Search

Copyright of Revista Foco (Interdisciplinary Studies Journal) is the property of Revista Foco and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The aim of this research was to investigate the profile and characteristics of the scientific output published in the Max Planck Institute's journal Ius Commune between 1967 and 2001. Bibliometric techniques were used, with a predominantly quantitative approach. The research universe consisted of all the articles published in all the editions of this journal. The bibliometric indicators measured were a total of 28 editions, 285 articles, 163 authors, 26 female authors, 22 nationalities and nine languages. The author who published the most in the journal was Johannes-Michael Scholz, with 19 articles. The nationality with the highest number of authors in the journal is German. The results show an overview of the topics covered and the authors, nationalities and languages that have contributed to the journal Ius Commune. A discussion of the results of this research concludes the importance of the journal Ius Commune for the diffusion, dissemination and socialization of scientific production on legal topics and for the formation of a legal conceptual framework for European unification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Cuadernos de Historia del Derecho is the property of Universidad Complutense de Madrid and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This article examines the rise of the English copyright system, which dates back to the Statute of Anne, considered to be the first copyright law. For such purpose, it is used a descriptive and deductive methodology, fundamentally based on a bibliographical review and on the investigation of the legislation and of the precedents. The work starts from the invention of the press, going through the period of the granting of privileges, until the enactment of the Statute of Queen Anne. It also examines the creation of the company of stationers of London, the issue of the Licensing Act of 1662 and the dispute between booksellers in Scotland and England. The results obtained indicate that the Statute of Queen Anne did not have as its main objective the protection of authors, but such protection was eventually admitted as a reflection of judicial decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

En este ensayo se repasan las aportaciones teórico-metodológicas de Carlos Ramos Núñez, profesor universitario y magistrado constitucional, en el campo de los estudios interdisciplinares de derecho y literatura. Si bien el autor toma como base el modelo clásico elaborado por juristas estadounidenses y europeos, realiza una contribución significativa al tratar de manera especial la «reconstrucción y debate de casos célebres». Esta visión particular da cuenta de su formación como historiador del derecho y sus afinidades en favor de un análisis cultural del fenómeno jurídico. Lo anterior, sin duda, es necesario para la construcción paulatina de una identidad latinoamericana en los estudios de derecho y literatura que afiance el movimiento a nivel regional.

Copyright of Prudentia Iuris is the property of Pontificia Universidad Catolica Argentina and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Estudios de Derecho is the property of Estudios de Derecho and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Recensión del libro de BEATRIZ GARCÍA FUEYO que estudia la dación en pago. La regla del cambio de prestación en el cumplimiento del vínculo obligatorio, si hay acuerdo entre las partes, se altera por Justiniano, el año 534 d. C. mediante la imposición legal al acreedor de aceptar un inmueble del deudor que carece de numerario derivado de un préstamo, con las garantías del juez y evaluación de todo el patrimonio, además de la extnción definitiva del crédito. Vigente en Derecho común y hasta el siglo XIX, con regulación legal en España .desde el año 2015.

En esta contribución se examina, aplicando un instrumental histórico jurídico específico, la presencia alcanzada por la cultura jurídica argentina durante el período 1935-1940 en la actividad de la Gaceta Judicial, medio de difusión del superior tribunal colombiano. Se arriba a la conclusión de que durante esta época, y en función de múltiples intereses de los juristas locales, se incrementó considerablemente la presencia de contenidos jurídicos relacionados con lo argentino.

En este artículo el autor de Historia y Justicia responde a los comentarios vertidos sobre la obra por Víctor Brangier, Adrian Masters, Agustín Casagrande, Sergio Angeli y Marta Lorente. Ponderando algunos de los rasgos generales que dichos comentarios aportan al debate global, el autor se detiene luego en la respuesta de planteamientos puntuales surgidos de cada uno de ellos.

En el presente ensayo se analiza la Carta de dote y arras, de fecha 2 de junio de 1511 (AHPG, Libro de Protocolos Nº 2, fol. 511), en la que se acuerdan las condiciones económicas del futuro matrimonio entre D. Bartolome Sanchez y D.ª Françisca Alonso. Además, se comentan algunos textos de Las Siete Partidas del Sabio Rey don Alfonso (atribuidas a Alfonso X, El Sabio, en adelante las Partidas) que se refieren al régimen económico matrimonial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Historia y Sociedad (01218417) is the property of Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas y Economicas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Chilena de Derecho is the property of Revista Chilena de Derecho and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Cuadernos de Historia del Derecho is the property of Universidad Complutense de Madrid and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Historia del Derecho is the property of Instituto de Investigaciones de Historia del Derecho and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Historia del Derecho is the property of Instituto de Investigaciones de Historia del Derecho and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

En un sentido crítico y reflexivo los autores retoman la discusión de que más allá de la disputa si el Derecho es política, retórica o fenomenología, la disciplina jurídica claramente refleja su “nivel de calidad” a través de la jurisprudencia, entendida prima facie como doctrina y filosofía de juristas. Esta aseveración se refleja, de modo muy particular, a través de ámbitos medulares y propios de la tradición jurídica romanista como el Derecho Romano privado y público. Esta observación adquiere mayor trascendencia si consideramos el riesgo que supone, dentro de la profesión, que la práctica desconozca el arte y a una buena teoría que servirán de base y fundamento de las normas legales, los reglamentos, los formularios e incluso los trámites. Por lo tanto, los autores proponen al lector una revaloración del “Arte del Derecho” aludiendo de manera especial al caso ecuatoriano y sus bases histórico-fundacionales.

Copyright of Archivos de Criminología, Criminalística y Seguridad Privada is the property of Sociedad Mexicana de Criminologia Capitulo Nuevo Leon, A.C. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

El artículo atiende a un episodio central en el singular proceso de trasmisión textual que conoció la Monarquía de España, obra escrita por Pedro Salazar de Mendoza en el paso del siglo XVI al XVII, pero solo publicada en 1770. En concreto, se trata de recomponer la intervención de Andrés Marcos Burriel en esa historia y situarla en su contexto. Para ello se presta atención especial tanto a las preocupaciones que a mediados del XVIII atravesaba la «república de las letras» hispanas, como a la trascendencia que entre ellas iba adquiriendo la tentativa de localización de un derecho castellano que pudiera decirse español. Y todo ello, en el marco de una comisión de archivos para la Corona en el contexto negociador del concordato de 1753. El saldo relativamente fallido de la operación puede entonces ilustrar no solo los avatares de la historia textual de la Monarquía de España, sino también el clima cultural en el que se tanteaba su recuperación. Perfilar esa recuperación y lectura es el objetivo de este estudio.

Copyright of Historia y Sociedad (01218417) is the property of Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas y Economicas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Precedente is the property of Universidad ICESI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Procesos: Revista Ecuatoriana de Historia is the property of Universidad Andina Simon Bolivar, Sede Ecuador and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Hispania: Revista Española de Historia is the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Pacha: Revista de Estudios Contemporáneos del Sur Global is the property of PACHA REVISTA DE ESTUDIOS CONTEMPORANEOS DEL SUR GLOBAL and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

en este artículo se estudiaron los efectos de las leyes de “piedad Ilustrada” implementadas por el Estado de Venezuela en la península Goajira durante las décadas de 1830 y 1840 con el fin de restablecer el régimen misional. Para su elaboración se utilizó el método de investigación histórica socio-política. A partir de los datos encontrados y de la metodología aplicada se concluyó que estas leyes tuvieron como propósito el restablecimiento y organización secular del régimen misional para proteger e incorporar a los indígenas goajiros a la sociedad y a la economía nacional; para, restituir la propiedad de las parcialidades indígenas sobre el territorio de los resguardos despojados durante la República de Colombia (Gran Colombia); para, establecer normas de comercio entre indígenas y criollos; para fomentar la colonización criolla de las riberas del río Limón y del piedemonte de los montes de Oca con el fin de fortalecer la presencia venezolana sobre la península Goajira. Sin embargo, y con excepción del avance venezolano en la franja oriental de dicha península con el establecimiento de las “Guardias de Afuera”, el Gobierno venezolano no alcanzó los resultados esperados y siguió de manera inadvertida o intencional una línea de continuidad con el antiguo régimen misional colonial al persistir algunos de sus mecanismos básicos de funcionamiento como la tutela, la civilización forzada, la reducción y la expediciones militares de pacificación o “entradas”.

In this contribution we develop a historical reconstruction of the theoretical tensions and innovations promoted by the circulation of the legal category of the social function of property. We trace the conceptual history of this category considering as a focal point its application in the processes of social transformation that took place in Chile between 1930 and 1973, mainly from the theoretical work developed by the Chilean jurist Eduardo Novoa Monreal. We argue that Novoa's theorizations on the social function not only dispute the classical sense of the concept of property predominant in the national legal culture, but also account for an important break with the mechanistic reading of law preponderant within orthodox Marxist thought. In this sense, this work of conceptual appropriation and innovation represents a particular case of cultural translation of normative knowledge that contextually situates the global circulation of justifications aimed at disputing the concept of private property as an absolute and inviolable right. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Historia y Sociedad (01218417) is the property of Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas y Economicas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Historia del Derecho is the property of Instituto de Investigaciones de Historia del Derecho and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ciencia Jurídica is the property of Universidad de Guanajuato and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez is the property of Anales de la Catedra Francisco Suarez and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)