Search

Transfusion needs may impact patients' quality of life and CAR T-cells efficacy through transfusion-related immunomodulation. Transfusion needs after CD19 CAR T-cells for large B-cell lymphoma: predictive factors and impact on outcome. B Introduction: b Patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy may experience severe cytopenias due to lymphodepleting chemotherapy and/or CAR T-cells. [Extracted from the article]

B Introduction: b The primary analysis of the Ro-CHOP trial ( I NCT01796002 i ) demonstrated that romidepsine (Ro) plus CHOP did not provide an increased efficacy compared with CHOP alone in patients with previously untreated peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). ROMIDEPSIN PLUS CHOP VERSUS CHOP IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED PERIPHERAL T-CELL LYMPHOMA: FINAL ANALYSIS OF THE RO-CHOP TRIAL B Methods: b The study was an open-label multicenter randomized (1:1) phase III study of Ro-CHOP versus CHOP as frontline treatment of patients 18-80 years with PTCL. [Extracted from the article]

This study aims to provide QoL level for DLBCL patients at diagnosis and after 1 year, and to assess the occurrence of a RS effect. B Introduction: b Few quality of life (QoL) data are available for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients during the first year of diagnosis. Quality of life and response shift effect of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma French patients included in prospective real-life REALYSA cohort in the first year after diagnosis. [Extracted from the article]

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a distinct entity among hematological malignancies of B-cell origin. It is characterized by its unique histopathological features and generally favorable prognosis. Over the years, advancements in understanding its pathogenesis, coupled with refined diagnostic and evaluation modalities, as well as therapeutic strategies, have significantly transformed the landscape of HL management. In this article, we present a comprehensive set of recommendations for the management of HL, encompassing various aspects of diagnosis, risk stratification, evaluation, and treatment. These recommendations are based on the latest evidence-based guidelines, expert consensus opinions, and clinical trial data, aiming to provide clinicians with a practical framework for delivering optimal care to patients with HL., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest CR has received a research grant from Roche and personal fees and non-financial support from Janssen, Roche, Takeda, and Abbvie. ROC has received a research grant from Gilead and Takeda and personal fees and non-financial support from Janssen, Roche, Takeda, Merck/BMS, Abbvie, and Amgen. The other authors declare no competing interests. MA performed scientific and medical consul/ng for Novar/s, Janssen, Kite/Gilead and MSD and received research grants from Mnemo Therapeutics. R.D. reports honoraria from Novar/s and Takeda; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Sanofi and Kite Pharma / Gilead. GM reports honoraria from Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Kite, and Abbvie. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest, (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide (TAFA-LEN) treatment relevance pre- or post-anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is debated. We analyzed patients with large B-cell lymphoma in the DESCAR-T registry treated with axi[1]cel or tisa-cel in ≥3rd line and TAFA-LEN before (n = 15, "TL-pre-CAR-T" set) or directly after (n = 52, "TL-post-CAR-T" set) CAR T-cell therapy. We compared TAFA-LEN v. other treatments using inverse probability weighting in the TL-post-CAR[1]T set. In the TL-post-CAR-T set, the median progression-free survival (mPFS), overall survival (mOS), and duration of response (mDOR) since the first treatment for progression (mPFS2/mOS2/mDOR2) were 3, 4.7, and 8.1 months, respectively. The best overall response rate (bORR) and best complete response rate (bCRR) after TAFA-LEN were 13.5% and 7.7%, respectively. Outcomes were better for patients who relapsed >6 months after CAR T-cell therapy (mPFS2: 5.6 vs 2 months, P = .0138; mOS2: not reached vs 3.8 months, P = .0034). The bORR and bCRR between TAFA-LEN and other treatments were 20.6% vs 24.9% and 11.6% vs 15.6%, respectively. Outcomes were similar between TAFA-LEN and other treatments (mPFS2: 2.9 vs 2.4 months, P = .91; mOS2: 3.3 vs 5.5 months, P = .06). In an exploratory analysis of the TL-pre-CAR-T set, the median TAFA-LEN treatment duration before CAR-T was 3.7 months with no patient becoming CD19 negative. The bORR, bCRR, 6- month PFS, and OS rates after CAR T-cell infusion were 45.5%, 36.4%, 20.1%, and 58.2%, respectively. Neither TAFA-LEN nor comparative salvage treatment improved outcomes for patients relapsing after CAR T-cell therapy., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are now used in routine practice for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Severe (grade ≥ 3) cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) are still the most concerning acute toxicities leading to frequent intensive care unit (ICU) admission, prolonging hospitalization, and adding significant cost to treatment. We report on the incidence of CRS and ICANS and the outcomes in a large cohort of 925 patients with LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) in France based on patient data captured through the DESCAR-T registry. CRS of any grade occurred in 778 patients (84.1%), with 74 patients (8.0%) with grade 3 CRS or higher, while ICANS of any grade occurred in 375 patients (40.5%), with 112 patients (12.1%) with grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Based on the parameters selected by multivariable analyses, two independent prognostic scoring systems (PSS) were derived, one for grade ≥ 3 CRS and one for grade ≥ 3 ICANS. CRS-PSS included bulky disease, a platelet count < 150 G/L, a C-reactive protein (CRP) level > 30 mg/L and no bridging therapy or stable or progressive disease (SD/PD) after bridging. Patients with a CRS-PSS score > 2 had significantly higher risk to develop grade ≥ 3 CRS. ICANS-PSS included female sex, low level of platelets (< 150 G/L), use of axi-cel and no bridging therapy or SD/PD after bridging. Patients with a CRS-PSS score > 2 had significantly higher risk to develop grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Both scores were externally validated in international cohorts of patients treated with tisa-cel or axi-cel., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: In this retrospective study, chimeric antigen receptor T cells remained effective in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma after prior exposure to bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) targeting different antigens. These results are relevant to clinical practice, particularly given the increasing use of BsAbs in earlier treatment lines., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Abstract: Histologic transformation of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (HT-WM) carries a poor prognosis with standard treatments. Here, we report the first series of HT-WM treated with chimeric antigen receptor T cells showing a high efficacy and no unexpected toxicity., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The primary analysis of the Ro-CHOP phase III randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01796002) established that romidepsin (Ro) plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) did not yield an increased efficacy compared with CHOP alone as first-line treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. We report the planned final analysis 5 years after the last patient enrolled. With a median follow-up of 6 years, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 months compared with 10.2 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.005]; P = .054), while median overall survival was 62.2 months (35.7-86.6 months) and 43.8 months (30.1-70.2 months; HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.14]; P = .324) in the Ro-CHOP and CHOP arms, respectively. In an exploratory analysis, the median PFS in the centrally reviewed follicular helper T-cell lymphoma subgroup was significantly longer in the Ro-CHOP arm (19.5 v 10.6 months, HR, 0.703 [95% CI, 0.502 to 0.985]; P = .039). Second-line treatments were given to 251 patients with a median PFS2 and OS2 after relapse or progression of 3.3 months and 11.5 months, respectively. Within the limits of highly heterogeneous second-line treatments, no specific regimen seemed to provide superior disease control. However, a potential benefit was observed with brentuximab vedotin in association with chemotherapy even after excluding anaplastic large-cell lymphoma subtype or after adjusting for histology and international prognostic index in a multivariate model (HR for PFS, 0.431 [95% CI, 0.238 to 0.779]; P = .005).

Abstract: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells targeting CD19 have been approved for the treatment of relapse/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Hematotoxicity is the most frequent CAR T-cell-related adverse event. Transfusion support is a surrogate marker of severe cytopenias. Transfusion affects patients' quality of life, presents specific toxicities, and is known to affect immunity through the so-called transfusion-related immunomodulation that may affect CAR T-cell efficacy. We analyzed data from 671 patients from the French DESCAR-T registry for whom exhaustive transfusion data were available. Overall, 401 (59.8%) and 378 (56.3%) patients received transfusion in the 6-month period before and after CAR T-cell infusion, respectively. The number of patients receiving transfusion and the mean number of transfused products increased during the 6-month period before CAR T-cell infusion, peaked during the first month after infusion (early phase), and decreased over time. Predictive factors for transfusion at the early phase were age >60 years, ECOG PS ≥2, treatment with axicabtagene ciloleucel, pre-CAR T-cell transfusions, and CAR-HEMATOTOX score ≥2. Predictive factors for late transfusion (between 1 and 6 months after infusion) were pre-CAR T-cell transfusions, CAR-HEMATOTOX score ≥2, ICANS ≥3 (for red blood cells [RBC] transfusion), and tocilizumab use (for platelets transfusion). Early transfusions and late platelets (but not RBC) transfusions were associated with a shorter progression-free survival and overall survival. Lymphoma-related mortality and nonrelapse mortality were both increased in the transfused population. Our data shed light on the mechanisms of early and late cytopenia and on the potential impact of transfusions on CAR T-cell efficacy and toxicity., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Abstract: Older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) require more effective and less toxic therapies than younger patients. In this multicenter, prospective, phase 2 study, we investigated a new firstline therapy regimen comprising 6 cycles of prednisone (40 mg/m2, days 1-5), vinblastine (6 mg/m2, day 1), doxorubicin (40 mg/m2, day 1), and bendamustine (120 mg/m2, day 1) (PVAB regimen) every 21 days for patients with newly diagnosed cHL aged ≥61 years with an advanced Ann Arbor stage. A Mini Nutritional Assessment score ≥17 was the cutoff value for patients aged ≥70 years. The primary end point was the complete metabolic response (CMR) rate after 6 cycles. The median age of the 89 included patients was 68 years (range, 61-88 years), with 35 patients (39%) aged ≥70 years. Seventy-eight patients (88%) completed the 6 cycles. The toxicity rate was acceptable, with a 20% rate of related serious adverse events. CMR was achieved by 69 patients (77.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 67-86). After a median follow-up of 42 months, 31 patients progressed or relapsed (35%), and 24 died (27%) from HL (n = 11), toxicity during treatment (n = 4), secondary cancers (n = 6), or other causes (n = 3). The 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 50% and 69%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that liver involvement (P = .001), lymphopenia (P = .001), CRP (P = .0005), and comedications (P = .003) were independently associated with PFS. The PVAB regimen yielded a high CMR rate with acceptable toxicity. Over long-term follow-up, survival end points were influenced by unrelated lymphoma events. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02414568 and at EudraCT as 2014-001002-17., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

We conducted an observational study (FIRE) to understand the effectiveness and safety outcomes of ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in France, after a maximum follow-up of five years. Patients were included according to the French marketing authorization in 2016 (i.e. patients with relapsed or refractory CLL or to previously untreated CLL patients with deletion 17p and/or tumor protein p53 mutations unsuitable for chemoimmunotherapy) and could have initiated ibrutinib more than 30 days prior their enrolment in the study (i.e. retrospective patients) or between 30 days before and 14 days after their enrolment (i.e. prospective patients). The results showed that in the effectiveness population (N = 388), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 53.1 (95% CI: 44.5-60.5) months for retrospective patients and 52.9 (95% CI: 40.3-60.6) months for prospective patients and no difference was shown between the PFS of patients who had at least one dose reduction versus the PFS of patients without dose reduction (p = 0.7971 for retrospective and p = 0.3163 for prospective patients). For both retrospective and prospective patients, the median overall survival was not reached. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event of interest was infections (57.6% retrospective; 71.4% prospective). A total of 14.6% of the retrospective patients and 22.4% of the prospective patients had an adverse event leading to death. Our findings on effectiveness were consistent with other studies and the fact that patients with dose reductions had similar PFS than patients without dose reduction is reassuring. No additional safety concerns than those already mentioned in previous studies could be noticed.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03425591. Registered 1 February 2018 - Retrospectively registered., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: Real-world data (RWD) are essential to complement clinical trial (CT) data, but major challenges remain, such as data quality. REal world dAta in LYmphoma and Survival in Adults (REALYSA) is a prospective noninterventional multicentric cohort started in 2018 that included patients newly diagnosed with lymphoma in France. Herein is a proof-of-concept analysis on patients with first-line diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) to (1) evaluate the capacity of the cohort to provide robust data through a multistep validation process; (2) assess the consistency of the results; and (3) conduct an exploratory transportability assessment of 2 recent phase 3 CTs (POLARIX and SENIOR). The analysis population comprised 645 patients with DLBCL included before 31 March 2021 who received immunochemotherapy and for whom 3589 queries were generated, resulting in high data completeness (<4% missing data). Median age was 66 years, with mostly advanced-stage disease and high international prognostic index (IPI) score. Treatments were mostly rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP 75%) and reduced dose R-CHOP (13%). Estimated 1-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival rates were 77.9% and 90.0%, respectively (median follow-up, 9.9 months). Regarding transportability, when applying the CT's main inclusion criteria (age, performance status, and IPI), outcomes seemed comparable between patients in REALYSA and standard arms of POLARIX (1-year progression-free survival 79.8% vs 79.8%) and SENIOR (1-year EFS, 64.5% vs 60.0%). With its rigorous data validation process, REALYSA provides high-quality RWD, thus constituting a platform for numerous scientific purposes. The REALYSA study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03869619., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can induce prolonged remissions and potentially cure a significant proportion of patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas. However, some patients may die of causes unrelated to lymphoma after CAR T-cell therapy. To date, little is known about the nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after CAR T-cell therapy. Using the French DESCAR-T registry, we analyzed the incidence and causes of NRM and identified risk factors of NRM. We report on 957 patients who received standard-of-care axicabtagene ciloleucel (n = 598) or tisagenlecleucel (n = 359) between July 2018 and April 2022, in 27 French centers. With a median follow-up of 12.4 months, overall NRM occurred in 48 patients (5.0% of all patients): early (before day 28 after infusion) in 9 patients (0.9% of all patients and 19% of overall NRM), and late (on/after day 28 after infusion) in 39 patients (4.1% of all patients and 81% of overall NRM). Causes of overall NRM were distributed as follows: 56% infections (29% with non-COVID-19 and 27% with COVID-19), 10% cytokine release syndromes, 6% stroke, 6% cerebral hemorrhage, 6% second malignancies, 4% immune effector cell associated neurotoxicities, and 10% deaths from other causes. We report risk factors of early NRM and overall NRM. In multivariate analysis, both diabetes and elevated ferritin level at lymphodepletion were associated with an increased risk of overall NRM. Our results may help physicians in patient selection and management in order to reduce the NRM after CAR T-cell therapy., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Preservation of fertility has become a growing concern in young females with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). However, the rate of pregnancy after the current most frequently prescribed ABVD (doxorubicin [Adriamycin], bleomycin, vinblastine, and darcarbazine) chemotherapy for HL has rarely been studied. In this study, we aim to determine the impact of ABVD on the fertility of women treated for HL. We conducted a noninterventional, multicenter study of female patients of childbearing age who were treated for HL. Two healthy apparied women nonexposed to chemotherapy (our controls) were assigned for each patient. Fertility was assessed by the number of pregnancies and births after HL treatment. Sixty-seven patients were included. The median age at diagnosis was 24.4 years (range, 16-43). HL was a localized disease for 68.7%. Of all the patients, 53.7% started at least 1 pregnancy after treatment vs 54.5% of the controls (P = .92). Of all the patients who desired children, 81% had at least 1 pregnancy. Patients treated with ABVD did not have a longer median time to pregnancy (4.8 years in the group of patients and 6.8 years for controls). Across patients, there were 58 pregnancies and 48 births (ratio, 1:2) and 136 pregnancies and 104 births (ratio, 1:3) for the control cohort. No increase in obstetric or neonatal complications has been reported in HL in our study. The number of pregnancies, births, and the time to start a pregnancy in young women treated with ABVD for HL is not different from that of controls. Therefore, females with HL treated with ABVD should be reassured regarding fertility., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

This phase I/II study assessed the combination of brentuximab vedotin (BV) with ifosfamide-carboplatin-etoposide (ICE) as a second-line therapy in refractory/relapsed (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients. Phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BV (10 patients) and phase II evaluated the rate of complete metabolic response (CMR) after 2 cycles of BV-ICE (42 patients). There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) during phase I recommending BV 1.8 mg/kg for phase II. Twenty-six patients (61.9%) achieved CMR after 2 cycles of BV-ICE and 37 patients (88%) were transplanted. With a median follow-up of 38 months, the 3-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rate were 64.3% and 100%, respectively. Hematological toxicities (81%) and infections (21%) were the most frequent adverse event encountered BV-ICE regimen is feasible with manageable toxicities and could be an alternative to other salvage treatments. Trial Registration : ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02686346.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The RELEVANCE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01650701) showed that lenalidomide plus rituximab (R 2 ) provided similar efficacy to rituximab plus chemotherapy (R-chemo) in patients with advanced-stage, previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL). We report the second interim analysis of the RELEVANCE trial after 6 years of follow-up. Patients with previously untreated grade 1-3a FL were assigned 1:1 to R 2 or R-chemo, followed by rituximab maintenance. Coprimary end points were complete response (confirmed/unconfirmed) at week 120 and progression-free survival (PFS). At median follow-up of 72 months, 6-year PFS was 60% and 59% for R 2 and R-chemo, respectively (hazard ratio = 1.03 [95% CI, 0.84 to 1.27]). Six-year overall survival was estimated to be 89% in both groups. Median PFS and overall survival were not reached in either group. Overall response after progression was 61% and 59%, and 5-year estimated survival rate after progression was 69% and 74% in the R 2 and R-chemo groups, respectively. The transformation rate per year in the R 2 and R-chemo groups was 0.68% and 0.45%, and secondary primary malignancies occurred in 11% and 13% ( P = .34), respectively. No new safety signals were observed. R 2 continues to demonstrate comparable, durable efficacy and safety versus R-chemo in previously untreated patients with FL and provides an acceptable chemo-free alternative.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) have both demonstrated impressive clinical activity in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In this study, we analyzed the outcome of 809 patients with R/R DLBCL after two or more previous lines of treatment who had a commercial chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells order for axi-cel or tisa-cel and were registered in the retrospective French DESCAR-T registry study ( NCT04328298 ). After 1:1 propensity score matching (n = 418), the best overall response rate/complete response rate (ORR/CRR) was 80%/60% versus 66%/42% for patients treated with axi-cel compared to tisa-cel, respectively (P &lt; 0.001 for both ORR and CRR comparisons). After a median follow-up of 11.7 months, the 1-year progression-free survival was 46.6% for axi-cel and 33.2% for tisa-cel (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.46-0.79; P = 0.0003). Overall survival (OS) was also significantly improved after axi-cel infusion compared to after tisa-cel infusion (1-year OS 63.5% versus 48.8%; HR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45-0.88; P = 0.0072). Similar findings were observed using the inverse probability of treatment weighting statistical approach. Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome was significantly more frequent with axi-cel than with tisa-cel, but no significant difference was observed for grade ≥3. Regarding immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), both grade 1-2 and grade ≥3 ICANS were significantly more frequent with axi-cel than with tisa-cel. In conclusion, our matched comparison study supports a higher efficacy and also a higher toxicity of axi-cel compared to tisa-cel in the third or more treatment line for R/R DLBCL., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is a heterogeneous group of asymptomatic plasma cell disorder characterized by the presence of monoclonal protein ≥ 30 g/L and/or 10-60% of bone marrow plasma cells and no evidence of SLiM-CRAB criteria according to the 2014 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) recommendations. Once the effort to reclassify SMM with active disease as MM requiring treatment was completed, the need to redefine new high-risk SMM arose. The 20/2/20 and the IMWG risk model with the add-on high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities allow to identify high-risk SMM with 50% risk of progression to MM within 2 years, and therefore might help to propose a better therapeutic approach, either with the goal to « cure » by profoundly debulk the MM with aggressive therapies, or alternatively to restore the immune surveillance like a « delay » strategy with immune-based therapies. The debate is still ongoing but clearly challenges the watch-and-wait standard of care.

Purpose: Romidepsin, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, has demonstrated activity in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) as a single agent. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) therapy is widely used as first-line treatment of PTCL; however, it has limited efficacy. Results from a phase Ib and II study showed the feasibility of combining romidepsin with CHOP (Ro-CHOP)., Methods: This study is a randomized phase III study of Ro-CHOP versus CHOP in adult patients with previously untreated PTCL. All patients received CHOP in 3-week cycles for six cycles. Romidepsin, 12 mg/m 2 , was administered intravenously over a 4-hour period on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle for six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) according to International Working Group 1999 criteria., Results: Between January 2013 and December 2017, 421 patients were enrolled (Ro-CHOP, n = 211; CHOP, n = 210). The median PFS for Ro-CHOP versus CHOP was 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.0 to 25.8) versus 10.2 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 13.2) with a hazard ratio of 0.81 ( P = .096). In the Ro-CHOP versus CHOP arms, the median overall survival was 51.8 versus 42.9 months and the objective response rate was 63% versus 60% with complete response plus unconfirmed complete response rates of 41% versus 37% ( P > .1 in all comparisons), respectively. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in ≥ 30% of patients in the Ro-CHOP arm included thrombocytopenia (50% v 10% in the Ro-CHOP v CHOP arms, respectively), neutropenia (49% v 33%), anemia (47% v 17%), and leukopenia (32% v 20%)., Conclusion: The addition of romidepsin to CHOP did not improve PFS, response rates, nor overall survival and increased the frequency for grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Ro-CHOP does not represent a significant advance in the standard of care for patients with previously untreated PTCL., Competing Interests: Emmanuel BachyHonoraria: Gilead Sciences, Roche, Amgen, Janssen-CilagConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, TakedaResearch Funding: Amgen Foundation (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte Vincent CamusHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Incyte, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, NovartisConsulting or Advisory Role: RocheResearch Funding: iQone Healthcare (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Roche Catherine ThieblemontHonoraria: Celgene, AbbVie, Bayer, Janssen, Roche, Incyte, Novartis, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Kite/Gilead, Novartis David SibonConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, iQone Healthcare, Janssen, Roche, AbbVieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, Janssen René-Olivier CasasnovasHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, AmgenConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, IncyteResearch Funding: Roche/Genentech (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), Takeda (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Loïc YsebaertHonoraria: AbbVieConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Roche (Inst), Janssen-Cilag (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst) Gandhi DamajConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, iQoneResearch Funding: TakedaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: PFIZEE, Roche/Genentech, AbbVie Stéphanie GuidezConsulting or Advisory Role: Kite/GileadTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen Marc AndréConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, BMSiResearch Funding: Takeda (Inst), Roche (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Celgene, Gilead Sciences Alejandro Martín García-SanchoHonoraria: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Servier, Gilead Sciences, TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Celgene, MorphoSys, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, iQone, EUSA Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Servier, IncyteExpert Testimony: Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Celgene¸ Servier Maria Jesus PenarrubiaHonoraria: AbbVie, Celgene, Servier, Takeda, RocheConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Celgene, AbbVie, Takeda, Clinigen GroupResearch Funding: CelgeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Servier, Novartis, Janssen, Celgene, Takeda Philipp B. StaberHonoraria: Roche, Amgen, Takeda, Abbott/AbbVie, Janssen Oncology, Incyte, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, MSD Oncology, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Roche (Inst) Judith TrotmanResearch Funding: BeiGene (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), Pharmacyclics (Inst), Janssen-Cilag (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Celgene (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech Andreas HüttmannHonoraria: TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: TakedaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Pharma AG Philippe GaulardHonoraria: Takeda, Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: TakedaResearch Funding: Takeda (Inst), Innate Pharma (Inst), Sanofi (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Marie-Helene Delfau-LarueHonoraria: Gilead Sciences, AmgenResearch Funding: Roche, CelgeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Mundipharma Laurence de LevalHonoraria: Novartis (Inst)Consulting or Advisory Role: Lunaphore Technologies (Inst), Bayer (Inst) Michel MeignanHonoraria: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Ju LiEmployment: Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgeneStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgeneResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene Franck MorschhauserConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Epizyme, ServierSpeakers' Bureau: RocheExpert Testimony: Roche/Genentech Richard DelarueEmployment: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, BeiGeneStock and Other Ownership Interests: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, BeiGeneNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.