Search

While the macronutrient content of a ketogenic diet specifically utilized for childhood epilepsy is clearly defined in the literature, variations among other ketogenic diets exhibit substantial heterogeneity. Furthermore, studies utilizing ketogenic diets contain several confounders with notable impacts on outcomes, thereby rendering both their findings and those of the meta-analyses less reliable. The objective of this meta-epidemiological assessment was to scrutinize existing clinical trials that investigated the effects of ketogenic diets on patients with obesity and diabetes, thereby determining the feasibility of conducting a meta-analysis. The Ovid Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase databases were searched from 1946 to 24 September 2024. Of the studies reviewed, none met the predefined inclusion criteria. However, seven articles met these criteria very closely. In the future, studies investigating the effects of ketogenic diets containing significant confounding factors should adopt a single definition of a ketogenic diet. Additionally, accurate measurement of actual macronutrient and caloric intake, along with regularly monitored nutritional ketosis, will be essential to highlight the true effects of a ketogenic diet.

BackgroundMaternal health service uptake remains an important predictor of maternal outcomes including maternal mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the available evidence on the uptake of maternal health care services in developing countries and to assess the impact of place of residence, education status, and wealth index on the uptake of these services.MethodsWe examined the databases MEDLINE, Web of Science, Global Index Medicus, and Scopus until June 14, 2022. Cross-sectional studies done between 2015 and 2022 were considered. Mothers of reproductive age and all states of health were included in the study. Independently, two authors determined the eligibility of studies, extracted data, evaluated the risk of bias, and ranked the evidence’s degree of certainty. To combine the data, we performed a random-effects meta-analysis. The PROSPERO registration ID is CRD42022304094.ResultsWe included 51 studies. Mothers living in urban areas were three times more likely to receive antenatal care (OR 2.95; 95% CI 2.23 to 3.89; 15 studies; 340,390 participants) than rural mothers. Compared with no education, those with primary education were twice as likely to utilize antenatal care (OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.80 to 3.09; 9 studies; 154,398 participants) and those with secondary and higher education were six and fourteen times more likely to utilize antenatal care, respectively. Mothers in the second wealth index were twice as likely as mothers in the lowest wealth index to utilize antenatal care (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.36 to 1.91; 10 studies; 224,530 participants) and antenatal care utilization increased further among mothers in the higher wealth index. We observed similar relative inequalities in skilled delivery care and postnatal care utilization based on the pace of residence, education, and wealth index.ConclusionIn developing countries, the problem of inequity in utilizing maternal health care services persists and needs considerable attention.

Several meta-analyses have found a positive association between a popular type of “fad diet”, ketogenic diets, and their effect on anthropometric and blood parameters. However, the non-specific inclusion criteria for meta-analyses may lead to incorrect conclusions. The aim of this literature review is to highlight the main confounders and methodological pitfalls of meta-analyses on ketogenic diets by inspecting the presence of key inclusion criteria. The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for meta-analyses. Most meta-analyses did not define the essential parameters of a ketogenic diet (i.e., calories, macronutrient ratio, types of fatty acids, ketone bodies, etc.) as inclusion criteria. Of the 28 included meta-analyses, few addressed collecting real, re-measured nutritional data from the ketogenic diet and control groups in parallel with the pre-designed nutritional data. Most meta-analyses reported positive results in favor of ketogenic diets, which can result in erroneous conclusions considering the numerous methodological pitfalls and confounders. Well-designed clinical trials with comparable results and their meta-analyses are needed. Until then, medical professionals should not recommend ketogenic diets as a form of weight loss when other well-known dietary options have been shown to be healthy and effective.