Search

Abstract Striatal dysfunction has been implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, a disorder characterized by positive symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions. Haloperidol is a typical antipsychotic medication used in the treatment of schizophrenia that is known to antagonize dopamine D2 receptors, which are abundantly expressed in the striatum. However, haloperidol’s delayed therapeutic effect also suggests a mechanism of action that may go beyond the acute blocking of D2 receptors. Here, we performed proteomic analysis of striatum brain tissue and found more than 400 proteins significantly altered after 30 days of chronic haloperidol treatment in mice, namely proteins involved in glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic transmission. Cell-type specific electrophysiological recordings further revealed that haloperidol not only reduces the excitability of striatal medium spiny neurons expressing dopamine D2 receptors (D2-MSNs) but also affects D1-MSNs by increasing the ratio of inhibitory/excitatory synaptic transmission (I/E ratio) specifically onto D1-MSNs but not D2-MSNs. Therefore, we propose the slow remodeling of D1-MSNs as a mechanism mediating the delayed therapeutic effect of haloperidol over striatum circuits. Understanding how haloperidol exactly contributes to treating schizophrenia symptoms may help to improve therapeutic outcomes and elucidate the molecular underpinnings of this disorder.

This systematic review aims to gather evidence on the mechanisms triggered by diverse preconditioning strategies for mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their impact on their potential to treat ischemic and traumatic injuries affecting the nervous system. The 52 studies included in this review report nine different types of preconditioning, namely, manipulation of oxygen pressure, exposure to chemical substances, lesion mediators or inflammatory factors, usage of ultrasound, magnetic fields or biomechanical forces, and culture in scaffolds or 3D cultures. All these preconditioning strategies were reported to interfere with cellular pathways that influence MSCs’ survival and migration, alter MSCs’ phenotype, and modulate the secretome and proteome of these cells, among others. The effects on MSCs’ phenotype and characteristics influenced MSCs’ performance in models of injury, namely by increasing the homing and integration of the cells in the lesioned area and inducing the secretion of growth factors and cytokines. The administration of preconditioned MSCs promoted tissue regeneration, reduced neuroinflammation, and increased angiogenesis and myelinization in rodent models of stroke, traumatic brain injury, and spinal cord injury. These effects were also translated into improved cognitive and motor functions, suggesting an increased therapeutic potential of MSCs after preconditioning. Importantly, none of the studies reported adverse effects or less therapeutic potential with these strategies. Overall, we can conclude that all the preconditioning strategies included in this review can stimulate pathways that relate to the therapeutic effects of MSCs. Thus, it would be interesting to explore whether combining different preconditioning strategies can further boost the reparative effects of MSCs, solving some limitations of MSCs’ therapy, namely donor-associated variability.

Overactivation of microglial cells seems to play a crucial role in the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons occurring in Parkinson’s disease. We have previously demonstrated that glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) present in astrocytes secretome modulates microglial responses induced by an inflammatory insult. Therefore, astrocyte-derived soluble factors may include relevant molecular players of therapeutic interest in the control of excessive neuroinflammatory responses. However, in vivo, the control of neuroinflammation is more complex as it depends on the interaction between different types of cells other than microglia and astrocytes. Whether neurons may interfere in the astrocyte-microglia crosstalk, affecting the control of microglial reactivity exerted by astrocytes, is unclear. Therefore, the present work aimed to disclose if the control of microglial responses mediated by astrocyte-derived factors, including GDNF, could be affected by the crosstalk with neurons, impacting GDNF’s ability to protect dopaminergic neurons exposed to a pro-inflammatory environment. Also, we aimed to disclose if the protection of dopaminergic neurons by GDNF involves the modulation of microglial cells. Our results show that the neuroprotective effect of GDNF was mediated, at least in part, by a direct action on microglial cells through the GDNF family receptor α-1. However, this protective effect seems to be impaired by other mediators released in response to the neuron-astrocyte crosstalk since neuron-astrocyte secretome, in contrast to astrocytes secretome, was unable to protect dopaminergic neurons from the injury triggered by lipopolysaccharide-activated microglia. Supplementation with exogenous GDNF was needed to afford protection of dopaminergic neurons exposed to the inflammatory environment. In conclusion, our results revealed that dopaminergic protective effects promoted by GDNF involve the control of microglial reactivity. However, endogenous GDNF is insufficient to confer dopaminergic neuron protection against an inflammatory insult. This reinforces the importance of further developing new therapeutic strategies aiming at providing GDNF or enhancing its expression in the brain regions affected by Parkinson’s disease.

Due to their characteristics, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are considered a potential therapy for brain tissue injury or degeneration. Nevertheless, despite the promising results observed, there has been a growing interest in the use of cell-free therapies in regenerative medicine, such as the use of stem cell secretome. This review provides an in-depth compilation of data regarding the secretome composition, protocols used for its preparation, as well as existing information on the impact of secretome administration on various brain conditions, pointing out gaps and highlighting relevant findings. Moreover, due to the ability of MSCs to respond differently depending on their microenvironment, preconditioning of MSCs has been used to modulate their composition and, consequently, their therapeutic potential. The different strategies used to modulate the MSC secretome were also reviewed. Although secretome administration was effective in improving functional impairments, regeneration, neuroprotection, and reducing inflammation in brain tissue, a high variability in secretome preparation and administration was identified, compromising the transposition of preclinical data to clinical studies. Indeed, there are no reports of the use of secretome in clinical trials. Despite the existing limitations and lack of clinical data, secretome administration is a potential tool for the treatment of various diseases that impact the CNS.

Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is one of the leading causes of death and long-term disability in the perinatal period. Currently, therapeutic hypothermia is the standard of care for this condition with modest efficacy and strict enrollment criteria. Therapy with umbilical cord blood cells (UCBC) has come forward as a strong candidate for the treatment of neonatal HIE, but no preclinical studies have yet compared the action of UCBC combined with hypothermia (HT) with the action of each therapy by itself. Thus, to evaluate the potential of each therapeutic approach, a hypoxic-ischemic brain lesion was induced in postnatal day ten rat pups; two hours later, HT was applied for 4 h; and 24, 48, and 72 h post-injury, UCBC were administered intravenously. The neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury led to a brain lesion involving about 48% of the left hemisphere that was not improved by HT (36%) or UCBC alone (28%), but only with the combined therapies (25%; p = 0.0294). Moreover, a decrease in glial reactivity and improved functional outcomes were observed in both groups treated with UCBC. Overall, these results support UCBC as a successful therapeutic approach for HIE, even when treatment with therapeutic hypothermia is not possible.