Search

Background: Diagnosing myocarditis relies on multimodal data, including cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), clinical symptoms, and blood values. The correct interpretation and integration of CMR findings require radiological expertise and knowledge. We aimed to investigate the performance of Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4), a large language model, for report-based medical decision-making in the context of cardiac MRI for suspected myocarditis., Methods: This retrospective study includes CMR reports from 396 patients with suspected myocarditis and eight centers, respectively. CMR reports and patient data including blood values, age, and further clinical information were provided to GPT-4 and radiologists with 1 (resident 1), 2 (resident 2), and 4 years (resident 3) of experience in CMR and knowledge of the 2018 Lake Louise Criteria. The final impression of the report regarding the radiological assessment of whether myocarditis is present or not was not provided. The performance of Generative pre-trained transformer 4 (GPT-4) and the human readers were compared to a consensus reading (two board-certified radiologists with 8 and 10 years of experience in CMR). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated., Results: GPT-4 yielded an accuracy of 83%, sensitivity of 90%, and specificity of 78%, which was comparable to the physician with 1 year of experience (R1: 86%, 90%, 84%, p = 0.14) and lower than that of more experienced physicians (R2: 89%, 86%, 91%, p = 0.007 and R3: 91%, 85%, 96%, p < 0.001). GPT-4 and human readers showed a higher diagnostic performance when results from T1- and T2-mapping sequences were part of the reports, for residents 1 and 3 with statistical significance (p = 0.004 and p = 0.02, respectively)., Conclusion: GPT-4 yielded good accuracy for diagnosing myocarditis based on CMR reports in a large dataset from multiple centers and therefore holds the potential to serve as a diagnostic decision-supporting tool in this capacity, particularly for less experienced physicians. Further studies are required to explore the full potential and elucidate educational aspects of the integration of large language models in medical decision-making., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: David Maintz received speaker’s honoraria from Philips Healthcare. Jan Borggrefe received speaker’s honoraria from Siemens Healthineers. Simon Lennartz is a member of Editorial Board of Radiology and a Senior Deputy Editor of Radiology in Training. Otherwise, the authors declare no conflicts of interest and had full control over all data, and guarantee correctness., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Achieving a consensus on a definition for different aspects of radiomics workflows to support their translation into clinical usage. Furthermore, to assess the perspective of experts on important challenges for a successful clinical workflow implementation., Materials and Methods: The consensus was achieved by a multi-stage process. Stage 1 comprised a definition screening, a retrospective analysis with semantic mapping of terms found in 22 workflow definitions, and the compilation of an initial baseline definition. Stages 2 and 3 consisted of a Delphi process with over 45 experts hailing from sites participating in the German Research Foundation (DFG) Priority Program 2177. Stage 2 aimed to achieve a broad consensus for a definition proposal, while stage 3 identified the importance of translational challenges., Results: Workflow definitions from 22 publications (published 2012-2020) were analyzed. Sixty-nine definition terms were extracted, mapped, and semantic ambiguities (e.g., homonymous and synonymous terms) were identified and resolved. The consensus definition was developed via a Delphi process. The final definition comprising seven phases and 37 aspects reached a high overall consensus (> 89% of experts "agree" or "strongly agree"). Two aspects reached no strong consensus. In addition, the Delphi process identified and characterized from the participating experts' perspective the ten most important challenges in radiomics workflows., Conclusion: To overcome semantic inconsistencies between existing definitions and offer a well-defined, broad, referenceable terminology, a consensus workflow definition for radiomics-based setups and a terms mapping to existing literature was compiled. Moreover, the most relevant challenges towards clinical application were characterized., Critical Relevance Statement: Lack of standardization represents one major obstacle to successful clinical translation of radiomics. Here, we report a consensus workflow definition on different aspects of radiomics studies and highlight important challenges to advance the clinical adoption of radiomics., Key Points: Published radiomics workflow terminologies are inconsistent, hindering standardization and translation. A consensus radiomics workflow definition proposal with high agreement was developed. Publicly available result resources for further exploitation by the scientific community., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To investigate the potential of combining Compressed Sensing (CS) and a newly developed AI-based super resolution reconstruction prototype consisting of a series of convolutional neural networks (CNN) for a complete five-minute 2D knee MRI protocol., Methods: In this prospective study, 20 volunteers were examined using a 3T-MRI-scanner (Ingenia Elition X, Philips). Similar to clinical practice, the protocol consists of a fat-saturated 2D-proton-density-sequence in coronal, sagittal and transversal orientation as well as a sagittal T1-weighted sequence. The sequences were acquired with two different resolutions (standard and low resolution) and the raw data reconstructed with two different reconstruction algorithms: a conventional Compressed SENSE (CS) and a new CNN-based algorithm for denoising and subsequently to interpolate and therewith increase the sharpness of the image (CS-SuperRes). Subjective image quality was evaluated by two blinded radiologists reviewing 8 criteria on a 5-point Likert scale and signal-to-noise ratio calculated as an objective parameter., Results: The protocol reconstructed with CS-SuperRes received higher ratings than the time-equivalent CS reconstructions, statistically significant especially for low resolution acquisitions (e.g., overall image impression: 4.3 ± 0.4 vs. 3.4 ± 0.4, p < 0.05). CS-SuperRes reconstructions for the low resolution acquisition were comparable to traditional CS reconstructions with standard resolution for all parameters, achieving a scan time reduction from 11:01 min to 4:46 min (57 %) for the complete protocol (e.g. overall image impression: 4.3 ± 0.4 vs. 4.0 ± 0.5, p < 0.05)., Conclusion: The newly-developed AI-based reconstruction algorithm CS-SuperRes allows to reduce scan time by 57% while maintaining unchanged image quality compared to the conventional CS reconstruction., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest David Maintz is part of the speakers bureau at Philips Healthcare; all other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background Errors in radiology reports may occur because of resident-to-attending discrepancies, speech recognition inaccuracies, and large workload. Large language models, such as GPT-4 (ChatGPT; OpenAI), may assist in generating reports. Purpose To assess effectiveness of GPT-4 in identifying common errors in radiology reports, focusing on performance, time, and cost-efficiency. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, 200 radiology reports (radiography and cross-sectional imaging [CT and MRI]) were compiled between June 2023 and December 2023 at one institution. There were 150 errors from five common error categories (omission, insertion, spelling, side confusion, and other) intentionally inserted into 100 of the reports and used as the reference standard. Six radiologists (two senior radiologists, two attending physicians, and two residents) and GPT-4 were tasked with detecting these errors. Overall error detection performance, error detection in the five error categories, and reading time were assessed using Wald χ 2 tests and paired-sample t tests. Results GPT-4 (detection rate, 82.7%;124 of 150; 95% CI: 75.8, 87.9) matched the average detection performance of radiologists independent of their experience (senior radiologists, 89.3% [134 of 150; 95% CI: 83.4, 93.3]; attending physicians, 80.0% [120 of 150; 95% CI: 72.9, 85.6]; residents, 80.0% [120 of 150; 95% CI: 72.9, 85.6]; P value range, .522-.99). One senior radiologist outperformed GPT-4 (detection rate, 94.7%; 142 of 150; 95% CI: 89.8, 97.3; P = .006). GPT-4 required less processing time per radiology report than the fastest human reader in the study (mean reading time, 3.5 seconds ± 0.5 [SD] vs 25.1 seconds ± 20.1, respectively; P < .001; Cohen d = -1.08). The use of GPT-4 resulted in lower mean correction cost per report than the most cost-efficient radiologist ($0.03 ± 0.01 vs $0.42 ± 0.41; P < .001; Cohen d = -1.12). Conclusion The radiology report error detection rate of GPT-4 was comparable with that of radiologists, potentially reducing work hours and cost. © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Forman in this issue.

Purpose:  Due to the increasing number of COVID-19 infections since spring 2020 the patient care workflow underwent changes in Germany. To minimize face-to-face exposure and reduce infection risk, non-time-critical elective medical procedures were postponed. Since ultrasound examinations include non-time-critical elective examinations and often can be substituted by other imaging modalities not requiring direct patient contact, the number of examinations has declined significantly. The aim of this study is to quantify the baseline number of ultrasound examinations in the years before, during, and in the early post-pandemic period of the COVID-19 pandemic (since January 2015 to September 2023), and to measure the number of examinations at different German university hospitals., Materials and Methods:  The number of examinations was assessed based on a web-based database at all participating clinics at the indicated time points., Results:  N = 288 562 sonographic examinations from four sites were included in the present investigation. From January 2020 to June 2020, a significantly lower number of examinations of n = 591.21 vs. 698.43 (p = 0.01) per month and included center was performed. Also, excluding the initial pandemic period until June 2020, significantly fewer ultrasound examinations were performed compared to pre-pandemic years 648.1 vs. 698.4 (p < 0.05), per month and included center, while here differences between the individual centers were observed. In the late phase of the pandemic (n = 681.96) and in the post-pandemic phase (as defined by the WHO criteria from May 2023; n = 739.95), the number of sonographic examinations returned to pre-pandemic levels., Conclusion:  The decline in the number of sonographic examinations caused by the COVID-19 pandemic was initially largely intentional and can be illustrated quantitatively. After an initial abrupt decline in sonographic examinations, the pre-pandemic levels could not be reached for a long time, which could be due to restructuring of patient care and follow-up treatment. In the post-pandemic phase, the pre-pandemic level has been achieved again. The reasons for a prolonged reduction in ultrasound examinations are discussed in this article., Key Points:   · During the pandemic, significantly fewer ultrasound examinations were performed in the included centers.. · The number of examinations could not be reach the pre-pandemic level for a long time, which could be due to restructuring of patient care and follow-up treatment.. · Identifying causes for sonographic exam reduction is crucial in pandemic preparedness to uphold healthcare quality and continuity for all patients.. · The prolonged decline in sonographic examinations during the pandemic does not represent a lasting trend, as evidenced by the return to pre-pandemic levels.., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the management of cancer patients, determination of TNM status is essential for treatment decision-making and therefore closely linked to clinical outcome and survival. Here, we developed a tool for automatic three-dimensional (3D) localization and segmentation of cervical lymph nodes (LNs) on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) examinations., Methods: In this IRB-approved retrospective single-center study, 187 CECT examinations of the head and neck region from patients with various primary diseases were collected from our local database, and 3656 LNs (19.5 ± 14.9 LNs/CECT, mean ± standard deviation) with a short-axis diameter (SAD) ≥ 5 mm were segmented manually by expert physicians. With these data, we trained an independent fully convolutional neural network based on 3D foveal patches. Testing was performed on 30 independent CECTs with 925 segmented LNs with an SAD ≥ 5 mm., Results: In total, 4,581 LNs were segmented in 217 CECTs. The model achieved an average localization rate (LR), i.e., percentage of localized LNs/CECT, of 78.0% in the validation dataset. In the test dataset, average LR was 81.1% with a mean Dice coefficient of 0.71. For enlarged LNs with a SAD ≥ 10 mm, LR was 96.2%. In the test dataset, the false-positive rate was 2.4 LNs/CECT., Conclusions: Our trained AI model demonstrated a good overall performance in the consistent automatic localization and 3D segmentation of physiological and metastatic cervical LNs with a SAD ≥ 5 mm on CECTs. This could aid clinical localization and automatic 3D segmentation, which can benefit clinical care and radiomics research., Relevance Statement: Our AI model is a time-saving tool for 3D segmentation of cervical lymph nodes on contrast-enhanced CT scans and serves as a solid base for N staging in clinical practice and further radiomics research., Key Points: • Determination of N status in TNM staging is essential for therapy planning in oncology. • Segmenting cervical lymph nodes manually is highly time-consuming in clinical practice. • Our model provides a robust, automated 3D segmentation of cervical lymph nodes. • It achieves a high accuracy for localization especially of enlarged lymph nodes. • These segmentations should assist clinical care and radiomics research., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of combining compressed sense (CS) with a newly developed deep learning-based algorithm (CS-AI) using convolutional neural networks to accelerate 2D MRI of the knee., Methods: In this prospective study, 20 healthy volunteers were scanned with a 3T MRI scanner. All subjects received a fat-saturated sagittal 2D proton density reference sequence without acceleration and four additional acquisitions with different acceleration levels: 2, 3, 4 and 6. All sequences were reconstructed with the conventional CS and a new CS-AI algorithm. Two independent, blinded readers rated all images by seven criteria (overall image impression, visible artifacts, delineation of anterior ligament, posterior ligament, menisci, cartilage, and bone) using a 5-point Likert scale. Signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated. Subjective ratings and quantitative metrics were compared between CS and CS-AI with similar acceleration levels and between all CS/CS-AI images and the non-accelerated reference sequence. Friedman and Dunn´s multiple comparison tests were used for subjective, ANOVA and the Tukey Kramer test for quantitative metrics., Results: Conventional CS images at the lowest acceleration level (CS2) were already rated significantly lower than reference for 6/7 criteria. CS-AI images maintained similar image quality to the reference up to CS-AI three for all criteria, which would allow for a reduction in scan time of 64% with unchanged image quality compared to the unaccelerated sequence. SNR and CNR were significantly higher for all CS-AI reconstructions compared to CS (all p < 0.05)., Conclusions: AI-based image reconstruction showed higher image quality than CS for 2D knee imaging. Its implementation in the clinical routine yields the potential for faster MRI acquisition but needs further validation in non-healthy study subjects., Advances in Knowledge: Combining compressed SENSE with a newly developed deep learning-based algorithm using convolutional neural networks allows a 64% reduction in scan time for 2D imaging of the knee. Implementation of the new deep learning-based algorithm in clinical routine in near future should enable better image quality/resolution with constant scan time, or reduced acquisition times while maintaining diagnostic quality., Competing Interests: Conflict of interestThe author Kristina Sonnabend currently works for Philips GmbH Market DACH, Hamburg, Germany. David Maintz and Nils Große Hokamp are on the speaker’s bureau of Philips Healthcare. Nils Große Hokamp and Simon Lennartz receive research support from Philips Healthcare. The remaining authors have no potential conflict of interest to declare.

Objectives: Positron emission tomography (PET) is currently considered the non-invasive reference standard for lymph node (N-)staging in lung cancer. However, not all patients can undergo this diagnostic procedure due to high costs, limited availability, and additional radiation exposure. The purpose of this study was to predict the PET result from traditional contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and to test different feature extraction strategies., Methods: In this study, 100 lung cancer patients underwent a contrast-enhanced 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT scan between August 2012 and December 2019. We trained machine learning models to predict FDG uptake in the subsequent PET scan. Model inputs were composed of (i) traditional "hand-crafted" radiomics features from the segmented lymph nodes, (ii) deep features derived from a pretrained EfficientNet-CNN, and (iii) a hybrid approach combining (i) and (ii)., Results: In total, 2734 lymph nodes [555 (20.3%) PET-positive] from 100 patients [49% female; mean age 65, SD: 14] with lung cancer (60% adenocarcinoma, 21% plate epithelial carcinoma, 8% small-cell lung cancer) were included in this study. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) ranged from 0.79 to 0.87, and the scaled Brier score (SBS) ranged from 16 to 36%. The random forest model (iii) yielded the best results [AUC 0.871 (0.865-0.878), SBS 35.8 (34.2-37.2)] and had significantly higher model performance than both approaches alone (AUC: p < 0.001, z = 8.8 and z = 22.4; SBS: p < 0.001, z = 11.4 and z = 26.6, against (i) and (ii), respectively)., Conclusion: Both traditional radiomics features and transfer-learning deep radiomics features provide relevant and complementary information for non-invasive N-staging in lung cancer.

The radiologic evaluation of the sagittal angulation of the distal humerus is commonly based on standard lateral radiographs. However, lateral radiographs do not allow to examine the lateral angulation of the capitulum and the trochlea, separately. Although this problem could be approached via computed tomography, there are no data available describing the difference between the angulation of the capitulum and trochlea. Therefore, we aimed to assess sagittal angles of the capitulum and trochlea in relation to the humeral shaft based on 400 CT-scans of the elbow in healthy adults. Angles were measured in sagittal planes at the capitulum center and three anatomically defined trochlea locations and were spanned between the axis of the joint component and the humerus shaft. Angles were tested for differences between measurement locations and correlation with patient characteristics (age, sex, trans-epicondylar distance). Angles increased from lateral to medial measurement locations (107.4 ± 9.6°, 167.4 ± 8.2°, 171.8 ± 7.3°, 179.1 ± 7.0°; p < 0.05). Largest angle differences were detected between the capitulum and trochlea with smallest angles measured at the capitulum. Patient characteristics did not correlate with angles (p > 0.05). Intra-rater-reliability was r = 0.79-0.86. As CT-imaging allows to distinguish between sagittal capitulum and trochlea locations, it might benefit the radiologic diagnostic of sagittal malalignments of the distal humerus at the capitulum and trochlea, separately., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Compressed sensing accelerates magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition by undersampling of the k-space. Yet, excessive undersampling impairs image quality when using conventional reconstruction techniques. Deep-learning-based reconstruction methods might allow for stronger undersampling and thus faster MRI scans without loss of crucial image quality. We compared imaging approaches using parallel imaging (SENSE), a combination of parallel imaging and compressed sensing (COMPRESSED SENSE, CS), and a combination of CS and a deep-learning-based reconstruction (CS AI) on raw k-space data acquired at different undersampling factors. 3D T2-weighted images of the lumbar spine were obtained from 20 volunteers, including a 3D sequence (standard SENSE), as provided by the manufacturer, as well as accelerated 3D sequences (undersampling factors 4.5, 8, and 11) reconstructed with CS and CS AI. Subjective rating was performed using a 5-point Likert scale to evaluate anatomical structures and overall image impression. Objective rating was performed using apparent signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (aSNR and aCNR) as well as root mean square error (RMSE) and structural-similarity index (SSIM). The CS AI 4.5 sequence was subjectively rated better than the standard in several categories and deep-learning-based reconstructions were subjectively rated better than conventional reconstructions in several categories for acceleration factors 8 and 11. In the objective rating, only aSNR of the bone showed a significant tendency towards better results of the deep-learning-based reconstructions. We conclude that CS in combination with deep-learning-based image reconstruction allows for stronger undersampling of k-space data without loss of image quality, and thus has potential for further scan time reduction., Competing Interests: C.Z. received funding from the FF MED project (funding from the Ministry of Culture and science of North Rhine-Westphalia to support female scientists). K.S. and K.W. are working for Philips Healthcare. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abstract: To determine if anemia can be predicted on enhanced computed tomography (CT) examinations of the thorax using virtual non-contrast (VNC) images, in order to support clinicians especially in diagnosing primary asymptomatic patients in daily routine.In this monocentric study, 100 consecutive patients (50 with proven anemia), who underwent a contrast-enhanced CT examination of the thorax due to various indications were included. Attenuation was measured in the descending thoracic aorta, the intraventricular septum, and the left ventricle cavity both in the conventional contrast-enhanced and in the VNC images.Two experienced radiologists annotated the delineation of a dense interventricular septum or a hyperattenuating aortic wall sign for all patients.Hemoglobin levels were then correlated with the measured attenuation values, as well as the visualization of the aortic wall or interventricular septum.Good correlation was shown between hemoglobin levels and CT attenuation values of the left ventricular cavity (r = .59), aorta (r = .56), and ratio between left ventricular cavity and the intraventricular septum (r = .57). Receiver operating characteristic curve revealed ≤ 36.5 hounsfield units (left ventricular cavity) as the threshold for diagnosing anemia. Predicting anemia by visualization of a hyperattenuating aortic wall or a dense interventricular septum yielded a specificity of 98% and 92%, respectively.Predicting anemia on enhanced CT examinations using VNC is feasible. A threshold value of ≤ 36.5 hounsfield units (left ventricular cavity) best defines anemia. Aortic wall or interventricular septum visualization on VNC is a specific anemia indicator., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)