Search

Purpose: Parent coaching is a complex, psychosocial intervention with multiple core components. Clinicians' use of these core components may be influenced by distinct factors; no research has examined whether clinician perceptions of parent coaching vary across core coaching components. This study aimed to examine the extent to which clinicians working with families of young autistic children in publicly funded early intervention intend to use core parent coaching components, and to examine how closely psychological factors relate to providers' intentions to use each component. Methods: Using the Theory of Planned Behavior as a framework, this study compared the strength of clinicians' intentions across five core parent coaching components: collaboration with parents, delivering the intervention within daily routines, demonstrating the intervention, providing in-vivo feedback, and reflection and problem solving. We examined the associations between intentions and psychological determinants of intentions (i.e., attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy) for each component. Results: Clinicians' average intentions varied by core component, with strongest intentions for demonstrating the intervention strategy for a parent. The associations between intentions and psychological determinants also varied by core component. Attitudes, injunctive norms, and self-efficacy, but not descriptive norms, significantly related to clinicians' intentions to use collaboration and daily routines, whereas attitudes and descriptive norms, but not injunctive norms and self-efficacy, significantly related to clinicians' intentions to use feedback and reflection and problem solving. Conclusion: These results suggest that implementation strategies should be tailored to the specific intervention component to be most efficient and effective. The results also provide examples of potentially malleable factors that implementation strategies can strategically target. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

B Correction: Implement Sci 16, 87 (2021) b B https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01153-9 b Following publication of the original article [[1]], it was reported that a number of references were numbered incorrectly. Reference 1 Fishman J, Yang C, Mandell D. Attitude theory and measurement in implementation science: a secondary review of empirical studies and opportunities for advancement. [Extracted from the article]

Background: The current gold standard for measuring fidelity (specifically, adherence) to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is direct observation, a costly, resource-intensive practice that is not feasible for many community organizations to implement regularly. Recent research indicates that behavioral rehearsal (i.e., role-play between clinician and individual with regard to session delivery) and chart-stimulated recall (i.e., brief structured interview between clinician and individual about what they did in session; clinicians use the client chart to prompt memory) may provide accurate and affordable alternatives for measuring adherence to CBT in such settings, with behavioral rehearsal yielding greater correspondence with direct observation., Methods: Drawing on established causal theories from social psychology and leading implementation science frameworks, this study evaluates stakeholders' intention to use behavioral rehearsal and chart-stimulated recall. Specifically, we measured attitudes, self-efficacy, and subjective norms toward using each, and compared these factors across the two methods. We also examined the relationship between attitudes, self-efficacy, subjective norms, and intention to use each method. Finally, using an integrated approach we asked stakeholders to discuss their perception of contextual factors that may influence beliefs about using each method. These data were collected from community-based supervisors ( n  = 17) and clinicians ( n  = 66)., Results: Quantitative analyses suggest moderately strong intention to use both methods across stakeholders. There were no differences in supervisors' or clinicians' attitudes, self-efficacy, subjective norms, or intention across methods. More positive attitudes and greater reported subjective norms were associated with greater reported intention to use either measure. Qualitative analyses identified participants' specific beliefs about using each fidelity measure in their organization, and results were organized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research., Conclusions: Strategies are warranted to overcome or minimize potential barriers to using fidelity measurement methods and to further increase the strength of intention to use them. Plain Language Summary: The best way to measure fidelity, or how closely a clinician follows the protocol, to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is watching the session. This is an expensive practice that is not feasible for many community organizations to do regularly. Recent research indicates that behavioral rehearsal, or a role-play between the clinician and individual with regard to session delivery, and chart-stimulated recall, or a brief discussion between an individual and the clinician about what they did in session with the clinician having access to the chart to help them remember, may provide accurate and affordable alternatives for measuring fidelity to CBT. We just completed a study demonstrating that both methods are promising, with behavioral rehearsal offering scores that are the most similar to watching the session. Drawing on established theories from social psychology and leading implementation science frameworks, this study evaluates future supervisor and clinician motivation to use these fidelity measurement methods. Specifically, we measured supervisor (n = 17) and clinician (n = 66) attitudes, norms, self-efficacy, intentions, and anticipated barriers and facilitators to using each of these fidelity measurement tools. Quantitative and qualitative analyses suggest similar intention to use both methods, and concerns about barriers to using each method. Further research is warranted to minimize the burden associated with implementing fidelity measurement methods and deploying strategies to increase use., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Drs Sonja Schoenwald and Rinad Beidas both serve as co-authors on this paper, and have editorial affiliations with the Journal. Dr. Schoenwald is Co-Founding Editor in Chief of Implementation Research and Practice. Dr. Beidas was previously an Associate Editor; all decisions on this manuscript were made by another editor. Dr. Beidas is principal at Implementation Science & Practice, LLC. She receives royalties from Oxford University Press, consulting fees from United Behavioral Health and OptumLabs, and serves on the advisory boards for Optum Behavioral Health, AIM Youth Mental Health Foundation, and the Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation outside of the submitted work., (© The Author(s) 2022.)