Search

The COVID-19 pandemic had a global impact on daily lives, and this study aimed to assess the effects on broader aspects of health in the general population of Norway. This population-based cohort study assessed changes in health of the Norwegian general population from 3 months before to 9 months during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sampling was based on the results of Norwegian surveys designed for collecting general population norms for health measurement instruments. In December 2019, 12,790 randomly selected adults aged ≥18 years received a postal questionnaire. The 3,200 respondents received a similar follow-up postal questionnaire including the EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS-29 instruments, and questions about respondents having or having had COVID-19. Score changes were compared to estimates for the minimal important change (MIC) and age-related change. Association of instrument change scores with baseline characteristics, health problems, and having had COVID-19 was determined using multivariable linear regression. Of 3101 respondents with unchanged addresses, 2423 (78.1%) responded to the second survey. For all respondents, EQ VAS and PROMIS-29 scores for 6 of 8 domains were slightly poorer (p<0.01) than before COVID-19, and the mean change was below the MIC. In multivariable analyses, the greatest number of poorer outcomes were associated with being female, 18–29 years, or ≥80 years of age (p<0.01); > MIC for ≥ 80 years of age and EQ-5D index, PROMIS-29 physical function and social participation. Respondents who had COVID-19 had poorer outcomes for PROMIS-29 social participation (> MIC). Those reporting COVID-19 in their partner/family and not themselves, had poorer outcomes for PROMIS-29 anxiety and social participation. About 9 months into the COVID-19 pandemic, EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS-29 domain scores showed slightly poorer health in the Norwegian adult general population compared to 1 year earlier in the same respondents. The overall changes were less than expected for age-related change. Relatively poor outcomes defined as important, included general health and social participation for the elderly, and the latter for those having had COVID-19. In conclusion, this study found no evidence for a decline in important aspects of adult general population health in Norway that might be attributed to the pandemic at approximately 9 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We invited individuals aged above 16 years with a congenital transverse reduction deficiency at and above the wrist born in Norway between 1970 and 2006 to complete the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure, the 5-Level EuroQoL-5-Dimension instrument, the RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and a single-item questionnaire on arm function, appearance, pain and prosthesis wear. Of 154 eligible participants, 58 (38%) responded. Their scores were not different from the general population. All had been offered prostheses, and 56 (97%) had been fitted at a median age of 1 year (interquartile range 0–2.8). Of the participants, 37 (64%) were still prosthesis wearers, while 21 (36%) were non-wearers or using gripping devices only. Prosthesis wearers had higher levels of 'vitality' as assessed by the RAND-36 and rated their arm appearance higher, but there were no other score differences, indicating that prosthesis rejection is not associated with worse functional outcomes. Level of evidence: III [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We invited individuals aged above 16 years with a congenital transverse reduction deficiency at and above the wrist born in Norway between 1970 and 2006 to complete the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure, the 5-Level EuroQoL-5-Dimension instrument, the RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and a single-item questionnaire on arm function, appearance, pain and prosthesis wear. Of 154 eligible participants, 58 (38%) responded. Their scores were not different from the general population. All had been offered prostheses, and 56 (97%) had been fitted at a median age of 1 year (interquartile range 0-2.8). Of the participants, 37 (64%) were still prosthesis wearers, while 21 (36%) were non-wearers or using gripping devices only. Prosthesis wearers had higher levels of 'vitality' as assessed by the RAND-36 and rated their arm appearance higher, but there were no other score differences, indicating that prosthesis rejection is not associated with worse functional outcomes. Level of evidence: III., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.