11 results on '"Hulst, Marcel"'
Search Results
2. Cross-Reactivity of Human, Wild Boar, and Farm Animal Sera from Pre- and Post-Pandemic Periods with Αlpha- and Βeta-Coronaviruses (CoV), Including SARS-CoV-2
- Author
-
Hulst, Marcel, primary, Kant, Arie, additional, Harders-Westerveen, José, additional, Hoffmann, Markus, additional, Xie, Yajing, additional, Laheij, Charlotte, additional, Murk, Jean-Luc, additional, and Poel, Wim H. M. van der, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Cross-Reactivity of Human, Wild Boar, and Farm Animal Sera from Pre- and Post-Pandemic Periods with Alpha- and Βeta-Coronaviruses (CoV), including SARS-CoV-2.
- Author
-
Hulst, Marcel, Kant, Arie, Harders-Westerveen, José, Hoffmann, Markus, Xie, Yajing, Laheij, Charlotte, Murk, Jean-Luc, and Van der Poel, Wim H. M.
- Subjects
- *
WILD boar , *DOMESTIC animals , *SARS-CoV-2 , *CONVALESCENT plasma , *CROSS reactions (Immunology) , *SERODIAGNOSIS , *MONOCLONAL antibodies - Abstract
Panels of pre- and post-pandemic farm animals, wild boar and human sera, including human sera able to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, were tested in serological tests to determine their cross-reactivity with β- and α-CoV originating from farm animals. Sera were tested in neutralization assays with high ascending concentrations (up to 1 × 104 TCID50 units/well) of β-CoV Bovine coronavirus (BCV), SARS-CoV-2, and porcine α-CoV-transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV). In addition, sera were tested for immunostaining of cells infected with β-CoV porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis (PHEV). Testing revealed a significantly higher percentage of BCV neutralization (78%) for sera of humans that had experienced a SARS-CoV-2 infection (SARS-CoV-2 convalescent sera) than was observed for human pre-pandemic sera (37%). Also, 46% of these human SARS-CoV-2 convalescent sera neutralized the highest concentration of BCV (5 × 103 TCID50/well) tested, whereas only 9.6% of the pre-pandemic sera did. Largely similar percentages were observed for staining of PHEV-infected cells by these panels of human sera. Furthermore, post-pandemic sera collected from wild boars living near a densely populated area in The Netherlands also showed a higher percentage (43%) and stronger BCV neutralization than was observed for pre-pandemic sera from this area (21%) and for pre- (28%) and post-pandemic (20%) sera collected from wild boars living in a nature reserve park with limited access for the public. High percentages of BCV neutralization were observed for pre- and post-pandemic sera of cows (100%), pigs (up to 45%), sheep (36%) and rabbits (60%). However, this cross-neutralization was restricted to sera collected from specific herds or farms. TGEV was neutralized only by sera of pigs (68%) and a few wild boar sera (4.6%). None of the BCV and PHEV cross-reacting human pre-pandemic, wild boar and farm animal sera effectively neutralized SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Preexisting antibodies in human sera effectively neutralized the animal β-CoV BCV in vitro. This cross-neutralization was boosted after humans had experienced a SARS-CoV-2 infection, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 activated a "memory" antibody response against structurally related epitopes expressed on the surface of a broad range of heterologous CoV, including β-CoV isolated from farm animals. Further research is needed to elucidate if a symptomless infection or environmental exposure to SARS-CoV-2 or another β-CoV also triggers such a "memory" antibody response in wild boars and other free-living animals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Experimental and field investigations of exposure, replication and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in pigs in the Netherlands
- Author
-
Sikkema, Reina S, Tobias, Tijs, Oreshkova, Nadia, de Bruin, Erwin, Okba, Nisreen, Chandler, Felicity, Hulst, Marcel M, Rodon, Jordi, Houben, Manon, van Maanen, Kees, Bultman, Hans, Meester, Marina, Gerhards, Nora M, Bouwknegt, Martijn, Urlings, Bert, Haagmans, Bart, Kluytmans, Jan, Geurtsvan Kessel, Corine H, van der Poel, Wim H M, Koopmans, Marion P G, Stegeman, Arjan, FAH GZ varken, dFAH AVR, dFAH I&I, LS Virologie, FAH veterinaire epidemiologie, Producció Animal, Sanitat Animal, FAH GZ varken, dFAH AVR, dFAH I&I, LS Virologie, FAH veterinaire epidemiologie, and Virology
- Subjects
Letter ,Bioinformatica & Diermodellen ,Coronaviruses ,Epidemiology ,Swine ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,Immunology ,Infectious and parasitic diseases ,RC109-216 ,Biology ,medicine.disease_cause ,Microbiology ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,Virology ,antibody ,Bio-informatics & Animal models ,Drug Discovery ,Replication (statistics) ,medicine ,Animals ,Public Health Surveillance ,Epidemiology, Bio-informatics & Animal models ,One Health ,Animal species ,Netherlands ,Retrospective Studies ,Coronavirus ,Epidemiologie ,Swine Diseases ,Transmission (medicine) ,SARS-CoV-2 ,fungi ,COVID-19 ,food and beverages ,Environmental Exposure ,General Medicine ,QR1-502 ,Virology & Molecular Biology ,Virologie & Moleculaire Biologie ,Infectious Diseases ,Epidemiologie, Bioinformatica & Diermodellen ,Parasitology - Abstract
In order to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, transmission and reservoir development in swine, we combined results of an experimental and two observational studies. First, intranasal and intratracheal challenge of eight pigs did not result in infection, based on clinical signs and PCR on swab and lung tissue samples. Two serum samples returned a low positive result in virus neutralization, in line with findings in other infection experiments in pigs. Next, a retrospective observational study was performed in the Netherlands in the spring of 2020. Serum samples (N =417) obtained at slaughter from 17 farms located in a region with a high human case incidence in the first wave of the pandemic. Samples were tested with protein micro array, plaque reduction neutralization test and receptor-binding-domain ELISA. None of the serum samples was positive in all three assays, although six samples from one farm returned a low positive result in PRNT (titers 40-80). Therefore we conclude that serological evidence for large scale transmission was not observed. Finally, an outbreak of respiratory disease in pigs on one farm, coinciding with recent exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infected animal caretakers, was investigated. Tonsil swabs and paired serum samples were tested. No evidence for infection with SARS-CoV-2 was found. In conclusion, Although in both the experimental and the observational study few samples returned low antibody titer results in PRNT infection with SARS-CoV-2 was not confirmed. It was concluded that sporadic infections in the field cannot be excluded, but large-scale SARS-CoV-2 transmission among pigs is unlikely. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
- Published
- 2022
5. Experimental and field investigations of exposure, replication and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in pigs in the Netherlands
- Author
-
FAH GZ varken, dFAH AVR, dFAH I&I, LS Virologie, FAH veterinaire epidemiologie, Sikkema, Reina S, Tobias, Tijs, Oreshkova, Nadia, de Bruin, Erwin, Okba, Nisreen, Chandler, Felicity, Hulst, Marcel M, Rodon, Jordi, Houben, Manon, van Maanen, Kees, Bultman, Hans, Meester, Marina, Gerhards, Nora M, Bouwknegt, Martijn, Urlings, Bert, Haagmans, Bart, Kluytmans, Jan, Geurtsvan Kessel, Corine H, van der Poel, Wim H M, Koopmans, Marion P G, Stegeman, Arjan, FAH GZ varken, dFAH AVR, dFAH I&I, LS Virologie, FAH veterinaire epidemiologie, Sikkema, Reina S, Tobias, Tijs, Oreshkova, Nadia, de Bruin, Erwin, Okba, Nisreen, Chandler, Felicity, Hulst, Marcel M, Rodon, Jordi, Houben, Manon, van Maanen, Kees, Bultman, Hans, Meester, Marina, Gerhards, Nora M, Bouwknegt, Martijn, Urlings, Bert, Haagmans, Bart, Kluytmans, Jan, Geurtsvan Kessel, Corine H, van der Poel, Wim H M, Koopmans, Marion P G, and Stegeman, Arjan
- Published
- 2022
6. Experimental and field investigations of exposure, replication and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in pigs in the Netherlands
- Author
-
Sikkema, Reina S., Tobias, Tijs, Oreshkova, Nadia, de Bruin, Erwin, Okba, Nisreen, Chandler, Felicity, Hulst, Marcel M., Rodon, Jordi, Houben, Manon, van Maanen, Kees, Bultman, Hans, Meester, Marina, Gerhards, Nora M., Bouwknegt, Martijn, Urlings, Bert, Haagmans, Bart, Kluytmans, Jan, Geurts van Kessel, Corine H., van der Poel, Wim H.M., Koopmans, Marion P.G., Stegeman, Arjan, Sikkema, Reina S., Tobias, Tijs, Oreshkova, Nadia, de Bruin, Erwin, Okba, Nisreen, Chandler, Felicity, Hulst, Marcel M., Rodon, Jordi, Houben, Manon, van Maanen, Kees, Bultman, Hans, Meester, Marina, Gerhards, Nora M., Bouwknegt, Martijn, Urlings, Bert, Haagmans, Bart, Kluytmans, Jan, Geurts van Kessel, Corine H., van der Poel, Wim H.M., Koopmans, Marion P.G., and Stegeman, Arjan
- Abstract
In order to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, transmission and reservoir development in swine, we combined results of an experimental and two observational studies. First, intranasal and intratracheal challenge of eight pigs did not result in infection, based on clinical signs and PCR on swab and lung tissue samples. Two serum samples returned a low positive result in virus neutralization, in line with findings in other infection experiments in pigs. Next, a retrospective observational study was performed in the Netherlands in the spring of 2020. Serum samples (N =417) obtained at slaughter from 17 farms located in a region with a high human case incidence in the first wave of the pandemic. Samples were tested with protein micro array, plaque reduction neutralization test and receptor-binding-domain ELISA. None of the serum samples was positive in all three assays, although six samples from one farm returned a low positive result in PRNT (titers 40–80). Therefore we conclude that serological evidence for large scale transmission was not observed. Finally, an outbreak of respiratory disease in pigs on one farm, coinciding with recent exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infected animal caretakers, was investigated. Tonsil swabs and paired serum samples were tested. No evidence for infection with SARS-CoV-2 was found. In conclusion, Although in both the experimental and the observational study few samples returned low antibody titer results in PRNT infection with SARS-CoV-2 was not confirmed. It was concluded that sporadic infections in the field cannot be excluded, but large-scale SARS-CoV-2 transmission among pigs is unlikely.
- Published
- 2022
7. Experimental and field investigations of exposure, replication and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in pigs in the Netherlands
- Author
-
Medische Microbiologie, Infection & Immunity, JC onderzoeksprogramma Infectieziekten, Sikkema, Reina S., Tobias, Tijs, Oreshkova, Nadia, de Bruin, Erwin, Okba, Nisreen, Chandler, Felicity, Hulst, Marcel M., Rodon, Jordi, Houben, Manon, van Maanen, Kees, Bultman, Hans, Meester, Marina, Gerhards, Nora M., Bouwknegt, Martijn, Urlings, Bert, Haagmans, Bart, Kluytmans, Jan, GeurtsvanKessel, Corine H., van der Poel, Wim H.M., Koopmans, Marion P.G., Stegeman, Arjan, Medische Microbiologie, Infection & Immunity, JC onderzoeksprogramma Infectieziekten, Sikkema, Reina S., Tobias, Tijs, Oreshkova, Nadia, de Bruin, Erwin, Okba, Nisreen, Chandler, Felicity, Hulst, Marcel M., Rodon, Jordi, Houben, Manon, van Maanen, Kees, Bultman, Hans, Meester, Marina, Gerhards, Nora M., Bouwknegt, Martijn, Urlings, Bert, Haagmans, Bart, Kluytmans, Jan, GeurtsvanKessel, Corine H., van der Poel, Wim H.M., Koopmans, Marion P.G., and Stegeman, Arjan
- Published
- 2022
8. Experimental and field investigations of exposure, replication and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in pigs in the Netherlands
- Author
-
Sikkema, Reina S., primary, Tobias, Tijs, additional, Oreshkova, Nadia, additional, de Bruin, Erwin, additional, Okba, Nisreen, additional, Chandler, Felicity, additional, Hulst, Marcel M., additional, Rodon, Jordi, additional, Houben, Manon, additional, van Maanen, Kees, additional, Bultman, Hans, additional, Meester, Marina, additional, Gerhards, Nora M., additional, Bouwknegt, Martijn, additional, Urlings, Bert, additional, Haagmans, Bart, additional, Kluytmans, Jan, additional, GeurtsvanKessel, Corine H., additional, van der Poel, Wim H.M., additional, Koopmans, Marion P.G., additional, and Stegeman, Arjan, additional
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Occupational and environmental exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in and around infected mink farms.
- Author
-
de Rooij, Myrna M. T., der Honing, Renate W. Hakze-Van, Hulst, Marcel M., Harders, Frank, Engelsma, Marc, van de Hoef, Wouter, Meliefste, Kees, Nieuwenweg, Sigrid, Munnink, Bas B. Oude, van Schothorst, Isabella, Sikkema, Reina S., van der Spek, Arco N., Spierenburg, Marcel, Spithoven, Jack, Bouwstra, Ruth, Molenaar, Robert-Jan, Koopmans, Marion, Stegeman, Arjan, van der Poel, Wim H. M., and Smit, Lidwien A. M.
- Abstract
Objective: Unprecedented SARS-CoV-2 infections in farmed minks raised immediate concerns regarding transmission to humans and initiated intensive environmental investigations to assess occupational and environmental exposure.Methods: Air sampling was performed at infected Dutch mink farms, at farm premises and at nearby residential sites. A range of other environmental samples were collected from minks' housing units, including bedding materials. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was analysed in all samples by quantitative PCR.Results: Inside the farms, considerable levels of SARS-CoV-2 RNA were found in airborne dust, especially in personal inhalable dust samples (approximately 1000-10 000 copies/m3). Most of the settling dust samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA (82%, 75 of 92). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected in outdoor air samples, except for those collected near the entrance of the most recently infected farm. Many samples of minks' housing units and surfaces contained SARS-CoV-2 RNA.Conclusions: Infected mink farms can be highly contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 RNA. This warns of occupational exposure, which was substantiated by considerable SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations in personal air samples. Dispersion of SARS-CoV-2 to outdoor air was found to be limited and SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected in air samples collected beyond farm premises, implying a negligible risk of environmental exposure to nearby communities. Our occupational and environmental risk assessment is in line with whole genome sequencing analyses showing mink-to-human transmission among farm workers, but no indications of direct zoonotic transmission events to nearby communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. An interlaboratory proficiency test using metagenomic sequencing as a diagnostic tool for the detection of RNA viruses in swine fecal material.
- Author
-
Liu L, Hakhverdyan M, Wallgren P, Vanneste K, Fu Q, Lucas P, Blanchard Y, de Graaf M, Oude Munnink BB, van Boheemen S, Bossers A, Hulst M, and Van Borm S
- Subjects
- Animals, Swine, Computational Biology methods, Genome, Viral genetics, Laboratory Proficiency Testing, RNA, Viral genetics, Astroviridae Infections veterinary, Astroviridae Infections diagnosis, Astroviridae Infections virology, Metagenome, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing methods, Feces virology, Metagenomics methods, Swine Diseases virology, Swine Diseases diagnosis, RNA Viruses genetics, RNA Viruses isolation & purification, RNA Viruses classification
- Abstract
Metagenomic shotgun sequencing (mNGS) can serve as a generic molecular diagnostic tool. An mNGS proficiency test (PT) was performed in six European veterinary and public health laboratories to detect porcine astroviruses in fecal material and the extracted RNA. While different mNGS workflows for the generation of mNGS data were used in the different laboratories, the bioinformatic analysis was standardized using a metagenomic read classifier as well as read mapping to selected astroviral reference genomes to assess the semiquantitative representation of astrovirus species mixtures. All participants successfully identified and classified most of the viral reads to the two dominant species. The normalized read counts obtained by aligning reads to astrovirus reference genomes by Bowtie2 were in line with Kraken read classification counts. Moreover, participants performed well in terms of repeatability when the fecal sample was tested in duplicate. However, the normalized read counts per detected astrovirus species differed substantially between participants, which was related to the different laboratory methods used for data generation. Further modeling of the mNGS data indicated the importance of selecting appropriate reference data for mNGS read classification. As virus- or sample-specific biases may apply, caution is needed when extrapolating this swine feces-based PT for the detection of other RNA viruses or using different sample types. The suitability of experimental design to a given pathogen/sample matrix combination, quality assurance, interpretation, and follow-up investigation remain critical factors for the diagnostic interpretation of mNGS results., Importance: Metagenomic shotgun sequencing (mNGS) is a generic molecular diagnostic method, involving laboratory preparation of samples, sequencing, bioinformatic analysis of millions of short sequences, and interpretation of the results. In this paper, we investigated the performance of mNGS on the detection of porcine astroviruses, a model for RNA viruses in a pig fecal material, among six European veterinary and public health laboratories. We showed that different methods for data generation affect mNGS performance among participants and that the selection of reference genomes is crucial for read classification. Follow-up investigation remains a critical factor for the diagnostic interpretation of mNGS results. The paper contributes to potential improvements of mNGS as a diagnostic tool in clinical settings., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Cross-Reactivity of Human, Wild Boar, and Farm Animal Sera from Pre- and Post-Pandemic Periods with Alpha- and Βeta-Coronaviruses (CoV), including SARS-CoV-2.
- Author
-
Hulst M, Kant A, Harders-Westerveen J, Hoffmann M, Xie Y, Laheij C, Murk JL, and Van der Poel WHM
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Animals, Cattle, Rabbits, Sheep, Swine, Animals, Domestic, SARS-CoV-2, Pandemics, COVID-19 Serotherapy, Sus scrofa, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 veterinary, Transmissible gastroenteritis virus
- Abstract
Panels of pre- and post-pandemic farm animals, wild boar and human sera, including human sera able to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, were tested in serological tests to determine their cross-reactivity with β- and α-CoV originating from farm animals. Sera were tested in neutralization assays with high ascending concentrations (up to 1 × 10
4 TCID50 units/well) of β-CoV Bovine coronavirus (BCV), SARS-CoV-2, and porcine α-CoV-transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV). In addition, sera were tested for immunostaining of cells infected with β-CoV porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis (PHEV). Testing revealed a significantly higher percentage of BCV neutralization (78%) for sera of humans that had experienced a SARS-CoV-2 infection (SARS-CoV-2 convalescent sera) than was observed for human pre-pandemic sera (37%). Also, 46% of these human SARS-CoV-2 convalescent sera neutralized the highest concentration of BCV (5 × 103 TCID50 /well) tested, whereas only 9.6% of the pre-pandemic sera did. Largely similar percentages were observed for staining of PHEV-infected cells by these panels of human sera. Furthermore, post-pandemic sera collected from wild boars living near a densely populated area in The Netherlands also showed a higher percentage (43%) and stronger BCV neutralization than was observed for pre-pandemic sera from this area (21%) and for pre- (28%) and post-pandemic (20%) sera collected from wild boars living in a nature reserve park with limited access for the public. High percentages of BCV neutralization were observed for pre- and post-pandemic sera of cows (100%), pigs (up to 45%), sheep (36%) and rabbits (60%). However, this cross-neutralization was restricted to sera collected from specific herds or farms. TGEV was neutralized only by sera of pigs (68%) and a few wild boar sera (4.6%). None of the BCV and PHEV cross-reacting human pre-pandemic, wild boar and farm animal sera effectively neutralized SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Preexisting antibodies in human sera effectively neutralized the animal β-CoV BCV in vitro. This cross-neutralization was boosted after humans had experienced a SARS-CoV-2 infection, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 activated a "memory" antibody response against structurally related epitopes expressed on the surface of a broad range of heterologous CoV, including β-CoV isolated from farm animals. Further research is needed to elucidate if a symptomless infection or environmental exposure to SARS-CoV-2 or another β-CoV also triggers such a "memory" antibody response in wild boars and other free-living animals.- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.