Search

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) poses a significant health threat to the elderly population, leading to high morbidity and mortality rates. Serum ferritin, a critical indicator of iron metabolism, plays a pivotal role in inflammation and immune regulation. Nevertheless, its specific prognostic relevance in elderly patients with CAP remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive capacity of serum ferritin in determining the prognosis of elderly patients with CAP and to investigate its effectiveness when combined with the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) or CURB-65 (confusion, uremia, respiratory rate, blood pressure, aged ≥65 years) scores. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 451 elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) diagnosed with CAP according to established criteria. Serum ferritin concentrations were measured upon admission and various prognostic indicators such as 28-day mortality, mechanical ventilation requirement, and vasopressor administration were analyzed in conjunction with white blood count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), lactate (Lac), SOFA scores, and CURB-65 scores. The independent predictive value of ferritin was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Among the 451 patients, 99 (22%) died within 28 days. The area under the curve (AUC) of serum ferritin for predicting 28-day mortality was 0.75 (95%CI: 0.695-0.805). Ferritin outperformed WBC, CRP, and PCT in predictive performance, and its performance was comparable to Lac. When combined with SOFA or CURB-65 scores, the AUC of ferritin for predicting 28-day mortality increased to 0.84 and 0.847, respectively (P <0.001). Moreover, the AUC of ferritin for predicting vasopressor administration was 0.707, which increased to 0.864 and 0.822 when combined with SOFA or CURB-65 scores, respectively (P <0.001). Ferritin could predict mechanical ventilation requirement with an AUC of 0.618, but it was not an independent risk factor, and its predictive ability was not significantly different from other indicators. Conclusion: Admission serum ferritin is an independent predictor for the prognosis of elderly patients with CAP, and it exhibits a strong ability to predict the 28-day mortality and vasopressor administration. The combination of ferritin with SOFA and CURB-65 scores significantly improves the prognostic predictive potency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Poisoning is a major public health issue and a leading cause of admission to the emergency department (ED). There is a paucity of data describing the epidemiology and cost of acute poisoning. Therefore, this study investigated the epidemiology, patterns, and associated costs of acute poisoning in emergency department of the largest tertiary care healthcare centre in Qatar. Method: This study was a retrospective review of the health records of patients admitted to the ED due to poisoning between January 2015 and December 2019. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and costs associated with acute poisoning were assessed. Frequency and percentages were calculated for categorical variables and mean and SD for continuous variables. The relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and poisoning profile was assessed using the chi-square test. A micro-costing approach using the cost of each resource was applied for cost calculations. Result: The incidence of acute poisoning was 178 cases per 100,000 patients. Females (56%) and children below 14 years (44.3%) accounted for the largest proportion. Most of the exposures were accidental involving therapeutic agents (64.2%). The mean length of hospital stay was found to be 1.84 ± 0.81 days, and most patients (76.6%) were discharged within the first 8 h. A statistically significant difference was found between age groups and type of toxin (χ2 = 23.3, p < 0.001), cause and route of exposure (χ2 = 42.2, p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (χ2 = 113.16, p < 0.001). Admission to intensive care units had the highest cost expenditure (USD 326,008), while general wards accounted for the least (USD 57,709). Conclusion: Unintentional poisoning by pharmacological agents is common in infants and children. This study will assist in the development of educational and preventive programmes to minimise exposure to toxic agents. Further studies are required to explore the impact of medical toxicology services, and post discharge monitoring of poisoning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Influenza can be associated with nonrespiratory disease presentation, but these are less well documented due to the lack of routine testing for influenza in the healthcare system, especially if patients do not present with influenza‐like illness (ILI). We aimed to measure the proportion of influenza cases seeking care at emergency department (ED) for a nontraumatic cause, to describe their clinical presentation and their ED‐discharge diagnosis. Methods: The study was conducted at seven hospitals in France, Spain, Italy and Germany during the 2019–20 influenza season, for a period of 10 weeks. Patients (≥ 18 years) consulting for nontraumatic causes at the ED were invited to participate. Consenting patients provided upper respiratory swab samples for influenza testing by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Clinical and demographic data were collected. Results: There were 8678 patients included, 50.7% were female and the median age was 57 years. Among them, 494 (5.7%) were laboratory‐confirmed influenza (LCI) cases. Nonetheless, only 24.3% of LCI cases had an ED‐discharge of influenza. Of all cases confirmed as influenza, 47.6% had a nonrespiratory discharge diagnosis, which frequency increased with age. ILI case definition from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control was the most frequently met among influenza cases (68.6%). Older patients (≥ 65 years) were less frequently identified based on any ILI signs/symptoms. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the impact of influenza among patients seeking care at the ED cannot be easily assessed based on clinical presentation and medical records alone. Preventing influenza among adult population may reduce healthcare utilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over 10 million ED visits occur each year across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. Outside basic administrative data focused on time‐based targets, there is minimal information about clinical performance, quality of care, patient outcomes, or equity in emergency care. The lack of a timely, accurate or clinically useful data collection represents a missed opportunity to improve the care we deliver each day. The present paper outlines a proposal for a National Acute Care Secure Health Data Environment, including design, possible applications, and the steps taken to date by the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine ED Epidemiology Network in collaboration with the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia. Optimal use of the existing information collected routinely during clinical care of emergency patients has the potential to enable data‐driven quality improvement and research, leading to better care and better outcomes for millions of patients and families each year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the frequency of NSTEMI (non- st elevation myocardial infarction) in acute coronary syndrome patients presenting with the chest pain in emergency department of tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Cross Sectional study. Setting: Jinnah Post graduate Medical College Hospital Karachi. Period: June 20, 2023. Methods: Enrolling 112 consecutive volunteers was carried out Interview questions focused on the participants’ smoking, blood pressure, diabetes, and type of chest pain. Whether or not the participants had ACS, their diagnosis was documented. NSTEMI frequency was computed. Results: We have 112 patients enrolled with mean age was 52.73±14.24 years. Sixty five (58%) were male while forty seven (41.9 %) were females. out of 112 patients 45 (40.1%) were hypertensive, 32(28.5%) were diabetes and 29 (25.8%) were smoker. Among the participants 21 (18.7%) had NSTEMI and showed positive correlation with age, gender, nature of chest pain, hypertension and smoking. Conclusion: Among the individuals, one of the most frequent causes of chest pain was acute coronary syndrome. High suspicion and additional testing are they key tools for early diagnosis and management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Lung Ultrasonography (LUS) have surface as an expensive tool in the analysis and monitoring of COVID-19, known its capability to offer realtime imaging and detect pulmonary abnormalities associated with the disease, the identification of the unique LUS findings of COVID-19 and the presentation of their correlation with the prognostic factors and early severity of the illness. Method: The PRISMA recommendations were followed when conducting the comprehensive analysis. Finding suggests utilizing the descriptions lung ultrasonography and corona virus disease-19, SARS-CoV-2 was done by a survey on PubMed. A total of 1400 publications were found in which 10 were included. The increasing number of COVID-19 necessitates analytical tools for therapeutic treatment. Results: LU is a non-invasive method used to diagnose interstitial lung syndrome, revealing a characteristic pattern in COVID-19 pneumonia patients. LU has shown promise in detect and correlated with CT scan outcome. It proved useful as a practical substitute for more intrusive treatments in both monitoring the development of the disease and detecting the original infection. Regular evaluations, which are essential for handling serious situations, were made easier by real-time imaging. The probability of negative outcomes (Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, or requirement for involuntary aeration, death,) was greater in patients in the Emergency Department (ED) with higher LUS scores. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was well-predicted by the LUS results and/or the LUS score. Conclusions: The development of negative consequences is correlated with high LUS scores. Pleural Effusion (PE) inclusion in the LUS score and imaging protocol standardization for COVID-19 LUS are still being discussed. Its practicality for medical professionals stems from its capacity to monitor the progression of diseases and offer quick feedback. To standardize techniques and maximize their application in diverse therapeutic situations even during lung cancer therapies, more research is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) poses a significant health threat to the elderly population, leading to high morbidity and mortality rates. Serum ferritin, a critical indicator of iron metabolism, plays a pivotal role in inflammation and immune regulation. Nevertheless, its specific prognostic relevance in elderly patients with CAP remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive capacity of serum ferritin in determining the prognosis of elderly patients with CAP and to investigate its effectiveness when combined with the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) or CURB-65 (confusion, uremia, respiratory rate, blood pressure, aged ≥65 years) scores.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 451 elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) diagnosed with CAP according to established criteria. Serum ferritin concentrations were measured upon admission and various prognostic indicators such as 28-day mortality, mechanical ventilation requirement, and vasopressor administration were analyzed in conjunction with white blood count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), lactate (Lac), SOFA scores, and CURB-65 scores. The independent predictive value of ferritin was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and multivariate logistic regression.ResultsAmong the 451 patients, 99 (22%) died within 28 days. The area under the curve (AUC) of serum ferritin for predicting 28-day mortality was 0.75 (95%CI: 0.695-0.805). Ferritin outperformed WBC, CRP, and PCT in predictive performance, and its performance was comparable to Lac. When combined with SOFA or CURB-65 scores, the AUC of ferritin for predicting 28-day mortality increased to 0.84 and 0.847, respectively (P

Background: Chest pain is a prevalent reason for emergency room referrals and presents diagnostic challenges. The physician must carefully differentiate between cardiac and noncardiac causes, including various vascular and extracardiovascular conditions. However, it is crucial not to overlook serious conditions such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and early discharge management become difficult when traditional clinical criteria, ECG, and troponin values are insufficient. Recently, the focus has shifted to a "multi-marker" approach to improve diagnostic accuracy and prognosis in patients with chest pain. Methods: This observational, prospective, single-center study involved, with informed consent, 360 patients presenting to the emergency department with typical chest pain and included a control group of 120 healthy subjects. In addition to routine examinations, including tests for hsTnI (Siemens TNIH kit), according to the 0–1 h algorithm, biochemical markers sST2 (tumorigenicity suppression-2) and suPAR (soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) were also evaluated for each patient. A 12-month follow-up was conducted to monitor outcomes and adverse events. Results: We identified two groups of patients: a positive one (112 patients) with high levels of hsTnI, sST2 > 24.19 ng/mL, and suPAR > 2.9 ng/mL, diagnosed with ACS; and a negative one (136 patients) with low levels of hsTnI, suPAR < 2.9 ng/mL, and sST2 < 24.19 ng/mL. During the 12-month follow-up, no adverse events were observed in the negative group. In the intermediate group, patients with hsTnI between 6 ng/L and the ischemic limit, sST2 > 29.1 ng/mL and suPAR > 2.9 ng/mL, showed the highest probability of adverse events during follow-up, while those with sST2 < 24.19 ng/mL and suPAR < 2.9 ng/mL had a better outcome with no adverse events at 12 months. Conclusion: Our data suggest that sST2 and suPAR, together with hsTnI, may be useful in the prognosis of cardiovascular patients with ACS, providing additional information on endothelial damage. These biomarkers could guide the clinical decision on further diagnostic investigations. In addition, suPAR and sST2 emerge as promising for event prediction in patients with chest pain. Their integration into the standard approach in PS could facilitate more efficient patient management, allowing safe release or timely admission based on individual risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Shortages of mechanical ventilation have become a constant problem in Emergency Departments (EDs), thereby affecting the timely deployment of medical interventions that counteract the severe health complications experienced during respiratory disease seasons. It is then necessary to count on agile and robust methodological approaches predicting the expected demand loads to EDs while supporting the timely allocation of ventilators. In this paper, we propose an integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Discrete-event Simulation (DES) to design effective interventions ensuring the high availability of ventilators for patients needing these devices. Methods First, we applied Random Forest (RF) to estimate the mechanical ventilation probability of respiratory-affected patients entering the emergency wards. Second, we introduced the RF predictions into a DES model to diagnose the response of EDs in terms of mechanical ventilator availability. Lately, we pretested two different interventions suggested by decision-makers to address the scarcity of this resource. A case study in a European hospital group was used to validate the proposed methodology. Results The number of patients in the training cohort was 734, while the test group comprised 315. The sensitivity of the AI model was 93.08% (95% confidence interval, [88.46 − 96.26%]), whilst the specificity was 85.45% [77.45 − 91.45%]. On the other hand, the positive and negative predictive values were 91.62% (86.75 − 95.13%) and 87.85% (80.12 − 93.36%). Also, the Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve plot was 95.00% (89.25 − 100%). Finally, the median waiting time for mechanical ventilation was decreased by 17.48% after implementing a new resource capacity strategy. Conclusions Combining AI and DES helps healthcare decision-makers to elucidate interventions shortening the waiting times for mechanical ventilators in EDs during respiratory disease epidemics and pandemics.

The Emergency Department (ED) plays an important role in the healthcare field, due to the nature of the services it provides, especially for patients with urgent cases. Therefore, good management of ED is very important in improving the quality of services. Good management depends on the effective use of material and human resources. One of the most common problems that the ED suffers from is the long waiting period and the length of the patient’s stay. Many researchers have proposed many solutions to reduce waiting time and length of stay (LOS). One of the best solutions for resource optimization is modeling and simulation based on inputs such as patient length of stay and door-to-doctor time (DTDT). In this study, the ED was modeled using a Coloured Petri Net, and to determine the number of resources needed, genetic algorithms were used. This study was conducted in the ED of Hassani Abdelkader Hospital in Sidi Bel Abbes, and several simulation models were evaluated, which reduced the waiting time and the length of stay for the patient.

Background: Shortages of mechanical ventilation have become a constant problem in Emergency Departments (EDs), thereby affecting the timely deployment of medical interventions that counteract the severe health complications experienced during respiratory disease seasons. It is then necessary to count on agile and robust methodological approaches predicting the expected demand loads to EDs while supporting the timely allocation of ventilators. In this paper, we propose an integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Discrete-event Simulation (DES) to design effective interventions ensuring the high availability of ventilators for patients needing these devices. Methods: First, we applied Random Forest (RF) to estimate the mechanical ventilation probability of respiratory-affected patients entering the emergency wards. Second, we introduced the RF predictions into a DES model to diagnose the response of EDs in terms of mechanical ventilator availability. Lately, we pretested two different interventions suggested by decision-makers to address the scarcity of this resource. A case study in a European hospital group was used to validate the proposed methodology. Results: The number of patients in the training cohort was 734, while the test group comprised 315. The sensitivity of the AI model was 93.08% (95% confidence interval, [88.46 − 96.26%]), whilst the specificity was 85.45% [77.45 − 91.45%]. On the other hand, the positive and negative predictive values were 91.62% (86.75 − 95.13%) and 87.85% (80.12 − 93.36%). Also, the Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve plot was 95.00% (89.25 − 100%). Finally, the median waiting time for mechanical ventilation was decreased by 17.48% after implementing a new resource capacity strategy. Conclusions: Combining AI and DES helps healthcare decision-makers to elucidate interventions shortening the waiting times for mechanical ventilators in EDs during respiratory disease epidemics and pandemics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A full-scale simulation exercise is a comprehensive drill designed to replicate a real-world emergency scenario, thereby identifying the strengths and weaknesses in current practices. The overarching goal is to enhance healthcare system resilience through improved protocols, as highlighted in this systematic review tailored for researchers. The study aims specifically to assess the impact of full-scale simulations on enhancing hospital disaster plans. Methodology: Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review investigates the impact of full-scale simulation exercises on hospital disaster preparedness. The focus was on hospital staff involved in disaster and emergency preparedness training. The primary intervention was the execution of full-scale simulation exercises, and our research included various study designs, including randomised controlled trials and observational study designs. A comprehensive electronic database search was conducted, spanning PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception until October 9, 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using NIH tools. Results: The literature search yielded 2398 results, with 28 publications finally included in the systematic review. Summarising a broad range of disaster preparedness simulation exercises with a specific focus on full-scale simulation (FSS), the studies consistently demonstrated a positive impact on participants' skills, as well as identifying safety issues in hospital settings. Moreover, they revealed that simulations effectively addressed crucial areas for improvement in disaster response, including communication breakdowns, equipment deficiencies, and flaws in emergency plans. The studies utilised a multidimensional approach to evaluation metrics, encompassing non-technical skills, communication, teamwork, decision-making, and operational readiness. The exercises varied in duration from 30 minutes to multi-day simulations, covering a diverse range of disaster scenarios, such as mass casualties, viral epidemics, large aviation accidents, and terrorist attacks. Conclusion: Full-scale simulation exercises are a preparatory learning tool to test facility and staff readiness for complex emergencies. This systematic review focused on the different exercise scenarios used to address critical aspects of disaster response such as communication breakdowns, equipment deficiencies, and flaws in emergency plans. The scenarios and their duration were varied, and involved a multidimensional approach to evaluation. Such exercises enhance critical thinking and problem-solving skills, increase familiarity with potential emergencies, and build confidence in making judgments in real-world situations. In our opinion, there is a need for further programs that align simulation exercises with community resources for better preparedness in the face of public health disasters.

Abstract Background People who use substances (PWUS) encounter significant barriers to accessing care for their complex health needs. As a result, emergency departments (EDs) often become the first point of healthcare access for many PWUS and are a crucial setting for the study of health inequities. This study aimed to understand the ED healthcare experiences of PWUS with the intent of informing ways of improving the delivery of equitable care. Methods This qualitative study was part of a larger cross-sectional, mixed-methods study that examined ED experiences among diverse underserved and equity-deserving groups (EDGs) within Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Participants shared and self-interpreted a story about a memorable ED or UCC visit within the preceding 24 months. Data from participants who self-identified as having substance use experiences was analyzed through inductive thematic analysis. Results Of the 1973 unique participants who completed the survey, 246 participants self-identified as PWUS and were included in the analysis. Most participants were

Background: People who use substances (PWUS) encounter significant barriers to accessing care for their complex health needs. As a result, emergency departments (EDs) often become the first point of healthcare access for many PWUS and are a crucial setting for the study of health inequities. This study aimed to understand the ED healthcare experiences of PWUS with the intent of informing ways of improving the delivery of equitable care. Methods: This qualitative study was part of a larger cross-sectional, mixed-methods study that examined ED experiences among diverse underserved and equity-deserving groups (EDGs) within Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Participants shared and self-interpreted a story about a memorable ED or UCC visit within the preceding 24 months. Data from participants who self-identified as having substance use experiences was analyzed through inductive thematic analysis. Results: Of the 1973 unique participants who completed the survey, 246 participants self-identified as PWUS and were included in the analysis. Most participants were < 45 years of age (61%), male (53%), and white/European (57%). 45% identified as a person with a disability and 39% frequently struggled to make ends meet. Themes were determined at the patient, provider, and system levels. Patient: history of substance use and experience of intersectionality negatively influenced participants' anticipation and perception of care. Provider: negative experiences were linked to assumption making, feelings of stigma and discrimination, and negative perceptions of provider care. Whereas positive experiences were linked to positive perceptions of provider care. System: timeliness of care and the perception of inadequate mental health resources negatively impacted participants' care experience. Overall, these themes shaped participants' trust of ED staff, their desire to seek care, and their perception of the care quality received. Conclusions: PWUS face significant challenges when seeking care in the ED. Given that EDs are a main site of healthcare utilization, there is an urgent need to better support staff in the ED to improve care experiences among PWUS. Based on the findings, three recommendations are proposed: (1) Integration of an equity-oriented approach into the ED, (2) Widespread training on substance use, and (3) Investment in expert resources and services to support PWUS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose – Patient length of stay (LOS) is an important indicator of emergency department (ED) performance. Investigating factors that influence LOS could thus improve healthcare delivery and patient safety. Previous studies have focused on patient-level factors to explain LOS variation, with little research into service-related factors. This study examined the association between LOS and multi-level factors including patient-, service- and organization-level factors. Design/methodology/approach – This study uses a retrospective observational design to identify a cohort of patients from arrival to discharge from ED. A year-long data regarding patients flow trhoguh ED were analyzed using analytics techniques and multi-regression models. The response variable was patient LOS, and the independent variables were patient characteristics, service-related factors and organizational variables. Findings – The findings of this study showed that older patients, middle triage and hospitalization were all associated with longer LOS. Service-related factors such as complexity of care provided, initial ward designation and ward transfer had a significant impact as well. Finally, prolonged LOS was associated with a higher ratio of patients per medical doctor and per nurse. In contrast, a higher number of residents in the ED were associated with longer patient LOS. Originality/value – Previous studies on patient LOS have focused on patient-level factors, with little research on service-related factors. This study has addressed that gap by examining the association between LOS and multi-level factors including patient-, service- and organization-level factors. Patient-level factors included demographics, acuity, arrival shift, arrival mode and discharge type. Service-level factors consisted of first ward, ward transfer and complexity of care provided. Organizational factors consisted of three ratios: patients per MD, patients per nurse and patients per resident. The results add to the current understanding of factors that increase patient LOS in EDs and contribute to the body of knowledge on ED performance, operation management and quality of care. The study also provides practical and managerial insights that could be used to improve patient flow in EDs and reduce LOS.

Background: Hypoxia is a common presentation in the Emergency Department (ED) worldwide. It affects 9-12% of hospitalized adults in Sub-Saharan Africa. Timely diagnosis of the multiple causes such as pneumonia, heart failure among others is challenging. Chest X-Ray (CXR), one of the most utilized imaging modalities has many limitations, and the gold standard (Computed Tomography scan) is inaccessible. Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) is more available and increasingly being used, however little is known of its performance in resource limited EDs. The study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of PoCUS compared with CXR in identifying the causes of hypoxia in the medical ED. Methods: 49 adults presenting with hypoxia (SP02 ≤ 88%) in the medical ED were evaluated. Ultrasound of the lungs and heart (PoCUS) was done, then CXR obtained. Lung ultrasound (LUS) was compared with CXR (first reference standard). Chest X-Ray and PoCUS were each compared to the physician diagnosis (second reference standard) to determine agreement using an acceptable disagreement cut-off of 15%. Results: 31% more abnormalities were identified by LUS than CXR. Lung ultrasound findings agreed with CXR in 86% of the participants with moderate reliability (ĸ=0.75). There was no significant difference between the actual findings of the two tests (X2= 2, p 0.1). Using the second reference, 82% of the CXRs were similar with weak reliability (ĸ=0.5) compared to 98% of PoCUS findings with strong reliability (ĸ=0.9). Compared to PoCUS, CXRs significantly differed from the physician diagnosis (X2= 0.85, p 0.38 vs X2= 8.5, p 0.004 respectively). Conclusion: Overall, PoCUS was not inferior to CXR when compared to final physician diagnosis in identifying causes of hypoxia, and LUS and CXR had comparable performance. Significantly more abnormalities were identified on PoCUS and it demonstrated better agreement and strong reliability with the physician diagnosis than CXR. We recommend PoCUS use in patients with hypoxia attending resource limited in- and pre-hospital settings.

Abstract Background Telehealth can improve access to evidence-based care at a lower cost for patients, especially those living in underserved and remote areas. The barriers to the widespread adoption of telehealth have been well documented in the literature. However, the barriers may not be the same for pediatric patients, who must rely on their parents or guardians to make healthcare decisions. This paper presents some of the leading barriers parents or guardians of pediatric patients report in using telehealth to meet their children’s healthcare needs. Methods This cross-sectional survey was conducted in a tertiary care pediatric Emergency Department (ED) at a children’s hospital in Alabama between September 2020 to December 2020. The parents or guardians of pediatric patients were asked about their reasons for not using telehealth despite having healthcare needs for their children, whether they canceled or rescheduled healthcare provider visits and facility visits, and whether the child’s health conditions changed over the past three months. Descriptive analyses were conducted that explored the distribution of telehealth use across the variables listed above. Results Five hundred ninety-seven parents or guardians of pediatric patients participated in the survey, and 578 answered the question of whether they used telehealth or not over the past three months. Of them, 33.1% used telehealth, 54.3% did not, and 12.6% did not have healthcare needs for their child. The leading reason for not using telehealth was that the doctor or health provider did not give them a telehealth option, the second main reason was that they did not know what telehealth is, and the third leading reason was that the parents did not think telehealth would help meet healthcare needs for their child. Conclusions This study highlights the telehealth utilization barriers among underserved pediatric populations, including the need for physicians to proactively offer telehealth options to parents or guardians of pediatric patients. Improving health literacy is of paramount importance, given that a substantial proportion of parents were not familiar with telehealth. Policymakers and healthcare organizations should raise awareness about the benefits of telehealth which can improve healthcare access for underserved pediatric patients.

Background: Rapid treatment is critical in managing acute ischemic stroke (AIS) to improve patient outcomes. Various strategies have been used to optimize this treatment process, including the Acute Stroke Protocol (ASP) activation, and minimizing the duration of key performance metrices, such as door-to-needle time (DNT), CT-to-needle time (CTNT), CT-to-groin puncture time (CTGP), and door-to-groin puncture time (DGPT). However, identifying the delay-causing sub-tasks within the ASP could yield novel insights, facilitating optimization strategies for the AIS treatment process. Methods: This two-phase prospective observational time and motion study aimed to identify sub-tasks and compare their respective durations involved in the treatment process for AIS patients within ASPs. The study compared sub-task durations between "routine working hours" and "evenings and weekends" (after-hours), as well as between stroke neurologists and non-stroke neurologists. Additionally, the established performance metrices of AIS were compared among the aforementioned groups. Results: Phase 1 identified and categorized 34 sub-tasks into five broad categories, while Phase 2 analyzed the ASP for 389 patients. Among the 185 patients included in the study, 57 received revascularization treatment, with 30 receiving intravenous (IV) thrombolysis only, 20 receiving endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) only, and 7 receiving both IV thrombolysis and EVT. Significant delays were observed in sub-tasks including triage, registration, patient history sharing, treatment decisions, preparation of patients, preparation of thrombolytic agents, and angiosuite preparation. The majority of these significant delays (P < 0.05) were observed when were performed by a non-stroke neurologist and during after-hours operations. Furthermore, certain sub-tasks were exclusively performed during after-hours or when the treatment was provided by a non-stroke neurologist. Consequently, DNT, CTNT, and CTGP were significantly prolonged for both non-stroke neurologists and off-hours treatment. DGPT was significantly longer only when the ASP was conducted by non-stroke neurologists. Conclusions: The study identified several sub-tasks that lead to significant delays during the execution of the ASP. These findings provide a premise to design targeted quality improvement interventions to optimize the ASP for these specific delay-causing sub-tasks, particularly for non-stroke neurologists and after-hours. This approach has the potential to significantly enhance the efficiency of the AIS treatment process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol (EDACS‐ADP) are commonly used for risk stratification in undifferentiated patients with acute chest pain. This systematic review aimed to investigate EDACS‐ADP for risk stratification of emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain. The PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched for related studies without restrictions on the publication year. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and Stata 16.0 was used to determine the combined sensitivity, specificity, positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR), and negative DLR. Twelve studies comprising 14 290 patients were identified. Of these, 7537 (52.74%) patients were considered low risk, and 67 (0.89%) had major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death within 30 days of the patients' ED presentation. EDACS‐ADP showed a combined sensitivity of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95−0.99); specificity, 0.58 (0.53−0.63); positive DLR, 2.34 (2.08−2.63); negative DLR, 0.04 (0.02−0.09); diagnostic odds ratio, 53.11 (26.45−106.63); and summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, 0.83 (0.79−0.86). Despite the large statistical heterogeneity of the results, EDACS‐ADP identified a considerable number of low‐risk patients for early discharge, with a specificity >50% and an incidence of MACE within 30‐days of patients' ED presentation <1%. Thus, it is a useful tool with a potential for clinical application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients seeking emergency care for self-harm and suicidality report varying experiences from being believed and taken seriously to not being believed and taken seriously. Epistemic injustice provides a conceptual framework to explore how peoples' experiences of self-harm and suicidality are believed or not. We use an empirical method -conversation analysis - to analyze epistemics in clinical communication, focusing on how knowledge is claimed, contested and negotiated. In courtroom, police and political interaction, conversation analysis has identified communication practices implying implausibility in a person's story to contest and recharacterize their accounts. Aims: To investigate communication practices in Emergency Department (ED) biopsychosocial assessments that may (1) undermine, imply implausibility and recharacterize or (2) accept peoples' experiences of suicidal ideation and selfharm. Methods: Using conversation analysis, we micro-analyzed verbal and nonverbal communication in five video-recorded biopsychosocial assessments with people presenting to the ED with self-harm or suicidal ideation, and conducted supplementary analysis of participants' medical records and postvisit interviews. We present three cases where experiences were not accepted and undermined/recharacterized and two cases where experiences were accepted and validated. Results: When peoples' experiences of suicidality and self-harm were not accepted or were undermined, questioners: did not acknowledge or accept the person's account; asked questions that implied inconsistency or implausibility ("Didn't you tell your GP that you were coping okay?"); juxtaposed contrasting information to undermine the person's account ("You said you were coping okay before, and now you're saying you feel suicidal"); asked questions asserting that, e.g., asking for help implied they were not intending to end their life ("So when you called 111 what were you expecting them to do"); and resistinged or directly questioned the person's account. Multiple practices across the assessment built on each other to assert that the person was not suicidal, did not look or act like they were suicidal; that the person's decision to attend the ED was not justified; that an overdose was impulsive and not intended to end life; asking why the person didn't take a more harmful medication to overdose; that selfharming behaviors were not that serious and should be in the person's control. Alternative characterizations were used to justify decisions not to provide further support or referrals to specialist services. At times, these practices were also delivered when speaking over the patient. When peoples' experiences were accepted, practitioners acknowledged, accepted, validated suicidality/self-harm and introduced a shared understanding of experiences that patients found helpful. Non-verbal feedback such as nodding and eye contact was central in acceptance of patients' accounts. Conclusion: These findings advance our understanding of how peoples' experiences of suicidality or self-harm are undermined or accepted in mental health encounters in the ED. They have important clinical implications: patients report that when their experiences are not accepted or undermined, this makes them more distressed, less hopeful about the future and discourages future help-seeking when in crisis. Conversely, acknowledging, accepting and validating suicidality/self-harm and introducing a new ways of understanding peoples' experiences may make people less suicidal and more hopeful, generates shared understanding and encourages future help-seeking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sepsis, a life-threatening infection-induced inflammatory condition, has significant global health impacts. Timely detection is crucial for improving patient outcomes as sepsis can rapidly progress to severe forms. The application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) to predict sepsis using electronic health records (EHRs) has gained considerable attention for timely intervention. Methods: PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched for relevant studies. All studies that used ML/DL to detect or early-predict the onset of sepsis in the adult population using EHRs were considered. Data were extracted and analyzed from all studies that met the criteria and were also evaluated for their quality. Results: This systematic review examined 1942 articles, selecting 42 studies while adhering to strict criteria. The chosen studies were predominantly retrospective (n = 38) and spanned diverse geographic settings, with a focus on the United States. Different datasets, sepsis definitions, and prevalence rates were employed, necessitating data augmentation. Heterogeneous parameter utilization, diverse model distribution, and varying quality assessments were observed. Longitudinal data enabled early sepsis prediction, and quality criteria fulfillment varied, with inconsistent funding–article quality correlation. Conclusions: This systematic review underscores the significance of ML/DL methods for sepsis detection and early prediction through EHR data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Nystagmus is a valuable clinical finding. Although nystagmus is often described by the direction of its quick phases, it is the slow phase that reflects the underlying disorder. The aim of our study was to describe a new radiological diagnostic sign called "Vestibular Eye Sign"—VES. This sign is defined as an eye deviation that correlates with the slow phase of nystagmus (vestibule pathological side), which is seen in acute vestibular neuronitis and can be assessed on a CT head scan. Materials and methods: A total of 1250 patients were diagnosed with vertigo in the Emergency Department at Ziv Medical Center (ED) in Safed, Israel. The data of 315 patients who arrived at the ED between January 2010 and January 2022 were collected, with criteria eligible for the study. Patients were divided into 4 groups: Group A, "pure VN", Group B, "non-VN aetiology", Group C, BPPV patients, and Group D, patients who had a diagnosis of vertigo with unknown aetiology. All groups underwent head CT examination while in the ED. Results: In Group 1, pure vestibular neuritis was diagnosed in 70 (22.2%) patients. Regarding accuracy, VES (Vestibular Eye Sign) was found in 65 patients in group 1 and 8 patients in group 2 and had a sensitivity of 89%, specificity of 75% and a negative predictive value of 99.4% in group 1—pure vestibular neuronitis. Conclusion: VN is still a clinical diagnosis, but if the patient undergoes head CT, we suggest using the "Vestibular Eye Sign" as a complementary sign. As per our findings, this is a valuable sign on CT imaging for diagnosing the pathological side of isolated pure VN. It is sensitive to support a diagnosis with a high negative predictive value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Emergency department (ED) visits can be divided into urgent and non-urgent. A delay in seeking medical help, especially in urgent cases, can lead to fatal consequences, along with a higher rate of complications and morbidity. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic spread led to restrictions and eventually quarantines. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 spread and quarantine on ED visits rates comparing to parallel periods in preceding years (2013–2019). In addition, we compared this decrease to holidays and weekends, times in which a decrease in ED visits is seen. This was a descriptive retrospective study. Causes of ED referrals were divided into urgent and non-urgent, then into different subcategories including infectious, cardiac, etc. For the spring COVID-192020 quarantine period, a 56.3% decrease of mean ED visits per day was seen, as compared to preceding years (55.7% and 98.9% respectively). This decrease was also statistically evident when comparing the urgent and non-urgent causes separately and for all sub-categories. This pattern of decrease also showed statistical evidence of fewer ED visits during holidays for most comparisons, in which lower ED visit rates are expected. Significantly lower rates of ED visits were demonstrated during the COVID-19 quarantine period, as compared to preceding years and main holidays and weekends, a decrease that was also demonstrated for urgent life-threatening causes. Our findings can be used to inform a wide range of stakeholders, including regional planners, historians, sociologists, and international healthcare organizations. Healthcare providers should understand the reasons for this ED visit decline pattern, attempt to address patients' concerns, and increase awareness regarding alarming symptoms in urgent medical situations. • We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 spread and quarantine on emergency department (ED) visits rates. • For the COVID-19 quarantine period, a 56.3% decrease of mean ED visits per day was seen, as compared to preceding years. • This decrease was also evident when comparing the urgent and non-urgent causes separately and for all sub-categories. • Our findings can be used to inform a wide range of stakeholders, including international healthcare organizations. • Healthcare providers should understand the reasons for this ED visit decline and attempt to address patients concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Drug abuse is a public health problem in any country and road safety in particular as it poses serious consequences while driving, affecting the safety of all road users. This study aimed to investigate the drug prevalence and alcohol abuse among motor vehicle crash (MVC) survivors. Methods: This descriptive study was based on a review of the retrospective chart involving patients that were admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) of a level-I trauma center in Riyadh following an MVC. Injured patients in 2018 were identified from the electronic medical record system, and substance investigation was documented. After the hospital discharge, the research team contacted patients via phone to obtain further details about the nature of the crash and illegal substance use. Results: During the study, 209 patients were admitted to the ED following MVCs. The population was primarily males (84.7%) with an average age of 30 years. Forty subjects (19.14%) were screened for illegal substances by blood, urine, or both, 35 of which had confirmed intoxication. Alcohol was used in almost two-thirds of the 35 lab-confirmed intoxicated subjects (n = 23, 65.71%) either alone or in combination with other types of drugs. Conclusion: The widespread use of alcohol and other drug abuse among those involved in MVC is alarming and endangers road safety. There is a need to implement well-defined guidelines to screen, detect, and impose a penalty on driving under the influence to reduce MVC and improve population health. [SJEMed 2022; 3(2.000): 145-150]

CT is the gold standard for triaging critically ill patients, including in trauma, and its use has increased over time. CT turnaround times (TATs) are frequently targeted for improvement. As opposed to linear reductionist processes such as Lean and Six Sigma, a high-reliability organization (HRO) approach focuses on culture and teams to enable rapid problem solving. The authors evaluated the HRO model to rapidly generate, trial, select, and implement improvement interventions to improve trauma patient CT performance. All trauma patients presenting to a single institution's emergency department during a 5-month period were included. Project periods included 2-month preintervention, 1-month wash-in, and 2-month postintervention. Each initial trauma CT encounter during the wash-in and postintervention periods created job briefs in which the radiologist ensured that all involved had the pertinent clinical information and agreed on the imaging needed, thereby creating a shared mental model as well as an opportunity to raise concerns and provide ideas for improvement. A total of 447 patients were included: 145 preintervention, 68 wash-in, and 234 postintervention. The seven selected interventions were trauma text alert; scripted CT technologist-radiologist communication; modification of CT acquisition, processing, sending, and interpretation; and trauma mobile phones. The seven selected interventions reduced trauma patient CT median TATs by 60% (78 vs 31 min, P <.001), demonstrating the effectiveness of an HRO approach to improvement. An HRO-based approach was rapid in generating, trialing, selecting, and implementing improvement interventions, and the interventions were effective at substantially decreasing trauma patient CT TATs. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Restraint and seclusion continue to be used with patients demonstrating aggressive and violent behaviors while in the emergency department and as inpatients in behavioral health (BH) units. The use of sensory interventions such as the weighted blanket (WB) is garnering interest as alternatives to aid in managing anxiety, anger, and aggressive behaviors. Reports of the effectiveness of the WB have primarily been anecdotal, and results of research with children have been mixed. Only one study has been conducted with the WB with adults on an inpatient psychiatric unit. Aims: The aim of this pilot study was to assess the effectiveness of the WB by determining whether it decreases anxiety and/or anger in adult emergency department patients with preexisting psychiatric diagnoses. Methods: The study used a quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control group design with pre- and posttests for anxiety and anger. The intervention was a 15-pound WB. Participants (N = 15) were in one of three groups, which included no weighted blanket (NWB), WB for 15 minutes, or WB for 30 minutes. Results: All three groups showed a decrease in anxiety and anger scores. However, participants in the WB groups had a greater decrease in anxiety and anger posttest scores. Conclusions: The small sample size in this study did not allow for the determination of any differences between groups on anxiety or anger scores that could be viewed as a significant finding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Telehealth can improve access to evidence-based care at a lower cost for patients, especially those living in underserved and remote areas. The barriers to the widespread adoption of telehealth have been well documented in the literature. However, the barriers may not be the same for pediatric patients, who must rely on their parents or guardians to make healthcare decisions. This paper presents some of the leading barriers parents or guardians of pediatric patients report in using telehealth to meet their children's healthcare needs. Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted in a tertiary care pediatric Emergency Department (ED) at a children's hospital in Alabama between September 2020 to December 2020. The parents or guardians of pediatric patients were asked about their reasons for not using telehealth despite having healthcare needs for their children, whether they canceled or rescheduled healthcare provider visits and facility visits, and whether the child's health conditions changed over the past three months. Descriptive analyses were conducted that explored the distribution of telehealth use across the variables listed above. Results: Five hundred ninety-seven parents or guardians of pediatric patients participated in the survey, and 578 answered the question of whether they used telehealth or not over the past three months. Of them, 33.1% used telehealth, 54.3% did not, and 12.6% did not have healthcare needs for their child. The leading reason for not using telehealth was that the doctor or health provider did not give them a telehealth option, the second main reason was that they did not know what telehealth is, and the third leading reason was that the parents did not think telehealth would help meet healthcare needs for their child. Conclusions: This study highlights the telehealth utilization barriers among underserved pediatric populations, including the need for physicians to proactively offer telehealth options to parents or guardians of pediatric patients. Improving health literacy is of paramount importance, given that a substantial proportion of parents were not familiar with telehealth. Policymakers and healthcare organizations should raise awareness about the benefits of telehealth which can improve healthcare access for underserved pediatric patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypoxia is a common presentation in the Emergency Department (ED) worldwide. It affects 9-12% of hospitalized adults in Sub-Saharan Africa. Timely diagnosis of the multiple causes such as pneumonia, heart failure among others is challenging. Chest X-Ray (CXR), one of the most utilized imaging modalities has many limitations, and the gold standard (Computed Tomography scan) is inaccessible. Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) is more available and increasingly being used, however little is known of its performance in resource limited EDs. The study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of PoCUS compared with CXR in identifying the causes of hypoxia in the medical ED. 49 adults presenting with hypoxia (SP02 ≤ 88%) in the medical ED were evaluated. Ultrasound of the lungs and heart (PoCUS) was done, then CXR obtained. Lung ultrasound (LUS) was compared with CXR (first reference standard). Chest X-Ray and PoCUS were each compared to the physician diagnosis (second reference standard) to determine agreement using an acceptable disagreement cut-off of 15%. 31% more abnormalities were identified by LUS than CXR. Lung ultrasound findings agreed with CXR in 86% of the participants with moderate reliability (ĸ=0.75). There was no significant difference between the actual findings of the two tests (X2= 2, p 0.1). Using the second reference, 82% of the CXRs were similar with weak reliability (ĸ=0.5) compared to 98% of PoCUS findings with strong reliability (ĸ=0.9). Compared to PoCUS, CXRs significantly differed from the physician diagnosis (X2= 0.85, p 0.38 vs X2= 8.5, p 0.004 respectively). Overall, PoCUS was not inferior to CXR when compared to final physician diagnosis in identifying causes of hypoxia, and LUS and CXR had comparable performance. Significantly more abnormalities were identified on PoCUS and it demonstrated better agreement and strong reliability with the physician diagnosis than CXR. We recommend PoCUS use in patients with hypoxia attending resource limited in- and pre-hospital settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundPatients seeking emergency care for self-harm and suicidality report varying experiences from being believed and taken seriously to not being believed and taken seriously. Epistemic injustice provides a conceptual framework to explore how peoples’ experiences of self-harm and suicidality are believed or not. We use an empirical method –conversation analysis – to analyze epistemics in clinical communication, focusing on how knowledge is claimed, contested and negotiated. In courtroom, police and political interaction, conversation analysis has identified communication practices implying implausibility in a person’s story to contest and recharacterize their accounts.AimsTo investigate communication practices in Emergency Department (ED) biopsychosocial assessments that may (1) undermine, imply implausibility and recharacterize or (2) accept peoples’ experiences of suicidal ideation and self-harm.MethodsUsing conversation analysis, we micro-analyzed verbal and non-verbal communication in five video-recorded biopsychosocial assessments with people presenting to the ED with self-harm or suicidal ideation, and conducted supplementary analysis of participants’ medical records and post-visit interviews. We present three cases where experiences were not accepted and undermined/recharacterized and two cases where experiences were accepted and validated.ResultsWhen peoples’ experiences of suicidality and self-harm were not accepted or were undermined, questioners: did not acknowledge or accept the person’s account; asked questions that implied inconsistency or implausibility (“Didn’t you tell your GP that you were coping okay?”); juxtaposed contrasting information to undermine the person’s account (“You said you were coping okay before, and now you’re saying you feel suicidal”); asked questions asserting that, e.g., asking for help implied they were not intending to end their life (“So when you called 111 what were you expecting them to do”); and resistinged or directly questioned the person’s account. Multiple practices across the assessment built on each other to assert that the person was not suicidal, did not look or act like they were suicidal; that the person’s decision to attend the ED was not justified; that an overdose was impulsive and not intended to end life; asking why the person didn’t take a more harmful medication to overdose; that self-harming behaviors were not that serious and should be in the person’s control. Alternative characterizations were used to justify decisions not to provide further support or referrals to specialist services. At times, these practices were also delivered when speaking over the patient. When peoples’ experiences were accepted, practitioners acknowledged, accepted, validated suicidality/self-harm and introduced a shared understanding of experiences that patients found helpful. Non-verbal feedback such as nodding and eye contact was central in acceptance of patients’ accounts.ConclusionThese findings advance our understanding of how peoples’ experiences of suicidality or self-harm are undermined or accepted in mental health encounters in the ED. They have important clinical implications: patients report that when their experiences are not accepted or undermined, this makes them more distressed, less hopeful about the future and discourages future help-seeking when in crisis. Conversely, acknowledging, accepting and validating suicidality/self-harm and introducing a new ways of understanding peoples’ experiences may make people less suicidal and more hopeful, generates shared understanding and encourages future help-seeking.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at investigating seven aspects, which are believed to be critical for healthcare customer satisfaction level, as well as determining underlying factors affecting them within the emergency department. DESIGN: A quantitative and cross-sectional study design, with deductive reasoning, was applied to undertake this study. Setting: The study site involves different tertiary care private and public hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: General satisfaction perspective was measured involving satisfaction with technical quality, interpersonal manner, communication, financial aspects, time spent with the doctor, and accessibility and convenience. RESULTS: Respondents were 61.6% male and 38.4% female with mean age 34.65±10.27 years. Most of the healthcare customers (54.6%) commuted to the healthcare facility by ambulance. 72.2% of respondents were from private and 27.8% were from public healthcare facilities while the majority (55.4%) visits to healthcare emergency services were due to injury or intoxication. In our study mean general satisfaction, technical quality, interpersonal manner, communication, financial aspects, time spent with the doctor, and accessibility and convenience were 3.11±0.34, 3.42±0.37, 3.42±0.43, 3.45±0 .39, 3.31±0.42, 2.80±0.58 and 3.46±0.59 respectively. We found 52.6% of healthcare customers were satisfied with general aspects of service, 81.5% satisfied with technical quality, 80.50% satisfied with interpersonal manner, 82.5% satisfied with the communication, 66.3% satisfied with financial aspects, 20.4% satisfied with time spent with doctors and 75.7% satisfied with accessibility and convenience. CONCLUSION: General satisfaction with services was found to be at the lowest level, while the highest sati sfaction level was with the "time spent with the doctor". Healthcare institutes need to be more attentive to the service encounter time spent with doctors and on general issues for healthcare customers visiting the ED. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents the results concerning the evaluation of the processes of an Emergency Department (ED). Based on the analysis of both processes and data flow, a simulation model of patient throughput in the ED has been developed. Simulation results, obtained using the JaamSim software, pointed out the strengths and weaknesses of the departments' operations. Then, several alternative scenarios (hypothetical solutions) were created and tested, while the results were thoroughly analysed. In order to prioritise the several scenarios, two hierarchical processes were used. Firstly, a multicriteria table was developed based on decision makers' personal preference. Total length of stay was acknowledged as the factor with the higher importance. Consequently, the application of an analytical hierarchical process (AHP) managed to verify the primary ranking. A comparison of the proposed ideas was attempted, featuring the implementation of a fast track unit as the best practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Herein we report the case of a 63-year-old female tourist who presented to our Emergency Department with complete rectal prolapse. She had complained of diarrhea with traces of blood and mucus and had experienced fatigue after hiking. After the initial evaluation, it became clear that prolapse bares a large rectal tumor as a leading point. The prolapse was reduced under general anesthesia, along with a tumor biopsy. Further workup confirmed locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum, which was treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative surgery in another hospital after repatriation. Rectal prolapse affects people of all ages, but it is more common in older adults, particularly women. Treatment options vary depending on the severity of the prolapse and can range from conservative measures to surgical interventions. This case report highlights the importance of early recognition and appropriate management of rectal prolapse in the emergency setting and the possibility of an underlying malignancy.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has had profound effects on access to care, including outpatient sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and treatment. Many vulnerable populations already relied on the emergency department (ED) for much of their care prior to the pandemic. This study examines trends in STI testing and positivity before and during the pandemic at a large urban medical center and evaluates the role of the ED in providing STI care. Methods: This is a retrospective review of all gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomonas tests from November 1, 2018, through July 31, 2021. Demographic information and location and results of STI testing were extracted from the electronic medical record. Trends in STI testing and positivity were examined for 16 month periods before and after the COVID-19 pandemic started (March 15, 2020), with the latter divided into the early pandemic period (EPP: March 15 -July 31, 2020) and late pandemic period (LPP: August 1, 2020 - July 31, 2021). Results: Tests per month decreased by 42.4% during the EPP, but rebounded by July 2020. During the EPP, the proportion of all STI testing originating in the ED increased from 21.4% pre-pandemic to 29.3%, and among pregnant women from 45.2% to 51.5%. Overall STI positivity rate increased from 4.4% pre-pandemic to 6.2% in the EPP. Parallel trends were observed for gonorrhea and chlamydia individually. The ED represented 50.5% of overall positive tests, and as much as 63.1% of positive testing during the EPP. The ED was the source of 73.4% of positive tests among pregnant women, which increased to 82.1% during the EPP. Conclusions: STI trends from this large urban medical center paralleled national trends, with an early decrease in positive cases followed by a rebound by the end of May 2020. The ED represented an important source of testing for all patients, and especially for pregnant patients, throughout the study period, but even more so early in the pandemic. This suggests that more resources should be directed towards STI testing, education, and prevention in the ED, as well as to support linkage to outpatient primary and obstetric care during the ED visit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: COVID-19 pandemic transformed the health system response worldwide. The aim of this study is to report changes about numbers and reason for ENT consultations in emergency department (ED) during COVID-19 pandemic comparing with those occurred the previous year (2019). Methods: Data about patients admitted to adult and pediatric ED were collected from March 1 to May 31, 2019 and 2020. Patients referred for urgency from general practitioners were excluded from the study. Results: Global ED admission (except for dyspnea or COVID-19–related symptoms) dramatically decreased during pandemic (−50.9% among adults and −71.4% among pediatrics). At the same time, ENT consultancy significantly reduced too, by 71.5% (P <.01) among adults and 45.1% (P <.01) for pediatrics. Among adults, it was reported a statistically significant decrease in consultation for ear problems (−88.5%, P =.0146). Reduction in ENT referral for bone fracture (−40%, P =.059), vertigo (−77.8%, P =.637), and tonsillitis (−87.5%, P =.688) was consistent, but not significant. Among pediatric patients, it was observed an increase by 25% about foreign bodies (12 vs 15, P <.01). A reduction in numbers of consults for ear problem (−90.8%; P =.045), epistaxis (−80%; P =.196), and nasal fracture (−70%; P =.36) was also observed. Conclusion: Fear of infection and the forced lock down caused a significant decrease in the number of ED accesses and in ENT consultancy. These data may suggest that some ED referral usually could be deferred, but on the other hand, pandemic will cause a great diagnostic delay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To develop a questionnaire on knowledge attitude practice (KAP) of emerging infectious diseases (EID) for the emergency department (ED) nurses, and conduct a reliability and validity test. Methods Based on the theoretical model of KAP, the first draft of the questionnaire was formed through literature review and Delphi expert consultation. A total of 293 emergency nurses from three tertiary general hospitals in Shanghai were conveniently selected for investigation in May 2021 to complete items selection and to examine the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Results A questionnaire of ED nurses on EID was formed, including 12 items in knowledge dimension, 10 items in attitude dimension, and 12 items in practice dimension. After testing, the overall Cronbach's α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.926, and it of each dimension ranged from 0.617 to 0.968. The overall split-half reliability was 0.846, and it of each dimension ranged from 0.614 to 0.958. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) of the questionnaire was 0.99, and the item-level content validity index (I-CVI) were 0.99 to 1.00. The exploration factor analysis (EFA), showed that 4, 1 and 2 common factors were extracted from the three dimensions of knowledge, attitude and practice, respectively, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was respectively 50.192%, 78.319% and 73.341%, which of the overall factors of the questionnaire was 67.242%. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the overall and dimensional fit of the questionnaire were good. Conclusion The questionnaire is of good reliability and validity, and it can be used as a tool to evaluate the KAP level of ED nurses on EID. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Patients with acute HF are frequently hospitalized when they present to the ED. • EHMRG estimates 7-day mortality for patients with acute HF specifically in the ED. • EHMRG stratifies patients into risk groups to augment clinical decisions. • Lower risk patients with acute HF may be considered for discharge or care in EDOUs. Heart Failure (HF) is a primary diagnosis for hospital admission from the Emergency Department (ED), although not all patients require hospitalization. The Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG) estimates 7-day mortality in patients with acute HF in ED settings, but further validation is needed in the United States (US). To validate EHMRG scores by risk-stratifying patients with acute HF in a large tertiary healthcare center in the US and analyze outcome measures to determine if EHMRG risk scores safely identify low-risk groups that may be discharged or managed in ED observation units (EDOUs). A retrospective cohort analysis of 304 patients with acute HF presenting to an ED at a large, tertiary healthcare center was completed. EHMRG scores were calculated to stratify patients according to published thresholds. Mortality and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates were analyzed. No deaths occurred in very low and low-risk EHMRG groups at 7 days post discharge. 30-day mortality was significantly less in the lower risk groups (3.1%) when compared to all other patients (11.1%). MACE rates at 30 days in the very low risk group (15%) were significantly less when compared to all other patients (31.3%). Hospitalizations occurred in 23.4% of patients in lower risk groups. ED risk stratification with EHMRG differentiates high-risk patients requiring hospitalization from lower risk patients who can be safely managed in alternative settings with good outcomes. Data supports improved pathways for patients with acute HF during a time of high hospital volumes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic forced healthcare systems to quickly modify to swapping healthcare essentials. The emergency department (ED) decision-making condition is complex and particularly unstable order for care in a stated period conducts decision-makers to attempt to alter assets to touch the demand. ED managers are generally enforced to discover strategies and improving scenarios for decreasing transfer of patients. For this end, the proposed framework of this study is first developed to integrate the simulation model of the flow process of the COVID-19 patients with the Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution (MARCOS) methodology in Spherical fuzzy context to assess and prioritize scenarios based on desired performance measures. As a contribution, the proposed framework determined the importance of the performance measures based on Spherical fuzzy sets. The proposed SF-MARCOS approach takes the performance measures weights from the expert's team based on spherical fuzzy theory and the performance measures values from the simulation model, and rank the improving scenarios. Finally, a real-life study in a private hospital in Tehran, Iran, illustrates the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed framework. The analysis of the results shows that the patients' transfer rate can be reduced by applying new strategies with sensible expenditure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Functional decline following hospitalization remains an important problem in health care, especially for frail older adults. Modifiable factors related to reduction in harms of hospitalization are not well described. One particularly pervasive factor is emergency department (ED) boarding time; time waiting from decision to admit, until transfer to an in-patient medical unit. We sought to investigate how the functional status of frail older adults correlated with the length of time spent boarded in the ED. We found that patients who waited for 24 hours or more exhibited functional decline in both the Barthel Index and Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility and an increase in the Clinical Frailty Scale from discharge to 6 months post discharge. In conclusion, there is a need for additional investigation into ED focused interventions to reduce ED boarding time for this population or to improve access to specialized geriatric services within the ED.