Search

The usefulness of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and its dynamics before/after durvalumab consolidation therapy to predict safety or efficacy remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with durvalumab consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy (D group) or chemoradiotherapy alone (non-D group) at multiple institutions. We investigated the association between dNLR, or its dynamics, and pneumonitis, checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP), irAEs, and efficacy. Ninety-eight and fifty-six patients were enrolled in the D and non-D groups, respectively. The dNLR at baseline was significantly lower in patients who experienced irAEs or CIP than in those who did not. The low dNLR group, 28 days following durvalumab consolidation therapy (dNLR28 ≤ 3), demonstrated longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the high dNLR group (dNLR28 > 3) (PFS, hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22–0.88, p = 0.020; OS, HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16–0.94, p = 0.037). Among patients with high dNLR at baseline (dNLR > 3), the dNLR28 ≤ 3 group showed longer PFS than the dNLR28 > 3 group (p = 0.010). The dNLR is a predictive factor for irAEs and CIP in patients receiving durvalumab consolidation therapy. The dNLR at 28 days after durvalumab consolidation therapy and its dynamics predict favorable outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Management of pelvic node‐positive prostate cancer has been challenging and controversial. We conducted a study to evaluate the outcomes of whole‐pelvic (WP) simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Methods: A total of 67 consecutive patients with cT1c‐4N1M0 prostate cancer were definitively treated by WP SIB‐IMRT. Neoadjuvant ADT (median: 8.3 months) was administered in all cases. WP SIB‐IMRT was designed to simultaneously deliver 78, 66.3, and 58.5 Gy in 39 fractions to the prostate plus seminal vesicles, metastatic lymph nodes (LNs), and the pelvic LN region, respectively. Adjuvant ADT (median: 24.7 months) was administered in 66 patients. Results: The median follow‐up period was 81.6 months (range: 30.5–160.7). Biochemical relapse‐free, overall, and prostate cancer‐specific survival rates at 10 years were 59.8%, 79.6%, and 86.3%, respectively. Loco‐regional recurrence was not observed. Being in International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 5 and having a posttreatment detectable nadir prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level (≥0.010 ng/ml) were significantly associated with worse prostate cancer‐specific survival and progression of castration resistance. The 10‐year cumulative incidence rates of grade 2 and 3 late toxicities were, respectively, 1.5% and 0% for genitourinary, 0% and 1.5% for gastrointestinal events. No grade 4 acute or late toxicities were observed. Conclusions: WP SIB‐IMRT can be safely administered to patients with pelvic node‐positive prostate cancer. Since grade group 5 and detectable nadir PSA levels are risks for castration resistance, we may need to increase the intensity of treatment for such cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]