 women out of 6088 eligible women for the INDEX RCT, participated in the cohort study for observational data collection (induction of labour n = 372; expectant management n = 2174; unknown preference/management strategy n = 1096).Adverse perinatal outcome occurred in 1.1 % (4/372) in the induction group versus 1.9 % (42/2174) in the expectant group (adjRR 0.56; 95 %CI: 0.17-1.79), with severe adverse perinatal outcome occurring in 0.3 % (1/372) versus 1.0 % (22/2174), respectively (adjRR 0.39; 95 % CI: 0.05-2.88). There were no stillbirths among all 3642 women; one neonatal death occurred in the unknown preference/management group. Caesarean section rates were 10.5 % (39/372) after induction and 8.9 % (193/2174) after expectant management (adjRR 1.32; 95 % CI: 0.95-1.84).A higher incidence of adverse perinatal outcome was observed in nulliparous compared to multiparous women. Nulliparous 1.8 % (3/170) in the induction group versus 2.6 % (30/1134) in the expectant management group (adjRR 0.58; 95 % CI 0.14-2.41), multiparous 0.5 % (1/201) versus 1.1 % (11/1039) (adjRR 0.54; 95 % CI 0.07-24.19). One maternal death due to amniotic fluid embolism occurred after elective induction at 41 weeks + 6 days., Conclusion: In this cohort study among low-risk women receiving the policy of their preference in late-term pregnancy, a non-significant difference was found between induction of labour at 41 weeks and expectant management until 42 weeks in absolute risks of composite adverse (1.1 % versus 1.9 %) and severe adverse (0.3 % versus 1.0 %) perinatal outcome. The risks in this cohort study were lower than in the trial setting. There were no stillbirths among all 3642 women. Caesarean section rates were comparable., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Small for gestational age (SGA) newborns are at risk of developing neonatal hypoglycaemia. SGA newborns comprise a heterogeneous group including both constitutionally small and pathologically growth restricted newborns. The process of fetal growth restriction may result in brain sparing at the expense of the rest of the body, resulting in disproportionally small newborns. The aim of this study was to discover whether body proportionality influences the risk of developing neonatal hypoglycaemia in SGA newborns. A retrospective cohort study was performed in 402 newborns who were SGA without additional risk factors for hypoglycaemia. Body proportionality was classified in two ways: (1) using symmetric (sSGA) or asymmetric (aSGA), defined as head circumference (HC) below or above the 10th percentile, respectively; (2) using cephalization index (HC/birth weight), standardized for gestational age. Hypoglycaemia was observed in 50% of aSGA and 40.9% of sSGA newborns (P-value 0.12). Standardized CI in newborns with hypoglycaemia was higher compared to newborns without hypoglycaemia (median 1.27 (1.21-1.35) versus 1.24 (1.20-1.29); (P 0.002)). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed both CI and standardized CI to be associated with the occurrence of hypoglycaemia (OR 1.48 (1.24-1.77) and OR 1.44 (1.13-1.83), respectively). The majority of hypoglycaemic events (96.1%) occurred in the first 6 h after birth.   Conclusion: Body proportionality might be of influence, depending on the classification used. Larger prospective studies with a clear consensus definition of body proportionality are needed. What is Known: • Neonatal hypoglycaemia is an important complication in newborns. • Small for gestational age (SGA) newborns are more vulnerable to hypoglycaemia. What is New: • Higher incidence of hypoglycaemia was not observed in asymmetric SGA compared to symmetric SGA, but standardized cephalization index was associated with increased likelihood of hypoglycaemia. • Consensus-based definitions of body proportionality in newborns are needed., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background and Aims: To analyze outcomes of nationwide local audits of uterine rupture to draw lessons for clinical care., Methods: Descriptive cohort study. Critical incident audit sessions within all local perinatal cooperation groups in the Netherlands. Women who sustained uterine rupture between January 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2019., Main Outcome Measures: Improvable factors, recommendations, and lessons learned for clinical care. Women's case histories were discussed in multidisciplinary perinatal audit sessions. Participants evaluated care against national and local clinical guidelines and common professional standards to identify improvable factors. Cases and outcomes were registered in a nationwide database., Results: One hundred and fourteen women who sustained uterine rupture were discussed in local perinatal audit sessions by 40-60 participants on average: A total of 111 (97%) were multiparous of whom 107 (94%) had given birth by cesarean section in a previous pregnancy. The audit revealed 178 improvable factors and 200 recommendations. Six percent ( N  = 11) of the improvable factors were identified as very likely and 18% ( N  = 32) as likely to have a relationship with the outcome or occurrence of uterine rupture. Improvable factors were related to inadequate communication, absent, or unclear documentation, delay in diagnosing the rupture, and suboptimal management of labor. Speak up in case a suspicion arises, escalating care by involving specialist obstetricians, addressing the importance of accurate documentation, and improving training related to fetal monitoring were the most frequent recommendations and should be topics for team (skills and drills) training., Conclusions: Through a nationwide incident audit of uterine rupture, we identified improvable factors related to communication, documentation, and organization of care. Lessons learned include "speaking up," improving the transfer of information and team training are crucial to reduce the incidence of uterine rupture., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2022 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Men can be essential sources of support in maternal health, even more so in case of severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM), affecting 1-2% of childbearing women in low-resource settings. In a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews, we explored the perspectives of nine male partners of women who suffered from (pre-)eclampsia six to seven years earlier in rural Tanzania. Male partners considered their role to be pivotal regarding finances, decision-making in healthcare-seeking and family planning and provided physical and emotional support. After SAMM, households may be affected in the long run. Some men took over their female partner's household duties until up to two years after birth. Providing men with more information on complication readiness and birth preparedness would enable them to extend their role in maternal morbidity prevention.IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? The essential role of male partners in maternal health in low- and middle-income countries is well-studied in relation to its impact on care-seeking behaviour. After childbirth, the long-term role of male partners has not yet been studied. What do the results of this study add? We demonstrated the important role of men during, but also after SAMM. Households may be affected years after women suffered from SAMM. For women with the most urgent support needs, this study suggest that at least some men feel responsible for their partner and have different pivotal roles. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Because of their motivation to support their female partner, strategies to reduce recurring complications in subsequent pregnancies should include targeting male partners, for example, by increasing birth preparedness and complication readiness. Further studies should confirm the results from our innovative but small-scale study, as well as investigate the long-term role of male partners after uncomplicated births. Other studies could investigate the separation of couples after SAMM, family planning decisions after SAMM and strategies for involving men and increasing complication readiness and birth preparedness.

Introduction: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) in the United States, the ARRIVE trial, has indicated that induction of labor (IOL) in low-risk nulliparous women with a gestational age (GA) of 39 weeks compared to expectant management (EM) resulted in a significant lower rate of cesarean deliveries. The Dutch maternity care system is different compared to the United States with, among other factors, an overall significantly lower percentage of caesarean sections (CS). To investigate whether IOL has a favorable outcome in the Dutch maternity care system, a new trial is advised. In this questionnaire-based study we aim to evaluate whether Dutch low-risk pregnant women would be willing to participate in an RCT comparing IOL at 39 weeks to EM., Materials and Methods: We conducted an online survey in 2020 in the Netherlands. Respondent recruitment took place both in outpatient clinics at hospitals and midwife practices and via social media. Inclusion criteria were pregnant women with singleton gestation, GA ≤ 39 weeks, age 18 years or older and residency in the Netherlands. Exclusion criteria were multiple gestation, a history of a CS, planned IOL or CS in current pregnancy and GA > 39 weeks. A subgroup was formed of low risk (receiving primary care) nulliparous women with a gestational age between 34 and 39 weeks, comparable with the ARRIVE trial., Results: Three hundred eighty respondents participated. Of all respondents (nulli- and multiparous), 47 (12.4%) would be willing to participate in the hypothetical RCT and 70 (18.4%) might be willing to participate. Amongst the 70 women in the subgroup 11 women (15.7%) would be willing to participate and 17 (24.3%) might be willing to participate., Discussion and Conclusion: Calculating sample size in a country with a low CS rate, in relation to 69.2% of women are not willing to participate in an RCT comparing IOL at 39 weeks with EM, would require >18.000 women to be counselled for participation. We believe such a study is a challenge in the Netherlands., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Placenta localization from obstetric 2-D ultrasound (US) imaging is unattainable for many pregnant women in low-income countries because of a severe shortage of trained sonographers. To address this problem, we present a method to automatically detect low-lying placenta or placenta previa from 2-D US imaging. Two-dimensional US data from 280 pregnant women were collected in Ethiopia using a standardized acquisition protocol and low-cost equipment. The detection method consists of two parts. First, 2-D US segmentation of the placenta is performed using a deep learning model with a U-Net architecture. Second, the segmentation is used to classify each placenta as either normal or a class including both low-lying placenta and placenta previa. The segmentation model was trained and tested on 6574 2-D US images, achieving a median test Dice coefficient of 0.84 (interquartile range = 0.23). The classifier achieved a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 82% on a holdout test set of 148 cases. Additionally, the model was found to segment in real time (19 ± 2 ms per 2-D US image) using a smartphone paired with a low-cost 2-D US device. This work illustrates the feasibility of using automated placenta localization in a resource-limited setting., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest disclosure The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)