Search

Background: Acute pulmonary oedema is a life-threatening syndrome diagnosed based on radiological and clinical findings. However, to our knowledge, no studies have investigated this syndrome in critically ill patients. Objective: To describe the prevalence of radiologically and clinically diagnosed pulmonary oedema (RCDPO) in critically ill patients, characteristics of diagnosed patients, and treatments and outcomes in this patient population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using natural language processing to identify all radiological reports of pulmonary oedema among patients who had been admitted to single tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) over a 1-year period (January 2015 to January 2016). We reviewed clinical data, discharge diagnosis, treatment and outcomes for such patients, and used multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the association of RCDPO with various outcomes. Results: Out of 2001 ICU patients, we identified 238 patients (11.9%) with RCDPO. Patients with RCDPO were more acutely ill, had more chronic liver disease and had more chronic renal failure than critically ill patients who did not have RCDPO. They were typically admitted with acute cardiovascular disease; were more likely to receive invasive mechanical ventilation and continuous renal replacement therapy; had longer duration of ICU and hospital stay; were more likely to die in hospital; and, if discharged alive, were more likely to be admitted to a chronic care facility. In total, 46 RCDPO patients (19.3%) died in hospital. On multivariable analysis, only age and continuous renal replacement therapy were independently associated with mortality. In contrast, invasive mechanical ventilation was associated with a 2.5 times greater odds of radiological resolution. Conclusion: RCDPO affected about one in eight ICU patients. Such patients were sicker and had more comorbidities. The presence of RCDPO was independently associated with higher risk of death. Invasive mechanical ventilation was the only intervention independently associated with greater odds of radiological resolution., Competing Interests: No relevant disclosures., (© 2021 College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand.)

Objective: To test the effectiveness of chewing gum in the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery. Design: Prospective, open label, pilot randomised controlled trial. Setting: Two metropolitan ICUs. Participants: Ninety postoperative adult patients admitted to the ICU. Intervention: Patients administered chewing gum, who chewed for at least 15 minutes every 4 hours, were compared with a control group, who were administered a 20 mL sip of water orally every 4 hours. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the number of patient-reported episodes of nausea in the first 24 hours after the operation. Secondary outcomes included vomiting or dry retching episodes, and duration and severity of nausea. Results: Forty-six patients were randomly allocated to chewing gum and 44 patients to water. There was no difference between groups in the number of patients with nausea (10 [22%] chewing gum v 12 [27%] control patients; P = 0.72), nausea episodes (22 episodes; [median, 0; IQR, 0-0] v 21 episodes [median, 0; IQR, 0-1] per patient in each group respectively), vomiting/retching (2 [4%] chewing gum v 6 [14%] control patients; P = 0.24), or duration/severity of nausea. Conclusion: Regular postoperative administration of chewing gum in a surgical ICU patient cohort did not reduce nausea, vomiting or retching. The prevalence of PONV is less than previously reported. Our findings can inform future studies of PONV prophylaxis in post-surgical ICU patients. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry No. ACTRN12617001185358., Competing Interests: None declared., (© 2020 College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand.)