Search

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hemogram parameters, namely NLR and PLR, at the end of the first year of antifibrotic treatment in IPF patients and evaluate the association of change in NLR and PLR levels and mortality in this study population. Patients diagnosed with IPF and started on antifibrotic therapy between 2016 and 2022 were included. Study design was retrospective cohort study. Baseline NLR and PLR values were obtained at the time of diagnosis before any treatment was started. Follow-up levels of NLR and PLR were obtained at the completion of the first year of antifibrotic treatment. Results A total of 125 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 67.9 ± 7.27 years. It was found that increment in NLR at first year was significant in non-survived group (p = 0.01). When patients were separated into four groups according to their survival status and antifibrotic medication, significant NLR and PLR elevations were only present in non-survived pirfenidone group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01). Conclusions Elevated levels of NLR at the first year of antifibrotic treatment may be a sign of worse prognosis in IPF patients, especially in patients treated with pirfenidone.

Introduction: Coronavirus diseases-2019 (COVID-19) have been ongoing for more than two years. Despite the scientific research conducted in this process, there is still no widely accepted definitive treatment for the disease. For treating COVID-19, using antiviral agents previously used for the treatment of other RNA-virus infections has been seen as a fast way to a solution, and favipiravir is one of the leading agents. This prospective, multicenter, observational study was designed to investigate the safety of favipiravir in 500 patients treated with favipravir for favipravir. Methods: This study was conducted as a multicenter prospective study. Eight different sites from four cities participated, and 500 patients were included in the study. Follow-up of laboratory parameters, adverse events (AEs), and amelioration of fever, dyspnea, and cough symptoms of the patients was recorded in a case report form. Results: A total of 475 patients from eight centers completed the study. A total of 401 AEs were reported in 206 (51.4%) patients, which were mild-to-moderate in the majority of cases. Serious AEs occurred in 5 patients and death occurred in 4 patients. From the first to the last measurement, serum alanine aminotransferase levels (31.9±27.7 vs. 47.2±49.7 U/L, p37.8 for 6.6% on day 3, 3.2% on day 5, and 0.6% on day 10), dyspnea (for 56.4% on day 5, 62.4% on day 7, and 81.2% on day 10), and cough (46.0% on day 5, 73.0% on day 7, and 87.3% on day 10) were noted in an increasingly higher percentage of patients with continued therapy. Conclusion: The current study provides real-life data of favipiravir, which is a unique option in Turkey for treating COVID-19 patients. The results revealed that favipiravir is a well-tolerated agent with a low side-effect profile. However, it needs to be evaluated with well-designed, dose-compared, randomized controlled studies for the evaluation of efficacy.

Objective: To identify the clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection during the vaccination period nationwide in Turkey. Methods: COVID-19 patients followed in the pandemic services across Turkey between January 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022 were investigated retrospectively. Nosocomial COVID-19 was defined as a patient neither diagnosed with COVID-19 nor suspected COVID-19 at the hospital admission and was confirmed COVID-19 ≥5 days after hospital admission. The primary outcome of this study was in-hospital mortality; demographic features and vaccination status was compared between survivors and non-survivors. Results: During the study period, 15 573 COVID-19 patients were followed in 18 centers and 543 (3.5%) patients were nosocomial COVID-19. Most patients with nosocomial COVID-19 (80.4%) were transferred from medical wards. 162 (29.8%) of the patients with nosocomial COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit due to disease severity and 138 (25.4%) of the patients died during hospital stay. Advanced age (≥65 years) and number of comorbid diseases (≥2) was found to be associated with mortality in nosocomial COVID-19 (OR 1.74, 95% Cl 1.11-2.74 and OR 1.60, 95% Cl 1.02-2.56, respectively). Vaccination was associated with survival in nosocomial COVID-19 (OR 0.25, 95% Cl 0.16-0.38). Conclusions: Patients with nosocomial COVID-19 had increased admission to intensive care units and higher mortality rate. Vaccination can decrease the in-hospital mortality rate.

Abstract Objective Risk analysis models, which are used in the diagnostic algorithm of incidental pulmonary nodules, are based on patient data from developed countries. Mayo Clinic, Brock University and Herder are among the most known models. We aim to compare the reliability of these models in patients with indeterminate solid nodules and to investigate the contribution of the predictors used to the model. Methods We analysed 305 patients who performed transthoracic needle biopsy and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for solid nodules, retrospectively. For all three models, the malignancy risk probabilities of patients were calculated, and patients were classified as low (

ABSTRACT Objective: Various studies have shown that diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of thrombosis in the venous system as well as in the arterial system. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the association between admission blood glucose levels and clinical severity, recurrence, and mortality in pulmonary embolism in patients with DM. Materials and methods: This study was designed as a retrospective cross-sectional study. Patients with DM who were admitted to a tertiary care hospital due to pulmonary embolism (PE) between 2014 and 2019 were included. Demographic characteristics, radiological findings, clinical class of embolism, and mortality data were retrieved from hospital records. Patients with and without recurrent disease, as well as patients who survived and died, were compared. Also, patients were classified according to quartiles of admission blood glucose levels. The quartiles were compared in terms of mortality, clinical, class, and recurrence. Results: Two hundred ninety-three patients with DM and PE were included in the study. Patients with adverse outcome had significantly higher admission blood glucose levels (respectively, 197.9 ± 96.30 mg/dL vs. 170.7 ± 74.26 mg/dL; p = 0.03). Patients in the third and fourth quartile of admission blood glucose levels (>152 mg/dL) had significantly more severe disease with a higher proportion of massive and sub-massive PE and higher pro-BNP levels (respectively, p = 0.01 and 0.02). Conclusion: Non-survived patients and recurrent disease were associated with higher admission blood glucose levels. Also, patients with admission blood glucose levels higher than 152 mg/dL tend to have clinically more severe diseases.

Introduction: The Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has caused a serious pandemic. Thus, it is important to evaluate patients with data obtained at the first admission. Patients with severe disease should be recognized among patients admitted to the hospital symptomatically. This study aimed to examine the role of admission hemogram parameters in predicting prognosis in patients who were hospitalized for COVID-19. Materials and Methods: We enrolled all patients diagnosed with confirmed or probable COVID-19 retrospectively. Age, sex, smoking history, chronic disease, hemogram parameters [i.e., leukocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR)], D-dimer, ferritin, albumin, C-reactive protein, and lactate dehydrogenase were recorded. The relationship between hemogram parameters and poor prognosis was evaluated. The need for pulse-steroid therapy, transfer to the intensive care unit, and mortality indicated a poor prognosis. Results: The median age of the 156 patients enrolled in the study was 63 (24-94) years. Significant correlations were found in the univariate analysis between leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, NLR, PLR, LMR, and poor prognosis (p=0.013, p=0.004, p=0.000, p=0.036, p=0.000, p=0.010, and p=0.025, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, significant correlations were found between leukocytes, NLR, and poor prognosis (p=0.04 and p=0.001, respectively). The cut-off value of the COVID-hemogram score was three points, with 87% sensitivity and 62% specificity. The scoring system determined the risk for a poor prognosis in patients. The median score was 7 (5-8) in those with a poor prognosis and 2 (0-6) in those who did not have a poor prognosis (p

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the effects of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program with and without telecoaching on health-related outcomes in COVID-19 survivors. Methods: A total of 42 COVID-19 patients who completed medical treatment were randomly divided into two groups: the study (telecoaching) group (n = 21) and the control (no telecoaching) group (n = 21). Both groups participated in an 8-week home-based PR program including education, breathing exercises, strength training, and regular walking. The study group received phone calls from a physiotherapist once a week. Both groups of patients were assessed before and after the program by means of the following: pulmonary function tests; the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale; the six-minute walk test; extremity muscle strength measurement; the Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (to assess disease-related quality of life); the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36, to assess overall quality of life); and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Results: In both groups, there were significant improvements in the following: FVC; the six-minute walk distance; right and left deltoid muscle strength; Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire activity domain, impact domain, and total scores; and SF-36 social functioning, role-physical, role-emotional, and bodily pain domain scores (p < 0.05). Decreases in daily-life dyspnea, exertional dyspnea, and exertional fatigue were significant in the study group (p < 0.05), and the improvement in SF-36 social functioning domain scores was greater in the study group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: A home-based PR program with telecoaching increases social functioning and decreases daily-life dyspnea, exertional dyspnea, and exertional fatigue in COVID-19 survivors in comparison with a home-based PR program without telecoaching.