Search

Background: Anecdotally, patients don't seem to be more unwell than they were 10 years ago, yet they still seem more 'complex'. Aims: The aim of this study was to use an objective measure to assess the trend in complexity of general medicine patients over a 9‐year period. Methods: Complexity was pragmatically defined as a composite of comorbidity plus dependence/frailty. We selected 100 consecutive patients discharged from General Medicine at Monash Medical Centre (a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia) in the month of April of each year from 2011 to 2019. For each patient, we retrospectively calculated their burden of comorbidity and their degree of dependency/frailty. Comorbidity was measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and dependence/frailty was assessed using the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz ADL) and the Braden Scale (BS). The BS is a pressure injury risk assessment tool. Additional demographic data were collected, including length of stay, admission and discharge residence, 30‐day readmission rate and inpatient mortality. Results: There was no statistically significant change in the CCI or the Katz ADL. The median BS did however significantly decrease from 19 in 2011 to 16 in 2019 (P = 0.006), reflecting an increased risk of pressure injuries. Conclusions: Despite a stable level of comorbidity, our finding of a decreasing BS score may suggest that patients are becoming more dependent. This increase in dependency rather than a change in chronic disease burden may be the cause of apparent increasing patient complexity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inappropriate prescribing (IP) is a common problem in the older population. Despite numerous attempts to tackle this issue, it remains a public health concern. In most European countries, general practitioners (GPs) are responsible for global primary care and are thus gatekeepers for the adequacy of medicines, specifically for older people. An in-depth analysis of the situation is necessary to understand why this phenomenon is still prevalent and to identify solutions that could help avoid IP in primary practice. Method: A qualitative study based on five focus groups (FG) comprising nine to thirteen general practitioners was conducted in the French-speaking part of Belgium. Participants were recruited among the Local Medical Evaluation Groups (LMEG) and selected to guarantee heterogeneity in working organisations, years of professional experience, gender and age. All interviews were recorded with prior agreement and transcribed in verbatims. The transcripts were coded and analysed to highlight the primary themes, considering dominant and marginal discourses. Results: Fifty four GPs participated in the study, with an average experience of 30 years. IPs are perceived as a significant problem in the older population, leading to dangerous health situations. The issue is associated with polypharmacy and multimorbidity, and GPs stated to manage IP using their clinical experience. Most of the study participants faced difficulties managing IP, mostly due to the specificity and complexity of elderly care. Indeed, managing an older patient is challenging due to medical complexity, poor adherence to drug regimes, or low medical literacy. In addition, the medical environment of general practice is challenging, with multiple providers, lack of time, prescribing routine and the absence of effective communication with specialists or other care providers. Additionally, the tools and support available to help medication management in primary care are inadequate. Enhancing collaboration with pharmacists is perceived as a strong potential facilitator. Conclusion: This article addresses the complex management of IP in the old age, from the point of view of GPs. Interesting clues were highlighted, like the need to clarify roles of healthcare providers, the better fit of tools to facilitate medication's review with particularities of GPs needs and the empowerment of pharmacist collaboration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message: Early recognition and management of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are crucial, especially in patients with extensive xanthomas and premature coronary artery disease. Prompt diagnosis and aggressive lipid‐lowering therapy can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality rates. Careful clinical assessment in resource‐limited settings is essential for optimal outcomes. Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder that causes chronically elevated levels of low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Based on LDL levels, FH can be heterozygous or homozygous, further established through clinical features, laboratory findings, and genetic analysis. Elevated cholesterol levels cause atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and sudden death. Xanthomas are a clinical manifestation of FH that reveal the underlying systemic genetic disease. We present the case of a 47‐year‐old male with triple vessel coronary artery disease and widespread xanthomas, diagnosed with homozygous FH based on "The Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Diagnostic Criteria for Familial Hypercholesterolemia." Lifelong therapy with lipid‐lowering medications and lifestyle changes is necessary in such cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Inappropriate prescribing (IP) is a common problem in the older population. Despite numerous attempts to tackle this issue, it remains a public health concern. In most European countries, general practitioners (GPs) are responsible for global primary care and are thus gatekeepers for the adequacy of medicines, specifically for older people. An in-depth analysis of the situation is necessary to understand why this phenomenon is still prevalent and to identify solutions that could help avoid IP in primary practice. Method A qualitative study based on five focus groups (FG) comprising nine to thirteen general practitioners was conducted in the French-speaking part of Belgium. Participants were recruited among the Local Medical Evaluation Groups (LMEG) and selected to guarantee heterogeneity in working organisations, years of professional experience, gender and age. All interviews were recorded with prior agreement and transcribed in verbatims. The transcripts were coded and analysed to highlight the primary themes, considering dominant and marginal discourses. Results Fifty four GPs participated in the study, with an average experience of 30 years. IPs are perceived as a significant problem in the older population, leading to dangerous health situations. The issue is associated with polypharmacy and multimorbidity, and GPs stated to manage IP using their clinical experience. Most of the study participants faced difficulties managing IP, mostly due to the specificity and complexity of elderly care. Indeed, managing an older patient is challenging due to medical complexity, poor adherence to drug regimes, or low medical literacy. In addition, the medical environment of general practice is challenging, with multiple providers, lack of time, prescribing routine and the absence of effective communication with specialists or other care providers. Additionally, the tools and support available to help medication management in primary care are inadequate. Enhancing collaboration with pharmacists is perceived as a strong potential facilitator. Conclusion This article addresses the complex management of IP in the old age, from the point of view of GPs. Interesting clues were highlighted, like the need to clarify roles of healthcare providers, the better fit of tools to facilitate medication’s review with particularities of GPs needs and the empowerment of pharmacist collaboration.

Risa Hirata,1 Masaki Tago,1 Kiyoshi Shikino,2,3 Takashi Watari,4 Hiromizu Takahashi,5 Yosuke Sasaki,6 Taro Shimizu7 1Department of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan; 2Department of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan; 3Department of Community-Oriented Medical Education, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan; 4Integrated Clinical Education Center, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; 5Department of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan; 6Department of General Medicine and Emergency Care, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; 7Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, JapanCorrespondence: Masaki Tago, Department of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga, 849-8501, Japan, Tel +81 952 34 3238, Fax +81 952 34 2029, Email tagomas@cc.saga-u.ac.jpPurpose: There has been growing interest in generalists in Japan in recent years. However, due to the diverse use of the term “generalist”, the specific roles of these physicians remain ambiguous. Consequently, the target population for research on generalists is unclear, making it challenging to conduct studies within the generalist practice framework. Therefore, a literature search was conducted to examine how generalists are defined and classified in research worldwide.Methods: We conducted a literature search that focused exclusively on articles written in English and used keywords related to generalists, general medicine (GM), primary care, and family medicine. Based on the results, six physicians working in GM reviewed the findings and discussed the identified issues and their potential solutions.Results: The definition of generalists in studies targeting GM, family medicine, and primary care conducted worldwide, including Japan, varies. Generalists exhibit diverse roles even within university hospitals in Japan. No studies provide a precise categorization or definition of generalists based on specific medical practices or roles, except for hospitalists, who are primarily involved in inpatient management in the United States.Conclusion: The definition of GM was unclear based on the results of the literature search, and the lack of uniformity in backgrounds has rendered the target population unclear. Consequently, in healthcare settings where medical systems vary by country or region, evidence from studies targeting generalists cannot readily apply to actual practice. Clarifying generalists through an explicit definition based on clinical practice will allow for a more precise target population for research on generalists and enable the accumulation of evidence related to well-defined groups of generalists, contributing to the advancement of GM. Therefore, future research is required to develop new indicators to precisely classify and define generalists.Keywords: generalist, general medicine, definition, hospitalist

Abstract Background The increasing number of women physicians is in contrast to their underrepresentation in academic positions and professional associations. This study aimed to evaluate the status of women physicians in the Japanese Society of Hospital General Medicine (JHGM) based on society membership, board membership, and annual meeting authorship. Methods A cross‐sectional analysis was conducted. Information on women physicians, society and board membership, and annual meeting authorship was collected. Data from the Japanese Primary Care Association (JPCA) served as the control. The gender of authors with accepted abstracts in the JHGM and JPCA annual meetings was determined by name or Internet search. Results In the JHGM, 14.2% of members were women physicians, compared to 19.1% in the JPCA (p

Abstract Background There is a discussion among general practitioners and psychiatrists regarding over-diagnosing versus under-reporting of psychiatric diagnoses. A deeper understanding of this topic is relevant for providing reasonable health care and for planning future studies. A crucial factor to understanding this discussion is the difference in the prevalence of a disease in each sector. One way to attain knowledge about such prevalences is the analysis of routine care data of the sector in question. However, diagnosis-related data might be modified by several additional influencing factors. Aims This study aims to explore what kind of motives and modifying factors play a role for or against giving psychiatric diagnoses in psychiatric and general medical settings. Methods Twenty-six semi-structured interviews were conducted with German physicians in the fields of general medicine and psychiatry. Interviews were analysed using content analysis. Results The analysis revealed three major motivational categories for finding a diagnosis: (1) “objective matters” such as “categorisation for research”; (2) “functional and performance-related factors” such as “requirement for medication”, “billing aspects” that go with certain diagnoses or “access to adequate care” and (3) “Individual factors” such as the “personality of a physician”. Similarly, factors emerged that lead to not making psychiatric diagnoses like “fear of stigmatization among patients” or “detrimental insurance status with psychiatric diagnosis”. Additionally participants mentioned other reasons for “not diagnosing a psychiatric diagnosis“, such as “coding of other clinical pictures”. Conclusion The diagnostic process is a complex phenomenon that goes far beyond the identification of medical findings. This insight should be considered when processing and interpreting secondary data for designing health care systems or designing a study.

Aims Design Methods Results Conclusion Implications for the Profession Impact (Addressing) Patient or Public Contribution 1. To explore the perceptions of physicians, registered nurses (RN) and allied health professionals (AHP) towards the role of ward‐based advanced practice nurse (APN). 2. To examine healthcare professionals' perception of APN role expansion in inpatient care.Cross‐sectional study.A 43‐item survey comprising of five domains was conducted on healthcare professionals' perceptions towards ward‐based APNs in five medical wards of a tertiary hospital from November 2022 to February 2023. The participants were recruited using convenience sampling via email and cross‐platform messaging service.A total of 181 completed respondents including 26 physicians, 102 nurses and 45 AHPs. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Version 28.0. APNs were perceived to be spending a great extent of time across all five domains, namely, ‘direct comprehensive care’, ‘support of systems’, ‘research’, ‘education’ and ‘publication and professional leadership’. Significant differences were noted in perceptions based on prior experience with APNs and between different healthcare professions. The majority recognized APNs' positive impact on patient safety, efficiency and patient‐centeredness.This study offers valuable insights into ward‐based APNs' practice patterns, roles and impact, revealing a positive shift in their acceptance and expanding roles within inpatient general wards. It also highlights the valuable roles and impact of ward‐based APNs in direct patient care, system support, research, education and leadership, despite ongoing challenges in role clarity, particularly in treatment planning and ward rounds.APNs are highly regarded as competent and a consistent personnel in the wards. However, there are divided views on clinical activities that APNs undertake. What problem did the study address? ○Role ambiguity for ward‐based APNs. ○Healthcare professionals' readiness and acceptance of APNs. What were the main findings? ○APNs are perceived to have a strong involvement in direct patient care, support of system, research, education and leadership. ○APNs are recognized for their significant impact on patient safety, efficiency and patient‐centredness, but there were varied perceptions on the extent of time they spend in different practice domains. ○The critical roles of APNs participating in daily ward rounds and initiating discharge plans were highlighted, emphasizing their importance in timeliness and continuity of care. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? ○It will affect healthcare professionals including physicians, nurses, allied health professionals and healthcare administrators by providing insights into the roles and contributions of ward‐based APNs. ○The findings will guide policymakers and nurse leaders in making informed decisions about the implementation and development of APN roles, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes. What problem did the study address? ○Role ambiguity for ward‐based APNs. ○Healthcare professionals' readiness and acceptance of APNs. Role ambiguity for ward‐based APNs.Healthcare professionals' readiness and acceptance of APNs.What were the main findings? ○APNs are perceived to have a strong involvement in direct patient care, support of system, research, education and leadership. ○APNs are recognized for their significant impact on patient safety, efficiency and patient‐centredness, but there were varied perceptions on the extent of time they spend in different practice domains. ○The critical roles of APNs participating in daily ward rounds and initiating discharge plans were highlighted, emphasizing their importance in timeliness and continuity of care. APNs are perceived to have a strong involvement in direct patient care, support of system, research, education and leadership.APNs are recognized for their significant impact on patient safety, efficiency and patient‐centredness, but there were varied perceptions on the extent of time they spend in different practice domains.The critical roles of APNs participating in daily ward rounds and initiating discharge plans were highlighted, emphasizing their importance in timeliness and continuity of care.Where and on whom will the research have an impact? ○It will affect healthcare professionals including physicians, nurses, allied health professionals and healthcare administrators by providing insights into the roles and contributions of ward‐based APNs. ○The findings will guide policymakers and nurse leaders in making informed decisions about the implementation and development of APN roles, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes. It will affect healthcare professionals including physicians, nurses, allied health professionals and healthcare administrators by providing insights into the roles and contributions of ward‐based APNs.The findings will guide policymakers and nurse leaders in making informed decisions about the implementation and development of APN roles, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes.No Patient or Public Contribution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message: Pyroglutamic acidosis (PGA) or 5‐Oxoprolinuria is an uncommon and often overlooked cause of high anion gap metabolic acidosis (HAGMA). This case highlights the importance of systematically approaching HAGMA, and to consider PGA as a differential diagnosis when medications that disrupt the γ‐glutamyl cycle such as flucloxacillin and paracetamol are present. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the United States, Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) programs are required to provide advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) in the core inpatient rotation areas of hospital/health system pharmacy and inpatient general medicine patient care. Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy (C/SOPs) nationwide are increasingly utilizing blended or longitudinal APPE models to offer experiential opportunities; however, there is a gap in the literature to support programs with delineating rotation-specific competencies when integrating two or more rotations together. Utilizing a survey instrument, PharmD students at two C/SOPs reported their onsite inpatient rotation sub-competency activities achieved within the four competency areas of Hospital/Health Pharmacy Systems, Medication Safety and Quality, Clinical Applications, and Professional Practice, which are listed in Appendix C of the 2016 Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education Standards Guidance Document. Unpaired two-sample t-tests were performed to compare proportions of sub-competency activity occurrence in the two rotation settings. In total, 168 students reported inpatient activities related to the four competency areas, with 95–100% reporting their involvement in one or more sub-competency opportunities within each area. Of the 26 sub-competencies compared, 73% significantly facilitated the development of competency to a greater extent for one APPE inpatient rotation type over the other (p < 0.05). The findings can be utilized by C/SOPs to support the delineation of rotation-specific competencies when blending inpatient experiential opportunities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease hospitalisations associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In hospitals, HF patients are typically managed by cardiology or physician teams, with differences in patient demographics and clinical outcomes. This study utilises contemporary HF registry data to compare patient characteristics and outcomes in those with ADHF admitted into General Medicine and Cardiology units. The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry was utilised to identify patients hospitalised with ADHF 30-day period in each of four consecutive years. We compared patient characteristics, pharmacological management and outpatient follow-up of patients admitted to General Medicine and Cardiology units. Primary outcome measures included in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality. Between 2014 and 2017, a total of 1,253 patients with ADHF admissions were registered, with 53% admitted in General Medicine units and 47% in Cardiology units. General Medicine patients were more likely to be older (82 vs 71 years; p<0.001), female (51% vs 34%; p<0.001), and have higher prevalence of comorbidities and preserved left ventricular function (p<0.001). There were no differences in primary outcome measures between General Medicine and Cardiology in terms of: in-hospital mortality (5.0% vs 3.9%; p=0.35), 30-day readmission (23.4% vs 23.6%; p=0.93), and 30-day mortality (10.0% vs 8.0%; p=0.21). Hospitalised patients with HF continue to have high mortality and rehospitalisation rates. The choice of treatment by General Medicine or Cardiology units, based on the particular medical profile and individual needs of the patients, provides equivalent outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Objective: Clinical education stands as a critical domain for enhancing clinical skills. Evolving global demands, marked by an information explosion and dynamic shifts in disease patterns, coupled with deficiencies in clinical training and its disconnect from theoretical knowledge, pose significant challenges in patient care. This study aims to explore the obstacles and challenges associated with applying theoretical knowledge from the general medicine course in clinical practice. Materials & Methods: This qualitative research employed a conventional content analysis approach. Twenty participants, each with a minimum of one year of clinical education experience, were purposefully selected to ensure maximum diversity. Data were collected and analyzed through individual semi-structured interviews. Results: The data analysis identified five main categories as the primary challenges in applying theoretical knowledge in the clinical environment. These include "weakness of inputs," "weakness of policy," "ineffective training and novice practitioners," "ethical lapses, unprofessional conduct," and "challenges while studying." Additionally, 14 subcategories were derived, collectively representing the main challenges faced. Conclusion: The application of theoretical knowledge acquired in various aspects of clinical education is hampered by diverse challenges. These challenges manifest at different levels, encompassing management, policy, infrastructure, and human and material resources. Prioritizing identified issues and implementing corrective actions based on existing capacities is the initial step in overcoming these challenges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Due to the shortage of midwives in Germany, it is not always possible to provide comprehensive basic postnatal care for young families. Therefore, it is quite likely that general practitioners (GP), who serve as the first contact person in all health matters in our health care system, will be increasingly consulted regarding questions on postnatal care in the future. Consequently, the aim of this qualitative study was to explore central competencies for the care of families in the postnatal phase. Methods: Midwives were questioned about their postnatal activities with the help of a semistructured questionnaire. Thereafter, the interviews were evaluated using the Mayring method. Results: Interviews were conducted with 25 midwives with an average age of 45 years. Knowledge about the (patho)physiological processes of the mother and child during the postnatal phase, a supportive basic attitude, and time are important elements in the work with young postnatal families. Additionally, it is important to obtain competences in psychosocial issues. Conclusion: The acquisition of competences for the postnatal phase appears to be useful for GPs. Among other aspects, creation of a good networking structure with other health professions is important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The increasing number of women physicians is in contrast to their underrepresentation in academic positions and professional associations. This study aimed to evaluate the status of women physicians in the Japanese Society of Hospital General Medicine (JHGM) based on society membership, board membership, and annual meeting authorship. Methods: A cross‐sectional analysis was conducted. Information on women physicians, society and board membership, and annual meeting authorship was collected. Data from the Japanese Primary Care Association (JPCA) served as the control. The gender of authors with accepted abstracts in the JHGM and JPCA annual meetings was determined by name or Internet search. Results: In the JHGM, 14.2% of members were women physicians, compared to 19.1% in the JPCA (p < 0.001). None of the 21 JHGM board members were women, compared to 20.5% in the JPCA (p < 0.001). The average number of years of experience was significantly higher for the JHGM board members than for the JPCA board members (37.0 vs. 28.1 years, p < 0.001). Women first authors in the 2022–2023 JHGM meeting comprised 17.9%, significantly lower than the 28.4% in the 2023 JPCA meeting (p = 0.002). Similar patterns were seen for women last authors (6.0% in the JHGM vs. 18.8% in the JPCA, p < 0.001) and women chairpersons (17.9% in the JHGM vs. 40.3% in the JPCA, p = 0.036). Conclusions: The JHGM has low women representation in society and board membership, and annual meeting authorship. Strategies are needed to enhance diversity and inclusion by increasing women's participation and leadership in the JHGM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is a discussion among general practitioners and psychiatrists regarding over-diagnosing versus under-reporting of psychiatric diagnoses. A deeper understanding of this topic is relevant for providing reasonable health care and for planning future studies. A crucial factor to understanding this discussion is the difference in the prevalence of a disease in each sector. One way to attain knowledge about such prevalences is the analysis of routine care data of the sector in question. However, diagnosis-related data might be modified by several additional influencing factors. Aims: This study aims to explore what kind of motives and modifying factors play a role for or against giving psychiatric diagnoses in psychiatric and general medical settings. Methods: Twenty-six semi-structured interviews were conducted with German physicians in the fields of general medicine and psychiatry. Interviews were analysed using content analysis. Results: The analysis revealed three major motivational categories for finding a diagnosis: (1) "objective matters" such as "categorisation for research"; (2) "functional and performance-related factors" such as "requirement for medication", "billing aspects" that go with certain diagnoses or "access to adequate care" and (3) "Individual factors" such as the "personality of a physician". Similarly, factors emerged that lead to not making psychiatric diagnoses like "fear of stigmatization among patients" or "detrimental insurance status with psychiatric diagnosis". Additionally participants mentioned other reasons for "not diagnosing a psychiatric diagnosis", such as "coding of other clinical pictures". Conclusion: The diagnostic process is a complex phenomenon that goes far beyond the identification of medical findings. This insight should be considered when processing and interpreting secondary data for designing health care systems or designing a study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The primary aim of the study was to validate the Zulfiqar Frailty Scale (ZFS) and examine its concordance with the modified Short Emergency Geriatric Assessment (mSEGA) scale, Part A. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in Guadeloupe (France) over a two-month duration (from 20 February to 20 April 2024), involving elderly individuals aged 65 and older, deemed self-sufficient with an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) score exceeding four out of six. Results: Within this community cohort of 98 individuals, averaging 75 years in age, frailty according to the modified SEGA criteria was prevalent in 29%. Frailty according to the "ZFS" score was prevalent in 40%. Key predictors of frailty identified in our study included age, comorbidity (Charlson score), polypharmacy (total number of medications and therapeutic classes), and functional ability (ADL scores). Notably, experiences of falls and hospitalizations within the past six months significantly influenced the classification of frailty according to both ZFS and SEGA scales. Significant associations with the presence of home care aides (p < 0.0001), monopodal support test results (p < 0.0001), memory impairments (p < 0.0001), and recent hospitalizations (p = 0.0054) underscored the multidimensional impact of frailty. The Pearson correlation coefficient and its 95% confidence interval between the SEGA and Zulfiqar Frailty Scales stood at 0.73 [0.61: 0.81]. The discernment threshold for frailty was set at three out of six criteria, showcasing a sensitivity of 64% and a negative predictive value of 80%. The area under the curve (AUC) for the Zulfiqar Frailty Scale was reported as 0.8. Conclusion: The "ZFS" tool allows for the detection of frailty with a highly satisfactory sensitivity and negative predictive value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

KEY CLINICAL MESSAGE: Even in the era of technology‐guided medicine, the clinician must integrate into his daily practice a careful anamnesis and physical examination to be conducted within a close doctor–patient relationship. All these elements, together with tools such as teleconsultation and digitalized medical records, are able to significantly increase the effectiveness of health care action. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message Early recognition and management of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are crucial, especially in patients with extensive xanthomas and premature coronary artery disease. Prompt diagnosis and aggressive lipid‐lowering therapy can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality rates. Careful clinical assessment in resource‐limited settings is essential for optimal outcomes. Abstract Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder that causes chronically elevated levels of low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Based on LDL levels, FH can be heterozygous or homozygous, further established through clinical features, laboratory findings, and genetic analysis. Elevated cholesterol levels cause atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and sudden death. Xanthomas are a clinical manifestation of FH that reveal the underlying systemic genetic disease. We present the case of a 47‐year‐old male with triple vessel coronary artery disease and widespread xanthomas, diagnosed with homozygous FH based on “The Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Diagnostic Criteria for Familial Hypercholesterolemia.” Lifelong therapy with lipid‐lowering medications and lifestyle changes is necessary in such cases.

Abstract Purpose Annually, the French Ministry of Health funds clinical research projects based on a national call for projects. Since 2013, the Ministry has prioritized funding of primary care. Projects selected for funding are made public without distinguishing the specific area of research. The objective of this study was to identify and describe the evolution of the primary care research projects funded by the Ministry of Health between 2013 and 2019. Method We reviewed all of the 1796 medical research projects funded between 2013 and 2019 and categorized projects as primary care projects by using a list of specific keywords. This list was established through two approaches: (1) selected by an expert committee, the RECaP primary care working group, and (2) using an automated textual analysis of published articles in the field. The keywords were used to screen the titles of the medical research projects funded. The abstracts (at www.clinicaltrials.gov ) or details (from project leaders) were then analyzed by two independent reviewers to determine true primary care projects. Results Finally, 49 primary care projects were identified, representing 2.7% of all medical research projects funded, without any significant change over the period. These projects were predominantly interventional (69%), with a median number of patients expected per project of 902. Conclusion Despite the prioritization of primary care research in 2013 by the French ministry of health, the number and proportion of projects funded remains low, with no significant change over the years. Trial registration Not applicable.

This document is a letter to the editor of the Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, discussing a study comparing the effectiveness, safety, and cost of teleconsultation versus face-to-face models of pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics. The study found that there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or safety outcomes between the two models. However, the teleconsultation model had a higher direct patient cost due to more consultations and the use of more test strips. The study provides valuable insights into the use of teleconsultation in anticoagulation clinics and its potential benefits and drawbacks. [Extracted from the article]

Key Clinical Message: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) presents with renal failure and proteinuria in a minority of cases, usually due to secondary amyloidosis or IgA nephropathy. While focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is less common, it should still be in the differential regardless of the patient's clinical profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Annually, the French Ministry of Health funds clinical research projects based on a national call for projects. Since 2013, the Ministry has prioritized funding of primary care. Projects selected for funding are made public without distinguishing the specific area of research. The objective of this study was to identify and describe the evolution of the primary care research projects funded by the Ministry of Health between 2013 and 2019. Method: We reviewed all of the 1796 medical research projects funded between 2013 and 2019 and categorized projects as primary care projects by using a list of specific keywords. This list was established through two approaches: (1) selected by an expert committee, the RECaP primary care working group, and (2) using an automated textual analysis of published articles in the field. The keywords were used to screen the titles of the medical research projects funded. The abstracts (at www.clinicaltrials.gov) or details (from project leaders) were then analyzed by two independent reviewers to determine true primary care projects. Results: Finally, 49 primary care projects were identified, representing 2.7% of all medical research projects funded, without any significant change over the period. These projects were predominantly interventional (69%), with a median number of patients expected per project of 902. Conclusion: Despite the prioritization of primary care research in 2013 by the French ministry of health, the number and proportion of projects funded remains low, with no significant change over the years. Trial registration: Not applicable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message: While intermittent hemodialysis (HD) is the most efficient method of removing lithium in patients with lithium toxicity, continuous renal replacement therapy is an acceptable alternative in the setting of intradialytic hypotension. This form of dialysis can reduce the need for vasopressors during HD, which increases mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A general physician's training and experience enables them to manage a variety of acute and chronic medical conditions with multi-system pathology, while specialising in one specific area of medicine. In every illness there are other problems outside the specialty, requiring the wider expertise of the generalist as patients have multiple comorbidities and the multitude of disease pathology presenting are quite complex requiring a multi-faceted approach. The horizons of general internal medicine have broadened with a wide landscape of acute illnesses that are now being admitted under general medicine which is the path of least resistance. As we strive relentlessly while working on the ward at the bedside and in acute portals, we ought to remind ourselves of what are the attractions of general internal medicine and lead by example for the undergraduates and postgraduate doctors in training who see us as role models for doing clinical medicine, teaching, training and research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message Pyroglutamic acidosis (PGA) or 5‐Oxoprolinuria is an uncommon and often overlooked cause of high anion gap metabolic acidosis (HAGMA). This case highlights the importance of systematically approaching HAGMA, and to consider PGA as a differential diagnosis when medications that disrupt the γ‐glutamyl cycle such as flucloxacillin and paracetamol are present.

KEY CLINICAL MESSAGE Even in the era of technology‐guided medicine, the clinician must integrate into his daily practice a careful anamnesis and physical examination to be conducted within a close doctor–patient relationship. All these elements, together with tools such as teleconsultation and digitalized medical records, are able to significantly increase the effectiveness of health care action.

Masaki Tago,1 Risa Hirata,1 Hiromizu Takahashi,2 Shun Yamashita,1,3 Masayuki Nogi,4,5 Kiyoshi Shikino,6 Yosuke Sasaki,7 Takashi Watari,8 Taro Shimizu9 1Department of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan; 2Department of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan; 3Education and Research Center for Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan; 4Hospitalist Division, The Queen’s Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA; 5Department of General Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan; 6Department of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan; 7Department of General Medicine and Emergency Care, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; 8General Medicine Center, Shimane University Hospital, Shimane, Japan; 9Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, JapanCorrespondence: Masaki Tago, Department of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga, 849-8501, Japan, Tel +81 952 34 3238, Fax +81 952 34 2029, Email tagomas@cc.saga-u.ac.jpAbstract: Hospital Medicine in the United States has achieved significant progress in the accumulation of evidence. This development has influenced the increasing societal demand for General Medicine in Japan. Generalists in Japan actively engage in a wide range of interdisciplinary clinical practices, education, and management. Furthermore, Generalists have also contributed to advances in research. However, there is limited evidence regarding the benefits of General Medicine in Japan in all these areas, with most of the evidence derived from single-center studies. In Japan, the roles of Generalists are diverse, and the comprehensive definition of General Medicine makes it difficult to clearly delineate its scope. This results in an inadequate accumulation of evidence regarding the benefits of General Medicine, potentially making it less attractive to the public and younger physicians. Therefore, it is necessary to categorize General Medicine and collect clear evidence regarding its benefits.Keywords: classification, evidence, general medicine

Background: Generalized anxiety disorder is commonly underdiagnosed and undertreated in medical settings. Aim: The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence and correlates of generalized anxiety disorder among patients presenting to medicine outpatient department in a tertiary care centre. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted among the patients visiting the outpatient department of General Medicine in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Sociodemographic and clinical parameters were collected using a structured pro forma. All patients were administered Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) to screen for the presence of generalized anxiety disorder. Patients who score 10 or more underwent a semi-structured evaluation using a generalized anxiety disorder module of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders. Results: Two hundred and fifty patients were recruited for the study. The mean age of the participants was 40.66 ± 12.8 years. More than one-fourth of them had diabetes mellitus and about one-fifth of the participants had systemic hypertension and hypothyroidism. Thirty five (14%) participants screened positive on GAD-7 scale. On detailed evaluation using SCID-I, 19 (7.6%) participants were confirmed to have a generalized anxiety disorder. Female gender was associated with the presence of GAD. Conclusion: One in thirteen patients presenting to the medicine outpatient department were found to have generalized anxiety disorder. Female patients had a greater prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder compared to male patients.

Abstract Background The NHS Health Check is a preventive programme in the UK designed to screen for cardiovascular risk and to aid in primary disease prevention. Despite its widespread implementation, the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check for longer-term disease prevention is unclear. In this study, we measured the rate of new diagnoses in UK Biobank participants who underwent the NHS Health Check compared with those who did not. Methods Within the UK Biobank prospective study, 48,602 NHS Health Check recipients were identified from linked primary care records. These participants were then covariate-matched on an extensive range of socio-demographic, lifestyle, and medical factors with 48,602 participants without record of the check. Follow-up diagnoses were ascertained from health records over an average of 9 years (SD 2 years) including hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia, stroke, dementia, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, fatty liver disease, alcoholic liver disease, liver cirrhosis, liver failure, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease (stage 3 +), cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. Time-varying survival modelling was used to compare adjusted outcome rates between the groups. Results In the immediate 2 years after the NHS Health Check, higher diagnosis rates were observed for hypertension, high cholesterol, and chronic kidney disease among health check recipients compared to their matched counterparts. However, in the longer term, NHS Health Check recipients had significantly lower risk across all multiorgan disease outcomes and reduced rates of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Conclusions The NHS Health Check is linked to reduced incidence of disease across multiple organ systems, which may be attributed to risk modification through earlier detection and treatment of key risk factors such as hypertension and high cholesterol. This work adds important evidence to the growing body of research supporting the effectiveness of preventative interventions in reducing longer-term multimorbidity.

Abstract Background Low back pain is the fourth most common reason for consulting a general practitioner (GP) among people aged 40–50 years. Beyond the overall benefits of physical activity (PA) on health (psychological, cardiovascular, etc.), PA for low back pain seems to improve the prognosis in terms of pain, disability, and quality of life. The French National Health Insurance developed media campaigns to promote physical activity with low back pain and a smartphone application (app). Despite the known benefits and campaigns, GPs do not routinely provide advice about physical activity during low back pain consultations. To promote giving physical activity advice for low back pain, there is a need to understand how GPs currently provide this advice and whether technology could help. This study aims to explore the content of physical activity advice for low back pain that GPs provide in France, and their opinion about healthcare smartphone app provided electronically via the internet (e-health apps) as a support for this advice. Methods This qualitative study was conducted with semi-structured individual interviews among French GPs. The verbatim was double coded using a coding tree. Thematic analysis was performed using an inductive approach. Results Sixteen GPs from Maine et Loire, Sarthe, and Mayenne were included. The thematic analysis identified the following themes: GPs use a global patient-centred approach to physical activity advice for low back pain. The main goal is to enable patients to participate in their care. Advice was almost always general with little information about duration and frequency. The importance of patient-appropriate and easily achievable activities was emphasised. GPs referred patients to physiotherapists to reinforce regular physical activity, maintain motivation and improve patient adherence through supervision and follow-up. GPs knew little about e-health apps but felt they could be useful with young patients. The main barriers to their use included poor internet connection, lack of technical knowledge and no supervision meaning patients could injure themselves. Conclusions This is one of the first studies to assess the contents of physical activity advice GPs provide for low back pain. Further research is needed into the implementation of e-health apps for low back pain management. Trial registration Not applicable.

Background: Low back pain is the fourth most common reason for consulting a general practitioner (GP) among people aged 40–50 years. Beyond the overall benefits of physical activity (PA) on health (psychological, cardiovascular, etc.), PA for low back pain seems to improve the prognosis in terms of pain, disability, and quality of life. The French National Health Insurance developed media campaigns to promote physical activity with low back pain and a smartphone application (app). Despite the known benefits and campaigns, GPs do not routinely provide advice about physical activity during low back pain consultations. To promote giving physical activity advice for low back pain, there is a need to understand how GPs currently provide this advice and whether technology could help. This study aims to explore the content of physical activity advice for low back pain that GPs provide in France, and their opinion about healthcare smartphone app provided electronically via the internet (e-health apps) as a support for this advice. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted with semi-structured individual interviews among French GPs. The verbatim was double coded using a coding tree. Thematic analysis was performed using an inductive approach. Results: Sixteen GPs from Maine et Loire, Sarthe, and Mayenne were included. The thematic analysis identified the following themes: GPs use a global patient-centred approach to physical activity advice for low back pain. The main goal is to enable patients to participate in their care. Advice was almost always general with little information about duration and frequency. The importance of patient-appropriate and easily achievable activities was emphasised. GPs referred patients to physiotherapists to reinforce regular physical activity, maintain motivation and improve patient adherence through supervision and follow-up. GPs knew little about e-health apps but felt they could be useful with young patients. The main barriers to their use included poor internet connection, lack of technical knowledge and no supervision meaning patients could injure themselves. Conclusions: This is one of the first studies to assess the contents of physical activity advice GPs provide for low back pain. Further research is needed into the implementation of e-health apps for low back pain management. Trial registration: Not applicable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The NHS Health Check is a preventive programme in the UK designed to screen for cardiovascular risk and to aid in primary disease prevention. Despite its widespread implementation, the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check for longer-term disease prevention is unclear. In this study, we measured the rate of new diagnoses in UK Biobank participants who underwent the NHS Health Check compared with those who did not. Methods: Within the UK Biobank prospective study, 48,602 NHS Health Check recipients were identified from linked primary care records. These participants were then covariate-matched on an extensive range of socio-demographic, lifestyle, and medical factors with 48,602 participants without record of the check. Follow-up diagnoses were ascertained from health records over an average of 9 years (SD 2 years) including hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia, stroke, dementia, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, fatty liver disease, alcoholic liver disease, liver cirrhosis, liver failure, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease (stage 3 +), cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. Time-varying survival modelling was used to compare adjusted outcome rates between the groups. Results: In the immediate 2 years after the NHS Health Check, higher diagnosis rates were observed for hypertension, high cholesterol, and chronic kidney disease among health check recipients compared to their matched counterparts. However, in the longer term, NHS Health Check recipients had significantly lower risk across all multiorgan disease outcomes and reduced rates of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The NHS Health Check is linked to reduced incidence of disease across multiple organ systems, which may be attributed to risk modification through earlier detection and treatment of key risk factors such as hypertension and high cholesterol. This work adds important evidence to the growing body of research supporting the effectiveness of preventative interventions in reducing longer-term multimorbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message: Diagnosis of complex lymphatic anomalies can be difficult, and biopsies can be associated with significant morbidity. Mediastinal masses with features such as osseous involvement warrant thorough noninvasive evaluation prior to biopsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Literature points towards the potential benefits of the application of Eye Movement and Desensitization Processing (EMDR)-therapy for patients in the medical setting, with cancer and pain being among the domains it is applied to. The field of applying EMDR-therapy for patients treated in the medical setting has evolved to such an extent that it may be challenging to get a comprehensive overview. Objective: This systematic literature review aims to evaluate the use and effectiveness of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in patients treated in the medical setting. Methods: We performed a literature search following the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if the effectiveness of EMDR-therapy was assessed in adult patients treated in a medical setting. Excluded were patients exclusively suffering from a mental health disorder, without somatic comorbidity. A risk of bias analysis was performed. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022325238). Results: Eighty-seven studies, of which 26 (pilot)-RCTs were included and categorized in 14 medical domains. Additionally, three studies focusing on persistent physical complaints were included. Most evidence exists for its application in the fields of oncology, pain, and neurology. The overall appraisal of these studies showed at least moderate to high risks of bias. EMDR demonstrated effectiveness in reducing symptoms in 85 out of 87 studies. Notably, the occurrence of adverse events was rarely mentioned. Conclusions: Overall, outcomes seem to show beneficial effects of EMDR on reducing psychological and physical symptoms in patients treated in a medical setting. Due to the heterogeneity of reported outcomes, effect sizes could not be pooled. Due to the high risk of bias of the included studies, our results should be interpreted with caution and further controlled high-quality research is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Generalized anxiety disorder is commonly underdiagnosed and undertreated in medical settings. Aim: The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence and correlates of generalized anxiety disorder among patients presenting to medicine outpatient department in a tertiary care centre. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted among the patients visiting the outpatient department of General Medicine in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Sociodemographic and clinical parameters were collected using a structured pro forma. All patients were administered Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) to screen for the presence of generalized anxiety disorder. Patients who score 10 or more underwent a semi-structured evaluation using a generalized anxiety disorder module of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders. Results: Two hundred and fifty patients were recruited for the study. The mean age of the participants was 40.66 ± 12.8 years. More than one-fourth of them had diabetes mellitus and about one-fifth of the participants had systemic hypertension and hypothyroidism. Thirty five (14%) participants screened positive on GAD-7 scale. On detailed evaluation using SCID-I, 19 (7.6%) participants were confirmed to have a generalized anxiety disorder. Female gender was associated with the presence of GAD. Conclusion: One in thirteen patients presenting to the medicine outpatient department were found to have generalized anxiety disorder. Female patients had a greater prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder compared to male patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The global rise in antibiotic resistance necessitates an understanding of antibiotic usage patterns and the corresponding development of resistance within hospitals. This study explores these patterns within the General Medicine department of a tertiary care hospital. Objective: To determine the relationship between antibiotic prescription patterns and the emergence of resistance in a General Medicine department, and to identify potential areas of improvement for antibiotic stewardship. Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken, reviewing 500 antibiotic prescriptions and the associated patient records over a six-month period. Pathogen susceptibility to antibiotics was ascertained using standard microbiological techniques. Results: Of the 500 prescriptions assessed, 68% involved antibiotics. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were cephalosporins (29%), followed by fluoroquinolones (24%). It was found that 28% of the prescriptions potentially represented antibiotic misuse, often in cases with a primary viral diagnosis. Antibiotic resistance testing revealed that 38% of bacterial isolates exhibited resistance to the routinely prescribed antibiotics, with fluoroquinolones showing the highest resistance rates. Conclusions: The study indicates that there is a notable divergence from recommended antibiotic prescription guidelines within the General Medicine department. The observed resistance patterns underscore the urgency of implementing comprehensive antibiotic stewardship programs to promote optimal antibiotic use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: General medicine is an integral part of health services, yet there is little data highlighting their contribution to acute hospital care in Australia. Aims: To utilise the Victorian Department of Health's administrative dataset for hospital admissions to evaluate the relative contribution and trends over time of general medical services to acute multiday inpatient hospital separations in the Victorian public healthcare system. Methods: A retrospective time‐series study of general medical activity compared to other major specialties using hospital‐level data provided by the Department of Health: (i) extrapolation from diagnosis‐related group (DRG) activity data (2011–2021) and, (ii) directly reported discharge unit‐based activity (available from 2018). Acute multiday separations of all patients aged ≥18 years from all metropolitan and rural Victorian public hospitals were included. Results: Using the DRG‐based data, general medicine ranked as the largest care provider of all specialties studied, accounting for 12.1% of separations. Despite the largest increase at a rate of 2831 separations/year (0.336%/year of total, P < 0.001) compared to others, mean length of stay declined by 0.08 days/year (P < 0.001). These findings were significant for metropolitan and rural hospitals. The use of directly reported discharge unit‐based data also ranked general medicine as the largest care provider accounting for 32.9% of total separations, with rural hospital general medical services contributing nearly 50% of all multiday separations. Conclusions: Both DRG‐based data and discharge unit‐based data indicate that general medicine is the largest provider of acute multiday inpatient care in Victorian hospitals. The estimate of contribution of general medicine differed between the two datasets as DRG data likely over‐represents the role of other specialties possibly due to assumptions regarding specialty management of varying groups of diagnoses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message: Hemothorax is a rare and potentially fatal condition characterized by pleural effusion containing over 50% of the patient's hematocrit. A massive hemothorax involves blood loss exceeding 1.5 L. Common causes include chest trauma, invasive thoracic procedures, anticoagulant medications, vascular anomalies, malignancies, and hematologic abnormalities. Spontaneous hemothorax may be seen in conjunction with pulmonary infarction and spontaneous pneumothorax. Anticoagulation is a key therapeutic strategy for certain thromboembolic events, such as pulmonary embolism. Historically, these events were treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), which have demonstrated variable plasma concentrations and an increased risk of hemorrhage. With the advent of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), treatment has become as effective as VKAs while significantly reducing the risk of hemorrhage. However, some researchers have speculated that hemorrhagic complications in certain cases could be worse with DOACs than with VKAs. In the case presented here, we identified a genuine association between the use of rivaroxaban and spontaneous hemothorax following the initiation of treatment for pulmonary embolism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) presents with renal failure and proteinuria in a minority of cases, usually due to secondary amyloidosis or IgA nephropathy. While focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is less common, it should still be in the differential regardless of the patient's clinical profile.

Introduction: The traditional educational system has concentrated on cognition acquisition and skills essential for physician practice. However, medical educationists are focusing more on good professional doctors now, having a cognitive foundation to work alongside their social roles as a physician-to-be. Aims and Objectives: To assess medical professionalism amongst postgraduate trainees at Bolan Medical Complex Hospital, Quetta. Place and Duration of study: Bolan Medical Complex Hospital, Quetta during February 2024. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine professionalism utilizing a pre-validated questionnaire termed Professionalism Assessment Tool (PAT) from 47 Postgraduates (PGs) of the Neurosurgery, General Medicine, and Psychiatry departments. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS version 29 was used to calculate frequencies and percentages. The chi-square test was utilized to evaluate the association between professional years and items. A p-value of ? 0.05 is considered significant. Results: All 18 PGs from the psychiatry department, 23/36 (64%) from General Medicine, and all 6 from Neurosurgery filled out the questionnaire. 55.3%(n=25/47) were above 25 years of age, The majority were males (n=31, 66%) and 34% females, 36% (n=17/47) PGs were from 1st year of training. Item no 1 and 5 of Domain I and Domain 3 present the highest percentage score (52.4%) respectively. Highly statistically significant results (p-

Key Clinical Message While intermittent hemodialysis (HD) is the most efficient method of removing lithium in patients with lithium toxicity, continuous renal replacement therapy is an acceptable alternative in the setting of intradialytic hypotension. This form of dialysis can reduce the need for vasopressors during HD, which increases mortality.

ObjectivesEstimating mortality risk in hospitalised SARS-CoV-2+ patients may help with choosing level of care and discussions with patients. The Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium Mortality Score (4C Score) is a promising COVID-19 mortality risk model. We examined the association of risk factors with 30-day mortality in hospitalised, full-code SARS-CoV-2+ patients and investigated the discrimination and calibration of the 4C Score. This was a retrospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2+ hospitalised patients within the RECOVER (REgistry of suspected COVID-19 in EmeRgency care) network.Setting99 emergency departments (EDs) across the USA.ParticipantsPatients ≥18 years old, positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the ED, and hospitalised.Primary outcomeDeath within 30 days of the index visit. We performed logistic regression analysis, reporting multivariable risk ratios (MVRRs) and calculated the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) and mean prediction error for the original 4C Score and after dropping the C reactive protein (CRP) component.ResultsOf 6802 hospitalised patients with COVID-19, 1149 (16.9%) died within 30 days. The 30-day mortality was increased with age 80+ years (MVRR=5.79, 95% CI 4.23 to 7.34); male sex (MVRR=1.17, 1.05 to 1.28); and nursing home/assisted living facility residence (MVRR=1.29, 1.1 to 1.48). The 4C Score had comparable discrimination in the RECOVER dataset compared with the original 4C validation dataset (AUROC: RECOVER 0.786 (95% CI 0.773 to 0.799), 4C validation 0.763 (95% CI 0.757 to 0.769). Score-specific mortalities in our sample were lower than in the 4C validation sample (mean prediction error 6.0%). Dropping the CRP component from the 4C Score did not substantially affect discrimination and 4C risk estimates were now close (mean prediction error 0.7%).ConclusionsWe independently validated 4C Score as predicting risk of 30-day mortality in hospitalised SARS-CoV-2+ patients. We recommend dropping the CRP component of the score and using our recalibrated mortality risk estimates.