Search

Since 2000, targeted reduction in mortality of children younger than 5 years has been the cornerstone of global child health policy. This policy was expanded with the sustainable development goals [...]

Motor skills and movement-related functioning significantly shape how children experience and interact with the world around them. Among infants and young children, developmental motor disorders contribute to delays with motor, cognitive, and psychosocial development. Early and accurate identification of these disorders is necessary to facilitate timely access to therapeutic interventions that minimize the long-term effects of disability on everyday activities and participation. In the United States, motor assessments commonly used among children 0 to 3 years focus on completion of specific motor skills at a single point in time, which provides only a part of the greater picture that is a child's motor and movement-related functioning. Video-capture methods, like the General Movements Assessment (GMA) and the Infant Motor Profile (IMP), offer greater accuracy and predictive power to (1) identify motor deficits in young children and (2) facilitate early access to supportive, therapeutic intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This commentary examines the provisions for early childhood development (ECD) in the global action plan for rehabilitation published by the World Health Organisation (WHO) within the context of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) for inclusive education. The meeting reports of the WHO Rehabilitation 2030 for 2017 and 2019 and the related documents were reviewed along with ECD policy documents from WHO, UNICEF, UNESCO, and the World Bank. The importance of a life-course approach to rehabilitation for the health and wellbeing of persons with disabilities was highlighted in the Rehabilitation 2030. However, the critical and foundational role of rehabilitation in ECD for children with disabilities to facilitate inclusive education, especially in low- and middle-income countries as envisioned by the SDG 4.2, was not clearly addressed. Children under 5 years with developmental delays and disabilities who are not developmentally on track in health and psychosocial wellbeing require timely rehabilitation to ensure that they benefit from inclusive education. The culture and practice of rehabilitation should be nurtured from infancy as an indispensable component of ECD to adequately prepare children with developmental disabilities for inclusive education and ensure effective rehabilitation services over the life course. Rehabilitation is an integral and critical component of early childhood development to optimise school readiness for children with developmental disabilities. Routine newborn screening, developmental assessment, and surveillance of children from birth are foundational to any effective rehabilitation in early childhood. Global investment to promote and support rehabilitation services from early childhood within the health systems and across all levels of service delivery including community settings is warranted to achieve the sustainable development goals for children with disabilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate whether infants with complex congenital heart disease (CCHD) have an increased risk of impaired quality of motor behavior and delayed motor milestones. Method: A cohort of 69 infants with CCHD (43 males, 26 females) were assessed with the Infant Motor Profile (IMP) at three time periods between 6 to 18 months, mean ages in months (SD): 6.4 (0.7); 12.7 (1.0); 18.5 (0.7) IMP data were available from a reference sample of 300 Dutch infants. Analyses included multivariable logistic regression analysis to estimate differences in IMP scores below the 15th centile between children with CCHD and the reference group, and linear mixed‐effects models to assess the effect of ventricular physiology and systemic oxygen saturation (SpO2) of less than 90% on IMP outcomes. Results: Infants with CCHD had increased risks of total IMP scores below the 15th centile (lowest odds ratio [OR] at 18mo: 6.82 [95% confidence interval {CI} 2.87–16.19]), especially because of lower scores in the domains of variation, adaptability, and performance. Children with single ventricle CCHD scored consistently 3.03% (95% CI 1.00–5.07) lower than those with two ventricle physiology, mainly from contributions of the variation and performance domains. SpO2 of less than 90% was associated with 2.52% (95% CI 0.49–4.54) lower IMP scores. Interpretation: CCHD, especially single ventricle physiology, increases risk of impaired motor development. What this paper adds: Complex congenital heart disease (CCHD) substantially increases risk of impaired motor development.CCHD is associated with motor delay and reduced motor variation and adaptability.Single ventricle physiology increases the risk of impaired motor behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spanish, Portuguese & French translation of this Invited Editorial is available in the online issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To compare the predictive values of the General Movements Assessment (GMA) and the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment (SINDA) neurological scale for atypical neurodevelopmental outcome in 3-month-old at-risk infants., Method: A total of 109 infants (gestational age 30 weeks; range: 24-41; 52 males) attending a non-academic outpatient clinic were assessed with the GMA and the SINDA at 3 (2-4) months corrected age. The GMA pays attention to the complexity of general movements and presence of fidgety movements. Atypical neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months corrected age (and older) implied cerebral palsy (CP) or a Bayley Mental Development Index or Bayley Psychomotor Development Index lower than 70., Results: At 24 months corrected (and older) age, 16 children had an atypical outcome, including 14 children with CP. Regarding markedly reduced general movement complexity in combination with absent or sporadic fidgety movements, the GMA predicted an atypical outcome with specificity, positive, and negative predictive values greater than 0.900, and sensitivity of 0.687 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.460-0.915). SINDA predicted an atypical outcome with sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value greater than 0.900 and a positive predictive value of 0.652 (95% CI = 0.457-0.847). Regarding absent fidgety movements only or markedly reduced general movement complexity, the GMA predicted the outcome less well than both general movement criteria., Interpretation: The SINDA and GMA both predict neurodevelopmental outcome well, but SINDA is easier to learn than the GMA; being a non-video-based assessment, it allows caregiver feedback during the consultation whereas the GMA usually does not., (© 2024 The Authors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Mac Keith Press.)