Search

Motion prediction based on kinematic information such as body segment displacement and joint angle has been widely studied. Because motions originate from forces, it is beneficial to estimate dynamic information, such as the ground reaction force (GRF), in addition to kinematic information for advanced motion prediction. In this study, we proposed a method to estimate GRF and ground reaction moment (GRM) from electromyography (EMG) in combination with and without an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor using a machine learning technique. A long short-term memory network, which is suitable for processing long time-span data, was constructed with EMG and IMU as input data to estimate GRF during posture control and stepping motion. The results demonstrate that the proposed method can provide the GRF estimation with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 8.22 ± 0.97% (mean ± SE) for the posture control motion and 11.17 ± 2.16% (mean ± SE) for the stepping motion. We could confirm that EMG input is essential especially when we need to predict both GRF and GRM with limited numbers of sensors attached under knees. In addition, we developed a GRF visualization system integrated with ongoing motion in a Unity environment. This system enabled the visualization of the GRF vector in 3-dimensional space and provides predictive motion direction based on the estimated GRF, which can be useful for human motion prediction with portable sensors.

Multiple tasks are simultaneously performed during walking in our daily life. Distracted walk by smartphone usage is recently getting a social problem. The term dual-task gait refers to the secondary task added to the walking. Attention demanding tasks may influence how a person walks. Since in-lab measurement may not accurately reflect the daily living gait, wearable sensors approach have been proposed for gait analysis in an out-of-lab setting. This study addresses the potential of using only two inertial measurement units (IMUs) attached to the shoes for the assessment of cognitive dual-task gait and how it differs from single-task gait. We found that the proposed system is sensitive to recognizing a tiny change in gait features such as on the double support time and gait indices when subject performing dual-task gait compared to the single-task gait experiment.